916b83a6ee
Appendix C of BOLT 03 contains a series of test vectors asserting that commitment, HTLC success, and HTLC timeout transactions are created correctly. Here the test cases are transcribed to Go structs and verified. We also break out some logic need to tests that bypass the constructor and remove some redundant fields.
1173 lines
37 KiB
Go
1173 lines
37 KiB
Go
package lnwallet
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
"crypto/sha256"
|
|
"encoding/hex"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/btcec"
|
|
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash"
|
|
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/txscript"
|
|
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/wire"
|
|
"github.com/roasbeef/btcutil"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// TestCommitmentSpendValidation test the spendability of both outputs within
|
|
// the commitment transaction.
|
|
//
|
|
// The following spending cases are covered by this test:
|
|
// * Alice's spend from the delayed output on her commitment transaction.
|
|
// * Bob's spend from Alice's delayed output when she broadcasts a revoked
|
|
// commitment transaction.
|
|
// * Bob's spend from his unencumbered output within Alice's commitment
|
|
// transaction.
|
|
func TestCommitmentSpendValidation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We generate a fake output, and the corresponding txin. This output
|
|
// doesn't need to exist, as we'll only be validating spending from the
|
|
// transaction that references this.
|
|
txid, err := chainhash.NewHash(testHdSeed.CloneBytes())
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create txid: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
fundingOut := &wire.OutPoint{
|
|
Hash: *txid,
|
|
Index: 50,
|
|
}
|
|
fakeFundingTxIn := wire.NewTxIn(fundingOut, nil, nil)
|
|
|
|
const channelBalance = btcutil.Amount(1 * 10e8)
|
|
const csvTimeout = uint32(5)
|
|
|
|
// We also set up set some resources for the commitment transaction.
|
|
// Each side currently has 1 BTC within the channel, with a total
|
|
// channel capacity of 2BTC.
|
|
aliceKeyPriv, aliceKeyPub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
testWalletPrivKey)
|
|
bobKeyPriv, bobKeyPub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
bobsPrivKey)
|
|
|
|
revocationPreimage := testHdSeed.CloneBytes()
|
|
commitSecret, commitPoint := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
revocationPreimage)
|
|
revokePubKey := DeriveRevocationPubkey(bobKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
|
|
aliceDelayKey := TweakPubKey(aliceKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
bobPayKey := TweakPubKey(bobKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
|
|
aliceCommitTweak := SingleTweakBytes(commitPoint, aliceKeyPub)
|
|
bobCommitTweak := SingleTweakBytes(commitPoint, bobKeyPub)
|
|
|
|
aliceSelfOutputSigner := &mockSigner{
|
|
privkeys: []*btcec.PrivateKey{aliceKeyPriv},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// With all the test data set up, we create the commitment transaction.
|
|
// We only focus on a single party's transactions, as the scripts are
|
|
// identical with the roles reversed.
|
|
//
|
|
// This is Alice's commitment transaction, so she must wait a CSV delay
|
|
// of 5 blocks before sweeping the output, while bob can spend
|
|
// immediately with either the revocation key, or his regular key.
|
|
keyRing := &CommitmentKeyRing{
|
|
DelayKey: aliceDelayKey,
|
|
RevocationKey: revokePubKey,
|
|
NoDelayKey: bobPayKey,
|
|
}
|
|
commitmentTx, err := CreateCommitTx(*fakeFundingTxIn, keyRing, csvTimeout,
|
|
channelBalance, channelBalance, DefaultDustLimit())
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create commitment transaction: %v", nil)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
delayOutput := commitmentTx.TxOut[0]
|
|
regularOutput := commitmentTx.TxOut[1]
|
|
|
|
// We're testing an uncooperative close, output sweep, so construct a
|
|
// transaction which sweeps the funds to a random address.
|
|
targetOutput, err := commitScriptUnencumbered(aliceKeyPub)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create target output: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
sweepTx := wire.NewMsgTx(2)
|
|
sweepTx.AddTxIn(wire.NewTxIn(&wire.OutPoint{
|
|
Hash: commitmentTx.TxHash(),
|
|
Index: 0,
|
|
}, nil, nil))
|
|
sweepTx.AddTxOut(&wire.TxOut{
|
|
PkScript: targetOutput,
|
|
Value: 0.5 * 10e8,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll test spending with Alice's key after the timeout.
