5251ebe117
Prior to this change, the numQueryResponses that we calculated would be one more than what we actually wanted since it didn't account for the initial QueryChannelRange msg. This resulted in the test sending one extra delayed query than was configured. This doesn't fundamentally impact the test, but does make what happens in the test more reflective of the configuration.
1898 lines
55 KiB
Go
1898 lines
55 KiB
Go
package discovery
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"math"
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg"
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash"
|
|
"github.com/davecgh/go-spew/spew"
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
defaultEncoding = lnwire.EncodingSortedPlain
|
|
latestKnownHeight = 1337
|
|
startHeight = latestKnownHeight - chanRangeQueryBuffer
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
defaultChunkSize = encodingTypeToChunkSize[defaultEncoding]
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
type horizonQuery struct {
|
|
chain chainhash.Hash
|
|
start time.Time
|
|
end time.Time
|
|
}
|
|
type filterRangeReq struct {
|
|
startHeight, endHeight uint32
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type mockChannelGraphTimeSeries struct {
|
|
highestID lnwire.ShortChannelID
|
|
|
|
horizonReq chan horizonQuery
|
|
horizonResp chan []lnwire.Message
|
|
|
|
filterReq chan []lnwire.ShortChannelID
|
|
filterResp chan []lnwire.ShortChannelID
|
|
|
|
filterRangeReqs chan filterRangeReq
|
|
filterRangeResp chan []lnwire.ShortChannelID
|
|
|
|
annReq chan []lnwire.ShortChannelID
|
|
annResp chan []lnwire.Message
|
|
|
|
updateReq chan lnwire.ShortChannelID
|
|
updateResp chan []*lnwire.ChannelUpdate
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func newMockChannelGraphTimeSeries(
|
|
hID lnwire.ShortChannelID) *mockChannelGraphTimeSeries {
|
|
|
|
return &mockChannelGraphTimeSeries{
|
|
highestID: hID,
|
|
|
|
horizonReq: make(chan horizonQuery, 1),
|
|
horizonResp: make(chan []lnwire.Message, 1),
|
|
|
|
filterReq: make(chan []lnwire.ShortChannelID, 1),
|
|
filterResp: make(chan []lnwire.ShortChannelID, 1),
|
|
|
|
filterRangeReqs: make(chan filterRangeReq, 1),
|
|
filterRangeResp: make(chan []lnwire.ShortChannelID, 1),
|
|
|
|
annReq: make(chan []lnwire.ShortChannelID, 1),
|
|
annResp: make(chan []lnwire.Message, 1),
|
|
|
|
updateReq: make(chan lnwire.ShortChannelID, 1),
|
|
updateResp: make(chan []*lnwire.ChannelUpdate, 1),
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (m *mockChannelGraphTimeSeries) HighestChanID(chain chainhash.Hash) (*lnwire.ShortChannelID, error) {
|
|
return &m.highestID, nil
|
|
}
|
|
func (m *mockChannelGraphTimeSeries) UpdatesInHorizon(chain chainhash.Hash,
|
|
startTime time.Time, endTime time.Time) ([]lnwire.Message, error) {
|
|
|
|
m.horizonReq <- horizonQuery{
|
|
chain, startTime, endTime,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return <-m.horizonResp, nil
|
|
}
|
|
func (m *mockChannelGraphTimeSeries) FilterKnownChanIDs(chain chainhash.Hash,
|
|
superSet []lnwire.ShortChannelID) ([]lnwire.ShortChannelID, error) {
|
|
|
|
m.filterReq <- superSet
|
|
|
|
return <-m.filterResp, nil
|
|
}
|
|
func (m *mockChannelGraphTimeSeries) FilterChannelRange(chain chainhash.Hash,
|
|
startHeight, endHeight uint32) ([]lnwire.ShortChannelID, error) {
|
|
|
|
m.filterRangeReqs <- filterRangeReq{startHeight, endHeight}
|
|
|
|
return <-m.filterRangeResp, nil
|
|
}
|
|
func (m *mockChannelGraphTimeSeries) FetchChanAnns(chain chainhash.Hash,
|
|
shortChanIDs []lnwire.ShortChannelID) ([]lnwire.Message, error) {
|
|
|
|
m.annReq <- shortChanIDs
|
|
|
|
return <-m.annResp, nil
|
|
}
|
|
func (m *mockChannelGraphTimeSeries) FetchChanUpdates(chain chainhash.Hash,
|
|
shortChanID lnwire.ShortChannelID) ([]*lnwire.ChannelUpdate, error) {
|
|
|
|
m.updateReq <- shortChanID
|
|
|
|
return <-m.updateResp, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
var _ ChannelGraphTimeSeries = (*mockChannelGraphTimeSeries)(nil)
|
|
|
|
// newTestSyncer creates a new test instance of a GossipSyncer. A buffered
|
|
// message channel is returned for intercepting messages sent from the syncer,
|
|
// in addition to a mock channel series which allows the test to control which
|
|
// messages the syncer knows of or wishes to filter out. The variadic flags are
|
|
// treated as positional arguments where the first index signals that the syncer
|
|
// should spawn a channelGraphSyncer and second index signals that the syncer
|
|
// should spawn a replyHandler. Any flags beyond the first two are currently
|
|
// ignored. If no flags are provided, both a channelGraphSyncer and replyHandler
|
|
// will be spawned by default.
|
|
func newTestSyncer(hID lnwire.ShortChannelID,
|
|
encodingType lnwire.ShortChanIDEncoding, chunkSize int32,
|
|
flags ...bool) (chan []lnwire.Message,
|
|
*GossipSyncer, *mockChannelGraphTimeSeries) {
|
|
|
|
syncChannels := true
|
|
replyQueries := true
|
|
if len(flags) > 0 {
|
|
syncChannels = flags[0]
|
|
}
|
|
if len(flags) > 1 {
|
|
replyQueries = flags[1]
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
msgChan := make(chan []lnwire.Message, 20)
|
|
cfg := gossipSyncerCfg{
|
|
channelSeries: newMockChannelGraphTimeSeries(hID),
|
|
encodingType: encodingType,
|
|
chunkSize: chunkSize,
|
|
batchSize: chunkSize,
|
|
noSyncChannels: !syncChannels,
|
|
noReplyQueries: !replyQueries,
|
|
sendToPeer: func(msgs ...lnwire.Message) error {
|
|
msgChan <- msgs
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
sendToPeerSync: func(msgs ...lnwire.Message) error {
|
|
msgChan <- msgs
|
|
return nil
|
|
},
|
|
delayedQueryReplyInterval: 2 * time.Second,
|
|
}
|
|
syncer := newGossipSyncer(cfg)
|
|
|
|
return msgChan, syncer, cfg.channelSeries.(*mockChannelGraphTimeSeries)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerFilterGossipMsgsNoHorizon tests that if the remote peer
|
|
// doesn't have a horizon set, then we won't send any incoming messages to it.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerFilterGossipMsgsNoHorizon(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a GossipSyncer instance with a canned sendToPeer
|
|
// message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
msgChan, syncer, _ := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding,
|
|
defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// With the syncer created, we'll create a set of messages to filter
|
|
// through the gossiper to the target peer.
