lnd.xprv/lnwallet/channel_test.go

2019 lines
70 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
package lnwallet
import (
"bytes"
"crypto/sha256"
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
"io/ioutil"
"os"
"testing"
"github.com/davecgh/go-spew/spew"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/chainntnfs"
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/channeldb"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/shachain"
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/blockchain"
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/btcec"
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash"
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/txscript"
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/wire"
"github.com/roasbeef/btcutil"
)
var (
privPass = []byte("private-test")
// For simplicity a single priv key controls all of our test outputs.
testWalletPrivKey = []byte{
0x2b, 0xd8, 0x06, 0xc9, 0x7f, 0x0e, 0x00, 0xaf,
0x1a, 0x1f, 0xc3, 0x32, 0x8f, 0xa7, 0x63, 0xa9,
0x26, 0x97, 0x23, 0xc8, 0xdb, 0x8f, 0xac, 0x4f,
0x93, 0xaf, 0x71, 0xdb, 0x18, 0x6d, 0x6e, 0x90,
}
// We're alice :)
bobsPrivKey = []byte{
0x81, 0xb6, 0x37, 0xd8, 0xfc, 0xd2, 0xc6, 0xda,
0x63, 0x59, 0xe6, 0x96, 0x31, 0x13, 0xa1, 0x17,
0xd, 0xe7, 0x95, 0xe4, 0xb7, 0x25, 0xb8, 0x4d,
0x1e, 0xb, 0x4c, 0xfd, 0x9e, 0xc5, 0x8c, 0xe9,
}
// Use a hard-coded HD seed.
testHdSeed = [32]byte{
0xb7, 0x94, 0x38, 0x5f, 0x2d, 0x1e, 0xf7, 0xab,
0x4d, 0x92, 0x73, 0xd1, 0x90, 0x63, 0x81, 0xb4,
0x4f, 0x2f, 0x6f, 0x25, 0x88, 0xa3, 0xef, 0xb9,
0x6a, 0x49, 0x18, 0x83, 0x31, 0x98, 0x47, 0x53,
}
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
// The number of confirmations required to consider any created channel
// open.
numReqConfs = uint16(1)
)
type mockSigner struct {
key *btcec.PrivateKey
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
func (m *mockSigner) SignOutputRaw(tx *wire.MsgTx, signDesc *SignDescriptor) ([]byte, error) {
amt := signDesc.Output.Value
witnessScript := signDesc.WitnessScript
privKey := m.key
sig, err := txscript.RawTxInWitnessSignature(tx, signDesc.SigHashes,
signDesc.InputIndex, amt, witnessScript, txscript.SigHashAll, privKey)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return sig[:len(sig)-1], nil
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
func (m *mockSigner) ComputeInputScript(tx *wire.MsgTx, signDesc *SignDescriptor) (*InputScript, error) {
witnessScript, err := txscript.WitnessScript(tx, signDesc.SigHashes,
signDesc.InputIndex, signDesc.Output.Value, signDesc.Output.PkScript,
txscript.SigHashAll, m.key, true)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
return &InputScript{
Witness: witnessScript,
}, nil
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
type mockNotfier struct {
}
func (m *mockNotfier) RegisterConfirmationsNtfn(txid *chainhash.Hash, numConfs, heightHint uint32) (*chainntnfs.ConfirmationEvent, error) {
return nil, nil
}
func (m *mockNotfier) RegisterBlockEpochNtfn() (*chainntnfs.BlockEpochEvent, error) {
return nil, nil
}
func (m *mockNotfier) Start() error {
return nil
}
func (m *mockNotfier) Stop() error {
return nil
}
func (m *mockNotfier) RegisterSpendNtfn(outpoint *wire.OutPoint, heightHint uint32) (*chainntnfs.SpendEvent, error) {
return &chainntnfs.SpendEvent{
Spend: make(chan *chainntnfs.SpendDetail),
}, nil
}
// initRevocationWindows simulates a new channel being opened within the p2p
// network by populating the initial revocation windows of the passed
// commitment state machines.
func initRevocationWindows(chanA, chanB *LightningChannel, windowSize int) error {
for i := 0; i < windowSize; i++ {
aliceNextRevoke, err := chanA.ExtendRevocationWindow()
if err != nil {
return err
}
if htlcs, err := chanB.ReceiveRevocation(aliceNextRevoke); err != nil {
return err
} else if htlcs != nil {
return err
}
bobNextRevoke, err := chanB.ExtendRevocationWindow()
if err != nil {
return err
}
if htlcs, err := chanA.ReceiveRevocation(bobNextRevoke); err != nil {
return err
} else if htlcs != nil {
return err
}
}
return nil
}
// forceStateTransition executes the necessary interaction between the two
// commitment state machines to transition to a new state locking in any
// pending updates.
func forceStateTransition(chanA, chanB *LightningChannel) error {
aliceSig, err := chanA.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
return err
}
if err := chanB.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceSig); err != nil {
return err
}
bobRevocation, err := chanB.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
return err
}
bobSig, err := chanB.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
return err
}
if _, err := chanA.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := chanA.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobSig); err != nil {
return err
}
aliceRevocation, err := chanA.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
return err
}
if _, err := chanB.ReceiveRevocation(aliceRevocation); err != nil {
return err
}
return nil
}
2016-11-15 02:06:12 +03:00
// createTestChannels creates two test channels funded with 10 BTC, with 5 BTC
// allocated to each side. Within the channel, Alice is the initiator.
