Since our HTLC must also be added to the remote commitment, we do the
balance caluclation also from the remote chain perspective and report
our minimum balance from the two commit views as our available balance.
When we send non-dust HTLCs as the non-initiator, the remote party will
have to pay the extra commitment fee. To account for this we figure out
if they can afford paying this fee, if not we report that we only have
balance available for dust HTLCs, since these HTLCs won't increase the
commitment fee.
Since we want to handle the edge case where paying the HTLC fee would
take the initiator below the reserve, we move the subtraction of the
reserve into availableBalance where this calculation will be performed.
This commit adds an extra validation step when adding HTLCs. Previously
we would only validate the remote commitment resulting from adding an
HTLC, which in most cases is enough. However, there are situations where
the dustlimits are different, which could lead to the resulting remote
commitment from adding the HTLC being valid, but not the local
commitment.
Now we also validate the local commitment. A test to trigger the case is
added.
add
To ba able to validate the commitment sanity both for remote and local
commitments, and at the same time predict both our and their add, we let
validateCommitmentSanity take an extra payment descriptor to make this
possible.
This commit checks the commitment sanity when receiving an HTLC so
that if a commitment transaction will overflow from an ADD, it is
caught earlier rather than in ReceiveNewCommitment.
The unit test TestNewBreachRetributionSkipsDustHtlcs triggered a state
transition from Bob, even though it was Alice that had added the HTLCs.
This is wrong since it will lead to Bob still owing Alice a commitment,
which is not accounted for in the unit tests.
We add a sanity check that the add heights has been set for all entries
found in the logs, and return an error otherwise. This won't happen
during normal operation, but it does reveal the mistake in the unit
test, which is fixed by making Alice trigger the transition.
In addition we resolve a long standing TODO by removing a (purposeful)
panic in the channel state machine. Old version of lnd had a bug that
could lead to the parent entries being lost during channel restore. A
panic was added to get to the bottom of if.
This is now fixed, so new nodes shouldn't encounter it. However, to be
on the safe side, instead of panicking we return an error back to
gracefully exit the channel state machine.
Updates were always restored with the same log index. This could cause a
crash when the logs were compacted and possibly other problems
elsewhere.
Extended unit test to cover the crash scenario.
This commit updates the channel state machine to
persistently store remote updates that we have received a
signature for, but that we haven't yet included in a commit
signature of our own.
Previously those updates were only stored in memory and
dropped across restarts. This lead to the production of
an invalid signature and channel force closure. The remote
party expects us to include those updates.
When creating the keyring, the tweak is already calculated in the remote
commitment case. We add the calculation also for our own commitment, so
we can use it in all cases without deriving the tweak.
Based on the current channel type, we derive the script used for the
to_remote output. Currently only the unencumbered p2wkh type is used,
but that will change with upcoming channel types.
To make the channel state machine less concerned about the type of
commitment, we nil the local tweak when creating the keyring, depending
on the commitment type.
We abstract away how keys are generated for the different channel types
types (currently tweak(less)).
Intention is that more of the logic that is unique for each commitment
type lives in commitment.go, making the channel state machine oblivious
to the keys and outputs being created on the commitment tx for a given
channel state.
createCommitmentTx would earlier mutate the passed commitment struct
after evaluating the htlc view and calculating the final balances, which
was confusing since the balances are supposed to only be *after*
subtracting fees.
Instead we take the needed parameters as arguments, and return the final
balances, tx and fee to populate the commitment struct in a proper way.
PURE CODE MOVE:
Moving createCommitmentTx, CreateCommitTx, createStateHintObfuscator,
CommitmentKeyRing, DeriveCommitmentKeys, addHTLC, genHtlcScripts
We move the methods and structs to a new file commitment.go in
preparation for defining all the logic that is dependent on the channel
type in this new file.
Instead of passing delays and dustlimits separately, we pass the correct
channel config to CreateCommitTx from the POV of the local party that
owns the commit tx.
To make it more clear which commitment we are actually creating, we
rename variables to denote local and remote, to prepare for the case
when both outputs might be delayed.
This commit adds fields for upfront shutdown scripts set
by the local and remote peer to the OpenChannel struct.
These values are optional, so they are added with their
own keys in the chanBucket in the DB.
This commit sets our close addresss to the address
specified by option upfront shutdown, if specified,
and disconnects from peers that fail to provide
their upfront shutdown address for coopertaive closes
of channels that were opened with the option set.
Instead of tracking local updates in a separate link variable, query
this state from the channel itself.
This commit also fixes the issue where the commit tx was not updated
anymore after a failed first attempt because the revocation window was
closed. Also those pending updates will be taken into account when the
remote party revokes.
Previously the channel method FullySynced was used to decide whether to
send a new commit sig message. However, it could happen that FullySynced
was false, but that we didn't owe a commitment signature. Instead we
were waiting on the other party to send us a signature. If that
happened, we'd send out an empty commit sig. This commit modifies the
condition that triggers a new commit sig and fixes this deviation from
the spec.
To facilitate the logging, this commit adds a new OweCommitment method.
For the logging, we only need to consider the remote perspective. In a
later commit, we'll also start using the local perspective to support
the decision to send another signature.
In this commit, we create a new chainfee package, that houses all fee
related functionality used within the codebase. The creation of this new
package furthers our long-term goal of extracting functionality from the
bloated `lnwallet` package into new distinct packages. Additionally,
this new packages resolves a class of import cycle that could arise if a
new package that was imported by something in `lnwallet` wanted to use
the existing fee related functions in the prior `lnwallet` package.
In this commit, we convert the existing `channeldb.ChannelType` type
into a _bit field_. This doesn't require us to change the current
serialization or interpretation or the type as it is, since all the
current defined values us a distinct bit. This PR lays the ground work
for any future changes that may introduce new channel types (like anchor
outputs), and also any changes that may modify the existing invariants
around channels (if we're the initiator, we always have the funding
transaction).
Without this, it was possible for a combination of our balance and max
fee allocation to result in a fee rate below the fee floor causing the
remote party to reject the update and close the channel.
In this commit, we move to make a full deep copy of the commitment
transaction in `getSignedCommitTx` to ensure that we don't mutate the
commitment on disk, possibly resulting in a "hot commitment".
In this commit, we consolidate the number of areas where we derive our
commitment keys. Before this commit, the `isOurCommitment` function in
the chain watcher used a custom routine to derive the expected
scripts/keys for our commitment at that height. With the recent changes,
we now have additional logic in `DeriveCommitmentKeys` that wasn't
copied over to this area. As a result, the prior logic would erroneously
detect if it was our commitment that had hit the chain or not.
In this commit, we remove the old custom code, and use
`DeriveCommitmentKeys` wihtin the chain watcher as well. This ensures
that we only need to maintain the key derivation code in a single place,
preventing future bugs of this nature.
In this commit, we update the brar logic in the channel state machine,
and also the brar itself to be aware of the new commitment format.
Similar to the unilateral close summary, we'll now blank out the
SingleTweak field in `NewBreachRetribution` if it's a tweakless
commitment. The brar will then use this to properly identify the
commitment type, to ensure we use the proper witness generation function
when we're handling our own breach.