976 lines
31 KiB
Go
976 lines
31 KiB
Go
package htlcswitch
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
|
|
"io"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/davecgh/go-spew/spew"
|
|
"github.com/go-errors/errors"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwallet"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
|
|
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash"
|
|
"github.com/roasbeef/btcutil"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// messageToString is used to produce less spammy log messages in trace
|
|
// mode by setting the 'Curve" parameter to nil. Doing this avoids printing out
|
|
// each of the field elements in the curve parameters for secp256k1.
|
|
func messageToString(msg lnwire.Message) string {
|
|
switch m := msg.(type) {
|
|
case *lnwire.RevokeAndAck:
|
|
m.NextRevocationKey.Curve = nil
|
|
case *lnwire.NodeAnnouncement:
|
|
m.NodeID.Curve = nil
|
|
case *lnwire.ChannelAnnouncement:
|
|
m.NodeID1.Curve = nil
|
|
m.NodeID2.Curve = nil
|
|
m.BitcoinKey1.Curve = nil
|
|
m.BitcoinKey2.Curve = nil
|
|
case *lnwire.SingleFundingComplete:
|
|
m.RevocationKey.Curve = nil
|
|
case *lnwire.SingleFundingRequest:
|
|
m.CommitmentKey.Curve = nil
|
|
m.ChannelDerivationPoint.Curve = nil
|
|
case *lnwire.SingleFundingResponse:
|
|
m.ChannelDerivationPoint.Curve = nil
|
|
m.CommitmentKey.Curve = nil
|
|
m.RevocationKey.Curve = nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return spew.Sdump(msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// createLogFunc is a helper function which returns the function which will be
|
|
// used for logging message are received from another peer.
|
|
func createLogFunc(name string, channelID lnwire.ChannelID) messageInterceptor {
|
|
return func(m lnwire.Message) {
|
|
if getChanID(m) == channelID {
|
|
// Skip logging of extend revocation window messages.
|
|
switch m := m.(type) {
|
|
case *lnwire.RevokeAndAck:
|
|
var zeroHash chainhash.Hash
|
|
if bytes.Equal(zeroHash[:], m.Revocation[:]) {
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
fmt.Printf("---------------------- \n %v received: "+
|
|
"%v", name, messageToString(m))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestChannelLinkSingleHopPayment in this test we checks the interaction
|
|
// between Alice and Bob within scope of one channel.
|
|
func TestChannelLinkSingleHopPayment(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*3,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
bobBandwidthBefore := n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
aliceBandwidthBefore := n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
|
|
debug := false
|
|
if debug {
|
|
// Log message that alice receives.
|
|
n.aliceServer.record(createLogFunc("alice",
|
|
n.aliceChannelLink.ChanID()))
|
|
|
|
// Log message that bob receives.
|
|
n.bobServer.record(createLogFunc("bob",
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink.ChanID()))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var amount btcutil.Amount = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
htlcAmt, totalTimelock, hops := generateHops(amount, n.firstBobChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
// Wait for:
|
|
// * HTLC add request to be sent to bob.
|
|
// * alice<->bob commitment state to be updated.
|
|
// * settle request to be sent back from bob to alice.
|
|
// * alice<->bob commitment state to be updated.
|
|
// * user notification to be sent.
|
|
invoice, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.bobServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amount, htlcAmt, totalTimelock)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to make the payment: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Wait for Bob to receive the revocation.
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO(roasbef); replace with select over returned err chan
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
// Check that alice invoice was settled and bandwidth of HTLC
|
|
// links was changed.
|
|
if !invoice.Terms.Settled {
|
|
t.Fatal("invoice wasn't settled")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if aliceBandwidthBefore-amount != n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatal("alice bandwidth should have descreased on payment " +
|
|
"amount")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if bobBandwidthBefore+amount != n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatal("bob bandwidth isn't match")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestChannelLinkBidirectionalOneHopPayments tests the ability of channel
|
|
// link to cope with bigger number of payment updates that commitment
|
|
// transaction may consist.
