lnwallet: fix failure messages, spacing in tests
This commit changes t.Fatal to t.Fatalf in TestCheckDustLimit so as to provide more information. This commit also makes some column width adjustments and minor spelling/formatting changes.
This commit is contained in:
bryanvu
Olaoluwa Osuntokun
parent
a4ba72c08c
commit
c1769f959b
@ -2189,7 +2189,8 @@ func testGraphTopologyNotifications(net *networkHarness, t *harnessTest) {
|
||||
chanUpdate := graphUpdate.ChannelUpdates[0]
|
||||
if chanUpdate.Capacity != int64(chanAmt) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("channel capacities mismatch: expected %v, "+
|
||||
"got %v", chanAmt, chanUpdate.Capacity)
|
||||
"got %v", chanAmt,
|
||||
btcutil.Amount(chanUpdate.Capacity))
|
||||
}
|
||||
switch chanUpdate.AdvertisingNode {
|
||||
case net.Alice.PubKeyStr:
|
||||
|
||||
@ -544,7 +544,8 @@ func TestSimpleAddSettleWorkflow(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
if aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent != satoshisTransferred {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice satoshis sent incorrect %v vs %v expected",
|
||||
aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent, satoshisTransferred)
|
||||
aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent,
|
||||
satoshisTransferred)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if aliceChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived != 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice satoshis received incorrect %v vs %v expected",
|
||||
@ -552,7 +553,8 @@ func TestSimpleAddSettleWorkflow(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
if bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived != satoshisTransferred {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob satoshis received incorrect %v vs %v expected",
|
||||
bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived, satoshisTransferred)
|
||||
bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisReceived,
|
||||
satoshisTransferred)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if bobChannel.channelState.TotalSatoshisSent != 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob satoshis sent incorrect %v vs %v expected",
|
||||
@ -567,24 +569,24 @@ func TestSimpleAddSettleWorkflow(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
aliceChannel.currentHeight, 2)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if aliceChannel.revocationWindowEdge != 3 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice revocation window not incremented, is %v should be %v",
|
||||
aliceChannel.revocationWindowEdge, 3)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice revocation window not incremented, is %v "+
|
||||
"should be %v", aliceChannel.revocationWindowEdge, 3)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if bobChannel.revocationWindowEdge != 3 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice revocation window not incremented, is %v should be %v",
|
||||
bobChannel.revocationWindowEdge, 3)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice revocation window not incremented, is %v "+
|
||||
"should be %v", bobChannel.revocationWindowEdge, 3)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The logs of both sides should now be cleared since the entry adding
|
||||
// the HTLC should have been removed once both sides receive the
|
||||
// revocation.
|
||||
if aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.Len() != 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice's local not updated, should be empty, has %v entries "+
|
||||
"instead", aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.Len())
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice's local not updated, should be empty, has %v "+
|
||||
"entries instead", aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.Len())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len() != 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice's remote not updated, should be empty, has %v entries "+
|
||||
"instead", aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len())
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice's remote not updated, should be empty, has %v "+
|
||||
"entries instead", aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if len(aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.updateIndex) != 0 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice's local log index not cleared, should be empty but "+
|
||||
@ -885,12 +887,14 @@ func TestForceClose(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice fails to include to-self output in ForceCloseSummary")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.PubKey != aliceChannel.channelState.OurCommitKey {
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.PubKey !=
|
||||
aliceChannel.channelState.OurCommitKey {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice incorrect pubkey in SelfOutputSignDesc")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value != int64(aliceAmount) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice incorrect output value in SelfOutputSignDesc, "+
|
||||
"expected %v, got %v", aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance,
|
||||
"expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance,
|
||||
closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -915,12 +919,14 @@ func TestForceClose(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob fails to include to-self output in ForceCloseSummary")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.PubKey != bobChannel.channelState.OurCommitKey {
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.PubKey !=
|
||||
bobChannel.channelState.OurCommitKey {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob incorrect pubkey in SelfOutputSignDesc")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value != int64(bobAmount) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob incorrect output value in SelfOutputSignDesc, "+
|
||||
"expected %v, got %v", bobChannel.channelState.OurBalance,
|
||||
"expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobChannel.channelState.OurBalance,
|
||||
closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -943,7 +949,8 @@ func TestForceClose(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
aliceChannel.ForceCloseSignal = make(chan struct{})
|
||||
bobChannel.ForceCloseSignal = make(chan struct{})
|
||||
|
||||
// Have Bobs' to-self output be below her dust limit and check ForceCloseSummary again on both peers.