|
|
delayScript, err := commitScriptToSelf(csvTimeout, aliceDelayKey,
|
|
revokePubKey)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to generate alice delay script: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
sweepTx.TxIn[0].Sequence = lockTimeToSequence(false, csvTimeout)
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
WitnessScript: delayScript,
|
|
PubKey: aliceKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: aliceCommitTweak,
|
|
SigHashes: txscript.NewTxSigHashes(sweepTx),
|
|
Output: &wire.TxOut{
|
|
Value: int64(channelBalance),
|
|
},
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
aliceWitnessSpend, err := CommitSpendTimeout(aliceSelfOutputSigner,
|
|
signDesc, sweepTx)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to generate delay commit spend witness: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
sweepTx.TxIn[0].Witness = aliceWitnessSpend
|
|
vm, err := txscript.NewEngine(delayOutput.PkScript,
|
|
sweepTx, 0, txscript.StandardVerifyFlags, nil,
|
|
nil, int64(channelBalance))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create engine: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := vm.Execute(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("spend from delay output is invalid: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
bobSigner := &mockSigner{privkeys: []*btcec.PrivateKey{bobKeyPriv}}
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll test bob spending with the derived revocation key to
|
|
// simulate the scenario when Alice broadcasts this commitment
|
|
// transaction after it's been revoked.
|
|
signDesc = &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
DoubleTweak: commitSecret,
|
|
WitnessScript: delayScript,
|
|
SigHashes: txscript.NewTxSigHashes(sweepTx),
|
|
Output: &wire.TxOut{
|
|
Value: int64(channelBalance),
|
|
},
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
bobWitnessSpend, err := CommitSpendRevoke(bobSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to generate revocation witness: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
sweepTx.TxIn[0].Witness = bobWitnessSpend
|
|
vm, err = txscript.NewEngine(delayOutput.PkScript,
|
|
sweepTx, 0, txscript.StandardVerifyFlags, nil,
|
|
nil, int64(channelBalance))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create engine: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := vm.Execute(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("revocation spend is invalid: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// In order to test the final scenario, we modify the TxIn of the sweep
|
|
// transaction to instead point to to the regular output (non delay)
|
|
// within the commitment transaction.
|
|
sweepTx.TxIn[0] = &wire.TxIn{
|
|
PreviousOutPoint: wire.OutPoint{
|
|
Hash: commitmentTx.TxHash(),
|
|
Index: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Finally, we test bob sweeping his output as normal in the case that
|
|
// Alice broadcasts this commitment transaction.
|
|
bobScriptp2wkh, err := commitScriptUnencumbered(bobPayKey)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create bob p2wkh script: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
signDesc = &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: bobCommitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: bobScriptp2wkh,
|
|
SigHashes: txscript.NewTxSigHashes(sweepTx),
|
|
Output: &wire.TxOut{
|
|
Value: int64(channelBalance),
|
|
PkScript: bobScriptp2wkh,
|
|
},
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
bobRegularSpend, err := CommitSpendNoDelay(bobSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create bob regular spend: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
sweepTx.TxIn[0].Witness = bobRegularSpend
|
|
vm, err = txscript.NewEngine(regularOutput.PkScript,
|
|
sweepTx, 0, txscript.StandardVerifyFlags, nil,
|
|
nil, int64(channelBalance))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create engine: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := vm.Execute(); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("bob p2wkh spend is invalid: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestRevocationKeyDerivation tests that given a public key, and a revocation
|
|
// hash, the homomorphic revocation public and private key derivation work
|
|
// properly.
|
|
func TestRevocationKeyDerivation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll generate a commitment point, and a commitment secret.
|
|
// These will be used to derive the ultimate revocation keys.
|
|
revocationPreimage := testHdSeed.CloneBytes()
|
|
commitSecret, commitPoint := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
revocationPreimage)
|
|
|
|
// With the commitment secrets generated, we'll now create the base
|
|
// keys we'll use to derive the revocation key from.
|
|
basePriv, basePub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
testWalletPrivKey)
|
|
|
|
// With the point and key obtained, we can now derive the revocation
|
|
// key itself.
|
|
revocationPub := DeriveRevocationPubkey(basePub, commitPoint)
|
|
|
|
// The revocation public key derived from the original public key, and
|
|
// the one derived from the private key should be identical.
|
|
revocationPriv := DeriveRevocationPrivKey(basePriv, commitSecret)
|
|
if !revocationPub.IsEqual(revocationPriv.PubKey()) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("derived public keys don't match!")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestTweakKeyDerivation tests that given a public key, and commitment tweak,
|
|
// then we're able to properly derive a tweaked private key that corresponds to
|
|
// the computed tweak public key. This scenario ensure that our key derivation
|
|
// for any of the non revocation keys on the commitment transaction is correct.
|
|
func TestTweakKeyDerivation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll generate a base public key that we'll be "tweaking".
|
|
baseSecret := testHdSeed.CloneBytes()
|
|
basePriv, basePub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(), baseSecret)
|
|
|
|
// With the base key create, we'll now create a commitment point, and
|
|
// from that derive the bytes we'll used to tweak the base public key.
|
|
commitPoint := ComputeCommitmentPoint(bobsPrivKey)
|
|
commitTweak := SingleTweakBytes(commitPoint, basePub)
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll modify the public key. When we apply the same operation
|
|
// to the private key we should get a key that matches.
