package chainntnfs_test import ( "sync" "testing" "github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash" "github.com/btcsuite/btcd/wire" "github.com/btcsuite/btcutil" "github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/chainntnfs" ) var zeroHash chainhash.Hash type mockHintCache struct { mu sync.Mutex confHints map[chainhash.Hash]uint32 spendHints map[wire.OutPoint]uint32 } var _ chainntnfs.SpendHintCache = (*mockHintCache)(nil) var _ chainntnfs.ConfirmHintCache = (*mockHintCache)(nil) func (c *mockHintCache) CommitSpendHint(heightHint uint32, ops ...wire.OutPoint) error { c.mu.Lock() defer c.mu.Unlock() for _, op := range ops { c.spendHints[op] = heightHint } return nil } func (c *mockHintCache) QuerySpendHint(op wire.OutPoint) (uint32, error) { c.mu.Lock() defer c.mu.Unlock() hint, ok := c.spendHints[op] if !ok { return 0, chainntnfs.ErrSpendHintNotFound } return hint, nil } func (c *mockHintCache) PurgeSpendHint(ops ...wire.OutPoint) error { c.mu.Lock() defer c.mu.Unlock() for _, op := range ops { delete(c.spendHints, op) } return nil } func (c *mockHintCache) CommitConfirmHint(heightHint uint32, txids ...chainhash.Hash) error { c.mu.Lock() defer c.mu.Unlock() for _, txid := range txids { c.confHints[txid] = heightHint } return nil } func (c *mockHintCache) QueryConfirmHint(txid chainhash.Hash) (uint32, error) { c.mu.Lock() defer c.mu.Unlock() hint, ok := c.confHints[txid] if !ok { return 0, chainntnfs.ErrConfirmHintNotFound } return hint, nil } func (c *mockHintCache) PurgeConfirmHint(txids ...chainhash.Hash) error { c.mu.Lock() defer c.mu.Unlock() for _, txid := range txids { delete(c.confHints, txid) } return nil } func newMockHintCache() *mockHintCache { return &mockHintCache{ confHints: make(map[chainhash.Hash]uint32), spendHints: make(map[wire.OutPoint]uint32), } } // TestTxConfFutureDispatch tests that the TxNotifier dispatches registered // notifications when the transaction confirms after registration. func TestTxConfFutureDispatch(t *testing.T) { t.Parallel() const ( tx1NumConfs uint32 = 1 tx2NumConfs uint32 = 2 ) var ( tx1 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 1} tx2 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 2} tx3 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 3} ) hintCache := newMockHintCache() n := chainntnfs.NewTxNotifier(10, 100, hintCache) // Create the test transactions and register them with the TxNotifier // before including them in a block to receive future // notifications. tx1Hash := tx1.TxHash() ntfn1 := chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ TxID: &tx1Hash, NumConfirmations: tx1NumConfs, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(tx1NumConfs), } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(&ntfn1); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register ntfn: %v", err) } tx2Hash := tx2.TxHash() ntfn2 := chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ TxID: &tx2Hash, NumConfirmations: tx2NumConfs, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(tx2NumConfs), } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(&ntfn2); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register ntfn: %v", err) } // We should not receive any notifications from both transactions // since they have not been included in a block yet. select { case <-ntfn1.Event.Updates: t.Fatal("Received unexpected confirmation update for tx1") case txConf := <-ntfn1.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx1: %v", txConf) default: } select { case <-ntfn2.Event.Updates: t.Fatal("Received unexpected confirmation update for tx2") case txConf := <-ntfn2.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx2: %v", txConf) default: } // Include the transactions in a block and add it to the TxNotifier. // This should confirm tx1, but not tx2. block1 := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{ Transactions: []*wire.MsgTx{&tx1, &tx2, &tx3}, }) err := n.ConnectTip( block1.Hash(), 11, block1.Transactions(), ) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } // We should only receive one update for tx1 since it only requires // one confirmation and it already met it. select { case numConfsLeft := <-ntfn1.Event.Updates: const expected = 0 if numConfsLeft != expected { t.Fatalf("Received incorrect confirmation update: tx1 "+ "expected %d confirmations left, got %d", expected, numConfsLeft) } default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx1") } // A confirmation notification for this tranaction should be dispatched, // as it only required one confirmation. select { case txConf := <-ntfn1.Event.Confirmed: expectedConf := chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{ BlockHash: block1.Hash(), BlockHeight: 11, TxIndex: 0, } assertEqualTxConf(t, txConf, &expectedConf) default: t.Fatalf("Expected confirmation for tx1") } // We should only receive one update for tx2 since it only has one // confirmation so far and it requires two. select { case numConfsLeft := <-ntfn2.Event.Updates: const expected = 1 if numConfsLeft != expected { t.Fatalf("Received incorrect confirmation update: tx2 "+ "expected %d confirmations left, got %d", expected, numConfsLeft) } default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx2") } // A confirmation notification for tx2 should not be dispatched yet, as // it requires one more confirmation. select { case txConf := <-ntfn2.