|
|
func TestChannelLinkBidirectionalOneHopPayments(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*3,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
bobBandwidthBefore := n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
aliceBandwidthBefore := n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
|
|
debug := false
|
|
if debug {
|
|
// Log message that alice receives.
|
|
n.aliceServer.record(createLogFunc("alice",
|
|
n.aliceChannelLink.ChanID()))
|
|
|
|
// Log message that bob receives.
|
|
n.bobServer.record(createLogFunc("bob",
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink.ChanID()))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const amt btcutil.Amount = 10
|
|
|
|
htlcAmt, totalTimelock, hopsForwards := generateHops(amt,
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink)
|
|
_, _, hopsBackwards := generateHops(amt, n.aliceChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
// Send max available payment number in both sides, thereby testing
|
|
// the property of channel link to cope with overflowing.
|
|
errChan := make(chan error)
|
|
count := 2 * lnwallet.MaxHTLCNumber
|
|
for i := 0; i < count/2; i++ {
|
|
go func() {
|
|
_, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.bobServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hopsForwards, amt, htlcAmt,
|
|
totalTimelock)
|
|
errChan <- err
|
|
}()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < count/2; i++ {
|
|
go func() {
|
|
_, err := n.makePayment(n.bobServer, n.aliceServer,
|
|
n.aliceServer.PubKey(), hopsBackwards, amt, htlcAmt,
|
|
totalTimelock)
|
|
errChan <- err
|
|
}()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that alice invoice was settled and bandwidth of HTLC
|
|
// links was changed.
|
|
for i := 0; i < count; i++ {
|
|
select {
|
|
case err := <-errChan:
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to make the payment: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
case <-time.After(4 * time.Second):
|
|
t.Fatalf("timeout: (%v/%v)", i+1, count)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At the end Bob and Alice balances should be the same as previous,
|
|
// because they sent the equal amount of money to each other.
|
|
if aliceBandwidthBefore != n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatal("alice bandwidth shouldn't have changed")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if bobBandwidthBefore != n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatal("bob bandwidth shouldn't have changed")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestChannelLinkMultiHopPayment checks the ability to send payment over two
|
|
// hopes. In this test we send the payment from Carol to Alice over Bob peer.
|
|
// (Carol -> Bob -> Alice) and checking that HTLC was settled properly and
|
|
// balances were changed in two channels.
|
|
func TestChannelLinkMultiHopPayment(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*3,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
carolBandwidthBefore := n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
firstBobBandwidthBefore := n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
secondBobBandwidthBefore := n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
aliceBandwidthBefore := n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
|
|
debug := false
|
|
if debug {
|
|
// Log messages that alice receives from bob.
|
|
n.aliceServer.record(createLogFunc("[alice]<-bob<-carol: ",
|
|
n.aliceChannelLink.ChanID()))
|
|
|
|
// Log messages that bob receives from alice.
|
|
n.bobServer.record(createLogFunc("alice->[bob]->carol: ",
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink.ChanID()))
|
|
|
|
// Log messages that bob receives from carol.
|
|
n.bobServer.record(createLogFunc("alice<-[bob]<-carol: ",
|
|
n.secondBobChannelLink.ChanID()))
|
|
|
|
// Log messages that carol receives from bob.
|
|
n.carolServer.record(createLogFunc("alice->bob->[carol]",
|
|
n.carolChannelLink.ChanID()))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var amount btcutil.Amount = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
htlcAmt, totalTimelock, hops := generateHops(amount,
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink, n.carolChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
// Wait for:
|
|
// * HTLC add request to be sent from Alice to Bob.
|
|
// * Alice<->Bob commitment states to be updated.
|
|
// * HTLC add request to be propagated to Carol.
|
|
// * Bob<->Carol commitment state to be updated.
|
|
// * settle request to be sent back from Carol to Bob.
|
|
// * Alice<->Bob commitment state to be updated.
|
|
// * settle request to be sent back from Bob to Alice.
|
|
// * Alice<->Bob commitment states to be updated.
|
|
// * user notification to be sent.
|
|
invoice, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.carolServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amount, htlcAmt,
|
|
totalTimelock)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to send payment: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Wait for Bob to receive the revocation.