func createTestChannels(revocationWindow int) (*LightningChannel, *LightningChannel, func(), error) {
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
aliceKeyPriv, aliceKeyPub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
testWalletPrivKey)
bobKeyPriv, bobKeyPub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
bobsPrivKey)
channelCapacity := btcutil.Amount(10 * 1e8)
channelBal := channelCapacity / 2
aliceDustLimit := btcutil.Amount(200)
bobDustLimit := btcutil.Amount(1300)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
csvTimeoutAlice := uint32(5)
csvTimeoutBob := uint32(4)
witnessScript, _, err := GenFundingPkScript(aliceKeyPub.SerializeCompressed(),
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
bobKeyPub.SerializeCompressed(), int64(channelCapacity))
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, nil, err
}
prevOut := &wire.OutPoint{
Hash: chainhash.Hash(testHdSeed),
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
Index: 0,
}
fundingTxIn := wire.NewTxIn(prevOut, nil, nil)
bobRoot := DeriveRevocationRoot(bobKeyPriv, bobKeyPub, aliceKeyPub)
bobPreimageProducer := shachain.NewRevocationProducer(*bobRoot)
bobFirstRevoke, err := bobPreimageProducer.AtIndex(0)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, nil, err
}
bobRevokeKey := DeriveRevocationPubkey(aliceKeyPub, bobFirstRevoke[:])
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
aliceRoot := DeriveRevocationRoot(aliceKeyPriv, aliceKeyPub, bobKeyPub)
alicePreimageProducer := shachain.NewRevocationProducer(*aliceRoot)
aliceFirstRevoke, err := alicePreimageProducer.AtIndex(0)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, nil, err
}
aliceRevokeKey := DeriveRevocationPubkey(bobKeyPub, aliceFirstRevoke[:])
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
aliceCommitTx, err := CreateCommitTx(fundingTxIn, aliceKeyPub,
bobKeyPub, aliceRevokeKey, csvTimeoutAlice, channelBal, channelBal, aliceDustLimit)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, nil, err
}
bobCommitTx, err := CreateCommitTx(fundingTxIn, bobKeyPub,
aliceKeyPub, bobRevokeKey, csvTimeoutBob, channelBal, channelBal, bobDustLimit)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, nil, err
}
alicePath, err := ioutil.TempDir("", "alicedb")
dbAlice, err := channeldb.Open(alicePath)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, nil, err
}
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
bobPath, err := ioutil.TempDir("", "bobdb")
dbBob, err := channeldb.Open(bobPath)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, nil, err
}
var obsfucator [StateHintSize]byte
copy(obsfucator[:], aliceFirstRevoke[:])
estimator := &StaticFeeEstimator{24, 6}
feePerKw := btcutil.Amount(estimator.EstimateFeePerWeight(1) * 1000)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
aliceChannelState := &channeldb.OpenChannel{
IdentityPub: aliceKeyPub,
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
ChanID: prevOut,
ChanType: channeldb.SingleFunder,
FeePerKw: feePerKw,
IsInitiator: true,
StateHintObsfucator: obsfucator,
OurCommitKey: aliceKeyPub,
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
TheirCommitKey: bobKeyPub,
Capacity: channelCapacity,
OurBalance: channelBal,
TheirBalance: channelBal,
OurCommitTx: aliceCommitTx,
OurCommitSig: bytes.Repeat([]byte{1}, 71),
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
FundingOutpoint: prevOut,
OurMultiSigKey: aliceKeyPub,
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
TheirMultiSigKey: bobKeyPub,
FundingWitnessScript: witnessScript,
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
LocalCsvDelay: csvTimeoutAlice,
RemoteCsvDelay: csvTimeoutBob,
TheirCurrentRevocation: bobRevokeKey,
RevocationProducer: alicePreimageProducer,
RevocationStore: shachain.NewRevocationStore(),
TheirDustLimit: bobDustLimit,
OurDustLimit: aliceDustLimit,
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
Db: dbAlice,
}
bobChannelState := &channeldb.OpenChannel{
IdentityPub: bobKeyPub,
FeePerKw: feePerKw,
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
ChanID: prevOut,
ChanType: channeldb.SingleFunder,
IsInitiator: false,
StateHintObsfucator: obsfucator,
OurCommitKey: bobKeyPub,
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
TheirCommitKey: aliceKeyPub,
Capacity: channelCapacity,
OurBalance: channelBal,
TheirBalance: channelBal,
OurCommitTx: bobCommitTx,
OurCommitSig: bytes.Repeat([]byte{1}, 71),
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
FundingOutpoint: prevOut,
OurMultiSigKey: bobKeyPub,
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
TheirMultiSigKey: aliceKeyPub,
FundingWitnessScript: witnessScript,
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
LocalCsvDelay: csvTimeoutBob,
RemoteCsvDelay: csvTimeoutAlice,
TheirCurrentRevocation: aliceRevokeKey,
RevocationProducer: bobPreimageProducer,
RevocationStore: shachain.NewRevocationStore(),
TheirDustLimit: aliceDustLimit,
OurDustLimit: bobDustLimit,
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
Db: dbBob,
}
cleanUpFunc := func() {
os.RemoveAll(bobPath)
os.RemoveAll(alicePath)
}
aliceSigner := &mockSigner{aliceKeyPriv}
bobSigner := &mockSigner{bobKeyPriv}
notifier := &mockNotfier{}
channelAlice, err := NewLightningChannel(aliceSigner, notifier,
estimator, aliceChannelState)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, nil, err
}
channelBob, err := NewLightningChannel(bobSigner, notifier,
estimator, bobChannelState)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, nil, err
}
// Now that the channel are open, simulate the start of a session by
// having Alice and Bob extend their revocation windows to each other.
err = initRevocationWindows(channelAlice, channelBob, revocationWindow)
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, nil, err
}
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
return channelAlice, channelBob, cleanUpFunc, nil
}
// calcStaticFee calculates appropriate fees for commitment transactions. This
// function provides a simple way to allow test balance assertions to take fee
// calculations into account.
// TODO(bvu): Refactor when dynamic fee estimation is added.
func calcStaticFee(numHTLCs int) btcutil.Amount {
const (
commitWeight = btcutil.Amount(724)
htlcWeight = 172
feePerKw = btcutil.Amount(24/4) * 1000
)
return feePerKw * (commitWeight +
btcutil.Amount(htlcWeight*numHTLCs)) / 1000
}
// createHTLC is a utility function for generating an HTLC with a given preimage
// and a given amount.
func createHTLC(data int, amount btcutil.Amount) (*lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC, [32]byte) {
preimage := bytes.Repeat([]byte{byte(data)}, 32)
paymentHash := sha256.Sum256(preimage)
var returnPreimage [32]byte
copy(returnPreimage[:], preimage)
return &lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC{
PaymentHash: paymentHash,
Amount: amount,
Expiry: uint32(5),
}, returnPreimage
}
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
// TestSimpleAddSettleWorkflow tests a simple channel scenario wherein the
// local node (Alice in this case) creates a new outgoing HTLC to bob, commits
// this change, then bob immediately commits a settlement of the HTLC after the
// initial add is fully committed in both commit chains.
//
2016-10-15 16:18:38 +03:00
// TODO(roasbeef): write higher level framework to exercise various states of
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
// the state machine
// * DSL language perhaps?
// * constructed via input/output files
func TestSimpleAddSettleWorkflow(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(1)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// The edge of the revocation window for both sides should be 1 at this
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
// point.
if aliceChannel.revocationWindowEdge != 1 {
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
t.Fatalf("alice revocation window not incremented, is %v should be %v",
aliceChannel.revocationWindowEdge, 1)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
if bobChannel.revocationWindowEdge != 1 {
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
t.Fatalf("alice revocation window not incremented, is %v should be %v",
bobChannel.revocationWindowEdge, 1)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
paymentPreimage := bytes.Repeat([]byte{1}, 32)
paymentHash := sha256.Sum256(paymentPreimage)
htlc := &lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC{
PaymentHash: paymentHash,
Amount: btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin,
Expiry: uint32(5),
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
// First Alice adds the outgoing HTLC to her local channel's state
// update log. Then Alice sends this wire message over to Bob who
// adds this htlc to his remote state update log.
if _, err := aliceChannel.AddHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to recv htlc: %v", err)
}
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
// Next alice commits this change by sending a signature message. Since
// we expect the messages to be ordered, Bob will receive the HTLC we
// just sent before he receives this signature, so the signature will
// cover the HTLC.
aliceSig, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to sign commitment: %v", err)
}
// Bob receives this signature message, and checks that this covers the
// state he has in his remote log. This includes the HTLC just sent
// from Alice.
if err := bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceSig); err != nil {
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alice's new commitment: %v", err)
}
// Bob revokes his prior commitment given to him by Alice, since he now
// has a valid signature for a newer commitment.
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
bobRevocation, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to generate bob revocation: %v", err)
}
// Bob finally send a signature for Alice's commitment transaction.
// This signature will cover the HTLC, since Bob will first send the
// revocation just created. The revocation also acks every received
// HTLC up to the point where Alice sent here signature.
bobSig, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to sign alice's commitment: %v", err)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
2016-10-15 16:18:38 +03:00
// Alice then processes this revocation, sending her own recovation for
// her prior commitment transaction. Alice shouldn't have any HTLCs to
// forward since she's sending an outgoing HTLC.
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if htlcs, err := aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to rocess bob's revocation: %v", err)
} else if len(htlcs) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("alice forwards %v htlcs, should forward none: ", len(htlcs))
}
// Alice then processes bob's signature, and since she just received
// the revocation, she expect this signature to cover everything up to
// the point where she sent her signature, including the HTLC.
if err := aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobSig); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to process bob's new commitment: %v", err)
}
// Alice then generates a revocation for bob.
