8d2e6deade
Add tests that inputs with required TXOuts gets aggregated and swept, while keeping locktimes satisfied.
2082 lines
51 KiB
Go
2082 lines
51 KiB
Go
package sweep
|
||
|
||
import (
|
||
"os"
|
||
"reflect"
|
||
"runtime/debug"
|
||
"runtime/pprof"
|
||
"testing"
|
||
"time"
|
||
|
||
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec"
|
||
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash"
|
||
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/wire"
|
||
"github.com/btcsuite/btcutil"
|
||
"github.com/davecgh/go-spew/spew"
|
||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/build"
|
||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/input"
|
||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/keychain"
|
||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntest/mock"
|
||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwallet"
|
||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwallet/chainfee"
|
||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
var (
|
||
testLog = build.NewSubLogger("SWPR_TEST", nil)
|
||
|
||
testMaxSweepAttempts = 3
|
||
|
||
testMaxInputsPerTx = 3
|
||
|
||
defaultFeePref = Params{Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 1}}
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
type sweeperTestContext struct {
|
||
t *testing.T
|
||
|
||
sweeper *UtxoSweeper
|
||
notifier *MockNotifier
|
||
estimator *mockFeeEstimator
|
||
backend *mockBackend
|
||
store *MockSweeperStore
|
||
|
||
timeoutChan chan chan time.Time
|
||
publishChan chan wire.MsgTx
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
var (
|
||
spendableInputs []*input.BaseInput
|
||
testInputCount int
|
||
|
||
testPubKey, _ = btcec.ParsePubKey([]byte{
|
||
0x04, 0x11, 0xdb, 0x93, 0xe1, 0xdc, 0xdb, 0x8a,
|
||
0x01, 0x6b, 0x49, 0x84, 0x0f, 0x8c, 0x53, 0xbc, 0x1e,
|
||
0xb6, 0x8a, 0x38, 0x2e, 0x97, 0xb1, 0x48, 0x2e, 0xca,
|
||
0xd7, 0xb1, 0x48, 0xa6, 0x90, 0x9a, 0x5c, 0xb2, 0xe0,
|
||
0xea, 0xdd, 0xfb, 0x84, 0xcc, 0xf9, 0x74, 0x44, 0x64,
|
||
0xf8, 0x2e, 0x16, 0x0b, 0xfa, 0x9b, 0x8b, 0x64, 0xf9,
|
||
0xd4, 0xc0, 0x3f, 0x99, 0x9b, 0x86, 0x43, 0xf6, 0x56,
|
||
0xb4, 0x12, 0xa3,
|
||
}, btcec.S256())
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
func createTestInput(value int64, witnessType input.WitnessType) input.BaseInput {
|
||
hash := chainhash.Hash{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
|
||
0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
|
||
byte(testInputCount + 1)}
|
||
|
||
input := input.MakeBaseInput(
|
||
&wire.OutPoint{
|
||
Hash: hash,
|
||
},
|
||
witnessType,
|
||
&input.SignDescriptor{
|
||
Output: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
Value: value,
|
||
},
|
||
KeyDesc: keychain.KeyDescriptor{
|
||
PubKey: testPubKey,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
0,
|
||
nil,
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
testInputCount++
|
||
|
||
return input
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func init() {
|
||
// Create a set of test spendable inputs.
|
||
for i := 0; i < 20; i++ {
|
||
input := createTestInput(int64(10000+i*500),
|
||
input.CommitmentTimeLock)
|
||
|
||
spendableInputs = append(spendableInputs, &input)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func createSweeperTestContext(t *testing.T) *sweeperTestContext {
|
||
notifier := NewMockNotifier(t)
|
||
|
||
store := NewMockSweeperStore()
|
||
|
||
backend := newMockBackend(t, notifier)
|
||
backend.walletUtxos = []*lnwallet.Utxo{
|
||
{
|
||
Value: btcutil.Amount(1_000_000),
|
||
AddressType: lnwallet.WitnessPubKey,
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
estimator := newMockFeeEstimator(10000, chainfee.FeePerKwFloor)
|
||
|
||
ctx := &sweeperTestContext{
|
||
notifier: notifier,
|
||
publishChan: backend.publishChan,
|
||
t: t,
|
||
estimator: estimator,
|
||
backend: backend,
|
||
store: store,
|
||
timeoutChan: make(chan chan time.Time, 1),
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
var outputScriptCount byte
|
||
ctx.sweeper = New(&UtxoSweeperConfig{
|
||
Notifier: notifier,
|
||
Wallet: backend,
|
||
NewBatchTimer: func() <-chan time.Time {
|
||
c := make(chan time.Time, 1)
|
||
ctx.timeoutChan <- c
|
||
return c
|
||
},
|
||
Store: store,
|
||
Signer: &mock.DummySigner{},
|
||
GenSweepScript: func() ([]byte, error) {
|
||
script := []byte{outputScriptCount}
|
||
outputScriptCount++
|
||
return script, nil
|
||
},
|
||
FeeEstimator: estimator,
|
||
MaxInputsPerTx: testMaxInputsPerTx,
|
||
MaxSweepAttempts: testMaxSweepAttempts,
|
||
NextAttemptDeltaFunc: func(attempts int) int32 {
|
||
// Use delta func without random factor.
|
||
return 1 << uint(attempts-1)
|
||
},
|
||
MaxFeeRate: DefaultMaxFeeRate,
|
||
FeeRateBucketSize: DefaultFeeRateBucketSize,
|
||
})
|
||
|
||
ctx.sweeper.Start()
|
||
|
||
return ctx
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func (ctx *sweeperTestContext) restartSweeper() {
|
||
ctx.t.Helper()
|
||
|
||
ctx.sweeper.Stop()
|
||
ctx.sweeper = New(ctx.sweeper.cfg)
|
||
ctx.sweeper.Start()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func (ctx *sweeperTestContext) tick() {
|
||
testLog.Trace("Waiting for tick to be consumed")
|
||
select {
|
||
case c := <-ctx.timeoutChan:
|
||
select {
|
||
case c <- time.Time{}:
|
||
testLog.Trace("Tick")
|
||
case <-time.After(defaultTestTimeout):
|
||
debug.PrintStack()
|
||
ctx.t.Fatal("tick timeout - tick not consumed")
|
||
}
|
||
case <-time.After(defaultTestTimeout):
|
||
debug.PrintStack()
|
||
ctx.t.Fatal("tick timeout - no new timer created")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// assertNoTick asserts that the sweeper does not wait for a tick.
|
||
func (ctx *sweeperTestContext) assertNoTick() {
|
||
ctx.t.Helper()
|
||
|
||
select {
|
||
case <-ctx.timeoutChan:
|
||
ctx.t.Fatal("unexpected tick")
|
||
|
||
case <-time.After(processingDelay):
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func (ctx *sweeperTestContext) assertNoNewTimer() {
|
||
select {
|
||
case <-ctx.timeoutChan:
|
||
ctx.t.Fatal("no new timer expected")
|
||
default:
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func (ctx *sweeperTestContext) finish(expectedGoroutineCount int) {
|
||
// We assume that when finish is called, sweeper has finished all its
|
||
// goroutines. This implies that the waitgroup is empty.
