In this commit, we fix a slight regression that happened when the
sendtoroute RPC call was implemented. As a result of the refactoring,
the debughtlc mode silently broke. In this commit, we fix this by
checking against the zero hash, rather than the length of the payment
hash, as since we use a fixed sized byte slice, it will always be zero.
In this commit, we modify the existing logic that would attempt to read
the min CLTV information from the invoice directly. With this route, we
avoid any sort of DB index modifications, as this information is already
stored within the payment request, which is already available to the
outside callers. By modifying the InvoiceDatabase interface, we avoid
having to make the switch aware of what the "primary" chain is.
In this commit, we fix a slight bug recently introduced by the addition
of the new signal package. As we now use a regular defer for many
actions, it may be possible that the logs aren't yet initialized (for
example, lnd -h), which can cause a panic if the shutdown procedure goes
to log before the logs have been initialized.
In this commit, a new weight function is introduced. This will create a
meaningful effect of time lock on route selection. Also, removes the
squaring of the fee term. This led to suboptimal routes.
Unit test added that covers the weight function and asserts that the
lowest fee route is indeed returned.
This comment extends the unit tests for NewRoute with checks
on the total time lock for a route as well as the expected time
lock values for every hop along the route.
This commit fixes the logic inside the newRoute function to
address the following problems:
- Fee calculation for a hop does not include the fee that needs
to be paid to the next hop.
- The incoming channel capacity "sanity" check does not include
the fee to be paid to the current hop.
This change makes the test more sensitive to bugs than a route
with nodes that all enforce the same fee policy.
In addition to that, the fee has been increased to a level
at which potential problems with improper fee calculation
become detectable (and not disappear in rounding).
In this commit, we update all the lncfg methods used to properly pass in
a new resolver. This is required in order to ensure that we don't leak
our DNS queries if Tor mode is active.
This commit fixes a bug in the
TestDecayedLogPersistentGarbageCollector unit test.
The test generates a second hash prefix, which is never
added to the log, and used to query for the final
existence check. This commit reverts the behavior so
that the same hash prefix is used throughout the test.
In this commit, we fix a lingering bug within the link when we're the
exit node for a particular payment. Before this commit, we would assert
that the invoice gives us enough of a delta based on our current routing
policy. However, if the invoice was generated with a lower delta, or
we've changed from the default routing policy, then this would case us
to fail back any payments sent to us.
We fix this by instead using the newly available final CLTV delta
information within the extracted invoice.
Fixes#1431.
In this commit, we move to explicitly storing a bit more information
within the invoice. Currently this information is already stored in the
payment request, but by storing it at this level, callers that may not
be in the state to fully decode a payment request can obtain this data.
We avoid a database migration by appending this data to the end of an
invoice. When decoding, we'll try to read out this extra information,
and simply return what we have if it isn't found.
In this commit, we fix the incorrect expiry values in the
spec_example.json test file. Many of the time locks were incorrect which
allowed bugs within the path finding logic related to CLTV deltas to go
un-detected.
In this commit, we fix an existing bug in the newRoute method. Before
this commit we would use the time lock delta of the current hop to
compute the outgoing time lock for the current hop. This is incorrect as
the time lock delta of the _outgoing_ hop should be used, as this is
what we're paying for "transit" on. This is a bug left over from when we
switched the meaning of the CLTV delta on the ChannelUpdate message
sometime last year.
The fix is simple: use the CLTV delta of the prior (later in the route)
hop.
In this commit, we extract the time lock policy verification logic from
the processRemoteAdds method to the HtlcSatifiesPolicy method. With this
change, we fix a lingering bug within the link: we'll no longer verify
time lock polices within the incoming link, instead we'll verify it at
forwarding time like we should. This is a bug left over from the switch
of what the CLTV delta denotes in the channel update message we made
within the spec sometime last year.
In this commit, we extend the existing HtlcSatifiesPolicy method to also
accept timelock and height information. This is required as an upcoming
commit will fix an existing bug in the forwarding logic wherein we use
the time lock policies of the incoming node rather than that of the
outgoing node.
In this commit, we fix a bug in the generateHops helper function. Before
this commit, it erroneously used the CLTV delta of the current hop,
rather than that of the prior hop when computing the payload. This was
incorrect, as when computing the timelock for the incoming hop, we need
to factor in the CTLV delta of the outgoing lock, not the incoming lock.
In this commit, we add a new test to the switch:
TestForwardingAsymmetricTimeLockPolicies. This test ensures that a link
has two channels, one of which has a greater CLTV delta than the latter,
that a payment will successfully be routed across the channels. Atm, the
test fails (including the fix to hop payload generation included in the
next commit).
Atm, due to the way that we check forwarding policies, we'll reject this
payment as we're attempting to enforce the policy of the incoming link
(cltv delta of 7), instead of that of the outgoing link (cltv delta of
6). As a result, atm, the incoming link checks if (incoming_timeout -
delta < outgoing_timeout). For the values in the test case: 112 - 7 <
106 -> 105 < 106, this check fails. The payload is proper, but the check
itself should be applied at the outgoing hop.