|
||||
// Have Bobs' to-self output be below her dust limit and check
|
||||
// ForceCloseSummary again on both peers.
|
||||
htlc, preimage := createHTLC(0, bobAmount-htlcAmount)
|
||||
if _, err := bobChannel.AddHTLC(htlc); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice unable to add htlc: %v", err)
|
||||
@ -980,12 +987,15 @@ func TestForceClose(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc == nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice fails to include to-self output in ForceCloseSummary")
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.PubKey != aliceChannel.channelState.OurCommitKey {
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.PubKey !=
|
||||
aliceChannel.channelState.OurCommitKey {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice incorrect pubkey in SelfOutputSignDesc")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value != int64(aliceAmount) {
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value !=
|
||||
int64(aliceAmount) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice incorrect output value in SelfOutputSignDesc, "+
|
||||
"expected %v, got %v", aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance,
|
||||
"expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance,
|
||||
closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc.Output.Value)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1006,7 +1016,8 @@ func TestForceClose(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unable to force close channel: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
// Bob's to-self output is below Bob's dust value and should be reflected in the ForceCloseSummary.
|
||||
// Bob's to-self output is below Bob's dust value and should be
|
||||
// reflected in the ForceCloseSummary.
|
||||
if closeSummary.SelfOutputSignDesc != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob incorrectly includes to-self output in ForceCloseSummary")
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1051,8 +1062,9 @@ func TestCheckDustLimit(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
htlcAmount := btcutil.Amount(500)
|
||||
|
||||
if !((htlcAmount > aliceDustLimit) && (bobDustLimit > htlcAmount)) {
|
||||
t.Fatal("htlc amount needs to be above Alice's dust limit, but " +
|
||||
"below Bob's dust limit .")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("htlc amount (%v) should be above Alice's dust limit (%v),"+
|
||||
"and below Bob's dust limit (%v).", htlcAmount, aliceDustLimit,
|
||||
bobDustLimit)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
aliceAmount := aliceChannel.channelState.OurBalance
|
||||
@ -1077,25 +1089,31 @@ func TestCheckDustLimit(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// From Alice point of view HTLC's amount is bigger than dust limit.
|
||||
commitment := aliceChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
|
||||
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 3 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("htlc wasn't added")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("incorrect number of outputs: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
3, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.ourBalance != aliceAmount-htlcAmount {
|
||||
t.Fatal("our balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Alice has wrong balance: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceAmount-htlcAmount, commitment.ourBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.theirBalance != bobAmount {
|
||||
t.Fatal("their balance was updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Alice has wrong balance for Bob: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobAmount, commitment.theirBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// From Bob point of view HTLC's amount is lower then dust limit.
|
||||
commitment = bobChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
|
||||
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("HTLC with dust amount was added")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Incorrect number of outputs: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
2, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.theirBalance != aliceAmount-htlcAmount {
|
||||
t.Fatal("their balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Bob has wrong balance for Alice: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceAmount-htlcAmount, commitment.theirBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.ourBalance != bobAmount {
|
||||
t.Fatal("our balance was updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Bob has wrong balance: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobAmount, commitment.ourBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Settle HTLC and sign new commitment.