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx2: %v", txConf) default: } // Create a new block and add it to the TxNotifier at the next height. // This should confirm tx2. block2 := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{ Transactions: []*wire.MsgTx{&tx3}, }) err = n.ConnectTip(block2.Hash(), 12, block2.Transactions()) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } // We should not receive any event notifications for tx1 since it has // already been confirmed. select { case <-ntfn1.Event.Updates: t.Fatal("Received unexpected confirmation update for tx1") case txConf := <-ntfn1.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx1: %v", txConf) default: } // We should only receive one update since the last at the new height, // indicating how many confirmations are still left. select { case numConfsLeft := <-ntfn2.Event.Updates: const expected = 0 if numConfsLeft != expected { t.Fatalf("Received incorrect confirmation update: tx2 "+ "expected %d confirmations left, got %d", expected, numConfsLeft) } default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx2") } // A confirmation notification for tx2 should be dispatched, since it // now meets its required number of confirmations. select { case txConf := <-ntfn2.Event.Confirmed: expectedConf := chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{ BlockHash: block1.Hash(), BlockHeight: 11, TxIndex: 1, } assertEqualTxConf(t, txConf, &expectedConf) default: t.Fatalf("Expected confirmation for tx2") } } // TestTxConfHistoricalDispatch tests that the TxNotifier dispatches registered // notifications when the transaction is confirmed before registration. func TestTxConfHistoricalDispatch(t *testing.T) { t.Parallel() const ( tx1NumConfs uint32 = 1 tx2NumConfs uint32 = 3 ) var ( tx1 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 1} tx2 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 2} tx3 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 3} ) hintCache := newMockHintCache() n := chainntnfs.NewTxNotifier(10, 100, hintCache) // Create the test transactions at a height before the TxNotifier's // starting height so that they are confirmed once registering them. tx1Hash := tx1.TxHash() ntfn1 := chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ ConfID: 0, TxID: &tx1Hash, NumConfirmations: tx1NumConfs, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(tx1NumConfs), } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(&ntfn1); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register ntfn: %v", err) } tx2Hash := tx2.TxHash() ntfn2 := chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ ConfID: 1, TxID: &tx2Hash, NumConfirmations: tx2NumConfs, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(tx2NumConfs), } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(&ntfn2); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register ntfn: %v", err) } // Update tx1 with its confirmation details. We should only receive one // update since it only requires one confirmation and it already met it. txConf1 := chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{ BlockHash: &zeroHash, BlockHeight: 9, TxIndex: 1, } err := n.UpdateConfDetails(tx1Hash, &txConf1) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to update conf details: %v", err) } select { case numConfsLeft := <-ntfn1.Event.Updates: const expected = 0 if numConfsLeft != expected { t.Fatalf("Received incorrect confirmation update: tx1 "+ "expected %d confirmations left, got %d", expected, numConfsLeft) } default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx1") } // A confirmation notification for tx1 should also be dispatched. select { case txConf := <-ntfn1.Event.Confirmed: assertEqualTxConf(t, txConf, &txConf1) default: t.Fatalf("Expected confirmation for tx1") } // Update tx2 with its confirmation details. This should not trigger a // confirmation notification since it hasn't reached its required number // of confirmations, but we should receive a confirmation update // indicating how many confirmation are left. txConf2 := chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{ BlockHash: &zeroHash, BlockHeight: 9, TxIndex: 2, } err = n.UpdateConfDetails(tx2Hash, &txConf2) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to update conf details: %v", err) } select { case numConfsLeft := <-ntfn2.Event.Updates: const expected = 1 if numConfsLeft != expected { t.Fatalf("Received incorrect confirmation update: tx2 "+ "expected %d confirmations left, got %d", expected, numConfsLeft) } default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx2") } select { case txConf := <-ntfn2.