This commit consists of a mass variable renaming to call the pkScript being executed for segwit outputs the `witnessScript` instead of `redeemScript`. The latter naming convention is generally considered to be reserved for the context of BIP 16 execution. With segwit to be deployed soon, we should be using the correct terminology uniformly through the codebase.
In addition some minor typos throughout the codebase has been fixed.
This commit modifies the prior funding workflow to account for fees
when creating the funding output. As a stop gap, the current fee for
the commitment transaction is now hard-coded at 5k satoshis. Once the
fee models are in place this should instead be some high multiple of
the current “average” fee rate within the network, continuing, the
proper fee should be adjusted from the commitment transaction has
outputs are added/removed.
This commit performs a major refactor of the current wallet,
reservation, and channel code in order to call into a WalletController
implementation rather than directly into btcwallet.
The current set of wallets tests have been modified in order to test
against *all* registered WalletController implementations rather than
only btcwallet. As a result, all future WalletControllers primary need
to ensure that their implementation passes the current set of tests
(which will be expanded into the future), providing an easy path of
integration assurance.
Rather than directly holding the private keys throughout funding and
channel creation, the burden of securing keys has been shifted to the
specified WalletController and Signer interfaces. All signing is done
via the Signer interface rather than directly, increasing flexibility
dramatically.
During channel funding, rather than creating a txscript.Engine to
verify commitment signatures, regular ECDSA sig verification is now
used instead. This is faster and more efficient.
Finally certain fields/methods within ChannelReservation and
LightningChannel have been exposed publicly in order to restrict the
amount of modifications the prior tests needed to undergo in order to
support testing directly agains the WalletController interface.
With this commit, the reservation workflow for the single funder use
case is now aware of the usage of revocation keys.
The changes are relatively minor:
* contributions now have RevocationKeys instead of RevocationHashes
* CompleteReservationSingle now takes the initiators revocation key
This unifies some inconstancies across the code-base with hashes being
32 vs 20 bytes. All hashes, whether payment or revocation are now
uniformly 32 bytes everywhere. As a result, only OP_SHA256 will be used
within commitment and HTLC scripts. The rationale for using sha256
instead of hash160 for the HTLC payment pre-image is that alternative
chains are more likely to have sha256 implemented, rather than
ripemd160.
A forthcoming commit will update the current commitment, and HTLC
scripts.
This commit adds 3 methods to lnwallet.ChannelReservation intended to
facilitating a single funder channel workflow between two nodes. A
single funder workflow is characterized as the initiator committing all
the funds to a channel, with the responder only providing public keys,
and a revocation hash.
The workflow remains the same for the initiator of the funding
transaction, however for the responder, the following methods are
instead called in order:
* .ProcessSingleConribution()
* .CompleteSingleContribution()
* .FinalizeReservation()
These methods are required for the responder as they are never able to
construct the full funding transaction, and only receive the out point
of the funding transaction once available.
* Hooks into the ChainNotifier infrastructure to receive a notification
once the funding transaction gets enough notifications.
* Still need to set up the notification grouting within a
LightningChannel to watch for uncooperative closures, and broadcasts
and revoked channel states.
* Workflow along with expected call orders have been documented.
* With this, the initial iteration of ChannelReservation is mostly
complete.
* However, there are still some unfinished steps internally within the
wallet related to processing. Such as factoring proper tx fees,
splitting fees, some node interaction etc.
* Initial draft of brain dump of chandler. Nothing yet set in stone.
* Will most likely move the storage of all structs to a more “column”
oriented approach. Such that, small updates like incrementing the total
satoshi sent don’t result in the entire struct being serialized and
written.
* Some skeleton structs for other possible data we might want to store
are also included.
* Seem valuable to record as much data as possible for record keeping,
visualization, debugging, etc. Will need to set up a time+space+dirty
cache to ensure performance isn’t impacted too much.
* Contribution from remote host necessary to construct the initial
commitment transaction is now also expected
* All message structs and handlers updated accordingly
* AddContribution now also generates both commitment tnxs, and
generates a signature for their version of the commitment transaction