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
// Check that Carol invoice was settled and bandwidth of HTLC
|
|
// links were changed.
|
|
if !invoice.Terms.Settled {
|
|
t.Fatal("alice invoice wasn't settled")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expectedAliceBandwidth := aliceBandwidthBefore - htlcAmt
|
|
if expectedAliceBandwidth != n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("channel bandwidth incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedAliceBandwidth, n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expectedBobBandwidth1 := firstBobBandwidthBefore + htlcAmt
|
|
if expectedBobBandwidth1 != n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("channel bandwidth incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedBobBandwidth1, n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expectedBobBandwidth2 := secondBobBandwidthBefore - amount
|
|
if expectedBobBandwidth2 != n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("channel bandwidth incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedBobBandwidth2, n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expectedCarolBandwidth := carolBandwidthBefore + amount
|
|
if expectedCarolBandwidth != n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("channel bandwidth incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedCarolBandwidth, n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestExitNodeTimelockPayloadMismatch tests that when an exit node receives an
|
|
// incoming HTLC, if the time lock encoded in the payload of the forwarded HTLC
|
|
// doesn't match the expected payment value, then the HTLC will be rejected
|
|
// with the appropriate error.
|
|
func TestExitNodeTimelockPayloadMismatch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
const amount = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
htlcAmt, htlcExpiry, hops := generateHops(amount,
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
// In order to exercise this case, we'll now _manually_ modify the
|
|
// per-hop payload for outgoing time lock to be the incorrect value.
|
|
// The proper value of the outgoing CLTV should be the policy set by
|
|
// the receiving node, instead we set it to be a random value.
|
|
hops[0].OutgoingCTLV = 500
|
|
|
|
_, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.bobServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amount, htlcAmt, htlcExpiry)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("payment should have failed but didn't")
|
|
} else if err.Error() != lnwire.UpstreamTimeout.String() {
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): use proper error after error propagation is
|
|
// in
|
|
t.Fatalf("incorrect error, expected insufficient value, "+
|
|
"instead have: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestExitNodeAmountPayloadMismatch tests that when an exit node receives an
|
|
// incoming HTLC, if the amount encoded in the onion payload of the forwarded
|
|
// HTLC doesn't match the expected payment value, then the HTLC will be
|
|
// rejected.
|
|
func TestExitNodeAmountPayloadMismatch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
const amount = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
htlcAmt, htlcExpiry, hops := generateHops(amount, n.firstBobChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
// In order to exercise this case, we'll now _manually_ modify the
|
|
// per-hop payload for amount to be the incorrect value. The proper
|
|
// value of the amount to forward should be the amount that the
|
|
// receiving node expects to receive.
|
|
hops[0].AmountToForward = 1
|
|
|
|
_, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.bobServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amount, htlcAmt, htlcExpiry)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("payment should have failed but didn't")
|
|
} else if err.Error() != lnwire.IncorrectValue.String() {
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): use proper error after error propagation is
|
|
// in
|
|
t.Fatalf("incorrect error, expected insufficient value, "+
|
|
"instead have: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLinkForwardMinHTLCPolicyMismatch tests that if a node is an intermediate
|
|
// node in a multi-hop payment, and receives an HTLC which violates its
|
|
// specified multi-hop policy, then the HTLC is rejected.
|
|
func TestLinkForwardTimelockPolicyMismatch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
// We'll be sending 1 BTC over a 2-hop (3 vertex) route.
|
|
var amount btcutil.Amount = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
|
|
// Generate the route over two hops, ignoring the total time lock that
|
|
// we'll need to use for the first HTLC in order to have a sufficient
|
|
// time-lock value to account for the decrements over the entire route.
|
|
htlcAmt, htlcExpiry, hops := generateHops(amount, n.firstBobChannelLink,
|
|
n.carolChannelLink)
|
|
htlcExpiry += 10
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll make the payment which'll send an HTLC with our
|
|
// specified parameters to the first hop in the route.
|
|
_, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.bobServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amount, htlcAmt, htlcExpiry)
|
|
|
|
// We should get an error, and that error should indicate that the HTLC
|
|
// should be rejected due to a policy violation.
