This commit is a follow up to the prior commit which fixed a rounding
error bug in lnwallet. For uniformity, we also fix other occurrences in
the breach arbiter, as well as the integration tests.
In this commit, we address an un accounted for case during the breach
remedy process. If the remote node actually went directly to the second
layer during a channel breach attempt, then we wouldn’t properly be
able to sweep with out justice transaction, as some HTLC inputs may
actually be spent at that point.
In order to address this case, we’ll now catch the transaction
rejection, then check to see which input was spent, promote that to a
second level spend, and repeat as necessary. At the end of this loop,
any inputs which have been spent to the second level will have had the
prevouts and witnesses updated.
In order to perform this transition, we now also store the second level
witness script in the database. This allow us to modify the sign desc
with the proper input value, as well as witness script.
This commit introduces a RetributionStore interface, which
establishes the methods used to access persisted information
regarding breached channels. A RetributionStore is used to
persist retributionInfo regarding all channels for which
the wallet has signaled a breach.
The current design could be improved by moving certain
functionality, e.g. closing channels and htlc links, such
that they are handled by upstream by their respective
subsystems. This was investigated, but deemed preferable to
postpone to a later update to prevent the current
implementation from sprawling amongst too many packages.
The test suite creates a mockRetributionStore and ensures that
it exhibits the same behavior as the retribution store backed
by a channeldb.DB.
This commit adds a breached contract retribution storage layer using
boltdb to the breach arbiter. The breach arbiter now stores retribution
state on disk between detecting a contract breach, broadcasting a
justice transaction that sweeps the channel, and finally witnessing the
justice transaction confirm on the blockchain. It is critical that such
state is persisted on disk, so that if our node restarts at any point
during the retribution procedure, we can recover and continue from the
persisted state.