|
||
signalChan := make(chan struct{})
|
||
go func() {
|
||
ctx.sweeper.wg.Wait()
|
||
close(signalChan)
|
||
}()
|
||
|
||
// Simulate exits of the expected number of running goroutines.
|
||
for i := 0; i < expectedGoroutineCount; i++ {
|
||
ctx.sweeper.wg.Done()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// We now expect the Wait to succeed.
|
||
select {
|
||
case <-signalChan:
|
||
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
||
pprof.Lookup("goroutine").WriteTo(os.Stdout, 1)
|
||
|
||
ctx.t.Fatalf("lingering goroutines detected after test " +
|
||
"is finished")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Restore waitgroup state to what it was before.
|
||
ctx.sweeper.wg.Add(expectedGoroutineCount)
|
||
|
||
// Stop sweeper.
|
||
ctx.sweeper.Stop()
|
||
|
||
// We should have consumed and asserted all published transactions in
|
||
// our unit tests.
|
||
ctx.assertNoTx()
|
||
ctx.assertNoNewTimer()
|
||
if !ctx.backend.isDone() {
|
||
ctx.t.Fatal("unconfirmed txes remaining")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func (ctx *sweeperTestContext) assertNoTx() {
|
||
ctx.t.Helper()
|
||
select {
|
||
case <-ctx.publishChan:
|
||
ctx.t.Fatalf("unexpected transactions published")
|
||
default:
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func (ctx *sweeperTestContext) receiveTx() wire.MsgTx {
|
||
ctx.t.Helper()
|
||
var tx wire.MsgTx
|
||
select {
|
||
case tx = <-ctx.publishChan:
|
||
return tx
|
||
case <-time.After(5 * time.Second):
|
||
pprof.Lookup("goroutine").WriteTo(os.Stdout, 1)
|
||
|
||
ctx.t.Fatalf("tx not published")
|
||
}
|
||
return tx
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func (ctx *sweeperTestContext) expectResult(c chan Result, expected error) {
|
||
ctx.t.Helper()
|
||
select {
|
||
case result := <-c:
|
||
if result.Err != expected {
|
||
ctx.t.Fatalf("expected %v result, but got %v",
|
||
expected, result.Err,
|
||
)
|
||
}
|
||
case <-time.After(defaultTestTimeout):
|
||
ctx.t.Fatalf("no result received")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func (ctx *sweeperTestContext) assertPendingInputs(inputs ...input.Input) {
|
||
ctx.t.Helper()
|
||
|
||
inputSet := make(map[wire.OutPoint]struct{}, len(inputs))
|
||
for _, input := range inputs {
|
||
inputSet[*input.OutPoint()] = struct{}{}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
pendingInputs, err := ctx.sweeper.PendingInputs()
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
ctx.t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
if len(pendingInputs) != len(inputSet) {
|
||
ctx.t.Fatalf("expected %d pending inputs, got %d",
|
||
len(inputSet), len(pendingInputs))
|
||
}
|
||
for input := range pendingInputs {
|
||
if _, ok := inputSet[input]; !ok {
|
||
ctx.t.Fatalf("found unexpected input %v", input)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// assertTxSweepsInputs ensures that the transaction returned within the value
|
||
// received from resultChan spends the given inputs.
|
||
func assertTxSweepsInputs(t *testing.T, sweepTx *wire.MsgTx,
|
||
inputs ...input.Input) {
|
||
|
||
t.Helper()
|
||
|
||
if len(sweepTx.TxIn) != len(inputs) {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected sweep tx to contain %d inputs, got %d",
|
||
len(inputs), len(sweepTx.TxIn))
|
||
}
|
||
m := make(map[wire.OutPoint]struct{}, len(inputs))
|
||
for _, input := range inputs {
|
||
m[*input.OutPoint()] = struct{}{}
|
||
}
|
||
for _, txIn := range sweepTx.TxIn {
|
||
if _, ok := m[txIn.PreviousOutPoint]; !ok {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected tx %v to spend input %v",
|
||
txIn.PreviousOutPoint, sweepTx.TxHash())
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// assertTxFeeRate asserts that the transaction was created with the given
|
||
// inputs and fee rate.
|
||
//
|
||
// NOTE: This assumes that transactions only have one output, as this is the
|
||
// only type of transaction the UtxoSweeper can create at the moment.
|
||
func assertTxFeeRate(t *testing.T, tx *wire.MsgTx,
|
||
expectedFeeRate chainfee.SatPerKWeight, inputs ...input.Input) {
|
||
|
||
t.Helper()
|
||
|
||
if len(tx.TxIn) != len(inputs) {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected %d inputs, got %d", len(tx.TxIn), len(inputs))
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
m := make(map[wire.OutPoint]input.Input, len(inputs))
|
||
for _, input := range inputs {
|
||
m[*input.OutPoint()] = input
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
var inputAmt int64
|
||
for _, txIn := range tx.TxIn {
|
||
input, ok := m[txIn.PreviousOutPoint]
|
||
if !ok {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected input %v to be provided",
|
||
txIn.PreviousOutPoint)
|
||
}
|
||
inputAmt += input.SignDesc().Output.Value
|
||
}
|
||
outputAmt := tx.TxOut[0].Value
|
||
|
||
fee := btcutil.Amount(inputAmt - outputAmt)
|
||
_, estimator := getWeightEstimate(inputs, 0)
|
||
txWeight := estimator.weight()
|
||
|
||
expectedFee := expectedFeeRate.FeeForWeight(int64(txWeight))
|
||
if fee != expectedFee {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected fee rate %v results in %v fee, got %v fee",
|
||
expectedFeeRate, expectedFee, fee)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestSuccess tests the sweeper happy flow.
|
||
func TestSuccess(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Sweeping an input without a fee preference should result in an error.
|
||
_, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(spendableInputs[0], Params{})
|
||
if err != ErrNoFeePreference {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected ErrNoFeePreference, got %v", err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
resultChan, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
spendableInputs[0], defaultFeePref,
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
sweepTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
select {
|
||
case result := <-resultChan:
|
||
if result.Err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected successful spend, but received "+
|
||
"error %v instead", result.Err)
|
||
}
|
||
if result.Tx.TxHash() != sweepTx.TxHash() {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected sweep tx ")
|
||
}
|
||
case <-time.After(5 * time.Second):
|
||
t.Fatalf("no result received")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
|
||
// Assert that last tx is stored in the database so we can republish
|
||
// on restart.