|
|
tweakedPub := TweakPubKey(basePub, commitPoint)
|
|
|
|
// Finally, attempt to re-generate the private key that matches the
|
|
// tweaked public key. The derived key should match exactly.
|
|
derivedPriv := TweakPrivKey(basePriv, commitTweak)
|
|
if !derivedPriv.PubKey().IsEqual(tweakedPub) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("pub keys don't match")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// makeWitnessTestCase is a helper function used within test cases involving
|
|
// the validity of a crafted witness. This function is a wrapper function which
|
|
// allows constructing table-driven tests. In the case of an error while
|
|
// constructing the witness, the test fails fatally.
|
|
func makeWitnessTestCase(t *testing.T,
|
|
f func() (wire.TxWitness, error)) func() wire.TxWitness {
|
|
|
|
return func() wire.TxWitness {
|
|
witness, err := f()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create witness test case: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return witness
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestHTLCSenderSpendValidation tests all possible valid+invalid redemption
|
|
// paths in the script used within the sender's commitment transaction for an
|
|
// outgoing HTLC.
|
|
//
|
|
// The following cases are exercised by this test:
|
|
// sender script:
|
|
// * receiver spends
|
|
// * revoke w/ sig
|
|
// * HTLC with invalid preimage size
|
|
// * HTLC with valid preimage size + sig
|
|
// * sender spends
|
|
// * invalid lock-time for CLTV
|
|
// * invalid sequence for CSV
|
|
// * valid lock-time+sequence, valid sig
|
|
func TestHTLCSenderSpendValidation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We generate a fake output, and the corresponding txin. This output
|
|
// doesn't need to exist, as we'll only be validating spending from the
|
|
// transaction that references this.
|
|
txid, err := chainhash.NewHash(testHdSeed.CloneBytes())
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create txid: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
fundingOut := &wire.OutPoint{
|
|
Hash: *txid,
|
|
Index: 50,
|
|
}
|
|
fakeFundingTxIn := wire.NewTxIn(fundingOut, nil, nil)
|
|
|
|
// Next we'll the commitment secret for our commitment tx and also the
|
|
// revocation key that we'll use as well.
|
|
revokePreimage := testHdSeed.CloneBytes()
|
|
commitSecret, commitPoint := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
revokePreimage)
|
|
|
|
// Generate a payment preimage to be used below.
|
|
paymentPreimage := revokePreimage
|
|
paymentPreimage[0] ^= 1
|
|
paymentHash := sha256.Sum256(paymentPreimage[:])
|
|
|
|
// We'll also need some tests keys for alice and bob, and metadata of
|
|
// the HTLC output.
|
|
aliceKeyPriv, aliceKeyPub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
testWalletPrivKey)
|
|
bobKeyPriv, bobKeyPub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
bobsPrivKey)
|
|
paymentAmt := btcutil.Amount(1 * 10e8)
|
|
|
|
aliceLocalKey := TweakPubKey(aliceKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
bobLocalKey := TweakPubKey(bobKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
|
|
// As we'll be modeling spends from Alice's commitment transaction,
|
|
// we'll be using Bob's base point for the revocation key.
|
|
revocationKey := DeriveRevocationPubkey(bobKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
|
|
// Generate the raw HTLC redemption scripts, and its p2wsh counterpart.
|
|
htlcWitnessScript, err := senderHTLCScript(aliceLocalKey, bobLocalKey,
|
|
revocationKey, paymentHash[:])
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create htlc sender script: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
htlcPkScript, err := witnessScriptHash(htlcWitnessScript)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create p2wsh htlc script: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This will be Alice's commitment transaction. In this scenario Alice
|
|
// is sending an HTLC to a node she has a path to (could be Bob, could
|
|
// be multiple hops down, it doesn't really matter).
|
|
htlcOutput := &wire.TxOut{
|
|
Value: int64(paymentAmt),
|
|
PkScript: htlcPkScript,
|
|
}
|
|
senderCommitTx := wire.NewMsgTx(2)
|
|
senderCommitTx.AddTxIn(fakeFundingTxIn)
|
|
senderCommitTx.AddTxOut(htlcOutput)
|
|
|
|
prevOut := &wire.OutPoint{
|
|
Hash: senderCommitTx.TxHash(),
|
|
Index: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sweepTx := wire.NewMsgTx(2)
|
|
sweepTx.AddTxIn(wire.NewTxIn(prevOut, nil, nil))
|
|
sweepTx.AddTxOut(
|
|
&wire.TxOut{
|
|
PkScript: []byte("doesn't matter"),
|
|
Value: 1 * 10e8,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
sweepTxSigHashes := txscript.NewTxSigHashes(sweepTx)
|
|
|
|
bobCommitTweak := SingleTweakBytes(commitPoint, bobKeyPub)
|
|
aliceCommitTweak := SingleTweakBytes(commitPoint, aliceKeyPub)
|
|
|
|
// Finally, we'll create mock signers for both of them based on their
|
|
// private keys. This test simplifies a bit and uses the same key as
|
|
// the base point for all scripts and derivations.