|
|
msgs := []msgWithSenders{
|
|
{
|
|
msg: &lnwire.NodeAnnouncement{Timestamp: uint32(time.Now().Unix())},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
msg: &lnwire.NodeAnnouncement{Timestamp: uint32(time.Now().Unix())},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll then attempt to filter the set of messages through the target
|
|
// peer.
|
|
syncer.FilterGossipMsgs(msgs...)
|
|
|
|
// As the remote peer doesn't yet have a gossip timestamp set, we
|
|
// shouldn't receive any outbound messages.
|
|
select {
|
|
case msg := <-msgChan:
|
|
t.Fatalf("received message but shouldn't have: %v",
|
|
spew.Sdump(msg))
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Millisecond * 10):
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func unixStamp(a int64) uint32 {
|
|
t := time.Unix(a, 0)
|
|
return uint32(t.Unix())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerFilterGossipMsgsAll tests that we're able to properly filter
|
|
// out a set of incoming messages based on the set remote update horizon for a
|
|
// peer. We tests all messages type, and all time straddling. We'll also send a
|
|
// channel ann that already has a channel update on disk.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerFilterGossipMsgsAllInMemory(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a GossipSyncer instance with a canned sendToPeer
|
|
// message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
msgChan, syncer, chanSeries := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding,
|
|
defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// We'll create then apply a remote horizon for the target peer with a
|
|
// set of manually selected timestamps.
|
|
remoteHorizon := &lnwire.GossipTimestampRange{
|
|
FirstTimestamp: unixStamp(25000),
|
|
TimestampRange: uint32(1000),
|
|
}
|
|
syncer.remoteUpdateHorizon = remoteHorizon
|
|
|
|
// With the syncer created, we'll create a set of messages to filter
|
|
// through the gossiper to the target peer. Our message will consist of
|
|
// one node announcement above the horizon, one below. Additionally,
|
|
// we'll include a chan ann with an update below the horizon, one
|
|
// with an update timestamp above the horizon, and one without any
|
|
// channel updates at all.
|
|
msgs := []msgWithSenders{
|
|
{
|
|
// Node ann above horizon.
|
|
msg: &lnwire.NodeAnnouncement{Timestamp: unixStamp(25001)},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// Node ann below horizon.
|
|
msg: &lnwire.NodeAnnouncement{Timestamp: unixStamp(5)},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// Node ann above horizon.
|
|
msg: &lnwire.NodeAnnouncement{Timestamp: unixStamp(999999)},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// Ann tuple below horizon.
|
|
msg: &lnwire.ChannelAnnouncement{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
msg: &lnwire.ChannelUpdate{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10),
|
|
Timestamp: unixStamp(5),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// Ann tuple above horizon.
|
|
msg: &lnwire.ChannelAnnouncement{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(15),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
msg: &lnwire.ChannelUpdate{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(15),
|
|
Timestamp: unixStamp(25002),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// Ann tuple beyond horizon.
|
|
msg: &lnwire.ChannelAnnouncement{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(20),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
msg: &lnwire.ChannelUpdate{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(20),
|
|
Timestamp: unixStamp(999999),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
// Ann w/o an update at all, the update in the DB will
|
|
// be below the horizon.
|
|
msg: &lnwire.ChannelAnnouncement{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(25),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Before we send off the query, we'll ensure we send the missing
|
|
// channel update for that final ann. It will be below the horizon, so
|
|
// shouldn't be sent anyway.
|
|
go func() {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case query := <-chanSeries.updateReq:
|
|
|
|
// It should be asking for the chan updates of short
|
|
// chan ID 25.
|
|
expectedID := lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(25)
|
|
if expectedID != query {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong query id: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedID, query)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If so, then we'll send back the missing update.
|
|
chanSeries.updateResp <- []*lnwire.ChannelUpdate{
|
|
{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(25),
|
|
Timestamp: unixStamp(5),
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// We'll then instruct the gossiper to filter this set of messages.
|
|
syncer.FilterGossipMsgs(msgs...)
|
|
|
|
// Out of all the messages we sent in, we should only get 2 of them
|
|
// back.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no msgs received")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan:
|
|
if len(msgs) != 3 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected 3 messages instead got %v "+
|
|
"messages: %v", len(msgs), spew.Sdump(msgs))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerApplyGossipFilter tests that once a gossip filter is applied
|
|
// for the remote peer, then we send the peer all known messages which are
|
|
// within their desired time horizon.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerApplyGossipFilter(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a GossipSyncer instance with a canned sendToPeer
|
|
// message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
msgChan, syncer, chanSeries := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding,
|
|
defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// We'll apply this gossip horizon for the remote peer.
|
|
remoteHorizon := &lnwire.GossipTimestampRange{
|
|
FirstTimestamp: unixStamp(25000),
|
|
TimestampRange: uint32(1000),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Before we apply the horizon, we'll dispatch a response to the query
|
|
// that the syncer will issue.
|
|
go func() {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case query := <-chanSeries.horizonReq:
|
|
// The syncer should have translated the time range
|
|
// into the proper star time.
|
|
if remoteHorizon.FirstTimestamp != uint32(query.start.Unix()) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong query stamp: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
remoteHorizon.FirstTimestamp, query.start)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// For this first response, we'll send back an empty
|
|
// set of messages. As result, we shouldn't send any
|
|
// messages.
|
|
chanSeries.horizonResp <- []lnwire.Message{}
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// We'll now attempt to apply the gossip filter for the remote peer.