|
||
lastTx, err := ctx.store.GetLastPublishedTx()
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
if lastTx == nil || sweepTx.TxHash() != lastTx.TxHash() {
|
||
t.Fatalf("last tx not stored")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestDust asserts that inputs that are not big enough to raise above the dust
|
||
// limit, are held back until the total set does surpass the limit.
|
||
func TestDust(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Sweeping a single output produces a tx of 486 weight units. With the
|
||
// test fee rate, the sweep tx will pay 4860 sat in fees.
|
||
//
|
||
// Create an input so that the output after paying fees is still
|
||
// positive (400 sat), but less than the dust limit (537 sat) for the
|
||
// sweep tx output script (P2WPKH).
|
||
dustInput := createTestInput(5260, input.CommitmentTimeLock)
|
||
|
||
_, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(&dustInput, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// No sweep transaction is expected now. The sweeper should recognize
|
||
// that the sweep output will not be relayed and not generate the tx. It
|
||
// isn't possible to attach a wallet utxo either, because the added
|
||
// weight would create a negatively yielding transaction at this fee
|
||
// rate.
|
||
|
||
// Sweep another input that brings the tx output above the dust limit.
|
||
largeInput := createTestInput(100000, input.CommitmentTimeLock)
|
||
|
||
_, err = ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(&largeInput, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
// The second input brings the sweep output above the dust limit. We
|
||
// expect a sweep tx now.
|
||
|
||
sweepTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
if len(sweepTx.TxIn) != 2 {
|
||
t.Fatalf("Expected tx to sweep 2 inputs, but contains %v "+
|
||
"inputs instead", len(sweepTx.TxIn))
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestWalletUtxo asserts that inputs that are not big enough to raise above the
|
||
// dust limit are accompanied by a wallet utxo to make them sweepable.
|
||
func TestWalletUtxo(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Sweeping a single output produces a tx of 439 weight units. At the
|
||
// fee floor, the sweep tx will pay 439*253/1000 = 111 sat in fees.
|
||
//
|
||
// Create an input so that the output after paying fees is still
|
||
// positive (183 sat), but less than the dust limit (537 sat) for the
|
||
// sweep tx output script (P2WPKH).
|
||
//
|
||
// What we now expect is that the sweeper will attach a utxo from the
|
||
// wallet. This increases the tx weight to 712 units with a fee of 180
|
||
// sats. The tx yield becomes then 294-180 = 114 sats.
|
||
dustInput := createTestInput(294, input.WitnessKeyHash)
|
||
|
||
_, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
&dustInput,
|
||
Params{Fee: FeePreference{FeeRate: chainfee.FeePerKwFloor}},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
sweepTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
if len(sweepTx.TxIn) != 2 {
|
||
t.Fatalf("Expected tx to sweep 2 inputs, but contains %v "+
|
||
"inputs instead", len(sweepTx.TxIn))
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Calculate expected output value based on wallet utxo of 1_000_000
|
||
// sats.
|
||
expectedOutputValue := int64(294 + 1_000_000 - 180)
|
||
if sweepTx.TxOut[0].Value != expectedOutputValue {
|
||
t.Fatalf("Expected output value of %v, but got %v",
|
||
expectedOutputValue, sweepTx.TxOut[0].Value)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestNegativeInput asserts that no inputs with a negative yield are swept.
|
||
// Negative yield means that the value minus the added fee is negative.
|
||
func TestNegativeInput(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Sweep an input large enough to cover fees, so in any case the tx
|
||
// output will be above the dust limit.
|
||
largeInput := createTestInput(100000, input.CommitmentNoDelay)
|
||
largeInputResult, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
&largeInput, defaultFeePref,
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Sweep an additional input with a negative net yield. The weight of
|
||
// the HtlcAcceptedRemoteSuccess input type adds more in fees than its
|
||
// value at the current fee level.
|
||
negInput := createTestInput(2900, input.HtlcOfferedRemoteTimeout)
|
||
negInputResult, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(&negInput, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Sweep a third input that has a smaller output than the previous one,
|
||
// but yields positively because of its lower weight.
|
||
positiveInput := createTestInput(2800, input.CommitmentNoDelay)
|
||
positiveInputResult, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
&positiveInput, defaultFeePref,
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
// We expect that a sweep tx is published now, but it should only
|
||
// contain the large input. The negative input should stay out of sweeps
|
||
// until fees come down to get a positive net yield.
|
||
sweepTx1 := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
assertTxSweepsInputs(t, &sweepTx1, &largeInput, &positiveInput)
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
ctx.expectResult(largeInputResult, nil)
|
||
ctx.expectResult(positiveInputResult, nil)
|
||
|
||
// Lower fee rate so that the negative input is no longer negative.
|
||
ctx.estimator.updateFees(1000, 1000)
|
||
|
||
// Create another large input.
|
||
secondLargeInput := createTestInput(100000, input.CommitmentNoDelay)
|
||
secondLargeInputResult, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
&secondLargeInput, defaultFeePref,
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
sweepTx2 := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
assertTxSweepsInputs(t, &sweepTx2, &secondLargeInput, &negInput)
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
ctx.expectResult(secondLargeInputResult, nil)
|
||
ctx.expectResult(negInputResult, nil)
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestChunks asserts that large sets of inputs are split into multiple txes.
|
||
func TestChunks(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Sweep five inputs.
|
||
for _, input := range spendableInputs[:5] {
|
||
_, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
// We expect two txes to be published because of the max input count of
|
||
// three.
|
||
sweepTx1 := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
if len(sweepTx1.TxIn) != 3 {
|
||
t.Fatalf("Expected first tx to sweep 3 inputs, but contains %v "+
|
||
"inputs instead", len(sweepTx1.TxIn))
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
sweepTx2 := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
if len(sweepTx2.TxIn) != 2 {
|
||
t.Fatalf("Expected first tx to sweep 2 inputs, but contains %v "+
|
||
"inputs instead", len(sweepTx1.TxIn))
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestRemoteSpend asserts that remote spends are properly detected and handled
|
||
// both before the sweep is published as well as after.
|
||
func TestRemoteSpend(t *testing.T) {
|
||
t.Run("pre-sweep", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||
testRemoteSpend(t, false)
|
||
})
|
||
t.Run("post-sweep", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||
testRemoteSpend(t, true)
|
||
})
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func testRemoteSpend(t *testing.T, postSweep bool) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
resultChan1, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
spendableInputs[0], defaultFeePref,
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
resultChan2, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
spendableInputs[1], defaultFeePref,
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Spend the input with an unknown tx.
|
||
remoteTx := &wire.MsgTx{
|
||
TxIn: []*wire.TxIn{
|
||
{
|
||
PreviousOutPoint: *(spendableInputs[0].OutPoint()),
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
err = ctx.backend.publishTransaction(remoteTx)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if postSweep {
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
// Tx publication by sweeper returns ErrDoubleSpend. Sweeper
|
||
// will retry the inputs without reporting a result. It could be
|
||
// spent by the remote party.