|
|
bobSigner := &mockSigner{privkeys: []*btcec.PrivateKey{bobKeyPriv}}
|
|
aliceSigner := &mockSigner{privkeys: []*btcec.PrivateKey{aliceKeyPriv}}
|
|
|
|
// We'll also generate a signature on the sweep transaction above
|
|
// that'll act as Bob's signature to Alice for the second level HTLC
|
|
// transaction.
|
|
bobSignDesc := SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: bobCommitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
bobRecvrSig, err := bobSigner.SignOutputRaw(sweepTx, &bobSignDesc)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to generate alice signature: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
testCases := []struct {
|
|
witness func() wire.TxWitness
|
|
valid bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
// revoke w/ sig
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): test invalid revoke
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
DoubleTweak: commitSecret,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return senderHtlcSpendRevoke(bobSigner, signDesc,
|
|
revocationKey, sweepTx)
|
|
}),
|
|
true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// HTLC with invalid preimage size
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: bobCommitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return SenderHtlcSpendRedeem(bobSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx,
|
|
// Invalid preimage length
|
|
bytes.Repeat([]byte{1}, 45))
|
|
}),
|
|
false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// HTLC with valid preimage size + sig
|
|
// TODO(roabeef): invalid preimage
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: bobCommitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return SenderHtlcSpendRedeem(bobSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx, paymentPreimage)
|
|
}),
|
|
true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// valid spend to the transition the state of the HTLC
|
|
// output with the second level HTLC timeout
|
|
// transaction.
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: aliceKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: aliceCommitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return senderHtlcSpendTimeout(bobRecvrSig, aliceSigner,
|
|
signDesc, sweepTx)
|
|
}),
|
|
true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, testCase := range testCases {
|
|
sweepTx.TxIn[0].Witness = testCase.witness()
|
|
|
|
vm, err := txscript.NewEngine(htlcPkScript,
|
|
sweepTx, 0, txscript.StandardVerifyFlags, nil,
|
|
nil, int64(paymentAmt))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create engine: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This buffer will trace execution of the Script, only dumping
|
|
// out to stdout in the case that a test fails.
|
|
var debugBuf bytes.Buffer
|
|
|
|
done := false
|
|
for !done {
|
|
dis, err := vm.DisasmPC()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("stepping (%v)\n", err)
|
|
}
|
|
debugBuf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("stepping %v\n", dis))
|
|
|
|
done, err = vm.Step()
|
|
if err != nil && testCase.valid {
|
|
fmt.Println(debugBuf.String())
|
|
t.Fatalf("spend test case #%v failed, spend "+
|
|
"should be valid: %v", i, err)
|
|
} else if err == nil && !testCase.valid && done {
|
|
fmt.Println(debugBuf.String())
|
|
t.Fatalf("spend test case #%v succeed, spend "+
|
|
"should be invalid: %v", i, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
debugBuf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("Stack: %v", vm.GetStack()))
|
|
debugBuf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("AltStack: %v", vm.GetAltStack()))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestHTLCReceiverSpendValidation tests all possible valid+invalid redemption
|
|
// paths in the script used within the receiver's commitment transaction for an
|
|
// incoming HTLC.
|
|
//
|
|
// The following cases are exercised by this test:
|
|
// * receiver spends
|
|
// * HTLC redemption w/ invalid preimage size
|
|
// * HTLC redemption w/ invalid sequence
|
|
// * HTLC redemption w/ valid preimage size
|
|
// * sender spends
|
|
// * revoke w/ sig
|
|
// * refund w/ invalid lock time
|
|
// * refund w/ valid lock time
|
|
func TestHTLCReceiverSpendValidation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We generate a fake output, and the corresponding txin. This output
|
|
// doesn't need to exist, as we'll only be validating spending from the
|
|
// transaction that references this.
|
|
txid, err := chainhash.NewHash(testHdSeed.CloneBytes())
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create txid: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
fundingOut := &wire.OutPoint{
|
|
Hash: *txid,
|
|
Index: 50,
|
|
}
|
|
fakeFundingTxIn := wire.NewTxIn(fundingOut, nil, nil)
|
|
|
|
// Next we'll the commitment secret for our commitment tx and also the
|
|
// revocation key that we'll use as well.
|
|
revokePreimage := testHdSeed.CloneBytes()
|
|
commitSecret, commitPoint := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
revokePreimage)
|
|
|
|
// Generate a payment preimage to be used below.