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
aliceRevocation, err := aliceChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to revoke alice channel: %v", err)
}
// Finally Bob processes Alice's revocation, at this point the new HTLC
// is fully locked in within both commitment transactions. Bob should
// also be able to forward an HTLC now that the HTLC has been locked
// into both commitment transactions.
if htlcs, err := bobChannel.ReceiveRevocation(aliceRevocation); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alive's revocation: %v", err)
} else if len(htlcs) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("bob should be able to forward an HTLC, instead can "+
"forward %v", len(htlcs))
}
// At this point, both sides should have the proper number of satoshis
// sent, and commitment height updated within their local channel
// state.
aliceSent := uint64(0)
bobSent := uint64(0)
if aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent != aliceSent {
t.Fatalf("alice has incorrect satoshis sent: %v vs %v",
aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent, aliceSent)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived != bobSent {
t.Fatalf("alice has incorrect satoshis received %v vs %v",
aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived, bobSent)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
if bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent != bobSent {
t.Fatalf("bob has incorrect satoshis sent %v vs %v",
bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent, bobSent)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
if bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived != aliceSent {
t.Fatalf("bob has incorrect satoshis received %v vs %v",
bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived, aliceSent)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
if bobChannel.currentHeight != 1 {
t.Fatalf("bob has incorrect commitment height, %v vs %v",
bobChannel.currentHeight, 1)
}
if aliceChannel.currentHeight != 1 {
t.Fatalf("alice has incorrect commitment height, %v vs %v",
aliceChannel.currentHeight, 1)
}
// Alice's revocation window should now be one beyond the size of the
// initial window. Same goes for Bob.
if aliceChannel.revocationWindowEdge != 2 {
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
t.Fatalf("alice revocation window not incremented, is %v should be %v",
aliceChannel.revocationWindowEdge, 2)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
if bobChannel.revocationWindowEdge != 2 {
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
t.Fatalf("alice revocation window not incremented, is %v should be %v",
bobChannel.revocationWindowEdge, 2)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
// Now we'll repeat a similar exchange, this time with Bob settling the
// HTLC once he learns of the preimage.
var preimage [32]byte
copy(preimage[:], paymentPreimage)
settleIndex, err := bobChannel.SettleHTLC(preimage)
if err != nil {
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
t.Fatalf("bob unable to settle inbound htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := aliceChannel.ReceiveHTLCSettle(preimage, settleIndex); err != nil {
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
t.Fatalf("alice unable to accept settle of outbound htlc: %v", err)
}
bobSig2, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to sign settle commitment: %v", err)
}
if err := aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobSig2); err != nil {
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
t.Fatalf("alice unable to process bob's new commitment: %v", err)
}
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
aliceRevocation2, err := aliceChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to generate revocation: %v", err)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
aliceSig2, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to sign new commitment: %v", err)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if htlcs, err := bobChannel.ReceiveRevocation(aliceRevocation2); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alice's revocation: %v", err)
} else if len(htlcs) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("bob shouldn't forward any HTLCs after outgoing settle, "+
"instead can forward: %v", spew.Sdump(htlcs))
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
if err := bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceSig2); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alice's new commitment: %v", err)
}
bobRevocation2, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to revoke commitment: %v", err)
}
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if htlcs, err := aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation2); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to process bob's revocation: %v", err)
} else if len(htlcs) != 1 {
// Alice should now be able to forward the settlement HTLC to
// any down stream peers.
t.Fatalf("alice should be able to forward a single HTLC, "+
"instead can forward %v: %v", len(htlcs), spew.Sdump(htlcs))
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
// At this point, Bob should have 6 BTC settled, with Alice still having
// 4 BTC. Alice's channel should show 1 BTC sent and Bob's channel should
// show 1 BTC received. They should also be at commitment height two,
// with the revocation window extended by by 1 (5).
satoshisTransferred := uint64(100000000)
if aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent != satoshisTransferred {
t.Fatalf("alice satoshis sent incorrect %v vs %v expected",
aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent,
satoshisTransferred)
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived != 0 {
t.Fatalf("alice satoshis received incorrect %v vs %v expected",
aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent, 0)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived != satoshisTransferred {
t.Fatalf("bob satoshis received incorrect %v vs %v expected",
bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived,
satoshisTransferred)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent != 0 {
t.Fatalf("bob satoshis sent incorrect %v vs %v expected",
bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived, 0)
}
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
if bobChannel.currentHeight != 2 {
t.Fatalf("bob has incorrect commitment height, %v vs %v",
bobChannel.currentHeight, 2)
}
if aliceChannel.currentHeight != 2 {
t.Fatalf("alice has incorrect commitment height, %v vs %v",
aliceChannel.currentHeight, 2)
}
if aliceChannel.revocationWindowEdge != 3 {
t.Fatalf("alice revocation window not incremented, is %v "+
"should be %v", aliceChannel.revocationWindowEdge, 3)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
if bobChannel.revocationWindowEdge != 3 {
t.Fatalf("alice revocation window not incremented, is %v "+
"should be %v", bobChannel.revocationWindowEdge, 3)
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
// The logs of both sides should now be cleared since the entry adding
// the HTLC should have been removed once both sides receive the
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
// revocation.
if aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.Len() != 0 {
t.Fatalf("alice's local not updated, should be empty, has %v "+
"entries instead", aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.Len())
}
if aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len() != 0 {
t.Fatalf("alice's remote not updated, should be empty, has %v "+
"entries instead", aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len())
}
if len(aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.updateIndex) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("alice's local log index not cleared, should be empty but "+
"has %v entries", len(aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.updateIndex))
}
if len(aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.updateIndex) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("alice's remote log index not cleared, should be empty but "+
"has %v entries", len(aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.updateIndex))
2016-07-06 03:01:55 +03:00
}
}
// TestCheckCommitTxSize checks that estimation size of commitment
// transaction with some degree of error corresponds to the actual size.
func TestCheckCommitTxSize(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
checkSize := func(channel *LightningChannel, count int) {
// Due to variable size of the signatures (70-73) in
// witness script actual size of commitment transaction might
// be lower on 6 weight.
BaseCommitmentTxSizeEstimationError := 6
commitTx, err := channel.getSignedCommitTx()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to initiate alice force close: %v", err)
}
actualCost := blockchain.GetTransactionWeight(btcutil.NewTx(commitTx))
estimatedCost := estimateCommitTxWeight(count, false)
diff := int(estimatedCost - actualCost)
if 0 > diff || BaseCommitmentTxSizeEstimationError < diff {
t.Fatalf("estimation is wrong, diff: %v", diff)
}
}
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(1)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// Check that weight estimation of the commitment transaction without
// HTLCs is right.
checkSize(aliceChannel, 0)
checkSize(bobChannel, 0)
// Adding HTLCs and check that size stays in allowable estimation
// error window.
for i := 1; i <= 10; i++ {
htlc, _ := createHTLC(i, btcutil.Amount(1e7))
if _, err := aliceChannel.AddHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to add htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to receive htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(aliceChannel, bobChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to complete state update: %v", err)
}
checkSize(aliceChannel, i)
checkSize(bobChannel, i)
}
// Settle HTLCs and check that estimation is counting cost of settle
// HTLCs properly.
for i := 10; i >= 1; i-- {
_, preimage := createHTLC(i, btcutil.Amount(1e7))
settleIndex, err := bobChannel.SettleHTLC(preimage)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to settle inbound htlc: %v", err)
}
err = aliceChannel.ReceiveHTLCSettle(preimage, settleIndex)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to accept settle of outbound htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(bobChannel, aliceChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to complete state update: %v", err)
}
checkSize(aliceChannel, i-1)
checkSize(bobChannel, i-1)
}
}
func TestCooperativeChannelClosure(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(1)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
aliceFeeRate := uint64(aliceChannel.channelState.FeePerKw)
bobFeeRate := uint64(bobChannel.channelState.FeePerKw)
// First we test creating of cooperative close proposals.