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
select {
|
||
case result := <-resultChan1:
|
||
if result.Err != ErrRemoteSpend {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected remote spend")
|
||
}
|
||
if result.Tx.TxHash() != remoteTx.TxHash() {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected remote spend tx")
|
||
}
|
||
case <-time.After(5 * time.Second):
|
||
t.Fatalf("no result received")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if !postSweep {
|
||
// Assert that the sweeper sweeps the remaining input.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
sweepTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
if len(sweepTx.TxIn) != 1 {
|
||
t.Fatal("expected sweep to only sweep the one remaining output")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan2, nil)
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
} else {
|
||
// Expected sweeper to be still listening for spend of the
|
||
// error input.
|
||
ctx.finish(2)
|
||
|
||
select {
|
||
case <-resultChan2:
|
||
t.Fatalf("no result expected for error input")
|
||
default:
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestIdempotency asserts that offering the same input multiple times is
|
||
// handled correctly.
|
||
func TestIdempotency(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
input := spendableInputs[0]
|
||
resultChan1, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
resultChan2, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
resultChan3, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Spend the input of the sweep tx.
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan1, nil)
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan2, nil)
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan3, nil)
|
||
|
||
// Offer the same input again. The sweeper will register a spend ntfn
|
||
// for this input. Because the input has already been spent, it will
|
||
// immediately receive the spend notification with a spending tx hash.
|
||
// Because the sweeper kept track of all of its sweep txes, it will
|
||
// recognize the spend as its own.
|
||
resultChan4, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan4, nil)
|
||
|
||
// Timer is still running, but spend notification was delivered before
|
||
// it expired.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestNoInputs asserts that nothing happens if nothing happens.
|
||
func TestNoInputs(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// No tx should appear. This is asserted in finish().
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestRestart asserts that the sweeper picks up sweeping properly after
|
||
// a restart.
|
||
func TestRestart(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Sweep input and expect sweep tx.
|
||
input1 := spendableInputs[0]
|
||
if _, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input1, defaultFeePref); err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
// Restart sweeper.
|
||
ctx.restartSweeper()
|
||
|
||
// Expect last tx to be republished.
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
// Simulate other subsystem (e.g. contract resolver) re-offering inputs.
|
||
spendChan1, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input1, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
input2 := spendableInputs[1]
|
||
spendChan2, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input2, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Spend inputs of sweep txes and verify that spend channels signal
|
||
// spends.
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
// Sweeper should recognize that its sweep tx of the previous run is
|
||
// spending the input.
|
||
select {
|
||
case result := <-spendChan1:
|
||
if result.Err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected successful sweep")
|
||
}
|
||
case <-time.After(defaultTestTimeout):
|
||
t.Fatalf("no result received")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Timer tick should trigger republishing a sweep for the remaining
|
||
// input.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
select {
|
||
case result := <-spendChan2:
|
||
if result.Err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected successful sweep")
|
||
}
|
||
case <-time.After(defaultTestTimeout):
|
||
t.Fatalf("no result received")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Restart sweeper again. No action is expected.
|
||
ctx.restartSweeper()
|
||
|
||
// Expect last tx to be republished.
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestRestartRemoteSpend asserts that the sweeper picks up sweeping properly after
|
||
// a restart with remote spend.
|
||
func TestRestartRemoteSpend(t *testing.T) {
|
||
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Sweep input.
|
||
input1 := spendableInputs[0]
|
||
if _, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input1, defaultFeePref); err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Sweep another input.
|
||
input2 := spendableInputs[1]
|
||
if _, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input2, defaultFeePref); err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
sweepTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
// Restart sweeper.
|
||
ctx.restartSweeper()
|
||
|
||
// Expect last tx to be republished.
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
// Replace the sweep tx with a remote tx spending input 1.
|
||
ctx.backend.deleteUnconfirmed(sweepTx.TxHash())
|
||
|
||
remoteTx := &wire.MsgTx{
|
||
TxIn: []*wire.TxIn{
|
||
{
|
||
PreviousOutPoint: *(input2.OutPoint()),
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
if err := ctx.backend.publishTransaction(remoteTx); err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Mine remote spending tx.
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
// Simulate other subsystem (e.g. contract resolver) re-offering input 0.
|
||
spendChan, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input1, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Expect sweeper to construct a new tx, because input 1 was spend
|
||
// remotely.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
ctx.expectResult(spendChan, nil)
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestRestartConfirmed asserts that the sweeper picks up sweeping properly after
|
||
// a restart with a confirm of our own sweep tx.
|
||
func TestRestartConfirmed(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Sweep input.
|
||
input := spendableInputs[0]
|
||
if _, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input, defaultFeePref); err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
// Restart sweeper.
|
||
ctx.restartSweeper()
|
||
|
||
// Expect last tx to be republished.
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
// Mine the sweep tx.
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
// Simulate other subsystem (e.g. contract resolver) re-offering input 0.
|
||
spendChan, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(input, defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Here we expect again a successful sweep.
|
||
ctx.expectResult(spendChan, nil)
|
||
|
||
// Timer started but not needed because spend ntfn was sent.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestRestartRepublish asserts that sweeper republishes the last published
|
||
// tx on restart.
|
||
func TestRestartRepublish(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
_, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(spendableInputs[0], defaultFeePref)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
sweepTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
// Restart sweeper again. No action is expected.
|
||
ctx.restartSweeper()
|
||
|
||
republishedTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
if sweepTx.TxHash() != republishedTx.TxHash() {
|
||
t.Fatalf("last tx not republished")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Mine the tx to conclude the test properly.
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestRetry tests the sweeper retry flow.
|
||
func TestRetry(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
resultChan0, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
spendableInputs[0], defaultFeePref,
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
// We expect a sweep to be published.
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
// New block arrives. This should trigger a new sweep attempt timer
|
||
// start.
|
||
ctx.notifier.NotifyEpoch(1000)
|
||
|
||
// Offer a fresh input.
|
||
resultChan1, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
spendableInputs[1], defaultFeePref,
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
// Two txes are expected to be published, because new and retry inputs
|
||
// are separated.
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan0, nil)
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan1, nil)
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestGiveUp asserts that the sweeper gives up on an input if it can't be swept
|
||
// after a configured number of attempts.a
|
||
func TestGiveUp(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
resultChan0, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
spendableInputs[0], defaultFeePref,
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
// We expect a sweep to be published at height 100 (mockChainIOHeight).