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx2: %v", txConf) default: } // Create a new block and add it to the TxNotifier at the next height. // This should confirm tx2. block := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{ Transactions: []*wire.MsgTx{&tx3}, }) err = n.ConnectTip(block.Hash(), 11, block.Transactions()) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } // We should not receive any event notifications for tx1 since it has // already been confirmed. select { case <-ntfn1.Event.Updates: t.Fatal("Received unexpected confirmation update for tx1") case txConf := <-ntfn1.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx1: %v", txConf) default: } // We should only receive one update for tx2 since the last one, // indicating how many confirmations are still left. select { case numConfsLeft := <-ntfn2.Event.Updates: const expected = 0 if numConfsLeft != expected { t.Fatalf("Received incorrect confirmation update: tx2 "+ "expected %d confirmations left, got %d", expected, numConfsLeft) } default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx2") } // A confirmation notification for tx2 should be dispatched, as it met // its required number of confirmations. select { case txConf := <-ntfn2.Event.Confirmed: assertEqualTxConf(t, txConf, &txConf2) default: t.Fatalf("Expected confirmation for tx2") } } // TestTxConfChainReorg tests that TxNotifier dispatches Confirmed and // NegativeConf notifications appropriately when there is a chain // reorganization. func TestTxConfChainReorg(t *testing.T) { t.Parallel() const ( tx1NumConfs uint32 = 2 tx2NumConfs uint32 = 1 tx3NumConfs uint32 = 2 ) var ( tx1 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 1} tx2 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 2} tx3 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 3} ) hintCache := newMockHintCache() n := chainntnfs.NewTxNotifier(7, 100, hintCache) // Tx 1 will be confirmed in block 9 and requires 2 confs. tx1Hash := tx1.TxHash() ntfn1 := chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ TxID: &tx1Hash, NumConfirmations: tx1NumConfs, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(tx1NumConfs), } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(&ntfn1); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register ntfn: %v", err) } if err := n.UpdateConfDetails(*ntfn1.TxID, nil); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to deliver conf details: %v", err) } // Tx 2 will be confirmed in block 10 and requires 1 conf. tx2Hash := tx2.TxHash() ntfn2 := chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ TxID: &tx2Hash, NumConfirmations: tx2NumConfs, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(tx2NumConfs), } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(&ntfn2); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register ntfn: %v", err) } if err := n.UpdateConfDetails(*ntfn2.TxID, nil); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to deliver conf details: %v", err) } // Tx 3 will be confirmed in block 10 and requires 2 confs. tx3Hash := tx3.TxHash() ntfn3 := chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ TxID: &tx3Hash, NumConfirmations: tx3NumConfs, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(tx3NumConfs), } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(&ntfn3); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register ntfn: %v", err) } if err := n.UpdateConfDetails(*ntfn3.TxID, nil); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to deliver conf details: %v", err) } // Sync chain to block 10. Txs 1 & 2 should be confirmed. block1 := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{ Transactions: []*wire.MsgTx{&tx1}, }) err := n.ConnectTip(nil, 8, block1.Transactions()) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } err = n.ConnectTip(nil, 9, nil) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } block2 := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{ Transactions: []*wire.MsgTx{&tx2, &tx3}, }) err = n.ConnectTip(nil, 10, block2.Transactions()) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } // We should receive two updates for tx1 since it requires two // confirmations and it has already met them. for i := 0; i < 2; i++ { select { case <-ntfn1.Event.Updates: default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx1") } } // A confirmation notification for tx1 should be dispatched, as it met // its required number of confirmations. select { case <-ntfn1.Event.Confirmed: default: t.Fatalf("Expected confirmation for tx1") } // We should only receive one update for tx2 since it only requires // one confirmation and it already met it. select { case <-ntfn2.Event.Updates: default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx2") } // A confirmation notification for tx2 should be dispatched, as it met // its required number of confirmations. select { case <-ntfn2.Event.Confirmed: default: t.Fatalf("Expected confirmation for tx2") } // We should only receive one update for tx3 since it only has one // confirmation so far and it requires two. select { case <-ntfn3.Event.Updates: default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx3") } // A confirmation notification for tx3 should not be dispatched yet, as // it requires one more confirmation. select { case txConf := <-ntfn3.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx3: %v", txConf) default: } // The block that included tx2 and tx3 is disconnected and two next // blocks without them are connected. err = n.DisconnectTip(10) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } err = n.ConnectTip(nil, 10, nil) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } err = n.ConnectTip(nil, 11, nil) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } select { case reorgDepth := <-ntfn2.Event.NegativeConf: if reorgDepth != 1 { t.Fatalf("Incorrect value for negative conf notification: "+ "expected %d, got %d", 1, reorgDepth) } default: t.Fatalf("Expected negative conf notification for tx1") } // We should not receive any event notifications from all of the // transactions because tx1 has already been confirmed and tx2 and tx3 // have not been included in the chain since the reorg. select { case <-ntfn1.Event.Updates: t.Fatal("Received unexpected confirmation update for tx1") case txConf := <-ntfn1.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx1: %v", txConf) default: } select { case <-ntfn2.Event.Updates: t.Fatal("Received unexpected confirmation update for tx2") case txConf := <-ntfn2.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx2: %v", txConf) default: } select { case <-ntfn3.Event.Updates: t.Fatal("Received unexpected confirmation update for tx3") case txConf := <-ntfn3.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx3: %v", txConf) default: } // Now transactions 2 & 3 are re-included in a new block. block3 := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{ Transactions: []*wire.MsgTx{&tx2, &tx3}, }) block4 := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{}) err = n.ConnectTip(block3.Hash(), 12, block3.Transactions()) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } err = n.ConnectTip(block4.Hash(), 13, block4.Transactions()) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } // We should only receive one update for tx2 since it only requires // one confirmation and it already met it. select { case numConfsLeft := <-ntfn2.Event.Updates: const expected = 0 if numConfsLeft != expected { t.Fatalf("Received incorrect confirmation update: tx2 "+ "expected %d confirmations left, got %d", expected, numConfsLeft) } default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx2") } // A confirmation notification for tx2 should be dispatched, as it met // its required number of confirmations. select { case txConf := <-ntfn2.Event.Confirmed: expectedConf := chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{ BlockHash: block3.Hash(), BlockHeight: 12, TxIndex: 0, } assertEqualTxConf(t, txConf, &expectedConf) default: t.Fatalf("Expected confirmation for tx2") } // We should receive two updates for tx3 since it requires two // confirmations and it has already met them. for i := uint32(1); i <= 2; i++ { select { case numConfsLeft := <-ntfn3.Event.Updates: expected := tx3NumConfs - i if numConfsLeft != expected { t.Fatalf("Received incorrect confirmation update: tx3 "+ "expected %d confirmations left, got %d", expected, numConfsLeft) } default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx2") } } // A confirmation notification for tx3 should be dispatched, as it met // its required number of confirmations. select { case txConf := <-ntfn3.Event.Confirmed: expectedConf := chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{ BlockHash: block3.Hash(), BlockHeight: 12, TxIndex: 1, } assertEqualTxConf(t, txConf, &expectedConf) default: t.Fatalf("Expected confirmation for tx3") } } // TestTxConfHeightHintCache ensures that the height hints for transactions are // kept track of correctly with each new block