This commit restructures an invoice's ContractTerms to better encompass
the restrictions placed on settling. For instance, the final ctlv delta
and invoice expiry are moved from the main invoice body (where
additional metadata is stored). Additionally, it moves the State field
outside of the terms since it is rather metadata about the invoice
instead of any terms offered to the sender in the payment request.
Previously the invoice registry wasn't aware of replayed htlcs. This was
dealt with by keeping the invoice accept/settle logic idempotent, so
that a replay wouldn't have an effect.
This mechanism has two limitations:
1. No accurate tracking of the total amount paid to an invoice. The total
amount couldn't just be increased with every htlc received, because it
could be a replay which would lead to counting the htlc amount multiple
times. Therefore the total amount was set to the amount of the first
htlc that was received, even though there may have been multiple htlcs
paying to the invoice.
2. Impossible to check htlc expiry consistently for hodl invoices. When
an htlc is new, its expiry needs to be checked against the invoice cltv
delta. But for a replay, that check must be skipped. The htlc was
accepted in time, the invoice was moved to the accepted state and a
replay some blocks later shouldn't lead to that htlc being cancelled.
Because the invoice registry couldn't recognize replays, it stopped
checking htlc expiry heights when the invoice reached the accepted
state. This prevents hold htlcs from being cancelled after a restart.
But unfortunately this also caused additional htlcs to be accepted on an
already accepted invoice without their expiry being checked.
In this commit, the invoice registry starts to persistently track htlcs
so that replays can be recognized. For replays, an htlc resolution
action is returned early. This fixes both limitations mentioned above.
Currently the invoice registry cannot tell apart the htlcs that pay to
an invoice. Because htlcs may also be replayed on startup, it isn't
possible to determine the total amount paid to an invoice.
This commit is a first step towards fixing that. It reports the circuit
keys of htlcs to the invoice registry, which forms the basis for
accurate invoice accounting.
Previously a check was made for accepted and settled invoices against
the paid amount. This opens up a probe vector where an attacker can pay
to an invoice with an amt that is higher than the invoice amount and
find out if the invoice is already paid or not.
In this commit, we update the `HopIterator` to gain awareness of the new
TLV hop payload. The default `HopIterator` will now hide the details of
the TLV from the caller, and return the same `ForwardingInfo` struct in
a uniform manner. We also add a new method: `ExtraOnionBlob` to allow
the caller to obtain the raw EOB (the serialized TLV stream) to pass
around.
Within the link, we'll now pass the EOB information into the invoice
registry. This allows the registry to parse out any additional
information from the EOB that it needs to settle the payment, such as a
preimage shard in the AMP case.
This commit is the final step in making the link unaware of invoices. It
now purely offers the htlc to the invoice registry and follows
instructions from the invoice registry about how and when to respond to
the htlc.
The change also fixes a bug where upon restart, hodl htlcs were
subjected to the invoice minimum cltv delta requirement again. If the
block height has increased in the mean while, the htlc would be canceled
back.
Furthermore the invoice registry interaction is aligned between link and
contract resolvers.
This commit modifies the invoice registry to handle invoices for which
the preimage is not known yet (hodl invoices). In that case, the
resolution channel passed in from links and resolvers is stored until we
either learn the preimage or want to cancel the htlc.
This commit detaches signaling the invoice registry that an htlc was
locked in from the actually settling of the htlc.
It is a preparation for hodl invoices.
Previously it was difficult to use the invoice registry in unit tests,
because it used zpay32 to decode the invoice. For that to succeed, a
valid signature is required on the payment request.
This commit injects the decode dependency on a different level so that
it is easier to mock.