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("payment should have failed but didn't")
|
|
} else if err.Error() != lnwire.UpstreamTimeout.String() {
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): use proper error after error propagation is
|
|
// in
|
|
t.Fatalf("incorrect error, expected insufficient value, "+
|
|
"instead have: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLinkForwardTimelockPolicyMismatch tests that if a node is an
|
|
// intermediate node in a multi-hop payment and receives an HTLC that violates
|
|
// its current fee policy, then the HTLC is rejected with the proper error.
|
|
func TestLinkForwardFeePolicyMismatch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
// We'll be sending 1 BTC over a 2-hop (3 vertex) route. Given the
|
|
// current default fee of 1 SAT, if we just send a single BTC over in
|
|
// an HTLC, it should be rejected.
|
|
var amountNoFee btcutil.Amount = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
|
|
// Generate the route over two hops, ignoring the amount we _should_
|
|
// actually send in order to be able to cover fees.
|
|
_, htlcExpiry, hops := generateHops(amountNoFee, n.firstBobChannelLink,
|
|
n.carolChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll make the payment which'll send an HTLC with our
|
|
// specified parameters to the first hop in the route.
|
|
_, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.bobServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amountNoFee, amountNoFee,
|
|
htlcExpiry)
|
|
|
|
// We should get an error, and that error should indicate that the HTLC
|
|
// should be rejected due to a policy violation.
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("payment should have failed but didn't")
|
|
} else if err.Error() != lnwire.IncorrectValue.String() {
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): use proper error after error propagation is
|
|
// in
|
|
t.Fatalf("incorrect error, expected insufficient value, "+
|
|
"instead have: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLinkForwardFeePolicyMismatch tests that if a node is an intermediate
|
|
// node and receives an HTLC which is _below_ its min HTLC policy, then the
|
|
// HTLC will be rejected.
|
|
func TestLinkForwardMinHTLCPolicyMismatch(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
// The current default global min HTLC policy set in the default config
|
|
// for the three-hop-network is 5 SAT. So in order to trigger this
|
|
// failure mode, we'll create an HTLC with 1 satoshi.
|
|
amountNoFee := btcutil.Amount(1)
|
|
|
|
// With the amount set, we'll generate a route over 2 hops within the
|
|
// network that attempts to pay out our specified amount.
|
|
htlcAmt, htlcExpiry, hops := generateHops(amountNoFee,
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink, n.carolChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll make the payment which'll send an HTLC with our
|
|
// specified parameters to the first hop in the route.
|
|
_, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.bobServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amountNoFee, htlcAmt,
|
|
htlcExpiry)
|
|
|
|
// We should get an error, and that error should indicate that the HTLC
|
|
// should be rejected due to a policy violation (below min HTLC).
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("payment should have failed but didn't")
|
|
} else if err.Error() != lnwire.IncorrectValue.String() {
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): use proper error after error propagation is
|
|
// in
|
|
t.Fatalf("incorrect error, expected insufficient value, "+
|
|
"instead have: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestUpdateForwardingPolicy tests that the forwarding policy for a link is
|
|
// able to be updated properly. We'll first create an HTLC that meets the
|
|
// specified policy, assert that it succeeds, update the policy (to invalidate
|
|
// the prior HTLC), and then ensure that the HTLC is rejected.
|
|
func TestUpdateForwardingPolicy(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
carolBandwidthBefore := n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
firstBobBandwidthBefore := n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
secondBobBandwidthBefore := n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
aliceBandwidthBefore := n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
|
|
amountNoFee := btcutil.Amount(10)
|
|
htlcAmt, htlcExpiry, hops := generateHops(amountNoFee,
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink, n.carolChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
// First, send this 1 BTC payment over the three hops, the payment
|
|
// should succeed, and all balances should be updated
|
|
// accordingly.
|
|
invoice, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.carolServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amountNoFee, htlcAmt,
|
|
htlcExpiry)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to send payment: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
// Carol's invoice should now be shown as settled as the payment
|
|
// succeeded.