|
|
err := syncer.ApplyGossipFilter(remoteHorizon)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to apply filter: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// There should be no messages in the message queue as we didn't send
|
|
// the syncer and messages within the horizon.
|
|
select {
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan:
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected no msgs, instead got %v", spew.Sdump(msgs))
|
|
default:
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If we repeat the process, but give the syncer a set of valid
|
|
// messages, then these should be sent to the remote peer.
|
|
go func() {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case query := <-chanSeries.horizonReq:
|
|
// The syncer should have translated the time range
|
|
// into the proper star time.
|
|
if remoteHorizon.FirstTimestamp != uint32(query.start.Unix()) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong query stamp: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
remoteHorizon.FirstTimestamp, query.start)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// For this first response, we'll send back a proper
|
|
// set of messages that should be echoed back.
|
|
chanSeries.horizonResp <- []lnwire.Message{
|
|
&lnwire.ChannelUpdate{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(25),
|
|
Timestamp: unixStamp(5),
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
err = syncer.ApplyGossipFilter(remoteHorizon)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to apply filter: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We should get back the exact same message.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no msgs received")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan:
|
|
if len(msgs) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong messages: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
1, len(msgs))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerReplyShortChanIDsWrongChainHash tests that if we get a chan
|
|
// ID query for the wrong chain, then we send back only a short ID end with
|
|
// complete=0.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerReplyShortChanIDsWrongChainHash(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a GossipSyncer instance with a canned sendToPeer
|
|
// message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
msgChan, syncer, _ := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding,
|
|
defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// We'll now ask the syncer to reply to a chan ID query, but for a
|
|
// chain that it isn't aware of.
|
|
err := syncer.replyShortChanIDs(&lnwire.QueryShortChanIDs{
|
|
ChainHash: *chaincfg.SimNetParams.GenesisHash,
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to process short chan ID's: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no msgs received")
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan:
|
|
|
|
// We should get back exactly one message, that's a
|
|
// ReplyShortChanIDsEnd with a matching chain hash, and a
|
|
// complete value of zero.
|
|
if len(msgs) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong messages: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
1, len(msgs))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
msg, ok := msgs[0].(*lnwire.ReplyShortChanIDsEnd)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected lnwire.ReplyShortChanIDsEnd "+
|
|
"instead got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if msg.ChainHash != *chaincfg.SimNetParams.GenesisHash {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong chain hash: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
msg.ChainHash, chaincfg.SimNetParams.GenesisHash)
|
|
}
|
|
if msg.Complete != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("complete set incorrectly")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerReplyShortChanIDs tests that in the case of a known chain
|
|
// hash for a QueryShortChanIDs, we'll return the set of matching
|
|
// announcements, as well as an ending ReplyShortChanIDsEnd message.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerReplyShortChanIDs(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a GossipSyncer instance with a canned sendToPeer
|
|
// message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
msgChan, syncer, chanSeries := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding,
|
|
defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
queryChanIDs := []lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(3),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
queryReply := []lnwire.Message{
|
|
&lnwire.ChannelAnnouncement{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(20),
|
|
},
|
|
&lnwire.ChannelUpdate{
|
|
ShortChannelID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(20),
|
|
Timestamp: unixStamp(999999),
|
|
},
|
|
&lnwire.NodeAnnouncement{Timestamp: unixStamp(25001)},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll then craft a reply to the upcoming query for all the matching
|
|
// channel announcements for a particular set of short channel ID's.
|
|
go func() {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case chanIDs := <-chanSeries.annReq:
|
|
// The set of chan ID's should match exactly.
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(chanIDs, queryChanIDs) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong chan IDs: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
queryChanIDs, chanIDs)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If they do, then we'll send back a response with
|
|
// some canned messages.
|
|
chanSeries.annResp <- queryReply
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// With our set up above complete, we'll now attempt to obtain a reply
|
|
// from the channel syncer for our target chan ID query.
|
|
err := syncer.replyShortChanIDs(&lnwire.QueryShortChanIDs{
|
|
ShortChanIDs: queryChanIDs,
|
|
})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to query for chan IDs: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < len(queryReply)+1; i++ {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no msgs received")
|
|
|
|
// We should get back exactly 4 messages. The first 3 are the
|
|
// same messages we sent above, and the query end message.
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan:
|
|
if len(msgs) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong number of messages: "+
|
|
"expected %v, got %v", 1, len(msgs))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
isQueryReply := i < len(queryReply)
|
|
finalMsg, ok := msgs[0].(*lnwire.ReplyShortChanIDsEnd)
|
|
|
|
switch {
|
|
case isQueryReply &&
|
|
!reflect.DeepEqual(queryReply[i], msgs[0]):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
spew.Sdump(queryReply[i]),
|
|
spew.Sdump(msgs[0]))
|
|
|
|
case !isQueryReply && !ok:
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected lnwire.ReplyShortChanIDsEnd"+
|
|
" instead got %T", msgs[3])
|
|
|
|
case !isQueryReply && finalMsg.Complete != 1:
|
|
t.Fatalf("complete wasn't set")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerReplyChanRangeQuery tests that if we receive a
|
|
// QueryChannelRange message, then we'll properly send back a chunked reply to
|
|
// the remote peer.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerReplyChanRangeQuery(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We'll use a smaller chunk size so we can easily test all the edge
|
|
// cases.
|
|
const chunkSize = 2
|
|
|
|
// We'll now create our test gossip syncer that will shortly respond to
|
|
// our canned query.
|
|
msgChan, syncer, chanSeries := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding, chunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll craft a query to ask for all the new chan ID's after
|
|
// block 100.
|
|
query := &lnwire.QueryChannelRange{
|
|
FirstBlockHeight: 100,
|
|
NumBlocks: 50,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll then launch a goroutine to reply to the query with a set of 5
|
|
// responses. This will ensure we get two full chunks, and one partial
|
|
// chunk.
|
|
resp := []lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(3),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(4),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(5),
|
|
}
|
|
go func() {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case filterReq := <-chanSeries.filterRangeReqs:
|
|
// We should be querying for block 100 to 150.
|
|
if filterReq.startHeight != 100 && filterReq.endHeight != 150 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong height range: %v", spew.Sdump(filterReq))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the proper request was sent, then we'll respond
|
|
// with our set of short channel ID's.