aliceSig, _, err := aliceChannel.CreateCloseProposal(
aliceFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create alice coop close proposal: %v", err)
}
aliceCloseSig := append(aliceSig, byte(txscript.SigHashAll))
bobSig, _, err := bobChannel.CreateCloseProposal(bobFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create bob coop close proposal: %v", err)
}
bobCloseSig := append(bobSig, byte(txscript.SigHashAll))
aliceCloseTx, err := bobChannel.CompleteCooperativeClose(bobCloseSig,
aliceCloseSig, bobFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to complete alice cooperative close: %v", err)
}
bobCloseSha := aliceCloseTx.TxHash()
bobCloseTx, err := aliceChannel.CompleteCooperativeClose(aliceCloseSig,
bobCloseSig, aliceFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to complete bob cooperative close: %v", err)
}
aliceCloseSha := bobCloseTx.TxHash()
if bobCloseSha != aliceCloseSha {
t.Fatalf("alice and bob close transactions don't match: %v", err)
}
}
// TestForceClose checks that the resulting ForceCloseSummary is correct when
// a peer is ForceClosing the channel. Will check outputs both above and below
// the dust limit.
func TestForceClose(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(3)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
htlcAmount := btcutil.Amount(500)
aliceAmount := aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance
bobAmount := bobChannel.channelState.OurBalance
closeSummary, err := aliceChannel.ForceClose()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to force close channel: %v", err)
}
// The SelfOutputSignDesc should be non-nil since the outout to-self is non-dust.
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc == nil {
t.Fatalf("alice fails to include to-self output in ForceCloseSummary")
} else {
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.PubKey !=
aliceChannel.channelState.OurCommitKey {
t.Fatalf("alice incorrect pubkey in SelfOutputSignDesc")
}
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value != int64(aliceAmount) {
t.Fatalf("alice incorrect output value in SelfOutputSignDesc, "+
"expected %v, got %v",
aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance,
closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value)
}
}
if closeSummary.SelfOutputMaturity != aliceChannel.channelState.LocalCsvDelay {
t.Fatalf("alice: incorrect local CSV delay in ForceCloseSummary, "+
"expected %v, got %v", aliceChannel.channelState.LocalCsvDelay,
closeSummary.SelfOutputMaturity)
}
closeTxHash := closeSummary.CloseTx.TxHash()
commitTxHash := aliceChannel.channelState.OurCommitTx.TxHash()
if !bytes.Equal(closeTxHash[:], commitTxHash[:]) {
t.Fatalf("alice: incorrect close transaction txid")
}
// Check the same for Bobs' ForceCloseSummary
closeSummary, err = bobChannel.ForceClose()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to force close channel: %v", err)
}
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc == nil {
t.Fatalf("bob fails to include to-self output in ForceCloseSummary")
} else {
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.PubKey !=
bobChannel.channelState.OurCommitKey {
t.Fatalf("bob incorrect pubkey in SelfOutputSignDesc")
}
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value != int64(bobAmount) {
t.Fatalf("bob incorrect output value in SelfOutputSignDesc, "+
"expected %v, got %v",
bobChannel.channelState.OurBalance,
closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value)
}
}
if closeSummary.SelfOutputMaturity != bobChannel.channelState.LocalCsvDelay {
t.Fatalf("bob: incorrect local CSV delay in ForceCloseSummary, "+
"expected %v, got %v", bobChannel.channelState.LocalCsvDelay,
closeSummary.SelfOutputMaturity)
}
closeTxHash = closeSummary.CloseTx.TxHash()
commitTxHash = bobChannel.channelState.OurCommitTx.TxHash()
if !bytes.Equal(closeTxHash[:], commitTxHash[:]) {
t.Fatalf("bob: incorrect close transaction txid")
}
// "re-open" channels
aliceChannel.status = channelOpen
bobChannel.status = channelOpen
aliceChannel.ForceCloseSignal = make(chan struct{})
bobChannel.ForceCloseSignal = make(chan struct{})
// Have Bobs' to-self output be below her dust limit and check
// ForceCloseSummary again on both peers.
htlc, preimage := createHTLC(0, bobAmount-htlcAmount)
if _, err := bobChannel.AddHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to add htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := aliceChannel.ReceiveHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to receive htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(bobChannel, aliceChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Can't update the channel state: %v", err)
}
// Settle HTLC and sign new commitment.
settleIndex, err := aliceChannel.SettleHTLC(preimage)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to settle inbound htlc: %v", err)
}
err = bobChannel.ReceiveHTLCSettle(preimage, settleIndex)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to accept settle of outbound htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(aliceChannel, bobChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Can't update the channel state: %v", err)
}
aliceAmount = aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance
bobAmount = bobChannel.channelState.OurBalance
closeSummary, err = aliceChannel.ForceClose()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to force close channel: %v", err)
}
// Alices' to-self output should still be in the commitment transaction.
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc == nil {
t.Fatalf("alice fails to include to-self output in ForceCloseSummary")
} else {
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.PubKey !=
aliceChannel.channelState.OurCommitKey {
t.Fatalf("alice incorrect pubkey in SelfOutputSignDesc")
}
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value !=
int64(aliceAmount) {
t.Fatalf("alice incorrect output value in SelfOutputSignDesc, "+
"expected %v, got %v",
aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance,
closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value)
}
}
if closeSummary.SelfOutputMaturity != aliceChannel.channelState.LocalCsvDelay {
t.Fatalf("alice: incorrect local CSV delay in ForceCloseSummary, "+
"expected %v, got %v", aliceChannel.channelState.LocalCsvDelay,
closeSummary.SelfOutputMaturity)
}
closeTxHash = closeSummary.CloseTx.TxHash()
commitTxHash = aliceChannel.channelState.OurCommitTx.TxHash()
if !bytes.Equal(closeTxHash[:], commitTxHash[:]) {
t.Fatalf("alice: incorrect close transaction txid")
}
closeSummary, err = bobChannel.ForceClose()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to force close channel: %v", err)
}
// Bob's to-self output is below Bob's dust value and should be
// reflected in the ForceCloseSummary.
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob incorrectly includes to-self output in ForceCloseSummary")
}
closeTxHash = closeSummary.CloseTx.TxHash()
commitTxHash = bobChannel.channelState.OurCommitTx.TxHash()
if !bytes.Equal(closeTxHash[:], commitTxHash[:]) {
t.Fatalf("bob: incorrect close transaction txid")
}
}
// TestDustHTLCFees checks that fees are calculated correctly when HTLCs fall
// below the nodes' dust limit. In these cases, the amount of the dust HTLCs
// should be applied to the commitment transaction fee.
func TestDustHTLCFees(t *testing.T) {
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(3)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// This HTLC amount should be lower than the dust limits of both nodes.
htlcAmount := btcutil.Amount(100)
htlc, _ := createHTLC(0, htlcAmount)
if _, err := aliceChannel.AddHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to add htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to receive htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(aliceChannel, bobChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Can't update the channel state: %v", err)
}
defaultFee := calcStaticFee(0)
if aliceChannel.channelState.CommitFee != defaultFee-htlcAmount {
t.Fatalf("dust htlc amounts not subtracted from commitment fee "+
"expected %v, got %v", defaultFee-htlcAmount,
aliceChannel.channelState.CommitFee)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.CommitFee != defaultFee-htlcAmount {
t.Fatalf("dust htlc amounts not subtracted from commitment fee "+
"expected %v, got %v", defaultFee-htlcAmount,
bobChannel.channelState.CommitFee)
}
}
// TestHTLCDustLimit checks the situation in which an HTLC is larger than one
// channel participant's dust limit, but smaller than the other participant's
// dust limit. In this case, the participants' commitment chains will diverge.