|
|
if !invoice.Terms.Settled {
|
|
t.Fatal("carol's invoice wasn't settled")
|
|
}
|
|
expectedAliceBandwidth := aliceBandwidthBefore - htlcAmt
|
|
if expectedAliceBandwidth != n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("channel bandwidth incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedAliceBandwidth, n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth())
|
|
}
|
|
expectedBobBandwidth1 := firstBobBandwidthBefore + htlcAmt
|
|
if expectedBobBandwidth1 != n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("channel bandwidth incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedBobBandwidth1, n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth())
|
|
}
|
|
expectedBobBandwidth2 := secondBobBandwidthBefore - amountNoFee
|
|
if expectedBobBandwidth2 != n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("channel bandwidth incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedBobBandwidth2, n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth())
|
|
}
|
|
expectedCarolBandwidth := carolBandwidthBefore + amountNoFee
|
|
if expectedCarolBandwidth != n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("channel bandwidth incorrect: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedCarolBandwidth, n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now we'll update Bob's policy to jack up his free rate to an extent
|
|
// that'll cause him to reject the same HTLC that we just sent.
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): should implement grace period within link policy
|
|
// update logic
|
|
newPolicy := n.globalPolicy
|
|
newPolicy.BaseFee = btcutil.Amount(1000)
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink.UpdateForwardingPolicy(newPolicy)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestChannelLinkMultiHopInsufficientPayment checks that we receive error if
|
|
// bob<->alice channel has insufficient BTC capacity/bandwidth. In this test we
|
|
// send the payment from Carol to Alice over Bob peer. (Carol -> Bob -> Alice)
|
|
func TestChannelLinkMultiHopInsufficientPayment(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*3,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("can't start three hop network: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
carolBandwidthBefore := n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
firstBobBandwidthBefore := n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
secondBobBandwidthBefore := n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
aliceBandwidthBefore := n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
|
|
var amount btcutil.Amount = 4 * btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
htlcAmt, totalTimelock, hops := generateHops(amount,
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink, n.carolChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
// Wait for:
|
|
// * HTLC add request to be sent to from Alice to Bob.
|
|
// * Alice<->Bob commitment states to be updated.
|
|
// * Bob trying to add HTLC add request in Bob<->Carol channel.
|
|
// * Cancel HTLC request to be sent back from Bob to Alice.
|
|
// * user notification to be sent.
|
|
invoice, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.bobServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amount, htlcAmt, totalTimelock)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("error haven't been received")
|
|
} else if err.Error() != errors.New(lnwire.InsufficientCapacity).Error() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong error have been received: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Wait for Alice to receive the revocation.
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): add in ntfn hook for state transition completion
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
// Check that alice invoice wasn't settled and bandwidth of htlc
|
|
// links hasn't been changed.
|
|
if invoice.Terms.Settled {
|
|
t.Fatal("alice invoice was settled")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth() != aliceBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of alice channel link which handles " +
|
|
"alice->bob channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() != firstBobBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of bob channel link which handles " +
|
|
"alice->bob channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() != secondBobBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of bob channel link which handles " +
|
|
"bob->carol channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth() != carolBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of carol channel link which handles " +
|
|
"bob->carol channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestChannelLinkMultiHopUnknownPaymentHash checks that we receive remote error
|
|
// from Alice if she received not suitable payment hash for htlc.
|
|
func TestChannelLinkMultiHopUnknownPaymentHash(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*3,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("can't start three hop network: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
carolBandwidthBefore := n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
firstBobBandwidthBefore := n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
secondBobBandwidthBefore := n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
aliceBandwidthBefore := n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
|
|
var amount btcutil.Amount = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
|
|
htlcAmt, totalTimelock, hops := generateHops(amount,
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink, n.carolChannelLink)
|
|
blob, err := generateRoute(hops...)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Generate payment: invoice and htlc.
|
|
invoice, htlc, err := generatePayment(amount, htlcAmt, totalTimelock,
|
|
blob)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We need to have wrong rhash for that reason we should change the
|
|
// preimage. Inverse first byte by xoring with 0xff.
|
|
invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage[0] ^= byte(255)
|
|
|
|
// Check who is last in the route and add invoice to server registry.
|
|
if err := n.carolServer.registry.AddInvoice(invoice); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("can't add invoice in carol registry: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Send payment and expose err channel.
|
|
_, err = n.aliceServer.htlcSwitch.SendHTLC(n.bobServer.PubKey(), htlc)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("error wasn't received")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Wait for Alice to receive the revocation.