|
|
chanSeries.filterRangeResp <- resp
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// With our goroutine active, we'll now issue the query.
|
|
if err := syncer.replyChanRangeQuery(query); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to issue query: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this point, we'll now wait for the syncer to send the chunked
|
|
// reply. We should get three sets of messages as two of them should be
|
|
// full, while the other is the final fragment.
|
|
const numExpectedChunks = 3
|
|
respMsgs := make([]lnwire.ShortChannelID, 0, 5)
|
|
for i := 0; i < numExpectedChunks; i++ {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no msgs received")
|
|
|
|
case msg := <-msgChan:
|
|
resp := msg[0]
|
|
rangeResp, ok := resp.(*lnwire.ReplyChannelRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ReplyChannelRange instead got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If this is not the last chunk, then Complete should
|
|
// be set to zero. Otherwise, it should be one.
|
|
switch {
|
|
case i < 2 && rangeResp.Complete != 0:
|
|
t.Fatalf("non-final chunk should have "+
|
|
"Complete=0: %v", spew.Sdump(rangeResp))
|
|
|
|
case i == 2 && rangeResp.Complete != 1:
|
|
t.Fatalf("final chunk should have "+
|
|
"Complete=1: %v", spew.Sdump(rangeResp))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
respMsgs = append(respMsgs, rangeResp.ShortChanIDs...)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We should get back exactly 5 short chan ID's, and they should match
|
|
// exactly the ID's we sent as a reply.
|
|
if len(respMsgs) != len(resp) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected %v chan ID's, instead got %v",
|
|
len(resp), spew.Sdump(respMsgs))
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(resp, respMsgs) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("mismatched response: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
spew.Sdump(resp), spew.Sdump(respMsgs))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerReplyChanRangeQueryNoNewChans tests that if we issue a reply
|
|
// for a channel range query, and we don't have any new channels, then we send
|
|
// back a single response that signals completion.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerReplyChanRangeQueryNoNewChans(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We'll now create our test gossip syncer that will shortly respond to
|
|
// our canned query.
|
|
msgChan, syncer, chanSeries := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding,
|
|
defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll craft a query to ask for all the new chan ID's after
|
|
// block 100.
|
|
query := &lnwire.QueryChannelRange{
|
|
FirstBlockHeight: 100,
|
|
NumBlocks: 50,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll then launch a goroutine to reply to the query no new channels.
|
|
resp := []lnwire.ShortChannelID{}
|
|
go func() {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case filterReq := <-chanSeries.filterRangeReqs:
|
|
// We should be querying for block 100 to 150.
|
|
if filterReq.startHeight != 100 && filterReq.endHeight != 150 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong height range: %v",
|
|
spew.Sdump(filterReq))
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If the proper request was sent, then we'll respond
|
|
// with our blank set of short chan ID's.
|
|
chanSeries.filterRangeResp <- resp
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// With our goroutine active, we'll now issue the query.
|
|
if err := syncer.replyChanRangeQuery(query); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to issue query: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We should get back exactly one message, and the message should
|
|
// indicate that this is the final in the series.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no msgs received")
|
|
|
|
case msg := <-msgChan:
|
|
resp := msg[0]
|
|
rangeResp, ok := resp.(*lnwire.ReplyChannelRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected ReplyChannelRange instead got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(rangeResp.ShortChanIDs) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected no chan ID's, instead "+
|
|
"got: %v", spew.Sdump(rangeResp.ShortChanIDs))
|
|
}
|
|
if rangeResp.Complete != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("complete wasn't set")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerGenChanRangeQuery tests that given the current best known
|
|
// channel ID, we properly generate an correct initial channel range response.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerGenChanRangeQuery(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a GossipSyncer instance with a canned sendToPeer
|
|
// message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
const startingHeight = 200
|
|
_, syncer, _ := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.ShortChannelID{BlockHeight: startingHeight},
|
|
defaultEncoding, defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// If we now ask the syncer to generate an initial range query, it
|
|
// should return a start height that's back chanRangeQueryBuffer
|
|
// blocks.
|
|
rangeQuery, err := syncer.genChanRangeQuery(false)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to resp: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
firstHeight := uint32(startingHeight - chanRangeQueryBuffer)
|
|
if rangeQuery.FirstBlockHeight != firstHeight {
|
|
t.Fatalf("incorrect chan range query: expected %v, %v",
|
|
rangeQuery.FirstBlockHeight,
|
|
startingHeight-chanRangeQueryBuffer)
|
|
}
|
|
if rangeQuery.NumBlocks != math.MaxUint32-firstHeight {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong num blocks: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
math.MaxUint32-firstHeight, rangeQuery.NumBlocks)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Generating a historical range query should result in a start height
|
|
// of 0.
|
|
rangeQuery, err = syncer.genChanRangeQuery(true)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to resp: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if rangeQuery.FirstBlockHeight != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("incorrect chan range query: expected %v, %v", 0,
|
|
rangeQuery.FirstBlockHeight)
|
|
}
|
|
if rangeQuery.NumBlocks != math.MaxUint32 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong num blocks: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
math.MaxUint32, rangeQuery.NumBlocks)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerProcessChanRangeReply tests that we'll properly buffer
|
|
// replied channel replies until we have the complete version. If no new
|
|
// channels were discovered, then we should go directly to the chanSsSynced
|
|
// state. Otherwise, we should go to the queryNewChannels states.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerProcessChanRangeReply(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a GossipSyncer instance with a canned sendToPeer
|
|
// message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
_, syncer, chanSeries := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding, defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
startingState := syncer.state
|
|
|
|
replies := []*lnwire.ReplyChannelRange{
|
|
{
|
|
ShortChanIDs: []lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
ShortChanIDs: []lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(11),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
Complete: 1,
|
|
ShortChanIDs: []lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(12),
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll begin by sending the syncer a set of non-complete channel
|
|
// range replies.
|
|
if err := syncer.processChanRangeReply(replies[0]); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to process reply: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if err := syncer.processChanRangeReply(replies[1]); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to process reply: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this point, we should still be in our starting state as the query
|
|
// hasn't finished.
|
|
if syncer.state != startingState {
|
|
t.Fatalf("state should not have transitioned")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
expectedReq := []lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(11),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(12),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// As we're about to send the final response, we'll launch a goroutine
|
|
// to respond back with a filtered set of chan ID's.
|
|
go func() {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case req := <-chanSeries.filterReq:
|
|
// We should get a request for the entire range of short
|
|
// chan ID's.