// In one commitment chain, the HTLC will be added as normal, in the other
// chain, the amount of the HTLC will contribute to the fees to be paid.
func TestHTLCDustLimit(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(3)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// The amount of the HTLC should be above Alice's dust limit and below
// Bob's dust limit.
htlcAmount := btcutil.Amount(500)
htlc, preimage := createHTLC(0, htlcAmount)
if _, err := aliceChannel.AddHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to add htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to receive htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(aliceChannel, bobChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("Can't update the channel state: %v", err)
}
// At this point, Alice's commitment transaction should have an HTLC,
// while Bob's should not, because the value falls beneath his dust
// limit. The amount of the HTLC should be applied to fees in Bob's
// commitment transaction.
commitment := aliceChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 3 {
t.Fatalf("incorrect # of outputs: expected %v, got %v",
3, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
}
defaultFee := calcStaticFee(0)
if bobChannel.channelState.CommitFee != defaultFee-htlcAmount {
t.Fatalf("dust htlc amount not subtracted from commitment fee "+
"expected %v, got %v", defaultFee-htlcAmount,
bobChannel.channelState.CommitFee)
}
// Settle HTLCs and sign new commitment.
settleIndex, err := bobChannel.SettleHTLC(preimage)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to settle inbound htlc: %v", err)
}
err = aliceChannel.ReceiveHTLCSettle(preimage, settleIndex)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to accept settle of outbound htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(bobChannel, aliceChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("state transition error: %v", err)
}
//At this point, for Alice's commitment chains, the value of the HTLC
//should have been added to Alice's balance and TotalSatoshisSent.
commitment = aliceChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 2 {
t.Fatalf("incorrect # of outputs: expected %v, got %v",
2, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent != uint64(htlcAmount) {
t.Fatalf("alice satoshis sent incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
htlcAmount, aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent)
}
}
// TestChannelBalanceDustLimit tests the condition when the remaining balance
// for one of the channel participants is so small as to be considered dust. In
// this case, the output for that participant is removed and all funds (minus
// fees) in the commitment transaction are allocated to the remaining channel
// participant.
//
// TODO(roasbeef): test needs to be fixed after reserve limits are done
func TestChannelBalanceDustLimit(t *testing.T) {
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(3)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// This amount should leave an amount larger than Alice's dust limit
// once fees have been subtracted, but smaller than Bob's dust limit.
defaultFee := calcStaticFee(0)
htlcAmount := aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance - (defaultFee +
aliceChannel.channelState.OurDustLimit + 100)
htlc, preimage := createHTLC(0, htlcAmount)
if _, err := aliceChannel.AddHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to add htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to receive htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(aliceChannel, bobChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("state transition error: %v", err)
}
settleIndex, err := bobChannel.SettleHTLC(preimage)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to settle inbound htlc: %v", err)
}
err = aliceChannel.ReceiveHTLCSettle(preimage, settleIndex)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to accept settle of outbound htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(bobChannel, aliceChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("state transition error: %v", err)
}
// At the conclusion of this test, in Bob's commitment chains, the
// output for Alice's balance should have been removed as dust, leaving
// only a single output that will send the remaining funds in the
// channel to Bob.
commitment := bobChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("incorrect # of outputs: expected %v, got %v",
1, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent != uint64(htlcAmount) {
t.Fatalf("alice satoshis sent incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
htlcAmount, aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent)
}
}
func TestStateUpdatePersistence(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(1)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
if err := aliceChannel.channelState.FullSync(); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to sync alice's channel: %v", err)
}
if err := bobChannel.channelState.FullSync(); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to sync bob's channel: %v", err)
}
const numHtlcs = 4
// Alice adds 3 HTLCs to the update log, while Bob adds a single HTLC.
var alicePreimage [32]byte
copy(alicePreimage[:], bytes.Repeat([]byte{0xaa}, 32))
var bobPreimage [32]byte
copy(bobPreimage[:], bytes.Repeat([]byte{0xbb}, 32))
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
rHash := sha256.Sum256(alicePreimage[:])
h := &lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC{
PaymentHash: rHash,
Amount: btcutil.Amount(5000),
Expiry: uint32(10),
}
if _, err := aliceChannel.AddHTLC(h); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add alice's htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveHTLC(h); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to recv alice's htlc: %v", err)
}
}
rHash := sha256.Sum256(bobPreimage[:])
bobh := &lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC{
PaymentHash: rHash,
Amount: btcutil.Amount(5000),
Expiry: uint32(10),
}
if _, err := bobChannel.AddHTLC(bobh); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add bob's htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := aliceChannel.ReceiveHTLC(bobh); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to recv bob's htlc: %v", err)
}
// Next, Alice initiates a state transition to include the HTLC's she
// added above in a new commitment state.
if err := forceStateTransition(aliceChannel, bobChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to complete alice's state transition: %v", err)
}
// Since the HTLC Bob sent wasn't included in Bob's version of the
// commitment transaction (but it was in Alice's, as he ACK'd her
// changes before creating a new state), Bob needs to trigger another
// state update in order to re-sync their states.
if err := forceStateTransition(bobChannel, aliceChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to complete bob's state transition: %v", err)
}
// The latest commitment from both sides should have all the HTLCs.
numAliceOutgoing := aliceChannel.localCommitChain.tail().outgoingHTLCs
numAliceIncoming := aliceChannel.localCommitChain.tail().incomingHTLCs
if len(numAliceOutgoing) != 3 {
t.Fatalf("expected %v htlcs, instead got %v", 3, numAliceOutgoing)
}
if len(numAliceIncoming) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("expected %v htlcs, instead got %v", 1, numAliceIncoming)
}
numBobOutgoing := bobChannel.localCommitChain.tail().outgoingHTLCs
numBobIncoming := bobChannel.localCommitChain.tail().incomingHTLCs
if len(numBobOutgoing) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("expected %v htlcs, instead got %v", 1, numBobOutgoing)
}
if len(numBobIncoming) != 3 {
t.Fatalf("expected %v htlcs, instead got %v", 3, numBobIncoming)
}
// Now fetch both of the channels created above from disk to simulate a
// node restart with persistence.
alicePub := aliceChannel.channelState.IdentityPub
aliceChannels, err := aliceChannel.channelState.Db.FetchOpenChannels(alicePub)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to fetch channel: %v", err)
}
bobPub := bobChannel.channelState.IdentityPub
bobChannels, err := bobChannel.channelState.Db.FetchOpenChannels(bobPub)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to fetch channel: %v", err)
}
notifier := aliceChannel.channelEvents
aliceChannelNew, err := NewLightningChannel(aliceChannel.signer,
notifier, aliceChannel.feeEstimator, aliceChannels[0])
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create new channel: %v", err)
}
bobChannelNew, err := NewLightningChannel(bobChannel.signer, notifier,
bobChannel.feeEstimator, bobChannels[0])
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create new channel: %v", err)
}
if err := initRevocationWindows(aliceChannelNew, bobChannelNew, 3); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to init revocation windows: %v", err)
}
// The state update logs of the new channels and the old channels
// should now be identical other than the height the HTLCs were added.
if aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.logIndex !=
aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.logIndex {
t.Fatalf("alice log counter: expected %v, got %v",
aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.logIndex,
aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.logIndex)
}
if aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex !=
aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex {
t.Fatalf("alice log counter: expected %v, got %v",
aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex,
aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex)
}
if aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.Len() !=
aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len() {
t.Fatalf("alice log len: expected %v, got %v",
aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.Len(),
aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len())
}
if aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len() !=
aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.Len() {
t.Fatalf("alice log len: expected %v, got %v",
aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len(),
aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.Len())
}
if bobChannel.localUpdateLog.logIndex !=
bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.logIndex {
t.Fatalf("bob log counter: expected %v, got %v",
bobChannel.localUpdateLog.logIndex,
bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.logIndex)
}
if bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex !=
bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex {
t.Fatalf("bob log counter: expected %v, got %v",
bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex,
bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex)
}
if bobChannel.localUpdateLog.Len() !=
bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len() {
t.Fatalf("bob log len: expected %v, got %v",
bobChannel.localUpdateLog.Len(),
bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len())
}
if bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len() !=
bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.Len() {
t.Fatalf("bob log len: expected %v, got %v",
bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len(),
bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.Len())
}
// Newly generated pkScripts for HTLCs should be the same as in the old channel.
for _, entry := range aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.updateIndex {
htlc := entry.Value.(*PaymentDescriptor)
restoredHtlc := aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.lookup(htlc.Index)
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.ourPkScript, restoredHtlc.ourPkScript) {
t.Fatalf("alice ourPkScript in ourLog: expected %X, got %X",
htlc.ourPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.ourPkScript[:5])
}
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.theirPkScript, restoredHtlc.theirPkScript) {
t.Fatalf("alice theirPkScript in ourLog: expected %X, got %X",
htlc.theirPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.theirPkScript[:5])
}
}
for _, entry := range aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.updateIndex {
htlc := entry.Value.(*PaymentDescriptor)
restoredHtlc := aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.lookup(htlc.Index)
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.ourPkScript, restoredHtlc.ourPkScript) {
t.Fatalf("alice ourPkScript in theirLog: expected %X, got %X",
htlc.ourPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.ourPkScript[:5])
}
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.theirPkScript, restoredHtlc.theirPkScript) {
t.Fatalf("alice theirPkScript in theirLog: expected %X, got %X",
htlc.theirPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.theirPkScript[:5])
}
}
for _, entry := range bobChannel.localUpdateLog.updateIndex {
htlc := entry.Value.(*PaymentDescriptor)
restoredHtlc := bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.lookup(htlc.Index)
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.ourPkScript, restoredHtlc.ourPkScript) {
t.Fatalf("bob ourPkScript in ourLog: expected %X, got %X",
htlc.ourPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.ourPkScript[:5])
}
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.theirPkScript, restoredHtlc.theirPkScript) {
t.Fatalf("bob theirPkScript in ourLog: expected %X, got %X",
htlc.theirPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.theirPkScript[:5])
}
}
for _, entry := range bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.updateIndex {
htlc := entry.Value.(*PaymentDescriptor)
restoredHtlc := bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.lookup(htlc.Index)
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.ourPkScript, restoredHtlc.ourPkScript) {
t.Fatalf("bob ourPkScript in theirLog: expected %X, got %X",
htlc.ourPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.ourPkScript[:5])
}
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.theirPkScript, restoredHtlc.theirPkScript) {
t.Fatalf("bob theirPkScript in theirLog: expected %X, got %X",
htlc.theirPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.theirPkScript[:5])
}
}
// Now settle all the HTLCs, then force a state update. The state
// update should suceed as both sides have identical.
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
settleIndex, err := bobChannelNew.SettleHTLC(alicePreimage)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle htlc: %v", err)
}
err = aliceChannelNew.ReceiveHTLCSettle(alicePreimage, settleIndex)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle htlc: %v", err)
}
}
settleIndex, err := aliceChannelNew.SettleHTLC(bobPreimage)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle htlc: %v", err)
}
err = bobChannelNew.ReceiveHTLCSettle(bobPreimage, settleIndex)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle htlc: %v", err)
}
// Similar to the two transitions above, as both Bob and Alice added
// entries to the update log before a state transition was initiated by
// either side, both sides are required to trigger an update in order
// to lock in their changes.
if err := forceStateTransition(aliceChannelNew, bobChannelNew); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to update commitments: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(bobChannelNew, aliceChannelNew); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to update commitments: %v", err)
}
// The amounts transferred should been updated as per the amounts in
// the HTLCs
if aliceChannelNew.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent != 15000 {
t.Fatalf("expected %v alice satoshis sent, got %v",
15000, aliceChannelNew.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent)
}
if aliceChannelNew.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived != 5000 {
t.Fatalf("expected %v alice satoshis received, got %v",
5000, aliceChannelNew.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived)
}
if bobChannelNew.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent != 5000 {
t.Fatalf("expected %v bob satoshis sent, got %v",
5000, bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent)
}
if bobChannelNew.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived != 15000 {
t.Fatalf("expected %v bob satoshis sent, got %v",
15000, bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent)
}
}
func TestCancelHTLC(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(5)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// Add a new HTLC from Alice to Bob, then trigger a new state
// transition in order to include it in the latest state.
const htlcAmt = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
var preImage [32]byte
copy(preImage[:], bytes.Repeat([]byte{0xaa}, 32))
htlc := &lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC{
PaymentHash: sha256.Sum256(preImage[:]),
Amount: htlcAmt,
Expiry: 10,
}
paymentHash := htlc.PaymentHash
if _, err := aliceChannel.AddHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add alice htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add bob htlc: %v", err)
}
if err := forceStateTransition(aliceChannel, bobChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create new commitment state: %v", err)
}
// With the HTLC committed, Alice's balance should reflect the clearing
// of the new HTLC.
aliceExpectedBalance := btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*4) -
calcStaticFee(1)
if aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance != aliceExpectedBalance {
t.Fatalf("Alice's balance is wrong: expected %v, got %v",
aliceExpectedBalance, aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance)
}
// Now, with the HTLC committed on both sides, trigger a cancellation
// from Bob to Alice, removing the HTLC.
htlcCancelIndex, err := bobChannel.FailHTLC(paymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to cancel HTLC: %v", err)
}
if err := aliceChannel.ReceiveFailHTLC(htlcCancelIndex); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to recv htlc cancel: %v", err)
}
// Now trigger another state transition, the HTLC should now be removed
// from both sides, with balances reflected.
if err := forceStateTransition(bobChannel, aliceChannel); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create new commitment: %v", err)
}
// Now HTLCs should be present on the commitment transaction for
// either side.