|
|
paymentPreimage := revokePreimage
|
|
paymentPreimage[0] ^= 1
|
|
paymentHash := sha256.Sum256(paymentPreimage[:])
|
|
|
|
// We'll also need some tests keys for alice and bob, and metadata of
|
|
// the HTLC output.
|
|
aliceKeyPriv, aliceKeyPub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
testWalletPrivKey)
|
|
bobKeyPriv, bobKeyPub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
bobsPrivKey)
|
|
paymentAmt := btcutil.Amount(1 * 10e8)
|
|
cltvTimeout := uint32(8)
|
|
|
|
aliceLocalKey := TweakPubKey(aliceKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
bobLocalKey := TweakPubKey(bobKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
|
|
// As we'll be modeling spends from Bob's commitment transaction, we'll
|
|
// be using Alice's base point for the revocation key.
|
|
revocationKey := DeriveRevocationPubkey(aliceKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
|
|
// Generate the raw HTLC redemption scripts, and its p2wsh counterpart.
|
|
htlcWitnessScript, err := receiverHTLCScript(cltvTimeout, aliceLocalKey,
|
|
bobLocalKey, revocationKey, paymentHash[:])
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create htlc sender script: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
htlcPkScript, err := witnessScriptHash(htlcWitnessScript)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create p2wsh htlc script: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This will be Bob's commitment transaction. In this scenario Alice is
|
|
// sending an HTLC to a node she has a path to (could be Bob, could be
|
|
// multiple hops down, it doesn't really matter).
|
|
htlcOutput := &wire.TxOut{
|
|
Value: int64(paymentAmt),
|
|
PkScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
receiverCommitTx := wire.NewMsgTx(2)
|
|
receiverCommitTx.AddTxIn(fakeFundingTxIn)
|
|
receiverCommitTx.AddTxOut(htlcOutput)
|
|
|
|
prevOut := &wire.OutPoint{
|
|
Hash: receiverCommitTx.TxHash(),
|
|
Index: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
sweepTx := wire.NewMsgTx(2)
|
|
sweepTx.AddTxIn(&wire.TxIn{
|
|
PreviousOutPoint: *prevOut,
|
|
})
|
|
sweepTx.AddTxOut(
|
|
&wire.TxOut{
|
|
PkScript: []byte("doesn't matter"),
|
|
Value: 1 * 10e8,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
sweepTxSigHashes := txscript.NewTxSigHashes(sweepTx)
|
|
|
|
bobCommitTweak := SingleTweakBytes(commitPoint, bobKeyPub)
|
|
aliceCommitTweak := SingleTweakBytes(commitPoint, aliceKeyPub)
|
|
|
|
// Finally, we'll create mock signers for both of them based on their
|
|
// private keys. This test simplifies a bit and uses the same key as
|
|
// the base point for all scripts and derivations.
|
|
bobSigner := &mockSigner{privkeys: []*btcec.PrivateKey{bobKeyPriv}}
|
|
aliceSigner := &mockSigner{privkeys: []*btcec.PrivateKey{aliceKeyPriv}}
|
|
|
|
// We'll also generate a signature on the sweep transaction above
|
|
// that'll act as Alice's signature to Bob for the second level HTLC
|
|
// transaction.
|
|
aliceSignDesc := SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: aliceKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: aliceCommitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
aliceSenderSig, err := aliceSigner.SignOutputRaw(sweepTx, &aliceSignDesc)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to generate alice signature: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): modify valid to check precise script errors?
|
|
testCases := []struct {
|
|
witness func() wire.TxWitness
|
|
valid bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
// HTLC redemption w/ invalid preimage size
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: bobCommitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return receiverHtlcSpendRedeem(aliceSenderSig,
|
|
bytes.Repeat([]byte{1}, 45), bobSigner,
|
|
signDesc, sweepTx)
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// HTLC redemption w/ valid preimage size
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: bobCommitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return receiverHtlcSpendRedeem(aliceSenderSig,
|
|
paymentPreimage[:], bobSigner,
|
|
signDesc, sweepTx)
|
|
}),
|
|
true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// revoke w/ sig
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: aliceKeyPub,
|
|
DoubleTweak: commitSecret,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return receiverHtlcSpendRevoke(aliceSigner,
|
|
signDesc, revocationKey, sweepTx)
|
|
}),
|
|
true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// refund w/ invalid lock time
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: aliceKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: aliceCommitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return receiverHtlcSpendTimeout(aliceSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx, int32(cltvTimeout-2))
|
|
}),
|
|
false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// refund w/ valid lock time
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: aliceKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: aliceCommitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return receiverHtlcSpendTimeout(aliceSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx, int32(cltvTimeout))
|
|
}),
|
|
true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, testCase := range testCases {
|
|
sweepTx.TxIn[0].Witness = testCase.witness()
|
|
|
|
vm, err := txscript.NewEngine(htlcPkScript,
|
|
sweepTx, 0, txscript.StandardVerifyFlags, nil,
|
|
nil, int64(paymentAmt))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create engine: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This buffer will trace execution of the Script, only dumping
|
|
// out to stdout in the case that a test fails.