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(expectedReq, req) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong request: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedReq, req)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll send back only the last two to simulate filtering.
|
|
chanSeries.filterResp <- expectedReq[1:]
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
// If we send the final message, then we should transition to
|
|
// queryNewChannels as we've sent a non-empty set of new channels.
|
|
if err := syncer.processChanRangeReply(replies[2]); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to process reply: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if syncer.syncState() != queryNewChannels {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong state: expected %v instead got %v",
|
|
queryNewChannels, syncer.state)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(syncer.newChansToQuery, expectedReq[1:]) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong set of chans to query: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
syncer.newChansToQuery, expectedReq[1:])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll repeat our final reply again, but this time we won't send any
|
|
// new channels. As a result, we should transition over to the
|
|
// chansSynced state.
|
|
go func() {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case req := <-chanSeries.filterReq:
|
|
// We should get a request for the entire range of short
|
|
// chan ID's.
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(expectedReq[2], req[0]) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong request: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
expectedReq[2], req[0])
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll send back only the last two to simulate filtering.
|
|
chanSeries.filterResp <- []lnwire.ShortChannelID{}
|
|
}
|
|
}()
|
|
if err := syncer.processChanRangeReply(replies[2]); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to process reply: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if syncer.syncState() != chansSynced {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong state: expected %v instead got %v",
|
|
chansSynced, syncer.state)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerSynchronizeChanIDs tests that we properly request chunks of
|
|
// the short chan ID's which were unknown to us. We'll ensure that we request
|
|
// chunk by chunk, and after the last chunk, we return true indicating that we
|
|
// can transition to the synced stage.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerSynchronizeChanIDs(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We'll modify the chunk size to be a smaller value, so we can ensure
|
|
// our chunk parsing works properly. With this value we should get 3
|
|
// queries: two full chunks, and one lingering chunk.
|
|
const chunkSize = 2
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create a GossipSyncer instance with a canned sendToPeer
|
|
// message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
msgChan, syncer, _ := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding, chunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll construct a set of chan ID's that we should query for,
|
|
// and set them as newChansToQuery within the state machine.
|
|
newChanIDs := []lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(3),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(4),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(5),
|
|
}
|
|
syncer.newChansToQuery = newChanIDs
|
|
|
|
for i := 0; i < chunkSize*2; i += 2 {
|
|
// With our set up complete, we'll request a sync of chan ID's.
|
|
done, err := syncer.synchronizeChanIDs()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to sync chan IDs: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this point, we shouldn't yet be done as only 2 items
|
|
// should have been queried for.
|
|
if done {
|
|
t.Fatalf("syncer shown as done, but shouldn't be!")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We should've received a new message from the syncer.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no msgs received")
|
|
|
|
case msg := <-msgChan:
|
|
queryMsg, ok := msg[0].(*lnwire.QueryShortChanIDs)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected QueryShortChanIDs instead "+
|
|
"got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The query message should have queried for the first
|
|
// two chan ID's, and nothing more.
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(queryMsg.ShortChanIDs, newChanIDs[i:i+chunkSize]) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong query: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
spew.Sdump(newChanIDs[i:i+chunkSize]),
|
|
queryMsg.ShortChanIDs)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// With the proper message sent out, the internal state of the
|
|
// syncer should reflect that it still has more channels to
|
|
// query for.
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(syncer.newChansToQuery, newChanIDs[i+chunkSize:]) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("incorrect chans to query for: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
spew.Sdump(newChanIDs[i+chunkSize:]),
|
|
syncer.newChansToQuery)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this point, only one more channel should be lingering for the
|
|
// syncer to query for.
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(newChanIDs[chunkSize*2:], syncer.newChansToQuery) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong chans to query: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
newChanIDs[chunkSize*2:], syncer.newChansToQuery)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If we issue another query, the syncer should tell us that it's done.
|
|
done, err := syncer.synchronizeChanIDs()
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to sync chan IDs: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
if done {
|
|
t.Fatalf("syncer should be finished!")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 15):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no msgs received")
|
|
|
|
case msg := <-msgChan:
|
|
queryMsg, ok := msg[0].(*lnwire.QueryShortChanIDs)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected QueryShortChanIDs instead "+
|
|
"got %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The query issued should simply be the last item.
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(queryMsg.ShortChanIDs, newChanIDs[chunkSize*2:]) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong query: expected %v, got %v",
|
|
spew.Sdump(newChanIDs[chunkSize*2:]),
|
|
queryMsg.ShortChanIDs)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// There also should be no more channels to query.
|
|
if len(syncer.newChansToQuery) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("should be no more chans to query for, "+
|
|
"instead have %v",
|
|
spew.Sdump(syncer.newChansToQuery))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerDelayDOS tests that the gossip syncer will begin delaying
|
|
// queries after its prescribed allotment of undelayed query responses. Once
|
|
// this happens, all query replies should be delayed by the configurated
|
|
// interval.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerDelayDOS(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We'll modify the chunk size to be a smaller value, since we'll be
|
|
// sending a modest number of queries. After exhausting our undelayed
|
|
// gossip queries, we'll send two extra queries and ensure that they are
|
|
// delayed properly.
|
|
const chunkSize = 2
|
|
const numDelayedQueries = 2
|
|
const delayTolerance = time.Millisecond * 200
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create two GossipSyncer instances with a canned
|
|
// sendToPeer message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
startHeight := lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
BlockHeight: 1144,
|
|
}
|
|
msgChan1, syncer1, chanSeries1 := newTestSyncer(
|
|
startHeight, defaultEncoding, chunkSize, true, false,
|
|
)
|
|
syncer1.Start()
|
|
defer syncer1.Stop()
|
|
|
|
msgChan2, syncer2, chanSeries2 := newTestSyncer(
|
|
startHeight, defaultEncoding, chunkSize, false, true,
|
|
)
|
|
syncer2.Start()
|
|
defer syncer2.Stop()
|
|
|
|
// Record the delayed query reply interval used by each syncer.
|
|
delayedQueryInterval := syncer1.cfg.delayedQueryReplyInterval
|
|
|
|
// Record the number of undelayed queries allowed by the syncers.