if len(aliceChannel.localCommitChain.tip().outgoingHTLCs) != 0 ||
len(aliceChannel.remoteCommitChain.tip().outgoingHTLCs) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("htlc's still active from alice's POV")
}
if len(aliceChannel.localCommitChain.tip().incomingHTLCs) != 0 ||
len(aliceChannel.remoteCommitChain.tip().incomingHTLCs) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("htlc's still active from alice's POV")
}
if len(bobChannel.localCommitChain.tip().outgoingHTLCs) != 0 ||
len(bobChannel.remoteCommitChain.tip().outgoingHTLCs) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("htlc's still active from bob's POV")
}
if len(bobChannel.localCommitChain.tip().incomingHTLCs) != 0 ||
len(bobChannel.remoteCommitChain.tip().incomingHTLCs) != 0 {
t.Fatalf("htlc's still active from bob's POV")
}
expectedBalance := btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 5)
if aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance != expectedBalance-calcStaticFee(0) {
t.Fatalf("balance is wrong: expected %v, got %v",
aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance, expectedBalance-
calcStaticFee(0))
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.TheirBalance != expectedBalance {
t.Fatalf("balance is wrong: expected %v, got %v",
aliceChannel.channelState.TheirBalance, expectedBalance)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.OurBalance != expectedBalance {
t.Fatalf("balance is wrong: expected %v, got %v",
bobChannel.channelState.OurBalance, expectedBalance)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.TheirBalance != expectedBalance-calcStaticFee(0) {
t.Fatalf("balance is wrong: expected %v, got %v",
bobChannel.channelState.TheirBalance,
expectedBalance-calcStaticFee(0))
}
}
func TestCooperativeCloseDustAdherence(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(5)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
aliceFeeRate := uint64(aliceChannel.channelState.FeePerKw)
bobFeeRate := uint64(bobChannel.channelState.FeePerKw)
setDustLimit := func(dustVal btcutil.Amount) {
aliceChannel.channelState.OurDustLimit = dustVal
aliceChannel.channelState.TheirDustLimit = dustVal
aliceChannel.channelState.OurDustLimit = dustVal
aliceChannel.channelState.TheirDustLimit = dustVal
}
resetChannelState := func() {
aliceChannel.status = channelOpen
bobChannel.status = channelOpen
}
setBalances := func(aliceBalance, bobBalance btcutil.Amount) {
aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance = aliceBalance
aliceChannel.channelState.TheirBalance = bobBalance
bobChannel.channelState.OurBalance = bobBalance
bobChannel.channelState.TheirBalance = aliceBalance
}
// We'll start be initializing the limit of both Alice and Bob to 10k
// satoshis.
dustLimit := btcutil.Amount(10000)
setDustLimit(dustLimit)
// Both sides currently have over 1 BTC settled as part of their
// balances. As a result, performing a cooperative closure now result
// in both sides having an output within the closure transaction.
aliceSig, _, err := aliceChannel.CreateCloseProposal(aliceFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to close channel: %v", err)
}
aliceCloseSig := append(aliceSig, byte(txscript.SigHashAll))
bobSig, _, err := bobChannel.CreateCloseProposal(bobFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to close channel: %v", err)
}
bobCloseSig := append(bobSig, byte(txscript.SigHashAll))
closeTx, err := bobChannel.CompleteCooperativeClose(bobCloseSig,
aliceCloseSig, bobFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to accept channel close: %v", err)
}
// The closure transaction should have exactly two outputs.
if len(closeTx.TxOut) != 2 {
t.Fatalf("close tx has wrong number of outputs: expected %v "+
"got %v", 2, len(closeTx.TxOut))
}
// We'll reset the channel states before proceeding to our nest test.
resetChannelState()
// Next we'll modify the current balances and dust limits such that
// Bob's current balance is above _below_ his dust limit.
aliceBal := btcutil.Amount(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin)
bobBal := btcutil.Amount(250)
setBalances(aliceBal, bobBal)
// Attempt another cooperative channel closure. It should succeed
// without any issues.
aliceSig, _, err = aliceChannel.CreateCloseProposal(aliceFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to close channel: %v", err)
}
aliceCloseSig = append(aliceSig, byte(txscript.SigHashAll))
bobSig, _, err = bobChannel.CreateCloseProposal(bobFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to close channel: %v", err)
}
bobCloseSig = append(bobSig, byte(txscript.SigHashAll))
closeTx, err = bobChannel.CompleteCooperativeClose(bobCloseSig,
aliceCloseSig, bobFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to accept channel close: %v", err)
}
// The closure transaction should only have a single output, and that
// output should be Alice's balance.
if len(closeTx.TxOut) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("close tx has wrong number of outputs: expected %v "+
"got %v", 1, len(closeTx.TxOut))
}
if closeTx.TxOut[0].Value != int64(aliceBal-calcStaticFee(0)) {
t.Fatalf("alice's balance is incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
int64(aliceBal-calcStaticFee(0)), closeTx.TxOut[0].Value)
}
// Finally, we'll modify the current balances and dust limits such that
// Alice's current balance is _below_ his her limit.
setBalances(bobBal, aliceBal)
resetChannelState()
// Our final attempt at another cooperative channel closure. It should
// succeed without any issues.
aliceSig, _, err = aliceChannel.CreateCloseProposal(aliceFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to close channel: %v", err)
}
aliceCloseSig = append(aliceSig, byte(txscript.SigHashAll))
bobSig, _, err = bobChannel.CreateCloseProposal(bobFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to close channel: %v", err)
}
bobCloseSig = append(bobSig, byte(txscript.SigHashAll))
closeTx, err = bobChannel.CompleteCooperativeClose(bobCloseSig,
aliceCloseSig, bobFeeRate)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to accept channel close: %v", err)
}
// The closure transaction should only have a single output, and that
// output should be Bob's balance.
if len(closeTx.TxOut) != 1 {
t.Fatalf("close tx has wrong number of outputs: expected %v "+
"got %v", 1, len(closeTx.TxOut))
}
if closeTx.TxOut[0].Value != int64(aliceBal) {
t.Fatalf("bob's balance is incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
aliceBal, closeTx.TxOut[0].Value)
}
}
// TestUpdateFeeFail tests that the signature verification will fail if they
// fee updates are out of sync.
func TestUpdateFeeFail(t *testing.T) {
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(1)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// Bob receives the update, that will apply to his commitment
// transaction.
bobChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(111)
// Alice sends signature for commitment that does not cover any fee
// update.
aliceSig, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to sign commitment: %v", err)
}
// Bob verifies this commit, meaning that he checks that it is
// consistent everything he has received. This should fail, since he got
// the fee update, but Alice never sent it.
err = bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceSig)
if err == nil {
t.Fatalf("expected bob to fail receiving alice's signature")
}
}
// TestUpdateFeeSenderCommits veriefies that the state machine progresses as
// expected if we send a fee update, and then the sender of the fee update
// sends a commitment signature.
func TestUpdateFeeSenderCommits(t *testing.T) {
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(1)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
paymentPreimage := bytes.Repeat([]byte{1}, 32)
paymentHash := sha256.Sum256(paymentPreimage)
htlc := &lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC{
PaymentHash: paymentHash,
Amount: btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin,
Expiry: uint32(5),
}
// First Alice adds the outgoing HTLC to her local channel's state
// update log. Then Alice sends this wire message over to Bob who
// adds this htlc to his remote state update log.
if _, err := aliceChannel.AddHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to recv htlc: %v", err)
}
// Simulate Alice sending update fee message to bob.
fee := btcutil.Amount(111)
aliceChannel.UpdateFee(fee)
bobChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(fee)
// Alice signs a commitment, which will cover everything sent to Bob
// (the HTLC and the fee update), and everything acked by Bob (nothing
// so far).
aliceSig, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to sign commitment: %v", err)
}
// Bob receives this signature message, and verifies that it is
// consistent with the state he had for Alice, including the received
// HTLC and fee update.
if err := bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceSig); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alice's new commitment: %v", err)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.FeePerKw == fee {
t.Fatalf("bob's feePerKw was unexpectedly locked in")
}
// Bob can revoke the prior commitment he had. This should lock in the
// fee update for him.
bobRevocation, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to generate bob revocation: %v", err)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.FeePerKw != fee {
t.Fatalf("bob's feePerKw was not locked in")
}
// Bob commits to all updates he has received from Alice. This includes
// the HTLC he received, and the fee update.
bobSig, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to sign alice's commitment: %v", err)
}
// Alice receives the revocation of the old one, and can now assume that
// Bob's received everything up to the signature she sent, including the
// HTLC and fee update.
if _, err := aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to rocess bob's revocation: %v", err)
}
// Alice receives new signature from Bob, and assumes this covers the
// changes.
if err := aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobSig); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to process bob's new commitment: %v", err)
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.FeePerKw == fee {
t.Fatalf("alice's feePerKw was unexpectedly locked in")
}
// Alice can revoke the old commitment, which will lock in the fee
// update.
aliceRevocation, err := aliceChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to revoke alice channel: %v", err)
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.FeePerKw != fee {
t.Fatalf("alice's feePerKw was not locked in")
}
// Bob receives revocation from Alice.