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
// Because of MaxSweepAttemps, two more sweeps will be attempted. We
|
||
// configured exponential back-off without randomness for the test. The
|
||
// second attempt, we expect to happen at 101. The third attempt at 103.
|
||
// At that point, the input is expected to be failed.
|
||
|
||
// Second attempt
|
||
ctx.notifier.NotifyEpoch(101)
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
// Third attempt
|
||
ctx.notifier.NotifyEpoch(103)
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan0, ErrTooManyAttempts)
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestDifferentFeePreferences ensures that the sweeper can have different
|
||
// transactions for different fee preferences. These transactions should be
|
||
// broadcast from highest to lowest fee rate.
|
||
func TestDifferentFeePreferences(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Throughout this test, we'll be attempting to sweep three inputs, two
|
||
// with the higher fee preference, and the last with the lower. We do
|
||
// this to ensure the sweeper can broadcast distinct transactions for
|
||
// each sweep with a different fee preference.
|
||
lowFeePref := FeePreference{ConfTarget: 12}
|
||
lowFeeRate := chainfee.SatPerKWeight(5000)
|
||
ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[lowFeePref.ConfTarget] = lowFeeRate
|
||
|
||
highFeePref := FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6}
|
||
highFeeRate := chainfee.SatPerKWeight(10000)
|
||
ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[highFeePref.ConfTarget] = highFeeRate
|
||
|
||
input1 := spendableInputs[0]
|
||
resultChan1, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
input1, Params{Fee: highFeePref},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
input2 := spendableInputs[1]
|
||
resultChan2, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
input2, Params{Fee: highFeePref},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
input3 := spendableInputs[2]
|
||
resultChan3, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
input3, Params{Fee: lowFeePref},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Start the sweeper's batch ticker, which should cause the sweep
|
||
// transactions to be broadcast in order of high to low fee preference.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
// The first transaction broadcast should be the one spending the higher
|
||
// fee rate inputs.
|
||
sweepTx1 := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
assertTxFeeRate(t, &sweepTx1, highFeeRate, input1, input2)
|
||
|
||
// The second should be the one spending the lower fee rate inputs.
|
||
sweepTx2 := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
assertTxFeeRate(t, &sweepTx2, lowFeeRate, input3)
|
||
|
||
// With the transactions broadcast, we'll mine a block to so that the
|
||
// result is delivered to each respective client.
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
resultChans := []chan Result{resultChan1, resultChan2, resultChan3}
|
||
for _, resultChan := range resultChans {
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan, nil)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestPendingInputs ensures that the sweeper correctly determines the inputs
|
||
// pending to be swept.
|
||
func TestPendingInputs(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Throughout this test, we'll be attempting to sweep three inputs, two
|
||
// with the higher fee preference, and the last with the lower. We do
|
||
// this to ensure the sweeper can return all pending inputs, even those
|
||
// with different fee preferences.
|
||
const (
|
||
lowFeeRate = 5000
|
||
highFeeRate = 10000
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
lowFeePref := FeePreference{
|
||
ConfTarget: 12,
|
||
}
|
||
ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[lowFeePref.ConfTarget] = lowFeeRate
|
||
|
||
highFeePref := FeePreference{
|
||
ConfTarget: 6,
|
||
}
|
||
ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[highFeePref.ConfTarget] = highFeeRate
|
||
|
||
input1 := spendableInputs[0]
|
||
resultChan1, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
input1, Params{Fee: highFeePref},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
input2 := spendableInputs[1]
|
||
_, err = ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
input2, Params{Fee: highFeePref},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
input3 := spendableInputs[2]
|
||
resultChan3, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
input3, Params{Fee: lowFeePref},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// We should expect to see all inputs pending.
|
||
ctx.assertPendingInputs(input1, input2, input3)
|
||
|
||
// We should expect to see both sweep transactions broadcast. The higher
|
||
// fee rate sweep should be broadcast first. We'll remove the lower fee
|
||
// rate sweep to ensure we can detect pending inputs after a sweep.
|
||
// Once the higher fee rate sweep confirms, we should no longer see
|
||
// those inputs pending.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
lowFeeRateTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
ctx.backend.deleteUnconfirmed(lowFeeRateTx.TxHash())
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan1, nil)
|
||
ctx.assertPendingInputs(input3)
|
||
|
||
// We'll then trigger a new block to rebroadcast the lower fee rate
|
||
// sweep. Once again we'll ensure those inputs are no longer pending
|
||
// once the sweep transaction confirms.
|
||
ctx.backend.notifier.NotifyEpoch(101)
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
ctx.expectResult(resultChan3, nil)
|
||
ctx.assertPendingInputs()
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestBumpFeeRBF ensures that the UtxoSweeper can properly handle a fee bump
|
||
// request for an input it is currently attempting to sweep. When sweeping the
|
||
// input with the higher fee rate, a replacement transaction is created.
|
||
func TestBumpFeeRBF(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
lowFeePref := FeePreference{ConfTarget: 144}
|
||
lowFeeRate := chainfee.FeePerKwFloor
|
||
ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[lowFeePref.ConfTarget] = lowFeeRate
|
||
|
||
// We'll first try to bump the fee of an output currently unknown to the
|
||
// UtxoSweeper. Doing so should result in a lnwallet.ErrNotMine error.
|
||
_, err := ctx.sweeper.UpdateParams(
|
||
wire.OutPoint{}, ParamsUpdate{Fee: lowFeePref},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != lnwallet.ErrNotMine {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected error lnwallet.ErrNotMine, got \"%v\"", err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// We'll then attempt to sweep an input, which we'll use to bump its fee
|
||
// later on.
|
||
input := createTestInput(
|
||
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin, input.CommitmentTimeLock,
|
||
)
|
||
sweepResult, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
&input, Params{Fee: lowFeePref},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Ensure that a transaction is broadcast with the lower fee preference.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
lowFeeTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
assertTxFeeRate(t, &lowFeeTx, lowFeeRate, &input)
|
||
|
||
// We'll then attempt to bump its fee rate.
|
||
highFeePref := FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6}
|
||
highFeeRate := DefaultMaxFeeRate
|
||
ctx.estimator.blocksToFee[highFeePref.ConfTarget] = highFeeRate
|
||
|
||
// We should expect to see an error if a fee preference isn't provided.
|
||
_, err = ctx.sweeper.UpdateParams(*input.OutPoint(), ParamsUpdate{})
|
||
if err != ErrNoFeePreference {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected ErrNoFeePreference, got %v", err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
bumpResult, err := ctx.sweeper.UpdateParams(
|
||
*input.OutPoint(), ParamsUpdate{Fee: highFeePref},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("unable to bump input's fee: %v", err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// A higher fee rate transaction should be immediately broadcast.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
highFeeTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
assertTxFeeRate(t, &highFeeTx, highFeeRate, &input)
|
||
|
||
// We'll finish our test by mining the sweep transaction.
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
ctx.expectResult(sweepResult, nil)
|
||
ctx.expectResult(bumpResult, nil)
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestExclusiveGroup tests the sweeper exclusive group functionality.
|
||
func TestExclusiveGroup(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// Sweep three inputs in the same exclusive group.
|
||
var results []chan Result
|
||
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
|
||
exclusiveGroup := uint64(1)
|
||
result, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
spendableInputs[i], Params{
|
||
Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6},
|
||
ExclusiveGroup: &exclusiveGroup,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
results = append(results, result)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// We expect all inputs to be published in separate transactions, even
|
||
// though they share the same fee preference.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
|
||
sweepTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
if len(sweepTx.TxOut) != 1 {
|
||
t.Fatal("expected a single tx out in the sweep tx")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Remove all txes except for the one that sweeps the first
|
||
// input. This simulates the sweeps being conflicting.
|
||
if sweepTx.TxIn[0].PreviousOutPoint !=
|
||
*spendableInputs[0].OutPoint() {
|
||
|
||
ctx.backend.deleteUnconfirmed(sweepTx.TxHash())
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Mine the first sweep tx.