|
|
numUndelayedQueries := syncer1.cfg.maxUndelayedQueryReplies
|
|
|
|
// We will send enough queries to exhaust the undelayed responses, and
|
|
// then send two more queries which should be delayed. An additional one
|
|
// is subtracted from the total since undelayed message will be consumed
|
|
// by the initial QueryChannelRange.
|
|
numQueryResponses := numUndelayedQueries + numDelayedQueries - 1
|
|
|
|
// The total number of responses must include the initial reply each
|
|
// syncer will make to QueryChannelRange.
|
|
numTotalQueries := 1 + numQueryResponses
|
|
|
|
// The total number of channels each syncer needs to request must be
|
|
// scaled by the chunk size being used.
|
|
numTotalChans := numQueryResponses * chunkSize
|
|
|
|
// Construct enough channels so that all of the queries will have enough
|
|
// channels. Since syncer1 won't know of any channels, their sets are
|
|
// inherently disjoint.
|
|
var syncer2Chans []lnwire.ShortChannelID
|
|
for i := 0; i < numTotalChans; i++ {
|
|
syncer2Chans = append(
|
|
syncer2Chans, lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(uint64(i)),
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll kick off the test by asserting syncer1 sends over the
|
|
// QueryChannelRange message the other node.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer1")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan1:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a QueryChannelRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.QueryChannelRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer2.queryMsgs <- msg:
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this point, we'll need to a response from syncer2's channel
|
|
// series. This will cause syncer1 to simply request the entire set of
|
|
// channels from syncer2. This will count as the first undelayed
|
|
// response for sycner2.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries2.filterRangeReqs:
|
|
// We'll send back all the channels that it should know of.
|
|
chanSeries2.filterRangeResp <- syncer2Chans
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this point, we'll assert that the ReplyChannelRange message is
|
|
// sent by sycner2.
|
|
for i := 0; i < numQueryResponses; i++ {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer2")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan2:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a ReplyChannelRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ReplyChannelRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer1.gossipMsgs <- msg:
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll now have syncer1 process the received sids from syncer2.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries1.filterReq:
|
|
chanSeries1.filterResp <- syncer2Chans
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this point, syncer1 should start to send out initial requests to
|
|
// query the chan IDs of the remote party. We'll keep track of the
|
|
// number of queries made using the iterated value, which starts at one
|
|
// due the initial contribution of the QueryChannelRange msgs.
|
|
for i := 1; i < numTotalQueries; i++ {
|
|
expDelayResponse := i >= numUndelayedQueries
|
|
queryBatch(t,
|
|
msgChan1, msgChan2,
|
|
syncer1, syncer2,
|
|
chanSeries2,
|
|
expDelayResponse,
|
|
delayedQueryInterval,
|
|
delayTolerance,
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// queryBatch is a helper method that will query for a single batch of channels
|
|
// from a peer and assert the responses. The method can also be used to assert
|
|
// the same transition happens, but is delayed by the remote peer's DOS
|
|
// rate-limiting. The provided chanSeries should belong to syncer2.
|
|
//
|
|
// The state transition performed is the following:
|
|
// syncer1 -- QueryShortChanIDs --> syncer2
|
|
// chanSeries.FetchChanAnns()
|
|
// syncer1 <-- ReplyShortChanIDsEnd -- syncer2
|
|
//
|
|
// If expDelayResponse is true, this method will assert that the call the
|
|
// FetchChanAnns happens between:
|
|
// [delayedQueryInterval-delayTolerance, delayedQueryInterval+delayTolerance].
|
|
func queryBatch(t *testing.T,
|
|
msgChan1, msgChan2 chan []lnwire.Message,
|
|
syncer1, syncer2 *GossipSyncer,
|
|
chanSeries *mockChannelGraphTimeSeries,
|
|
expDelayResponse bool,
|
|
delayedQueryInterval, delayTolerance time.Duration) {
|
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll assert that syncer1 sends a QueryShortChanIDs message to
|
|
// the remote peer.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer2")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan1:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a QueryShortChanIDs message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.QueryShortChanIDs)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryShortChanIDs for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer2.queryMsgs <- msg:
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll then respond to with an empty set of replies (as it doesn't
|
|
// affect the test).
|
|
switch {
|
|
|
|
// If this query has surpassed the undelayed query threshold, we will
|
|
// impose stricter timing constraints on the response times. We'll first
|
|
// test that syncer2's chanSeries doesn't immediately receive a query,
|
|
// and then check that the query hasn't gone unanswered entirely.
|
|
case expDelayResponse:
|
|
// Create a before and after timeout to test, our test
|
|
// will ensure the messages are delivered to the peer
|
|
// in this timeframe.
|
|
before := time.After(
|
|
delayedQueryInterval - delayTolerance,
|
|
)
|
|
after := time.After(
|
|
delayedQueryInterval + delayTolerance,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// First, ensure syncer2 doesn't try to respond up until the
|
|
// before time fires.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-before:
|
|
// Query is delayed, proceed.
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries.annReq:
|
|
t.Fatalf("DOSy query was not delayed")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// If syncer2 doesn't attempt a response within the allowed
|
|
// interval, then the messages are probably lost.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-after:
|
|
t.Fatalf("no delayed query received")
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries.annReq:
|
|
chanSeries.annResp <- []lnwire.Message{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise, syncer2 should query its chanSeries promtly.
|
|
default:
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(50 * time.Millisecond):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries.annReq:
|
|
chanSeries.annResp <- []lnwire.Message{}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Finally, assert that syncer2 replies to syncer1 with a
|
|
// ReplyShortChanIDsEnd.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(50 * time.Millisecond):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer2")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan2:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a ReplyShortChanIDsEnd message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ReplyShortChanIDsEnd)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"ReplyShortChanIDsEnd for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer1.gossipMsgs <- msg:
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerRoutineSync tests all state transitions of the main syncer
|
|
// goroutine. This ensures that given an encounter with a peer that has a set
|
|
// of distinct channels, then we'll properly synchronize our channel state with
|
|
// them.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerRoutineSync(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We'll modify the chunk size to be a smaller value, so we can ensure
|
|
// our chunk parsing works properly. With this value we should get 3
|
|
// queries: two full chunks, and one lingering chunk.
