Similar to the previous commit, we fix a bug resulting in the wrong
commit weight being calculated when an HTLC just above the remote's
duslimit was added from the remote. This was a result of using the
successFee instead of the timeoutFee when checking whether it was dust,
making us consider it dust when it shouldn't have been.
In this commit we fix a bug resulting in the wrong commit weight being
calculated when an HTLC just below the remote's duslimit was added. This
was a result of using the timeoutFee instead of the successFee when
checking whether it was dust, making us consider it non-dust when it
should have been.
Without this change the high-fee logic is never tested as it is instead caught by the dust-output logic. This change uses a higher fee rate to ensure an output value above the dust limit, while still spending 20% on fees.
To allow nodes more control over the amount of time that their funds
will be locked up, we add a MaxLocalCSVDelay option which sets the
maximum csv delay we will accept for all channels. We default to the
existing constant of 10000, and set a sane minimum on this value so that
clients cannot set unreasonably low maximum csv delays which will result
in their node rejecting all channels.
A while back, changes were made to the wallet such that it waits for the
backend to be synced before beginning to store the latest 10,000 blocks
of the chain. This inherently broke sync progress implementations based
on the best_header_timestamp result from the GetInfo RPC for
neutrino-based nodes as the wallet is no longer tracking all blocks in
the chain. To work around this, we now make sure to return the backend's
best header timestamp instead of the wallet's, allowing said sync
progress implementations to work again.
For unconfirmed commit tx anchors, supply the sweeper with cpfp info and
a confirmation target fee estimate.
The sweeper will try to pay for the parent commit tx as long as the
current fee estimate exceeds the pre-signed commit tx fee rate.
- let users specify their MAXIMUM WUMBO with new config option which sets the maximum channel size lnd will accept
- current implementation is a simple check by the fundingManager rather than anything to do with the ChannelAcceptor
- Add test cases which verify that maximum channel limit is respected for wumbo/non-wumbo channels
- use --maxchansize 0 value to distinguish set/unset config. If user sets max value to 0 it will not do anything as 0 is currently used to indicate to the funding manager that the limit should not be enforced. This seems justifiable since --maxchansize=0 doesn't seem to make sense at first glance.
- add integration test case to ensure that config parsing and valiation is proper. I simplified the funding managers check electing to rely on config.go to correctly parse and set up either i) non wumbo default limit of 0.16 BTC OR ii) wumbo default soft limit of 10 BTC
Addresses: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/issues/4557
To be spec compliant, we require the initiator to not pay the anchor
values into fees on coop close. We extract the balance calculation into
commitment.go, and add back the value of the anchors to the initiator's
balance.
Externally funded channels are expected by the user and explicitly
registered through the use of a funding shim and should therefore not
count towards the max pending channel count which is primarily there to
mitigate DoS attacks.
Previously whether or not to add test htlcs was implictly controlled by
a nil value of the HtlcDescs test parameter. With the conversion to
json, that nil value got lost.
The reason that the test still passed is because with the fee rate of
the no-htlc test case, the htlcs were trimmed. Also because in the test
json, balances are specified after applying htlcs, the test didn't fail
with a mismatching balance.
In this commit, we make a new wrapper method around the internal
`WalletController` method to ensure it holds the coin select mutex while
the balance is being computed.
This commit includes a regression test that checks that we remember
to restore updates that we sent to the peer but they haven't sent
us a signature for yet.
This fixes a long-standing force close bug. When we receive a
revocation, store the updates that the remote should sign next under
a new database key. Previously, these were not persisted which would
lead to force closure.
Follow up labelling of external transactions with labels for the
transaction types we create within lnd. Since these labels will live
a life of string matching, a version number and rigid format is added
so that string matching is less painful. We start out with channel ID,
where available, and a transaction "type". External labels, added in a
previous PR, are not updated to this new versioned label because they
are not lnd-initiated transactions. Label matching can check this case,
then check for a version number.
Previously, we could sign a pending commitment for the remote party,
disconnect, and not restore these signed remote updates as having been
removed at the pending commitment height. This commit fixes that to
look up whether the update under the unsigned acked updates key is
present on the pending commitment or not and appropriately set
the remove commit heights.
This commit moves the deletion of all updates under the unsigned
acked updates key from AppendRemoteCommitChain to
AdvanceCommitChainTail. This is done because if we went down after
signing for these updates but before receiving a revocation, we would
incorrectly reject their commitment signature:
Alice Bob
-----add----->
-----sig----->
<----rev------
<----sig------
-----rev----->
<----fail-----
<----sig------
-----rev----->
-----sig----->
*reconnect*
<----rev------
<----add------
x----sig------
It is also important to note that filtering is required when we
receive a revocation to ensure that we aren't erroneously deleting
remote updates. Take the following state transitions:
Alice Bob
-----add----->
-----sig----->
<----rev------
<----sig------
-----rev----->
-----add----->
-----sig----->
<----fail-----
<----sig------
-----rev-----> (alice stores updates here)
<----rev------
In the above case, if Alice deleted all updates rather than filtering
when receiving the final revocation from Bob, then Alice would have
to force close the channel due to missing updates. Since Alice hasn't
signed for any of the unsigned acked updates, she should not filter any
of them out.
The `restoreStateLogs` function now properly restores the
`addCommitHeightLocal` field of a settle or fail's parent add.
Previously, any updates' parent in unsignedAckedUpdates would have
the field set to the default value of 0. This would cause a force
closure when receiving a commitment due to our belt-and-suspenders
checks for update logs during commitment validation.
The bug in question occurs because the `addCommitHeightLocal` field
is only populated for a restored add if the add is on the local
commitment. `TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight` is expanded in
`lnwallet/channel_test.go` to demonstrate restoration now works.
The faulty state transition:
```
<----fail----
<----sig-----
-----rev----> (add no longer on Alice's commitment)
*Alice restores* (addCommitHeightLocal of failed htlc is 0)
```
NOTE: Alice dies after sending a revocation but before signing a
commitment. This is possible because there is a select block in the link
that can potentially exit after sending over the revocation but before
signing the next commitment state for the counterparty.
The first channels of a batch shouldn't publish the batch TX
to avoid problems if some of the funding flows can't be completed.
Only the last channel of a batch should publish. We set the channel flag
accordingly depending on the flag in the assembler.