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
// Check that alice invoice wasn't settled and bandwidth of htlc
|
|
// links hasn't been changed.
|
|
if invoice.Terms.Settled {
|
|
t.Fatal("alice invoice was settled")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth() != aliceBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of alice channel link which handles " +
|
|
"alice->bob channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() != firstBobBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of bob channel link which handles " +
|
|
"alice->bob channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() != secondBobBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of bob channel link which handles " +
|
|
"bob->carol channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth() != carolBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of carol channel link which handles " +
|
|
"bob->carol channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestChannelLinkMultiHopUnknownNextHop construct the chain of hops
|
|
// Carol<->Bob<->Alice and checks that we receive remote error from Bob if he
|
|
// has no idea about next hop (hop might goes down and routing info not updated
|
|
// yet).
|
|
func TestChannelLinkMultiHopUnknownNextHop(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*3,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
carolBandwidthBefore := n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
firstBobBandwidthBefore := n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
secondBobBandwidthBefore := n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
aliceBandwidthBefore := n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
|
|
var amount btcutil.Amount = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
htlcAmt, totalTimelock, hops := generateHops(amount,
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink, n.carolChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
davePub := newMockServer(t, "save").PubKey()
|
|
invoice, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.bobServer, davePub, hops,
|
|
amount, htlcAmt, totalTimelock)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("error haven't been received")
|
|
} else if err.Error() != errors.New(lnwire.UnknownDestination).Error() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong error have been received: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Wait for Alice to receive the revocation.
|
|
//
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): add in ntfn hook for state transition completion
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
// Check that alice invoice wasn't settled and bandwidth of htlc
|
|
// links hasn't been changed.
|
|
if invoice.Terms.Settled {
|
|
t.Fatal("alice invoice was settled")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth() != aliceBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of alice channel link which handles " +
|
|
"alice->bob channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() != firstBobBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of bob channel link which handles " +
|
|
"alice->bob channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() != secondBobBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of bob channel link which handles " +
|
|
"bob->carol channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth() != carolBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of carol channel link which handles " +
|
|
"bob->carol channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestChannelLinkMultiHopDecodeError checks that we send HTLC cancel if
|
|
// decoding of onion blob failed.
|
|
func TestChannelLinkMultiHopDecodeError(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*3,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("can't start three hop network: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
// Replace decode function with another which throws an error.
|
|
n.carolChannelLink.cfg.DecodeOnion = func(r io.Reader, meta []byte) (
|
|
HopIterator, error) {
|
|
return nil, errors.New("some sphinx decode error")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
carolBandwidthBefore := n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
firstBobBandwidthBefore := n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
secondBobBandwidthBefore := n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
aliceBandwidthBefore := n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth()
|
|
|
|
var amount btcutil.Amount = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
htlcAmt, totalTimelock, hops := generateHops(amount,
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink, n.carolChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
invoice, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.carolServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amount, htlcAmt, totalTimelock)
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("error haven't been received")
|
|
} else if err.Error() != errors.New(lnwire.SphinxParseError).Error() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong error have been received: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Wait for Bob to receive the revocation.
|
|
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
|
|
// Check that alice invoice wasn't settled and bandwidth of htlc
|
|
// links hasn't been changed.
|
|
if invoice.Terms.Settled {
|
|
t.Fatal("alice invoice was settled")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth() != aliceBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of alice channel link which handles " +
|
|
"alice->bob channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.firstBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() != firstBobBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of bob channel link which handles " +
|
|
"alice->bob channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.secondBobChannelLink.Bandwidth() != secondBobBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of bob channel link which handles " +
|
|
"bob->carol channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if n.carolChannelLink.Bandwidth() != carolBandwidthBefore {
|
|
t.Fatal("the bandwidth of carol channel link which handles " +
|
|
"bob->carol channel should be the same")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestChannelLinkSingleHopMessageOrdering test checks ordering of message which
|
|
// flying around between Alice and Bob are correct when Bob sends payments to
|
|
// Alice.