|
|
var debugBuf bytes.Buffer
|
|
|
|
done := false
|
|
for !done {
|
|
dis, err := vm.DisasmPC()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("stepping (%v)\n", err)
|
|
}
|
|
debugBuf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("stepping %v\n", dis))
|
|
|
|
done, err = vm.Step()
|
|
if err != nil && testCase.valid {
|
|
fmt.Println(debugBuf.String())
|
|
t.Fatalf("spend test case #%v failed, spend should be valid: %v", i, err)
|
|
} else if err == nil && !testCase.valid && done {
|
|
fmt.Println(debugBuf.String())
|
|
t.Fatalf("spend test case #%v succeed, spend should be invalid: %v", i, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
debugBuf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("Stack: %v", vm.GetStack()))
|
|
debugBuf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("AltStack: %v", vm.GetAltStack()))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestSecondLevelHtlcSpends tests all the possible redemption clauses from the
|
|
// HTLC success and timeout covenant transactions.
|
|
func TestSecondLevelHtlcSpends(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We'll start be creating a creating a 2BTC HTLC.
|
|
const htlcAmt = btcutil.Amount(2 * 10e8)
|
|
|
|
// In all of our scenarios, the CSV timeout to claim a self output will
|
|
// be 5 blocks.
|
|
const claimDelay = 5
|
|
|
|
// First we'll set up some initial key state for Alice and Bob that
|
|
// will be used in the scripts we created below.
|
|
aliceKeyPriv, aliceKeyPub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
testWalletPrivKey)
|
|
bobKeyPriv, bobKeyPub := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(btcec.S256(),
|
|
bobsPrivKey)
|
|
|
|
revokePreimage := testHdSeed.CloneBytes()
|
|
commitSecret, commitPoint := btcec.PrivKeyFromBytes(
|
|
btcec.S256(), revokePreimage)
|
|
|
|
// As we're modeling this as Bob sweeping the HTLC on-chain from his
|
|
// commitment transaction after a period of time, we'll be using a
|
|
// revocation key derived from Alice's base point and his secret.
|
|
revocationKey := DeriveRevocationPubkey(aliceKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
|
|
// Next, craft a fake HTLC outpoint that we'll use to generate the
|
|
// sweeping transaction using.
|
|
txid, err := chainhash.NewHash(testHdSeed.CloneBytes())
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create txid: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
htlcOutPoint := &wire.OutPoint{
|
|
Hash: *txid,
|
|
Index: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
sweepTx := wire.NewMsgTx(2)
|
|
sweepTx.AddTxIn(wire.NewTxIn(htlcOutPoint, nil, nil))
|
|
sweepTx.AddTxOut(
|
|
&wire.TxOut{
|
|
PkScript: []byte("doesn't matter"),
|
|
Value: 1 * 10e8,
|
|
},
|
|
)
|
|
sweepTxSigHashes := txscript.NewTxSigHashes(sweepTx)
|
|
|
|
// The delay key will be crafted using Bob's public key as the output
|
|
// we created will be spending from Alice's commitment transaction.
|
|
delayKey := TweakPubKey(bobKeyPub, commitPoint)
|
|
|
|
// The commit tweak will be required in order for Bob to derive the
|
|
// proper key need to spend the output.
|
|
commitTweak := SingleTweakBytes(commitPoint, bobKeyPub)
|
|
|
|
// Finally we'll generate the HTLC script itself that we'll be spending
|
|
// from. The revocation clause can be claimed by Alice, while Bob can
|
|
// sweep the output after a particular delay.
|
|
htlcWitnessScript, err := secondLevelHtlcScript(revocationKey,
|
|
delayKey, claimDelay)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create htlc script: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
htlcPkScript, err := witnessScriptHash(htlcWitnessScript)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create htlc output: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
htlcOutput := &wire.TxOut{
|
|
PkScript: htlcPkScript,
|
|
Value: int64(htlcAmt),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TODO(roasbeef): make actually use timeout/sucess txns?
|
|
|
|
// Finally, we'll create mock signers for both of them based on their
|
|
// private keys. This test simplifies a bit and uses the same key as
|
|
// the base point for all scripts and derivations.
|
|
bobSigner := &mockSigner{privkeys: []*btcec.PrivateKey{bobKeyPriv}}
|
|
aliceSigner := &mockSigner{privkeys: []*btcec.PrivateKey{aliceKeyPriv}}
|
|
|
|
testCases := []struct {
|
|
witness func() wire.TxWitness
|
|
valid bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
// Sender of the HTLC attempts to activate the
|
|
// revocation clause, but uses the wrong key (fails to
|
|
// use the double tweak in this case).