|
||||
@ -1108,29 +1126,35 @@ func TestCheckDustLimit(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice unable to accept settle of outbound htlc: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := forceStateTransition(bobChannel, aliceChannel); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Can't update the channel state: %v", err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("state transition error: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
commitment = aliceChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
|
||||
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("HTLC wasn't settled")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("wrong number of outputs: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
2, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.ourBalance != aliceAmount-htlcAmount {
|
||||
t.Fatal("our balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Alice has wrong balance: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceAmount-htlcAmount, commitment.ourBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.theirBalance != bobAmount+htlcAmount {
|
||||
t.Fatal("their balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Alice has wrong balance for Bob: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobAmount, commitment.theirBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
commitment = bobChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
|
||||
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("HTLC with dust amount wasn't settled")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("wrong number of outputs: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
2, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.ourBalance != bobAmount+htlcAmount {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("our balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Bob has wrong balance: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobAmount+htlcAmount, commitment.ourBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.theirBalance != aliceAmount-htlcAmount {
|
||||
t.Fatal("their balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Bob has wrong balance for Alice: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceAmount-htlcAmount, commitment.theirBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Next we will test when a non-HTLC output in the commitment
|
||||
@ -1148,33 +1172,37 @@ func TestCheckDustLimit(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob unable to receive htlc: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := forceStateTransition(aliceChannel, bobChannel); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Can't update the channel state: %v", err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("state transition error: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// From Alice's point of view, her output is bigger than the dust limit
|
||||
commitment = aliceChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
|
||||
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 3 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("incorrect number of outputs in commitment transaction "+
|
||||
"expected %v, got %v", 3, commitment.txn.TxOut)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("incorrect number of outputs in commitment transaction "+
|
||||
"expected %v, got %v", 3, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.ourBalance != aliceAmount-htlcAmount2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("our balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Alice has wrong balance: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceAmount-htlcAmount, commitment.ourBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.theirBalance != bobAmount {
|
||||
t.Fatal("their balance was updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Alice has wrong balance for Bob: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobAmount, commitment.theirBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// From Bob's point of view, Alice's output is lower than the dust limit
|
||||
commitment = bobChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
|
||||
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("incorrect number of outputs in commitment transaction "+
|
||||
"expected %v, got %v", 2, commitment.txn.TxOut)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("incorrect number of outputs in commitment transaction "+
|
||||
"expected %v, got %v", 2, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.theirBalance != aliceAmount-htlcAmount2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("their balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Bob has wrong balance for Alice: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceAmount-htlcAmount, commitment.theirBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.ourBalance != bobAmount {
|
||||
t.Fatal("our balance was updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Bob has wrong balance: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobAmount+htlcAmount, commitment.ourBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Settle HTLC and sign new commitment.
|
||||
@ -1187,33 +1215,36 @@ func TestCheckDustLimit(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice unable to accept settle of outbound htlc: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if err := forceStateTransition(bobChannel, aliceChannel); err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Can't update the channel state: %v", err)
|
||||
t.Fatalf("state transition error: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
commitment = aliceChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
|
||||
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("incorrect number of outputs in commitment transaction, "+
|
||||
t.Fatalf("incorrect number of outputs in commitment transaction, "+
|
||||
"expected %v got %v", 2, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.ourBalance != aliceAmount-htlcAmount2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("our balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Alice has wrong balance: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceAmount-htlcAmount, commitment.ourBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.theirBalance != bobAmount+htlcAmount2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("their balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Alice has wrong balance for Bob: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobAmount, commitment.theirBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
commitment = bobChannel.localCommitChain.tip()
|
||||
if len(commitment.txn.TxOut) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("incorrect number of outputs in commitment transaction, "+
|
||||
t.Fatalf("incorrect number of outputs in commitment transaction, "+
|
||||
"expected %v got %v", 1, len(commitment.txn.TxOut))
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.ourBalance != bobAmount+htlcAmount2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("our balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Bob has wrong balance: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobAmount+htlcAmount, commitment.ourBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if commitment.theirBalance != aliceAmount-htlcAmount2 {
|
||||
t.Fatal("their balance wasn't updated")
|
||||
t.Fatalf("Bob has wrong balance for Alice: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceAmount-htlcAmount, commitment.theirBalance)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestStateUpdatePersistence(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
@ -1330,11 +1361,13 @@ func TestStateUpdatePersistence(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unable to fetch channel: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
notifier := aliceChannel.channelEvents
|
||||
aliceChannelNew, err := NewLightningChannel(aliceChannel.signer, notifier, aliceChannels[0])
|
||||
aliceChannelNew, err := NewLightningChannel(aliceChannel.signer,
|
||||
notifier, aliceChannels[0])
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unable to create new channel: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
bobChannelNew, err := NewLightningChannel(bobChannel.signer, notifier, bobChannels[0])
|
||||
bobChannelNew, err := NewLightningChannel(bobChannel.signer, notifier,
|
||||
bobChannels[0])
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unable to create new channel: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1344,42 +1377,50 @@ func TestStateUpdatePersistence(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
// The state update logs of the new channels and the old channels
|
||||
// should now be identical other than the height the HTLCs were added.