|
|
func TestChannelLinkSingleHopMessageOrdering(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
n := newThreeHopNetwork(t,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*3,
|
|
btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin*5,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
chanPoint := n.aliceChannelLink.ChanID()
|
|
|
|
// Append initial channel window revocation messages which occurs after
|
|
// channel opening.
|
|
var aliceOrder []lnwire.Message
|
|
for i := 0; i < lnwallet.InitialRevocationWindow; i++ {
|
|
aliceOrder = append(aliceOrder, &lnwire.RevokeAndAck{})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The order in which Alice receives wire messages.
|
|
aliceOrder = append(aliceOrder, []lnwire.Message{
|
|
&lnwire.RevokeAndAck{},
|
|
&lnwire.CommitSig{},
|
|
&lnwire.UpdateFufillHTLC{},
|
|
&lnwire.CommitSig{},
|
|
&lnwire.RevokeAndAck{},
|
|
}...)
|
|
|
|
// Append initial channel window revocation messages which occurs after
|
|
// channel channel opening.
|
|
var bobOrder []lnwire.Message
|
|
for i := 0; i < lnwallet.InitialRevocationWindow; i++ {
|
|
bobOrder = append(bobOrder, &lnwire.RevokeAndAck{})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The order in which Bob receives wire messages.
|
|
bobOrder = append(bobOrder, []lnwire.Message{
|
|
&lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC{},
|
|
&lnwire.CommitSig{},
|
|
&lnwire.RevokeAndAck{},
|
|
&lnwire.RevokeAndAck{},
|
|
&lnwire.CommitSig{},
|
|
}...)
|
|
|
|
debug := false
|
|
if debug {
|
|
// Log message that alice receives.
|
|
n.aliceServer.record(createLogFunc("alice",
|
|
n.aliceChannelLink.ChanID()))
|
|
|
|
// Log message that bob receives.
|
|
n.bobServer.record(createLogFunc("bob",
|
|
n.firstBobChannelLink.ChanID()))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Check that alice receives messages in right order.
|
|
n.aliceServer.record(func(m lnwire.Message) {
|
|
if getChanID(m) == chanPoint {
|
|
if len(aliceOrder) == 0 {
|
|
t.Fatal("redundant messages")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if reflect.TypeOf(aliceOrder[0]) != reflect.TypeOf(m) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("alice received wrong message: \n"+
|
|
"real: %v\n expected: %v", m.MsgType(),
|
|
aliceOrder[0].MsgType())
|
|
}
|
|
aliceOrder = aliceOrder[1:]
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// Check that bob receives messages in right order.
|
|
n.bobServer.record(func(m lnwire.Message) {
|
|
if getChanID(m) == chanPoint {
|
|
if len(bobOrder) == 0 {
|
|
t.Fatal("redundant messages")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if reflect.TypeOf(bobOrder[0]) != reflect.TypeOf(m) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bob received wrong message: \n"+
|
|
"real: %v\n expected: %v", m.MsgType(),
|
|
bobOrder[0].MsgType())
|
|
}
|
|
bobOrder = bobOrder[1:]
|
|
}
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
if err := n.start(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("can't start three hop network: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
defer n.stop()
|
|
|
|
var amount btcutil.Amount = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin
|
|
htlcAmt, totalTimelock, hops := generateHops(amount, n.firstBobChannelLink)
|
|
|
|
// Wait for:
|
|
// * htlc add htlc request to be sent to alice
|
|
// * alice<->bob commitment state to be updated
|
|
// * settle request to be sent back from alice to bob
|
|
// * alice<->bob commitment state to be updated
|
|
_, err := n.makePayment(n.aliceServer, n.bobServer,
|
|
n.bobServer.PubKey(), hops, amount, htlcAmt, totalTimelock)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to make the payment: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|