connected/disconnected. This test // also asserts that the height hints are not updated until the simulated // historical dispatches have returned, and we know the transactions aren't // already in the chain. func TestTxConfHeightHintCache(t *testing.T) { t.Parallel() const ( startingHeight = 200 txDummyHeight = 201 tx1Height = 202 tx2Height = 203 ) // Initialize our TxNotifier instance backed by a height hint cache. hintCache := newMockHintCache() n := chainntnfs.NewTxNotifier( startingHeight, 100, hintCache, ) // Create two test transactions and register them for notifications. tx1 := wire.MsgTx{Version: 1} tx1Hash := tx1.TxHash() ntfn1 := &chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ TxID: &tx1Hash, NumConfirmations: 1, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(1), } tx2 := wire.MsgTx{Version: 2} tx2Hash := tx2.TxHash() ntfn2 := &chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ TxID: &tx2Hash, NumConfirmations: 2, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(2), } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(ntfn1); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register tx1: %v", err) } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(ntfn2); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register tx2: %v", err) } // Both transactions should not have a height hint set, as RegisterConf // should not alter the cache state. _, err := hintCache.QueryConfirmHint(tx1Hash) if err != chainntnfs.ErrConfirmHintNotFound { t.Fatalf("unexpected error when querying for height hint "+ "want: %v, got %v", chainntnfs.ErrConfirmHintNotFound, err) } _, err = hintCache.QueryConfirmHint(tx2Hash) if err != chainntnfs.ErrConfirmHintNotFound { t.Fatalf("unexpected error when querying for height hint "+ "want: %v, got %v", chainntnfs.ErrConfirmHintNotFound, err) } // Create a new block that will include the dummy transaction and extend // the chain. txDummy := wire.MsgTx{Version: 3} block1 := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{ Transactions: []*wire.MsgTx{&txDummy}, }) err = n.ConnectTip( block1.Hash(), txDummyHeight, block1.Transactions(), ) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } // Since UpdateConfDetails has not been called for either transaction, // the height hints should remain unchanged. This simulates blocks // confirming while the historical dispatch is processing the // registration. hint, err := hintCache.QueryConfirmHint(tx1Hash) if err != chainntnfs.ErrConfirmHintNotFound { t.Fatalf("unexpected error when querying for height hint "+ "want: %v, got %v", chainntnfs.ErrConfirmHintNotFound, err) } hint, err = hintCache.QueryConfirmHint(tx2Hash) if err != chainntnfs.ErrConfirmHintNotFound { t.Fatalf("unexpected error when querying for height hint "+ "want: %v, got %v", chainntnfs.ErrConfirmHintNotFound, err) } // Now, update the conf details reporting that the neither txn was found // in the historical dispatch. if err := n.UpdateConfDetails(tx1Hash, nil); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to update conf details: %v", err) } if err := n.UpdateConfDetails(tx2Hash, nil); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to update conf details: %v", err) } // We'll create another block that will include the first transaction // and extend the chain. block2 := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{ Transactions: []*wire.MsgTx{&tx1}, }) err = n.ConnectTip( block2.Hash(), tx1Height, block2.Transactions(), ) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } // Now that both notifications are waiting at tip for confirmations, // they should have their height hints updated to the latest block // height. hint, err = hintCache.QueryConfirmHint(tx1Hash) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to query for hint: %v", err) } if hint != tx1Height { t.Fatalf("expected hint %d, got %d", tx1Height, hint) } hint, err = hintCache.QueryConfirmHint(tx2Hash) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to query for hint: %v", err) } if hint != tx1Height { t.Fatalf("expected hint %d, got %d", tx2Height, hint) } // Next, we'll create another block that will include the second // transaction and extend the chain. block3 := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{ Transactions: []*wire.MsgTx{&tx2}, }) err = n.ConnectTip( block3.Hash(), tx2Height, block3.Transactions(), ) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } // The height hint for the first transaction should remain the same. hint, err = hintCache.QueryConfirmHint(tx1Hash) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to query for hint: %v", err) } if hint != tx1Height { t.Fatalf("expected hint %d, got %d", tx1Height, hint) } // The height hint for the second transaction should now be updated to // reflect its confirmation. hint, err = hintCache.QueryConfirmHint(tx2Hash) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to query for hint: %v", err) } if hint != tx2Height { t.Fatalf("expected hint %d, got %d", tx2Height, hint) } // Finally, we'll attempt do disconnect the last block in order to // simulate a chain reorg. if err := n.DisconnectTip(tx2Height); err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to disconnect block: %v", err) } // This should update the second transaction's height hint within the // cache to the previous height. hint, err = hintCache.QueryConfirmHint(tx2Hash) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to query for hint: %v", err) } if hint != tx1Height { t.Fatalf("expected hint %d, got %d", tx1Height, hint) } // The first transaction's height hint should remain at the original // confirmation height. hint, err = hintCache.QueryConfirmHint(tx2Hash) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to query for hint: %v", err) } if hint != tx1Height { t.Fatalf("expected hint %d, got %d", tx1Height, hint) } } func TestTxConfTearDown(t *testing.T) { t.Parallel() var ( tx1 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 1} tx2 = wire.MsgTx{Version: 2} ) hintCache := newMockHintCache() n := chainntnfs.NewTxNotifier(10, 100, hintCache) // Create the test transactions and register them with the TxNotifier to // receive notifications. tx1Hash := tx1.TxHash() ntfn1 := chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ TxID: &tx1Hash, NumConfirmations: 1, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(1), } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(&ntfn1); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register ntfn: %v", err) } if err := n.UpdateConfDetails(*ntfn1.TxID, nil); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to update conf details: %v", err) } tx2Hash := tx2.TxHash() ntfn2 := chainntnfs.ConfNtfn{ TxID: &tx2Hash, NumConfirmations: 2, Event: chainntnfs.NewConfirmationEvent(2), } if _, err := n.RegisterConf(&ntfn2); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to register ntfn: %v", err) } if err := n.UpdateConfDetails(*ntfn2.TxID, nil); err != nil { t.Fatalf("unable to update conf details: %v", err) } // Include the transactions in a block and add it to the TxNotifier. // This should confirm tx1, but not tx2. block := btcutil.NewBlock(&wire.MsgBlock{ Transactions: []*wire.MsgTx{&tx1, &tx2}, }) err := n.ConnectTip(block.Hash(), 11, block.Transactions()) if err != nil { t.Fatalf("Failed to connect block: %v", err) } // We do not care about the correctness of the notifications since they // are tested in other methods, but we'll still attempt to retrieve them // for the sake of not being able to later once the notification // channels are closed. select { case <-ntfn1.Event.Updates: default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx1") } select { case <-ntfn1.Event.Confirmed: default: t.Fatalf("Expected confirmation for tx1") } select { case <-ntfn2.Event.Updates: default: t.Fatal("Expected confirmation update for tx2") } select { case txConf := <-ntfn2.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx2: %v", txConf) default: } // The notification channels should be closed for notifications that // have not been dispatched yet, so we should not expect to receive any // more updates. n.TearDown() // tx1 should not receive any more updates because it has already been // confirmed and the TxNotifier has been shut down. select { case <-ntfn1.Event.Updates: t.Fatal("Received unexpected confirmation update for tx1") case txConf := <-ntfn1.Event.Confirmed: t.Fatalf("Received unexpected confirmation for tx1: %v", txConf) default: } // tx2 should not receive any more updates after the notifications // channels have been closed and the TxNotifier shut down. select { case _, more := <-ntfn2.Event.Updates: if more { t.Fatal("Expected closed Updates channel for tx2") } case _, more := <-ntfn2.Event.Confirmed: if more { t.Fatalf("Expected closed Confirmed channel for tx2") } default: t.Fatalf("Expected closed notification channels for tx2") } } func assertEqualTxConf(t *testing.T, actualConf, expectedConf *chainntnfs.TxConfirmation) { if actualConf.BlockHeight != expectedConf.BlockHeight { t.Fatalf("Incorrect block height in confirmation details: "+ "expected %d, got %d", expectedConf.BlockHeight, actualConf.BlockHeight) } if !actualConf.BlockHash.IsEqual(expectedConf.BlockHash) { t.Fatalf("Incorrect block hash in confirmation details: "+ "expected %d, got %d", expectedConf.BlockHash, actualConf.BlockHash) } if actualConf.TxIndex != expectedConf.TxIndex { t.Fatalf("Incorrect tx index in confirmation details: "+ "expected %d, got %d", expectedConf.TxIndex, actualConf.TxIndex) } }