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
// Expect the first input to be swept by the confirmed sweep tx.
|
||
result0 := <-results[0]
|
||
if result0.Err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal("expected first input to be swept")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Expect the other two inputs to return an error. They have no chance
|
||
// of confirming.
|
||
result1 := <-results[1]
|
||
if result1.Err != ErrExclusiveGroupSpend {
|
||
t.Fatal("expected second input to be canceled")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
result2 := <-results[2]
|
||
if result2.Err != ErrExclusiveGroupSpend {
|
||
t.Fatal("expected third input to be canceled")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestCpfp tests that the sweeper spends cpfp inputs at a fee rate that exceeds
|
||
// the parent tx fee rate.
|
||
func TestCpfp(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
ctx.estimator.updateFees(1000, chainfee.FeePerKwFloor)
|
||
|
||
// Offer an input with an unconfirmed parent tx to the sweeper. The
|
||
// parent tx pays 3000 sat/kw.
|
||
hash := chainhash.Hash{1}
|
||
input := input.MakeBaseInput(
|
||
&wire.OutPoint{Hash: hash},
|
||
input.CommitmentTimeLock,
|
||
&input.SignDescriptor{
|
||
Output: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
Value: 330,
|
||
},
|
||
KeyDesc: keychain.KeyDescriptor{
|
||
PubKey: testPubKey,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
0,
|
||
&input.TxInfo{
|
||
Weight: 300,
|
||
Fee: 900,
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
feePref := FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6}
|
||
result, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
&input, Params{Fee: feePref, Force: true},
|
||
)
|
||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||
|
||
// Because we sweep at 1000 sat/kw, the parent cannot be paid for. We
|
||
// expect the sweeper to remain idle.
|
||
ctx.assertNoTick()
|
||
|
||
// Increase the fee estimate to above the parent tx fee rate.
|
||
ctx.estimator.updateFees(5000, chainfee.FeePerKwFloor)
|
||
|
||
// Signal a new block. This is a trigger for the sweeper to refresh fee
|
||
// estimates.
|
||
ctx.notifier.NotifyEpoch(1000)
|
||
|
||
// Now we do expect a sweep transaction to be published with our input
|
||
// and an attached wallet utxo.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
tx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
require.Len(t, tx.TxIn, 2)
|
||
require.Len(t, tx.TxOut, 1)
|
||
|
||
// As inputs we have 10000 sats from the wallet and 330 sats from the
|
||
// cpfp input. The sweep tx is weight expected to be 759 units. There is
|
||
// an additional 300 weight units from the parent to include in the
|
||
// package, making a total of 1059. At 5000 sat/kw, the required fee for
|
||
// the package is 5295 sats. The parent already paid 900 sats, so there
|
||
// is 4395 sat remaining to be paid. The expected output value is
|
||
// therefore: 1_000_000 + 330 - 4395 = 995 935.
|
||
require.Equal(t, int64(995_935), tx.TxOut[0].Value)
|
||
|
||
// Mine the tx and assert that the result is passed back.
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
ctx.expectResult(result, nil)
|
||
|
||
ctx.finish(1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
var (
|
||
testInputsA = pendingInputs{
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 0}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 1}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 2}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
testInputsB = pendingInputs{
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 10}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 11}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 12}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
testInputsC = pendingInputs{
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 0}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 1}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 2}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 10}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 11}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
wire.OutPoint{Hash: chainhash.Hash{}, Index: 12}: &pendingInput{},
|
||
}
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
// TestMergeClusters check that we properly can merge clusters together,
|
||
// according to their required locktime.
|
||
func TestMergeClusters(t *testing.T) {
|
||
t.Parallel()
|
||
|
||
lockTime1 := uint32(100)
|
||
lockTime2 := uint32(200)
|
||
|
||
testCases := []struct {
|
||
name string
|
||
a inputCluster
|
||
b inputCluster
|
||
res []inputCluster
|
||
}{
|
||
{
|
||
name: "max fee rate",
|
||
a: inputCluster{
|
||
sweepFeeRate: 5000,
|
||
inputs: testInputsA,
|
||
},
|
||
b: inputCluster{
|
||
sweepFeeRate: 7000,
|
||
inputs: testInputsB,
|
||
},
|
||
res: []inputCluster{
|
||
{
|
||
sweepFeeRate: 7000,
|
||
inputs: testInputsC,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
name: "same locktime",
|
||
a: inputCluster{
|
||
lockTime: &lockTime1,
|
||
sweepFeeRate: 5000,
|
||
inputs: testInputsA,
|
||
},
|
||
b: inputCluster{
|
||
lockTime: &lockTime1,
|
||
sweepFeeRate: 7000,
|
||
inputs: testInputsB,
|
||
},
|
||
res: []inputCluster{
|
||
{
|
||
lockTime: &lockTime1,
|
||
sweepFeeRate: 7000,
|
||
inputs: testInputsC,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
name: "diff locktime",
|
||
a: inputCluster{
|
||
lockTime: &lockTime1,
|
||
sweepFeeRate: 5000,
|
||
inputs: testInputsA,
|
||
},
|
||
b: inputCluster{
|
||
lockTime: &lockTime2,
|
||
sweepFeeRate: 7000,
|
||
inputs: testInputsB,
|
||
},
|
||
res: []inputCluster{
|
||
{
|
||
lockTime: &lockTime1,
|
||
sweepFeeRate: 5000,
|
||
inputs: testInputsA,
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
lockTime: &lockTime2,
|
||
sweepFeeRate: 7000,
|
||
inputs: testInputsB,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
for _, test := range testCases {
|
||
merged := mergeClusters(test.a, test.b)
|
||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(merged, test.res) {
|
||
t.Fatalf("[%s] unexpected result: %v",
|
||
test.name, spew.Sdump(merged))
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestZipClusters tests that we can merge lists of inputs clusters correctly.
