In this commit, we fix an existing bug wherein we wouldn't set the short
channel ID for the close summary in the database in the case that the
remote party force closed. The fix is simple, ensure that within
NewUnilateralCloseSummary we properly set the short channel ID. A test
has also been added in this commit, which fails without the
modifications to lnwallet/channel.go.
Fixes#2072.
In this commit, we fix a slight bug by ensuring that the revocation info
at the final state of the channel, as well as the local chan config is
properly set within the channel close summary created within
NewUnilateralCloseSummary. Before this commit, for all cooperative close
transactions, this state would _only_ include the pubkey itself, which
in some cases may not be sufficient to re-derive the key if needed.
In this commit, we update the NewBreachRetribution method to include
pkScripts for htlc outputs. We do this now, as the breach arbiter will
need the raw pkScript when attempting to request spend notifications for
each HTLC.
In this commit, we export WitnessScriptHash and GenMultiSigScript as
external sub-systems may now need to use these methods in order to be
able to watch for confirmations based on the script of a transaction.
This commit adds a check for the LocalUnrevokedCommitPoint sent to us by
the remote during channel reestablishment, ensuring it is the same point
as they have previously sent us.
This commit enumerates the various error cases we can encounter when we
compare our remote commit chain to the view the remote communicates to us
via msg.NextLocalCommitHeight.
We now compare this height to our remote tail and tip height, returning
relevant error in case of a unrecoverable desync, and re-send a
commitment signature (including log updates) in case we owe one.
This commit enumerates the various error cases we can encounter when we
compare our local commit chain to the view the remote communicates to us
via msg.RemoteCommitTailHeight.
We now compare this height to our local tail height (note that there's
never a local "tip" at this point), returning relevant error in case of
a unrecoverable desync, and re-send a revocation in case we owe one.
This commit defines a few new errors that we can potentially encounter
during channel reestablishment:
* ErrInvalidLocalUnrevokedCommitPoint
* ErrCommitSyncLocalDataLoss
* ErrCommitSyncRemoteDataLoss
in addition to the already defined errors
* ErrInvalidLastCommitSecret
* ErrCannotSyncCommitChains
We check if the channel is FullySynced instead of comparing the local
and remote commit chain heights, as the heights might not be in sync.
Instead we call FullySynced which recently was modified to use compare
the message indexes instead, which is _should_ really be in sync between
the chains.
The test TestChanSyncOweRevocationAndCommitForceTransition is altered to
ensure the two chains at different heights before the test is started, to
trigger the case that would previously fail to resend the commitment
signature.
This commit fixes a bug which would cause the add heights of the HTLCs
in the update log to be set wrongly. At times, an add height could be
incorrecly set, leading to the HTLCs not being accounted for correctly
during evaluating the HTLC views. This was caused by the assumption that
if the HTLC was not on the pending remote commit, then it was locked in
on both the local and the remote commit, which is not always true.
Instead of making this assumption, we instead now inspect the three
commits: the local, remote and pending remote; and set the add heights
accordingly. This should ensure that HTLCs are subtracted from the
balances only when they are first added.
In this commit, we add a new index to the HTLC log. This new index is
meant to ensure that we don't attempt to modify and HTLC twice. An HTLC
modification is either a fail or a settle. This is the first in a series
of commits to fix an existing bug in the state machine that can cause a
panic if a remote node attempts to settle an HTLC twice.
In this commit, we add a precautionary assertion at the end of
createCommitmentTx. This assertion is meant to ensure that we don't
accept or propose a commitment transaction that attempts to send out
more than it was funded with.
In this commit, we move the check to CheckTransactionSanity into
createCommitmentTx. We do this as within wallet.go (during the funding
process) we actually end up calling this helper function twice, and also
moving it up until right when we create the fully commitment transaction
ensures we making our assertion against the final version.
This commit removes redundant HTLC restoring. We don't have to restore
outgoing HTLCs from the local commitment, as we _know_ they will always
be added to the remote commitment first. Also, when receiving
Settles/Fails, they will be removed from the local commitment first.
This way we can be sure that outgoing HTLCs found on the local
commitment always will be found on the remote commitment
Similarly we don't have to restore incoming HTLCs from the remote
commitment, as they will be added to the local commitment first.
This commit removes the stage during updateLog restoration where we
would attempt to restore incoming HLTCs from the pendingRemoteCommit, in
addition to update our log and htlc counter to reflect this state. The
reason we can safely remove this is to observe that a pending remote
commit is always created from a commitDiff which only contains updates
made by _us_, and thus only taken from the localUpdateLog. The same can
be said for the counters, when creating a commitDiff we'll always use
the remoteACKedIndex as the index into the remoteUpdateLog, meaning that
all potential updates will already be included in the remote commit that
has been ACKed.
remoteUpdateLog from localCommit
This commit fixes a bug within channel.go that would lead to the
content of the update logs and their indexes getting out of sync during
restores.
The scenario that could occur was that the localUpdateLog was initiated
with a log index taken from the localCommitment. Updates we send (which
are added to the localUpdateLog) will be added to the remote commitment
first. The problem happened when an update was sent and added to the
remote commitment, but not ACKed. Since it was not ACKed, we would not
add it to our local commitment. During a restart/restore we would init
the localUpdateLog with a height too low, such that when going through
the outgoing HTLCs on the remote commitment, we would restore an HTLC at
an index higher than our local log HTLC counter.
The symmetric change is done to the remoteUpdateLog.
This commit removes a faulty check we did to determine if the channel
commitments were fully synced. We assumed that if out local commitment
chain had a height higher than the remote, then we would have state
updates present in our chain but not in theirs, and owed a commitment.
However, there were cases where this wasn't true, and we would send a
new commitment even though we had no new updates to sign. This is a
protocol violation.
Now we don't longer check the heights to determine if we are fully
synced. A consequence of this is that we also need to check if we have
any pending fee updates that are nopt yet signed, as those are
considered non-empty updates.
This commit make us return an error in case a restored HTLC from a
pending remote commit has an index that is different from our local
update log index. It is appended with the assumption that these indexes
are the same, and if they are not we cannot really continue.
This commit adds a call to panic in case the HTLC we are looking for is
not found in the update log. It _should_ always be there, but we have
seen crashes resulting from it not being found. Since it will crash with
a nil pointer dereference below, we instead call panic giving us a bit
more information to work with.
In this commit, we modify the NewUnilateralCloseSummary to be able to
distinguish between a unilateral closure using the lowest+highest
commitment the remote party possesses. Before this commit, if the remote
party broadcast their highest commitment, when they have a lower
unrevoked commitment, then this function would fail to find the proper
output, leaving funds on the chain.
To fix this, it's now the duty of the caller to pass remotePendingCommit
with the proper value. The caller should use the lowest unrevoked
commitment, and the height hint of the broadcast commitment to discern
if this is a pending commitment or not.
