This commit upgrades the protobuf version. Compared to the previous
v1.2.0 it generates smaller diffs in generated code. This change was
introduced in:
fffb0f7828
The previous value was set to two days, which may not be enough to
handle large fee spikes where users still which to submit channels with
a low fee and don't mind lowering their time preference. Since the
timeout is only applied to channels that we don't initiate, there's real
downside since it's not our funds that are locked up.
In this commit we move handing the deobfuscator from the router to the
switch from when the payment is initiated, to when the result is
queried.
We do this because only the router can recreate the deobfuscator after a
restart, and we are preparing for being able to handle results across
restarts.
Since the deobfuscator cannot be nil anymore, we can also get rid of
that special case.
This lets us distinguish an critical error from a actual payment result
(success or failure). This is important since we know that we can only
attempt another payment when a final result from the previous payment
attempt is received.
With the following commits, it'll become important to not resuse
paymentIDs, since there is no way to tell whether the HTLC in question
has already been forwarded and settled/failed.
We clarify this in the SendHTLC comments, and alter the tests to not
attempt to resend an HTLC with a duplicate payment ID.
This commit moves the responsibility of generating a unique payment ID
from the switch to the router. This will make it easier for the router
to keep track of which HTLCs were successfully forwarded onto the
network, as it can query the switch for existing HTLCs as long as the
paymentIDs are kept.
The router is expected to maintain a map from paymentHash->paymentID,
such that they can be replayed on restart. This also lets the router
check the status of a sent payment after a restart, by querying the
switch for the paymentID in question.
This commit is the final step in making the link unaware of invoices. It
now purely offers the htlc to the invoice registry and follows
instructions from the invoice registry about how and when to respond to
the htlc.
The change also fixes a bug where upon restart, hodl htlcs were
subjected to the invoice minimum cltv delta requirement again. If the
block height has increased in the mean while, the htlc would be canceled
back.
Furthermore the invoice registry interaction is aligned between link and
contract resolvers.
This commit splits out several integration tests that will be modified
in a follow up commit to separate files. The current lnd_test.go file is
10k+ loc which makes it harder to handle by tools and it isn't good for
overview either.
This commit isolates preimages of forwarded htlcs from invoice
preimages. The reason to do this is to prevent the incoming contest
resolver from settling exit hop htlcs for which the invoice isn't marked
as settled.
The former tryApplyPreimage function silently ignored invalid preimages.
This could mask potential bugs. This commit makes the logic stricter and
generates an error in case an unexpected mismatch occurs.
New behaviour of the chain notifier to always send the current block
immediately after registration takes away the need to make a separate
GetBestBlock call on ChainIO.
Now that the success resolver preimage field is always populated by the
incoming contest resolver, preimage lookups earlier in the
process (channel and channel arbitrator) can mostly be removed.
One of the first things the incoming contest resolver does is checking
if the preimage is available and if it is, convert itself into a success
resolver.
This behaviour makes it unnecessary to already determine earlier in the
process whether an incoming contest or a success resolver is needed.
By having all incoming htlcs go through the incoming contest resolver,
the number of execution paths is reduced and it becomes easier to
ascertain that the implemented logic is correct.
The only functional change in this commit is that a forwarded htlc for
which is the preimage is known, is no longer settled when the htlc is
already expired. Previously a success resolver would be instantiated
directly, skipping the expiry height check.
This created a risk that the success resolver would never finish,
because an expired htlc could already have been swept by the remote
party and there is no detection of this remote spend in the success
resolver currently.
With the new change, the general direction that an expired htlc
shouldn't be settled and instead given up on is implemented more
consistently.
This commit prepares for fixing edges cases related to hodl
invoice on-chain resolution.