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: aliceKeyPub,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return htlcSpendRevoke(aliceSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx)
|
|
}),
|
|
false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// Sender of HTLC activates the revocation clause.
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: aliceKeyPub,
|
|
DoubleTweak: commitSecret,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return htlcSpendRevoke(aliceSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx)
|
|
}),
|
|
true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// Receiver of the HTLC attempts to sweep, but tries to
|
|
// do so pre-maturely with a smaller CSV delay (2
|
|
// blocks instead of 5 blocks).
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: commitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return htlcSpendSuccess(bobSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx, claimDelay-3)
|
|
}),
|
|
false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// Receiver of the HTLC sweeps with the proper CSV
|
|
// delay, but uses the wrong key (leaves off the single
|
|
// tweak).
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return htlcSpendSuccess(bobSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx, claimDelay)
|
|
}),
|
|
false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// Receiver of the HTLC sweeps with the proper CSV
|
|
// delay, and the correct key.
|
|
makeWitnessTestCase(t, func() (wire.TxWitness, error) {
|
|
signDesc := &SignDescriptor{
|
|
PubKey: bobKeyPub,
|
|
SingleTweak: commitTweak,
|
|
WitnessScript: htlcWitnessScript,
|
|
Output: htlcOutput,
|
|
HashType: txscript.SigHashAll,
|
|
SigHashes: sweepTxSigHashes,
|
|
InputIndex: 0,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return htlcSpendSuccess(bobSigner, signDesc,
|
|
sweepTx, claimDelay)
|
|
}),
|
|
true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i, testCase := range testCases {
|
|
sweepTx.TxIn[0].Witness = testCase.witness()
|
|
|
|
vm, err := txscript.NewEngine(htlcPkScript,
|
|
sweepTx, 0, txscript.StandardVerifyFlags, nil,
|
|
nil, int64(htlcAmt))
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create engine: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This buffer will trace execution of the Script, only dumping
|
|
// out to stdout in the case that a test fails.
|
|
var debugBuf bytes.Buffer
|
|
|
|
done := false
|
|
for !done {
|
|
dis, err := vm.DisasmPC()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("stepping (%v)\n", err)
|
|
}
|
|
debugBuf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("stepping %v\n", dis))
|
|
|
|
done, err = vm.Step()
|
|
if err != nil && testCase.valid {
|
|
fmt.Println(debugBuf.String())
|
|
t.Fatalf("spend test case #%v failed, spend "+
|
|
"should be valid: %v", i, err)
|
|
} else if err == nil && !testCase.valid && done {
|
|
fmt.Println(debugBuf.String())
|
|
t.Fatalf("spend test case #%v succeed, spend "+
|
|
"should be invalid: %v", i, err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
debugBuf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("Stack: %v", vm.GetStack()))
|
|
debugBuf.WriteString(fmt.Sprintf("AltStack: %v", vm.GetAltStack()))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestCommitTxStateHint(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
stateHintTests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
from uint64
|
|
to uint64
|
|
inputs int
|
|
shouldFail bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "states 0 to 1000",
|
|
from: 0,
|
|
to: 1000,
|
|
inputs: 1,
|
|
shouldFail: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "states 'maxStateHint-1000' to 'maxStateHint'",
|
|
from: maxStateHint - 1000,
|
|
to: maxStateHint,
|
|
inputs: 1,
|
|
shouldFail: false,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "state 'maxStateHint+1'",
|
|
from: maxStateHint + 1,
|
|
to: maxStateHint + 10,
|
|
inputs: 1,
|
|
shouldFail: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "commit transaction with two inputs",
|
|
inputs: 2,
|
|
shouldFail: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var obfuscator [StateHintSize]byte
|
|
copy(obfuscator[:], testHdSeed[:StateHintSize])
|
|
timeYesterday := uint32(time.Now().Unix() - 24*60*60)
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range stateHintTests {
|
|
commitTx := wire.NewMsgTx(2)
|
|
|
|
// Add supplied number of inputs to the commitment transaction.
|
|
for i := 0; i < test.inputs; i++ {
|
|
commitTx.AddTxIn(&wire.TxIn{})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i := test.from; i <= test.to; i++ {
|
|
stateNum := uint64(i)
|
|
|
|
err := SetStateNumHint(commitTx, stateNum, obfuscator)
|
|
if err != nil && !test.shouldFail {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to set state num %v: %v", i, err)
|
|
} else if err == nil && test.shouldFail {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Failed(%v): test should fail but did not", test.name)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
locktime := commitTx.LockTime
|
|
sequence := commitTx.TxIn[0].Sequence
|
|
|
|
// Locktime should not be less than 500,000,000 and not larger
|
|
// than the time 24 hours ago. One day should provide a good
|
|
// enough buffer for the tests.