|
||
func TestZipClusters(t *testing.T) {
|
||
t.Parallel()
|
||
|
||
createCluster := func(inp pendingInputs, f chainfee.SatPerKWeight) inputCluster {
|
||
return inputCluster{
|
||
sweepFeeRate: f,
|
||
inputs: inp,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
testCases := []struct {
|
||
name string
|
||
as []inputCluster
|
||
bs []inputCluster
|
||
res []inputCluster
|
||
}{
|
||
{
|
||
name: "merge A into B",
|
||
as: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsA, 5000),
|
||
},
|
||
bs: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 7000),
|
||
},
|
||
res: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsC, 7000),
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
name: "A can't merge with B",
|
||
as: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsA, 7000),
|
||
},
|
||
bs: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 5000),
|
||
},
|
||
res: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsA, 7000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 5000),
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
name: "empty bs",
|
||
as: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsA, 7000),
|
||
},
|
||
bs: []inputCluster{},
|
||
res: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsA, 7000),
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
name: "empty as",
|
||
as: []inputCluster{},
|
||
bs: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 5000),
|
||
},
|
||
res: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 5000),
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
|
||
{
|
||
name: "zip 3xA into 3xB",
|
||
as: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsA, 5000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsA, 5000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsA, 5000),
|
||
},
|
||
bs: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 7000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 7000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 7000),
|
||
},
|
||
res: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsC, 7000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsC, 7000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsC, 7000),
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
name: "zip A into 3xB",
|
||
as: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsA, 2500),
|
||
},
|
||
bs: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 3000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 2000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 1000),
|
||
},
|
||
res: []inputCluster{
|
||
createCluster(testInputsC, 3000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 2000),
|
||
createCluster(testInputsB, 1000),
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
for _, test := range testCases {
|
||
zipped := zipClusters(test.as, test.bs)
|
||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(zipped, test.res) {
|
||
t.Fatalf("[%s] unexpected result: %v",
|
||
test.name, spew.Sdump(zipped))
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
type testInput struct {
|
||
*input.BaseInput
|
||
|
||
locktime *uint32
|
||
reqTxOut *wire.TxOut
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func (i *testInput) RequiredLockTime() (uint32, bool) {
|
||
if i.locktime != nil {
|
||
return *i.locktime, true
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
return 0, false
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
func (i *testInput) RequiredTxOut() *wire.TxOut {
|
||
return i.reqTxOut
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestLockTimes checks that the sweeper properly groups inputs requiring the
|
||
// same locktime together into sweep transactions.
|
||
func TestLockTimes(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// We increase the number of max inputs to a tx so that won't
|
||
// impact our test.
|
||
ctx.sweeper.cfg.MaxInputsPerTx = 100
|
||
|
||
// We will set up the lock times in such a way that we expect the
|
||
// sweeper to divide the inputs into 4 diffeerent transactions.
|
||
const numSweeps = 4
|
||
|
||
// Sweep 8 inputs, using 4 different lock times.
|
||
var (
|
||
results []chan Result
|
||
inputs = make(map[wire.OutPoint]input.Input)
|
||
)
|
||
for i := 0; i < numSweeps*2; i++ {
|
||
lt := uint32(10 + (i % numSweeps))
|
||
inp := &testInput{
|
||
BaseInput: spendableInputs[i],
|
||
locktime: <,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
result, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
inp, Params{
|
||
Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6},
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
results = append(results, result)
|
||
|
||
op := inp.OutPoint()
|
||
inputs[*op] = inp
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// We also add 3 regular inputs that don't require any specific lock
|
||
// time.
|
||
for i := 0; i < 3; i++ {
|
||
inp := spendableInputs[i+numSweeps*2]
|
||
result, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
inp, Params{
|
||
Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6},
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
results = append(results, result)
|
||
|
||
op := inp.OutPoint()
|
||
inputs[*op] = inp
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// We expect all inputs to be published in separate transactions, even
|
||
// though they share the same fee preference.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
// Check the sweeps transactions, ensuring all inputs are there, and
|
||
// all the locktimes are satisfied.
|
||
for i := 0; i < numSweeps; i++ {
|
||
sweepTx := ctx.receiveTx()
|
||
if len(sweepTx.TxOut) != 1 {
|
||
t.Fatal("expected a single tx out in the sweep tx")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
for _, txIn := range sweepTx.TxIn {
|
||
op := txIn.PreviousOutPoint
|
||
inp, ok := inputs[op]
|
||
if !ok {
|
||
t.Fatalf("Unexpected outpoint: %v", op)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
delete(inputs, op)
|
||
|
||
// If this input had a required locktime, ensure the tx
|
||
// has that set correctly.
|
||
lt, ok := inp.RequiredLockTime()
|
||
if !ok {
|
||
continue
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
if lt != sweepTx.LockTime {
|
||
t.Fatalf("Input required locktime %v, sweep "+
|
||
"tx had locktime %v", lt, sweepTx.LockTime)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// The should be no inputs not foud in any of the sweeps.
|
||
if len(inputs) != 0 {
|
||
t.Fatalf("had unsweeped inputs")
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Mine the first sweeps
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
// Results should all come back.
|
||
for i := range results {
|
||
result := <-results[i]
|
||
if result.Err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal("expected input to be swept")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestRequiredTxOuts checks that inputs having a required TxOut gets swept with
|
||
// sweep transactions paying into these outputs.
|
||
func TestRequiredTxOuts(t *testing.T) {
|
||
// Create some test inputs and locktime vars.
|
||
var inputs []*input.BaseInput
|
||
for i := 0; i < 20; i++ {
|
||
input := createTestInput(
|
||
int64(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin+i*500),
|
||
input.CommitmentTimeLock,
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
inputs = append(inputs, &input)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
locktime1 := uint32(51)
|
||
locktime2 := uint32(52)
|
||
locktime3 := uint32(53)
|
||
|
||
testCases := []struct {
|
||
name string
|
||
inputs []*testInput
|
||
assertSweeps func(*testing.T, map[wire.OutPoint]*testInput,
|
||
[]*wire.MsgTx)
|
||
}{
|
||
{
|
||
// Single input with a required TX out that is smaller.
|
||
// We expect a change output to be added.
|
||
name: "single input, leftover change",
|
||
inputs: []*testInput{
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[0],
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("aaa"),
|
||
Value: 100000,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
|
||
// Since the required output value is small, we expect
|
||
// the rest after fees to go into a change output.
|
||
assertSweeps: func(t *testing.T,
|
||
_ map[wire.OutPoint]*testInput,
|
||
txs []*wire.MsgTx) {
|
||
|
||
require.Equal(t, 1, len(txs))
|
||
|
||
tx := txs[0]
|
||
require.Equal(t, 1, len(tx.TxIn))
|
||
|
||
// We should have two outputs, the required
|
||
// output must be the first one.
|
||
require.Equal(t, 2, len(tx.TxOut))
|
||
out := tx.TxOut[0]
|
||
require.Equal(t, []byte("aaa"), out.PkScript)
|
||
require.Equal(t, int64(100000), out.Value)
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
// An input committing to a slightly smaller output, so
|
||
// it will pay its own fees.
|
||
name: "single input, no change",
|
||
inputs: []*testInput{
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[0],
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("aaa"),
|
||
|
||
// Fee will be about 5340 sats.
|
||
// Subtract a bit more to
|
||
// ensure no dust change output
|
||
// is manifested.