|
||||
if aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.logIndex != aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.logIndex {
|
||||
if aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.logIndex !=
|
||||
aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.logIndex {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice log counter: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.logIndex,
|
||||
aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.logIndex)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex != aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex {
|
||||
if aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex !=
|
||||
aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice log counter: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex,
|
||||
aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.Len() != aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len() {
|
||||
if aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.Len() !=
|
||||
aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len() {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice log len: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceChannel.localUpdateLog.Len(),
|
||||
aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len() != aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.Len() {
|
||||
if aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len() !=
|
||||
aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.Len() {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice log len: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
aliceChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len(),
|
||||
aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.Len())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if bobChannel.localUpdateLog.logIndex != bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.logIndex {
|
||||
if bobChannel.localUpdateLog.logIndex !=
|
||||
bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.logIndex {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob log counter: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobChannel.localUpdateLog.logIndex,
|
||||
bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.logIndex)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex != bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex {
|
||||
if bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex !=
|
||||
bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob log counter: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex,
|
||||
bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.logIndex)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if bobChannel.localUpdateLog.Len() != bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len() {
|
||||
if bobChannel.localUpdateLog.Len() !=
|
||||
bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len() {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob log len: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len(),
|
||||
bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.Len())
|
||||
}
|
||||
if bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len() != bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.Len() {
|
||||
if bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len() !=
|
||||
bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.Len() {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob log len: expected %v, got %v",
|
||||
bobChannel.remoteUpdateLog.Len(),
|
||||
bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.Len())
|
||||
@ -1390,11 +1431,11 @@ func TestStateUpdatePersistence(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
htlc := entry.Value.(*PaymentDescriptor)
|
||||
restoredHtlc := aliceChannelNew.localUpdateLog.lookup(htlc.Index)
|
||||
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.ourPkScript, restoredHtlc.ourPkScript) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice ourPkScript in ourLog: expected %X..., got %X...",
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice ourPkScript in ourLog: expected %X, got %X",
|
||||
htlc.ourPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.ourPkScript[:5])
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.theirPkScript, restoredHtlc.theirPkScript) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice theirPkScript in ourLog: expected %X..., got %X...",
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice theirPkScript in ourLog: expected %X, got %X",
|
||||
htlc.theirPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.theirPkScript[:5])
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1402,11 +1443,11 @@ func TestStateUpdatePersistence(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
htlc := entry.Value.(*PaymentDescriptor)
|
||||
restoredHtlc := aliceChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.lookup(htlc.Index)
|
||||
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.ourPkScript, restoredHtlc.ourPkScript) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice ourPkScript in theirLog: expected %X..., got %X...",
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice ourPkScript in theirLog: expected %X, got %X",
|
||||
htlc.ourPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.ourPkScript[:5])
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.theirPkScript, restoredHtlc.theirPkScript) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice theirPkScript in theirLog: expected %X..., got %X...",
|
||||
t.Fatalf("alice theirPkScript in theirLog: expected %X, got %X",
|
||||
htlc.theirPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.theirPkScript[:5])
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1414,11 +1455,11 @@ func TestStateUpdatePersistence(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
htlc := entry.Value.(*PaymentDescriptor)
|
||||
restoredHtlc := bobChannelNew.localUpdateLog.lookup(htlc.Index)
|
||||
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.ourPkScript, restoredHtlc.ourPkScript) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob ourPkScript in ourLog: expected %X..., got %X...",
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob ourPkScript in ourLog: expected %X, got %X",
|
||||
htlc.ourPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.ourPkScript[:5])
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.theirPkScript, restoredHtlc.theirPkScript) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob theirPkScript in ourLog: expected %X..., got %X...",
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob theirPkScript in ourLog: expected %X, got %X",
|
||||
htlc.theirPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.theirPkScript[:5])
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1426,11 +1467,11 @@ func TestStateUpdatePersistence(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
htlc := entry.Value.(*PaymentDescriptor)
|
||||
restoredHtlc := bobChannelNew.remoteUpdateLog.lookup(htlc.Index)
|
||||
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.ourPkScript, restoredHtlc.ourPkScript) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob ourPkScript in theirLog: expected %X..., got %X...",
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob ourPkScript in theirLog: expected %X, got %X",
|
||||
htlc.ourPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.ourPkScript[:5])
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !bytes.Equal(htlc.theirPkScript, restoredHtlc.theirPkScript) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob theirPkScript in theirLog: expected %X..., got %X...",
|
||||
t.Fatalf("bob theirPkScript in theirLog: expected %X, got %X",
|
||||
htlc.theirPkScript[:5], restoredHtlc.theirPkScript[:5])
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1596,7 +1637,7 @@ func TestCancelHTLC(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestCooperativeCloseDustAdherance(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
func TestCooperativeCloseDustAdherence(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Create a test channel which will be used for the duration of this
|
||||
// unittest. The channel will be funded evenly with Alice having 5 BTC,
|
||||
// and Bob having 5 BTC.
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user