|
|
const chunkSize = 2
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create two GossipSyncer instances with a canned
|
|
// sendToPeer message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
startHeight := lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
BlockHeight: 1144,
|
|
}
|
|
msgChan1, syncer1, chanSeries1 := newTestSyncer(
|
|
startHeight, defaultEncoding, chunkSize, true, false,
|
|
)
|
|
syncer1.Start()
|
|
defer syncer1.Stop()
|
|
|
|
msgChan2, syncer2, chanSeries2 := newTestSyncer(
|
|
startHeight, defaultEncoding, chunkSize, false, true,
|
|
)
|
|
syncer2.Start()
|
|
defer syncer2.Stop()
|
|
|
|
// Although both nodes are at the same height, syncer will have 3 chan
|
|
// ID's that syncer1 doesn't know of.
|
|
syncer2Chans := []lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(4),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(5),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(6),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll kick off the test by passing over the QueryChannelRange
|
|
// messages from syncer1 to syncer2.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer1")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan1:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a QueryChannelRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.QueryChannelRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer2.queryMsgs <- msg:
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this point, we'll need to send a response from syncer2 to syncer1
|
|
// using syncer2's channels This will cause syncer1 to simply request
|
|
// the entire set of channels from the other.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries2.filterRangeReqs:
|
|
// We'll send back all the channels that it should know of.
|
|
chanSeries2.filterRangeResp <- syncer2Chans
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this point, we'll assert that syncer2 replies with the
|
|
// ReplyChannelRange messages. Two replies are expected since the chunk
|
|
// size is 2, and we need to query for 3 channels.
|
|
for i := 0; i < chunkSize; i++ {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer2")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan2:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a ReplyChannelRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ReplyChannelRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer1.gossipMsgs <- msg:
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll now send back a chunked response from syncer2 back to sycner1.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries1.filterReq:
|
|
chanSeries1.filterResp <- syncer2Chans
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this point, syncer1 should start to send out initial requests to
|
|
// query the chan IDs of the remote party. As the chunk size is 2,
|
|
// they'll need 2 rounds in order to fully reconcile the state.
|
|
for i := 0; i < chunkSize; i++ {
|
|
queryBatch(t,
|
|
msgChan1, msgChan2,
|
|
syncer1, syncer2,
|
|
chanSeries2,
|
|
false, 0, 0,
|
|
)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// At this stage syncer1 should now be sending over its initial
|
|
// GossipTimestampRange messages as it should be fully synced.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer1")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan1:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a GossipTimestampRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.GossipTimestampRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer2.gossipMsgs <- msg:
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerAlreadySynced tests that if we attempt to synchronize two
|
|
// syncers that have the exact same state, then they'll skip straight to the
|
|
// final state and not perform any channel queries.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerAlreadySynced(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We'll modify the chunk size to be a smaller value, so we can ensure
|
|
// our chunk parsing works properly. With this value we should get 3
|
|
// queries: two full chunks, and one lingering chunk.
|
|
const chunkSize = 2
|
|
|
|
// First, we'll create two GossipSyncer instances with a canned
|
|
// sendToPeer message to allow us to intercept their potential sends.
|
|
startHeight := lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
BlockHeight: 1144,
|
|
}
|
|
msgChan1, syncer1, chanSeries1 := newTestSyncer(
|
|
startHeight, defaultEncoding, chunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
syncer1.Start()
|
|
defer syncer1.Stop()
|
|
|
|
msgChan2, syncer2, chanSeries2 := newTestSyncer(
|
|
startHeight, defaultEncoding, chunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
syncer2.Start()
|
|
defer syncer2.Stop()
|
|
|
|
// The channel state of both syncers will be identical. They should
|
|
// recognize this, and skip the sync phase below.
|
|
syncer1Chans := []lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(3),
|
|
}
|
|
syncer2Chans := []lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2),
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(3),
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll now kick off the test by allowing both side to send their
|
|
// QueryChannelRange messages to each other.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer1")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan1:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a QueryChannelRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.QueryChannelRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer2.queryMsgs <- msg:
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer2")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan2:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a QueryChannelRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.QueryChannelRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer1.queryMsgs <- msg:
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// We'll now send back the range each side should send over: the set of
|
|
// channels they already know about.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries1.filterRangeReqs:
|
|
// We'll send all the channels that it should know of.
|
|
chanSeries1.filterRangeResp <- syncer1Chans
|
|
}
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries2.filterRangeReqs:
|
|
// We'll send back all the channels that it should know of.
|
|
chanSeries2.filterRangeResp <- syncer2Chans
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Next, we'll thread through the replies of both parties. As the chunk
|
|
// size is 2, and they both know of 3 channels, it'll take two around
|
|
// and two chunks.
|
|
for i := 0; i < chunkSize; i++ {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer1")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan1:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a ReplyChannelRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ReplyChannelRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer2.gossipMsgs <- msg:
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
for i := 0; i < chunkSize; i++ {
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer2")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan2:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a ReplyChannelRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.ReplyChannelRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer1.gossipMsgs <- msg:
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Now that both sides have the full responses, we'll send over the
|
|
// channels that they need to filter out. As both sides have the exact
|
|
// same set of channels, they should skip to the final state.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries1.filterReq:
|
|
chanSeries1.filterResp <- []lnwire.ShortChannelID{}
|
|
}
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("no query recvd")
|
|
|
|
case <-chanSeries2.filterReq:
|
|
chanSeries2.filterResp <- []lnwire.ShortChannelID{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// As both parties are already synced, the next message they send to
|
|
// each other should be the GossipTimestampRange message.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer1")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan1:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a GossipTimestampRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.GossipTimestampRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer2.gossipMsgs <- msg:
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("didn't get msg from syncer1")
|
|
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan2:
|
|
for _, msg := range msgs {
|
|
// The message MUST be a GossipTimestampRange message.