|
||
Value: inputs[0].SignDesc().Output.Value - 5600,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
|
||
// We expect this single input/output pair.
|
||
assertSweeps: func(t *testing.T,
|
||
_ map[wire.OutPoint]*testInput,
|
||
txs []*wire.MsgTx) {
|
||
|
||
require.Equal(t, 1, len(txs))
|
||
|
||
tx := txs[0]
|
||
require.Equal(t, 1, len(tx.TxIn))
|
||
|
||
require.Equal(t, 1, len(tx.TxOut))
|
||
out := tx.TxOut[0]
|
||
require.Equal(t, []byte("aaa"), out.PkScript)
|
||
require.Equal(
|
||
t,
|
||
inputs[0].SignDesc().Output.Value-5600,
|
||
out.Value,
|
||
)
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
// An input committing to an output of equal value, just
|
||
// add input to pay fees.
|
||
name: "single input, extra fee input",
|
||
inputs: []*testInput{
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[0],
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("aaa"),
|
||
Value: inputs[0].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
|
||
// We expect an extra input and output.
|
||
assertSweeps: func(t *testing.T,
|
||
_ map[wire.OutPoint]*testInput,
|
||
txs []*wire.MsgTx) {
|
||
|
||
require.Equal(t, 1, len(txs))
|
||
|
||
tx := txs[0]
|
||
require.Equal(t, 2, len(tx.TxIn))
|
||
|
||
require.Equal(t, 2, len(tx.TxOut))
|
||
out := tx.TxOut[0]
|
||
require.Equal(t, []byte("aaa"), out.PkScript)
|
||
require.Equal(
|
||
t, inputs[0].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
out.Value,
|
||
)
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
// Three inputs added, should be combined into a single
|
||
// sweep.
|
||
name: "three inputs",
|
||
inputs: []*testInput{
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[0],
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("aaa"),
|
||
Value: inputs[0].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[1],
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("bbb"),
|
||
Value: inputs[1].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[2],
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("ccc"),
|
||
Value: inputs[2].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
|
||
// We expect an extra input and output to pay fees.
|
||
assertSweeps: func(t *testing.T,
|
||
testInputs map[wire.OutPoint]*testInput,
|
||
txs []*wire.MsgTx) {
|
||
|
||
require.Equal(t, 1, len(txs))
|
||
|
||
tx := txs[0]
|
||
require.Equal(t, 4, len(tx.TxIn))
|
||
require.Equal(t, 4, len(tx.TxOut))
|
||
|
||
// The inputs and outputs must be in the same
|
||
// order.
|
||
for i, in := range tx.TxIn {
|
||
// Last one is the change input/output
|
||
// pair, so we'll skip it.
|
||
if i == 3 {
|
||
continue
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Get this input to ensure the output
|
||
// on index i coresponsd to this one.
|
||
inp := testInputs[in.PreviousOutPoint]
|
||
require.NotNil(t, inp)
|
||
|
||
require.Equal(
|
||
t, tx.TxOut[i].Value,
|
||
inp.SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
)
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
// Six inputs added, which 3 different locktimes.
|
||
// Should result in 3 sweeps.
|
||
name: "six inputs",
|
||
inputs: []*testInput{
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[0],
|
||
locktime: &locktime1,
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("aaa"),
|
||
Value: inputs[0].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[1],
|
||
locktime: &locktime1,
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("bbb"),
|
||
Value: inputs[1].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[2],
|
||
locktime: &locktime2,
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("ccc"),
|
||
Value: inputs[2].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[3],
|
||
locktime: &locktime2,
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("ddd"),
|
||
Value: inputs[3].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[4],
|
||
locktime: &locktime3,
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("eee"),
|
||
Value: inputs[4].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
{
|
||
BaseInput: inputs[5],
|
||
locktime: &locktime3,
|
||
reqTxOut: &wire.TxOut{
|
||
PkScript: []byte("fff"),
|
||
Value: inputs[5].SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
|
||
// We expect three sweeps, each having two of our
|
||
// inputs, one extra input and output to pay fees.
|
||
assertSweeps: func(t *testing.T,
|
||
testInputs map[wire.OutPoint]*testInput,
|
||
txs []*wire.MsgTx) {
|
||
|
||
require.Equal(t, 3, len(txs))
|
||
|
||
for _, tx := range txs {
|
||
require.Equal(t, 3, len(tx.TxIn))
|
||
require.Equal(t, 3, len(tx.TxOut))
|
||
|
||
// The inputs and outputs must be in
|
||
// the same order.
|
||
for i, in := range tx.TxIn {
|
||
// Last one is the change
|
||
// output, so we'll skip it.
|
||
if i == 2 {
|
||
continue
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Get this input to ensure the
|
||
// output on index i coresponsd
|
||
// to this one.
|
||
inp := testInputs[in.PreviousOutPoint]
|
||
require.NotNil(t, inp)
|
||
|
||
require.Equal(
|
||
t, tx.TxOut[i].Value,
|
||
inp.SignDesc().Output.Value,
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
// Check that the locktimes are
|
||
// kept intact.
|
||
require.Equal(
|
||
t, tx.LockTime,
|
||
*inp.locktime,
|
||
)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
for _, testCase := range testCases {
|
||
testCase := testCase
|
||
|
||
t.Run(testCase.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||
ctx := createSweeperTestContext(t)
|
||
|
||
// We increase the number of max inputs to a tx so that
|
||
// won't impact our test.
|
||
ctx.sweeper.cfg.MaxInputsPerTx = 100
|
||
|
||
// Sweep all test inputs.
|
||
var (
|
||
inputs = make(map[wire.OutPoint]*testInput)
|
||
results = make(map[wire.OutPoint]chan Result)
|
||
)
|
||
for _, inp := range testCase.inputs {
|
||
result, err := ctx.sweeper.SweepInput(
|
||
inp, Params{
|
||
Fee: FeePreference{ConfTarget: 6},
|
||
},
|
||
)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
op := inp.OutPoint()
|
||
results[*op] = result
|
||
inputs[*op] = inp
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Tick, which should trigger a sweep of all inputs.
|
||
ctx.tick()
|
||
|
||
// Check the sweeps transactions, ensuring all inputs
|
||
// are there, and all the locktimes are satisfied.
|
||
var sweeps []*wire.MsgTx
|
||
Loop:
|
||
for {
|
||
select {
|
||
case tx := <-ctx.publishChan:
|
||
sweeps = append(sweeps, &tx)
|
||
case <-time.After(200 * time.Millisecond):
|
||
break Loop
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Mine the sweeps.
|
||
ctx.backend.mine()
|
||
|
||
// Results should all come back.
|
||
for _, resultChan := range results {
|
||
result := <-resultChan
|
||
if result.Err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("expected input to be "+
|
||
"swept: %v", result.Err)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Assert the transactions are what we expect.
|
||
testCase.assertSweeps(t, inputs, sweeps)
|
||
})
|
||
}
|
||
}
|