|
|
if locktime < 5e8 || locktime > timeYesterday {
|
|
if !test.shouldFail {
|
|
t.Fatalf("The value of locktime (%v) may cause the commitment "+
|
|
"transaction to be unspendable", locktime)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if sequence&wire.SequenceLockTimeDisabled == 0 {
|
|
if !test.shouldFail {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Sequence locktime is NOT disabled when it should be")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
extractedStateNum := GetStateNumHint(commitTx, obfuscator)
|
|
if extractedStateNum != stateNum && !test.shouldFail {
|
|
t.Fatalf("state number mismatched, expected %v, got %v",
|
|
stateNum, extractedStateNum)
|
|
} else if extractedStateNum == stateNum && test.shouldFail {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Failed(%v): test should fail but did not", test.name)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
t.Logf("Passed: %v", test.name)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestSpecificationKeyDerivation implements the test vectors provided in
|
|
// BOLT-03, Appendix E.
|
|
func TestSpecificationKeyDerivation(t *testing.T) {
|
|
const (
|
|
baseSecretHex = "000102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f101112131415161718191a1b1c1d1e1f"
|
|
perCommitmentSecretHex = "1f1e1d1c1b1a191817161514131211100f0e0d0c0b0a09080706050403020100"
|
|
basePointHex = "036d6caac248af96f6afa7f904f550253a0f3ef3f5aa2fe6838a95b216691468e2"
|
|
perCommitmentPointHex = "025f7117a78150fe2ef97db7cfc83bd57b2e2c0d0dd25eaf467a4a1c2a45ce1486"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
baseSecret, err := privkeyFromHex(baseSecretHex)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Failed to parse serialized privkey: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perCommitmentSecret, err := privkeyFromHex(perCommitmentSecretHex)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Failed to parse serialized privkey: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
basePoint, err := pubkeyFromHex(basePointHex)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Failed to parse serialized pubkey: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
perCommitmentPoint, err := pubkeyFromHex(perCommitmentPointHex)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Failed to parse serialized pubkey: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// name: derivation of key from basepoint and per_commitment_point
|
|
const expectedLocalKeyHex = "0235f2dbfaa89b57ec7b055afe29849ef7ddfeb1cefdb9ebdc43f5494984db29e5"
|
|
actualLocalKey := TweakPubKey(basePoint, perCommitmentPoint)
|
|
actualLocalKeyHex := pubkeyToHex(actualLocalKey)
|
|
if actualLocalKeyHex != expectedLocalKeyHex {
|
|
t.Errorf("Incorrect derivation of local public key: "+
|
|
"expected %v, got %v", expectedLocalKeyHex, actualLocalKeyHex)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// name: derivation of secret key from basepoint secret and per_commitment_secret
|
|
const expectedLocalPrivKeyHex = "cbced912d3b21bf196a766651e436aff192362621ce317704ea2f75d87e7be0f"
|
|
tweak := SingleTweakBytes(perCommitmentPoint, basePoint)
|
|
actualLocalPrivKey := TweakPrivKey(baseSecret, tweak)
|
|
actualLocalPrivKeyHex := privkeyToHex(actualLocalPrivKey)
|
|
if actualLocalPrivKeyHex != expectedLocalPrivKeyHex {
|
|
t.Errorf("Incorrect derivation of local private key: "+
|
|
"expected %v, got %v, %v", expectedLocalPrivKeyHex,
|
|
actualLocalPrivKeyHex, hex.EncodeToString(tweak))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// name: derivation of revocation key from basepoint and per_commitment_point
|
|
const expectedRevocationKeyHex = "02916e326636d19c33f13e8c0c3a03dd157f332f3e99c317c141dd865eb01f8ff0"
|
|
actualRevocationKey := DeriveRevocationPubkey(basePoint, perCommitmentPoint)
|
|
actualRevocationKeyHex := pubkeyToHex(actualRevocationKey)
|
|
if actualRevocationKeyHex != expectedRevocationKeyHex {
|
|
t.Errorf("Incorrect derivation of revocation public key: "+
|
|
"expected %v, got %v", expectedRevocationKeyHex,
|
|
actualRevocationKeyHex)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// name: derivation of revocation secret from basepoint_secret and per_commitment_secret
|
|
const expectedRevocationPrivKeyHex = "d09ffff62ddb2297ab000cc85bcb4283fdeb6aa052affbc9dddcf33b61078110"
|
|
actualRevocationPrivKey := DeriveRevocationPrivKey(baseSecret,
|
|
perCommitmentSecret)
|
|
actualRevocationPrivKeyHex := privkeyToHex(actualRevocationPrivKey)
|
|
if actualRevocationPrivKeyHex != expectedRevocationPrivKeyHex {
|
|
t.Errorf("Incorrect derivation of revocation private key: "+
|
|
"expected %v, got %v", expectedRevocationPrivKeyHex,
|
|
actualRevocationPrivKeyHex)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|