|
|
_, ok := msg.(*lnwire.GossipTimestampRange)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
t.Fatalf("wrong message: expected "+
|
|
"QueryChannelRange for %T", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second * 2):
|
|
t.Fatalf("node 2 didn't read msg")
|
|
|
|
case syncer1.gossipMsgs <- msg:
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerSyncTransitions ensures that the gossip syncer properly
|
|
// carries out its duties when accepting a new sync transition request.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerSyncTransitions(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
assertMsgSent := func(t *testing.T, msgChan chan []lnwire.Message,
|
|
msg lnwire.Message) {
|
|
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
|
|
var msgSent lnwire.Message
|
|
select {
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan:
|
|
if len(msgs) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatal("expected to send a single message at "+
|
|
"a time, got %d", len(msgs))
|
|
}
|
|
msgSent = msgs[0]
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to send %T message", msg)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(msgSent, msg) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to send message: %v\ngot: %v",
|
|
spew.Sdump(msg), spew.Sdump(msgSent))
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
tests := []struct {
|
|
name string
|
|
entrySyncType SyncerType
|
|
finalSyncType SyncerType
|
|
assert func(t *testing.T, msgChan chan []lnwire.Message,
|
|
syncer *GossipSyncer)
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
name: "active to passive",
|
|
entrySyncType: ActiveSync,
|
|
finalSyncType: PassiveSync,
|
|
assert: func(t *testing.T, msgChan chan []lnwire.Message,
|
|
g *GossipSyncer) {
|
|
|
|
// When transitioning from active to passive, we
|
|
// should expect to see a new local update
|
|
// horizon sent to the remote peer indicating
|
|
// that it would not like to receive any future
|
|
// updates.
|
|
assertMsgSent(t, msgChan, &lnwire.GossipTimestampRange{
|
|
FirstTimestamp: uint32(zeroTimestamp.Unix()),
|
|
TimestampRange: 0,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
syncState := g.syncState()
|
|
if syncState != chansSynced {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected syncerState %v, "+
|
|
"got %v", chansSynced, syncState)
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
name: "passive to active",
|
|
entrySyncType: PassiveSync,
|
|
finalSyncType: ActiveSync,
|
|
assert: func(t *testing.T, msgChan chan []lnwire.Message,
|
|
g *GossipSyncer) {
|
|
|
|
// When transitioning from historical to active,
|
|
// we should expect to see a new local update
|
|
// horizon sent to the remote peer indicating
|
|
// that it would like to receive any future
|
|
// updates.
|
|
firstTimestamp := uint32(time.Now().Unix())
|
|
assertMsgSent(t, msgChan, &lnwire.GossipTimestampRange{
|
|
FirstTimestamp: firstTimestamp,
|
|
TimestampRange: math.MaxUint32,
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
syncState := g.syncState()
|
|
if syncState != chansSynced {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected syncerState %v, "+
|
|
"got %v", chansSynced, syncState)
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We'll start each test by creating our syncer. We'll
|
|
// initialize it with a state of chansSynced, as that's
|
|
// the only time when it can process sync transitions.
|
|
msgChan, syncer, _ := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.ShortChannelID{
|
|
BlockHeight: latestKnownHeight,
|
|
},
|
|
defaultEncoding, defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
syncer.setSyncState(chansSynced)
|
|
|
|
// We'll set the initial syncType to what the test
|
|
// demands.
|
|
syncer.setSyncType(test.entrySyncType)
|
|
|
|
// We'll then start the syncer in order to process the
|
|
// request.
|
|
syncer.Start()
|
|
defer syncer.Stop()
|
|
|
|
syncer.ProcessSyncTransition(test.finalSyncType)
|
|
|
|
// The syncer should now have the expected final
|
|
// SyncerType that the test expects.
|
|
syncType := syncer.SyncType()
|
|
if syncType != test.finalSyncType {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected syncType %v, got %v",
|
|
test.finalSyncType, syncType)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Finally, we'll run a set of assertions for each test
|
|
// to ensure the syncer performed its expected duties
|
|
// after processing its sync transition.
|
|
test.assert(t, msgChan, syncer)
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerHistoricalSync tests that a gossip syncer can perform a
|
|
// historical sync with the remote peer.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerHistoricalSync(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We'll create a new gossip syncer and manually override its state to
|
|
// chansSynced. This is necessary as the syncer can only process
|
|
// historical sync requests in this state.
|
|
msgChan, syncer, _ := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.ShortChannelID{BlockHeight: latestKnownHeight},
|
|
defaultEncoding, defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
syncer.setSyncType(PassiveSync)
|
|
syncer.setSyncState(chansSynced)
|
|
|
|
syncer.Start()
|
|
defer syncer.Stop()
|
|
|
|
syncer.historicalSync()
|
|
|
|
// We should expect to see a single lnwire.QueryChannelRange message be
|
|
// sent to the remote peer with a FirstBlockHeight of 0.
|
|
expectedMsg := &lnwire.QueryChannelRange{
|
|
FirstBlockHeight: 0,
|
|
NumBlocks: math.MaxUint32,
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case msgs := <-msgChan:
|
|
if len(msgs) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to send a single "+
|
|
"lnwire.QueryChannelRange message, got %d",
|
|
len(msgs))
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(msgs[0], expectedMsg) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to send message: %v\ngot: %v",
|
|
spew.Sdump(expectedMsg), spew.Sdump(msgs[0]))
|
|
}
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to send a lnwire.QueryChannelRange message")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestGossipSyncerSyncedSignal ensures that we receive a signal when a gossip
|
|
// syncer reaches its terminal chansSynced state.
|
|
func TestGossipSyncerSyncedSignal(t *testing.T) {
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
// We'll create a new gossip syncer and manually override its state to
|
|
// chansSynced.
|
|
_, syncer, _ := newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding,
|
|
defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
syncer.setSyncState(chansSynced)
|
|
|
|
// We'll go ahead and request a signal to be notified of when it reaches
|
|
// this state.
|
|
signalChan := syncer.ResetSyncedSignal()
|
|
|
|
// Starting the gossip syncer should cause the signal to be delivered.
|
|
syncer.Start()
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-signalChan:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Fatal("expected to receive chansSynced signal")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
syncer.Stop()
|
|
|
|
// We'll try this again, but this time we'll request the signal after
|
|
// the syncer is active and has already reached its chansSynced state.
|
|
_, syncer, _ = newTestSyncer(
|
|
lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(10), defaultEncoding,
|
|
defaultChunkSize,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
syncer.setSyncState(chansSynced)
|
|
|
|
syncer.Start()
|
|
defer syncer.Stop()
|
|
|
|
signalChan = syncer.ResetSyncedSignal()
|
|
|
|
// The signal should be delivered immediately.
|
|
select {
|
|
case <-signalChan:
|
|
case <-time.After(time.Second):
|
|
t.Fatal("expected to receive chansSynced signal")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|