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveRevocation(aliceRevocation); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alive's revocation: %v", err)
}
}
// TestUpdateFeeReceiverCommits tests that the state machine progresses as
// expected if we send a fee update, and then the receiver of the fee update
// sends a commitment signature.
func TestUpdateFeeReceiverCommits(t *testing.T) {
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(1)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
paymentPreimage := bytes.Repeat([]byte{1}, 32)
paymentHash := sha256.Sum256(paymentPreimage)
htlc := &lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC{
PaymentHash: paymentHash,
Amount: btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin,
Expiry: uint32(5),
}
// First Alice adds the outgoing HTLC to her local channel's state
// update log. Then Alice sends this wire message over to Bob who
// adds this htlc to his remote state update log.
if _, err := aliceChannel.AddHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add htlc: %v", err)
}
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to recv htlc: %v", err)
}
// Simulate Alice sending update fee message to bob
fee := btcutil.Amount(111)
aliceChannel.UpdateFee(fee)
bobChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(fee)
// Bob commits to every change he has sent since last time (none). He
// does not commit to the received HTLC and fee update, since Alice
// cannot know if he has received them.
bobSig, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to sign commitment: %v", err)
}
// Alice receives this signature message, and verifies that it is
// consistent with the remote state, not including any of the updates.
if err := aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobSig); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alice's new commitment: %v", err)
}
// Alice can revoke the prior commitment she had, this will ack
// everything received before last commitment signature, but in this
// case that is nothing.
aliceRevocation, err := aliceChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to generate bob revocation: %v", err)
}
// Bob receives the revocation of the old commitment
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveRevocation(aliceRevocation); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to rocess bob's revocation: %v", err)
}
// Alice will sign next commitment. Since she sent the revocation, she
// also ack'ed everything received, but in this case this is nothing.
// Since she sent the two updates, this signature will cover those two.
aliceSig, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to sign alice's commitment: %v", err)
}
// Bob gets the signature for the new commitment from Alice. He assumes
// this covers everything received from alice, including the two updates.
if err := bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceSig); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to process bob's new commitment: %v", err)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.FeePerKw == fee {
t.Fatalf("bob's feePerKw was unexpectedly locked in")
}
// Bob can revoke the old commitment. This will ack what he has
// received, including the HTLC and fee update. This will lock in the
// fee update for bob.
bobRevocation, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to revoke alice channel: %v", err)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.FeePerKw != fee {
t.Fatalf("bob's feePerKw was not locked in")
}
// Bob will send a new signature, which will cover what he just acked:
// the HTLC and fee update.
bobSig, err = bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to sign commitment: %v", err)
}
// Alice receives revokation from Bob, and can now be sure that Bob
// received the two updates, and they are considered locked in.
if _, err := aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alive's revocation: %v", err)
}
// Alice will receive the signature from Bob, which will cover what was
// just acked by his revocation.
if err := aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobSig); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to process bob's new commitment: %v", err)
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.FeePerKw == fee {
t.Fatalf("alice's feePerKw was unexpectedly locked in")
}
// After Alice now revokes her old commitment, the fee update should
// lock in.
aliceRevocation, err = aliceChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to generate bob revocation: %v", err)
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.FeePerKw != fee {
t.Fatalf("Alice's feePerKw was not locked in")
}
// Bob receives revokation from Alice.
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveRevocation(aliceRevocation); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alive's revocation: %v", err)
}
}
// TestUpdateFeeReceiverSendsUpdate tests that receiving a fee update as channel
// initiator fails, and that trying to initiate fee update as non-initiatior
// fails.
func TestUpdateFeeReceiverSendsUpdate(t *testing.T) {
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(1)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// Since Alice is the channel initiator, she should fail when receiving
// fee update
fee := btcutil.Amount(111)
err = aliceChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(fee)
if err == nil {
t.Fatalf("expected alice to fail receiving fee update")
}
// Similarly, initiating fee update should fail for Bob.
err = bobChannel.UpdateFee(fee)
if err == nil {
t.Fatalf("expected bob to fail initiating fee update")
}
}
// Test that if multiple update fee messages are sent consecutively, then the
// last one is the one that is being committed to.
func TestUpdateFeeMultipleUpdates(t *testing.T) {
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
aliceChannel, bobChannel, cleanUp, err := createTestChannels(1)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create test channels: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
// Simulate Alice sending update fee message to bob.
fee1 := btcutil.Amount(111)
fee2 := btcutil.Amount(222)
fee := btcutil.Amount(333)
aliceChannel.UpdateFee(fee1)
aliceChannel.UpdateFee(fee2)
aliceChannel.UpdateFee(fee)
// Alice signs a commitment, which will cover everything sent to Bob
// (the HTLC and the fee update), and everything acked by Bob (nothing
// so far).
aliceSig, err := aliceChannel.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to sign commitment: %v", err)
}
bobChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(fee1)
bobChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(fee2)
bobChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(fee)
// Bob receives this signature message, and verifies that it is
// consistent with the state he had for Alice, including the received
// HTLC and fee update.
if err := bobChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(aliceSig); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alice's new commitment: %v", err)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.FeePerKw == fee {
t.Fatalf("bob's feePerKw was unexpectedly locked in")
}
// Alice sending more fee updates now should not mess up the old fee
// they both committed to.
fee3 := btcutil.Amount(444)
fee4 := btcutil.Amount(555)
fee5 := btcutil.Amount(666)
aliceChannel.UpdateFee(fee3)
aliceChannel.UpdateFee(fee4)
aliceChannel.UpdateFee(fee5)
bobChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(fee3)
bobChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(fee4)
bobChannel.ReceiveUpdateFee(fee5)
// Bob can revoke the prior commitment he had. This should lock in the
// fee update for him.
bobRevocation, err := bobChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to generate bob revocation: %v", err)
}
if bobChannel.channelState.FeePerKw != fee {
t.Fatalf("bob's feePerKw was not locked in")
}
// Bob commits to all updates he has received from Alice. This includes
// the HTLC he received, and the fee update.
bobSig, err := bobChannel.SignNextCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to sign alice's commitment: %v", err)
}
// Alice receives the revocation of the old one, and can now assume that
// Bob's received everything up to the signature she sent, including the
// HTLC and fee update.
if _, err := aliceChannel.ReceiveRevocation(bobRevocation); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to rocess bob's revocation: %v", err)
}
// Alice receives new signature from Bob, and assumes this covers the
// changes.
if err := aliceChannel.ReceiveNewCommitment(bobSig); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("alice unable to process bob's new commitment: %v", err)
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.FeePerKw == fee {
t.Fatalf("alice's feePerKw was unexpectedly locked in")
}
// Alice can revoke the old commitment, which will lock in the fee
// update.
aliceRevocation, err := aliceChannel.RevokeCurrentCommitment()
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to revoke alice channel: %v", err)
}
if aliceChannel.channelState.FeePerKw != fee {
t.Fatalf("alice's feePerKw was not locked in")
}
// Bob receives revocation from Alice.
if _, err := bobChannel.ReceiveRevocation(aliceRevocation); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("bob unable to process alive's revocation: %v", err)
}
}