This commit fixes a lingering bug that could at times cause
incompatibilities with other implementations when attempting a
cooperative channel close. Before this commit, we would use a pointer
to the funding txin everywhere. As a result, each time we made a new
state, or verified one, we would modify the sequence field of the main
txin of the commitment transaction. Due to this if we updated the
channel, then went to do a cooperative channel closure, the sequence of
the txin would still be set to the value we used as the state hint.
To remedy this, we now copy the txin each time when making the
commitment transaction, and also the cooperative closure transaction.
This avoids accidentally mutating the txin itself.
Fixes#502.
Previously, some methods on a LightningChannel like SettleHTLC and
FailHTLC would identify HTLCs by payment hash. This would not always
work correctly if there are multiple HTLCs with the same payment hash,
so instead we change these methods to identify HTLCs by their unique
identifiers instead.
In this commit, we fix an existing bug that would cause issues within
the switch due to a value not being properly set. Before this commit we
would copy a byte array into a slice without first creating the
necessary capacity for that slice. To fix this, we’ll now ensure that
the blob has the proper capacity before copying over. Several tests
have been updated to always set a fake onion blob.
In this commit, we extend the initial check within SignNextCommitment
to bail out early if we don’t yet know the commitment point of the
remote party. This prevents a class of nil pointer panics if we attempt
to create a new state without yet having received the FundingLocked
message.
In this commit, we fix an existing bug within our cooperative channel
closing transaction generation. Before this commit, we wouldn’t account
for the fee already allocated within the commitment transaction. As a
result, we would calculate the evaluated balance considering the fee
incorrectly. In this commit, we fix this by adding the commitment fee
to the balance of the initiator when crafting the closing transaction
In this commit, we fix an existing bug, as only the initiator needs to
validate any new fee updates. If the initiator sends an invalid fee,
then it will be rejected by the responder as it may put them below
their required reserve.
In this commit, we ensure that we reject any UpdateFee messages if
after applying the update, the initiator doesn’t have enough funds to
actually pay for the new commitment state.
A test has been added to exercise this new behavior.
In this commit, we update the retransmission logic to ensure that we
properly retransmit any sent UpdateFee messages as part of a state
transition. When creating a CommitDiff, if we have a pending fee
update, then we’ll add that to the set of logs updates. When restoring
the commit diff from disk, if we encounter an UpdateFee entry, then
we’ll apply that as waiting to be ACK’d and skip adding it as a log
entry.
A new test has been added to excessive this new behavior.
In this commit, we add fully verification (other than checking the
commitment point matches after the fact) of the new optional fields
added to the lnwire.ChannelReestablish message. Two scenarios can
arise: we realize the remote party is on a prior state (and possibly
lost data), or we realize that *we* are on a prior state with the
remote party verifiably proving that they’re on a newer state.
In this commit we extend the set of fields populated within the
returned lnwire.ChannelReestablish to populate the optional data loss
fields. This entails included the commitment secret of the most
recently revoked remote commitment transaction and also our current
unrevoked commitment point.
In this commit, we update all the key derivation within the state
machine to account for the recent spec change which introduces a
distinct key for usages within all HTLC scripts. This change means that
the commitment payment and delay base points, are only required to be
online in the case that a party is forced to go to chain.
We introduce an additional local tweak to the keyring for the HTLC
tweak. Additionally, two new keys have been added: a local and a remote
HTLC key. Generation of sender/receiver HTLC scripts now use the local
and remote HTLC keys rather than the “payment” key for each party.
Finally, when creating/verifying signatures for second-level HTLC
transactions, we use these the distinct HTLC keys, rather than re-using
the payment keys.
In this commit we modify the primary InvoiceRegistry interface within
the package to instead return a direct value for LookupInvoice rather
than a pointer. This fixes an existing race condition wherein a caller
could modify or read the value of the returned invoice.
In this commit, we’ve added a set of unit tests to cover all enumerated
channel sync scenarios, including the case where both nodes deem that
they’re unable to synchronize properly.
In this commit we revert a prior commit
(5240953de02d281be694b2c87d151d6c7dce2cb5) which was added as a stop
gap before we added the proper state needed to recover from cases where
the commitment transactions of both chains had diverged slightly due to
asymmetric dust limits.
In this commit, we fix an existing derivation from the commitment state
machine as defined within the specification. Before this commit, we
only kept a single counter which both HTLC adds and fails/settles would
share. This was valid in the prior pre-spec iteration of the state
machine. However in the current draft of the spec, only a distinct
counter for HTLCs are used throughout.
This would cause an incompatibility, as if we mixed adds and settles
during an exchange, then our counter values would differ with other
implementations. To remedy this, we now introduce a distinct HTLC
counter and index within the updateLog.
Each Add will increment both the log counter, and the HTLC counter.
Each Settle/Fail will only increment the log counter. Inbound
Settle/Fails will index into the HTLC index as to target the proper
HTLC. The PaymentDescriptor type has been extended with an additional
field (HltcIndex) which itself tracks the index of an incoming/outgoing
HTLC.
This commit fixes the TestChannelBalanceDustLimit unit test in
channel_test.go. The unit test does not account for the fees
required by adding an HTLC. As a result, Alice's balance according
to her local and remote commitment chains drops below 0 at certain
points. By using the correct fee, this is avoided.
This commit expands the existing TestForceClose test case to add an
HTLC (outgoing) to Alice’s commitment transaction before force closing.
We then ensure that both the pre-signed timeout transaction _and_ the
sign descriptor to sweep the second-level output are fully valid.
This commit extracts the ending dust adherence test case from the
existing TestForceClose test case into a distinct test case. With this
modification, we now ensure that the two new tests are focused and test
a single scenario at at time.
This commit adds an additional return value to SettleHTLC in order to
make way for an upcoming change to modify the way bandwidth status from
the link to the switch is reported.
This commit fixes a bug within the HTLC construction and commitment
transaction construction that would result in HTLC _values_ within the
commitment transaction being off by a factor of 1000. This was due to
the fact that we failed to convert the amount of an HTLC, in mSAT, to
SAT before placing it as an output within the commitment transaction.
When attempt to locate the output index of a particular half, we use
the unconverted amount, meaning it was unnoticed.
This commit adds a new assertion within the TestSimpleAddSettleWorkflow
test to ensure that the HTLC is found within the commitment transaction
with the proper value in satoshi.
Note that this commit is temporary, and should be reverted once #231 is
merged. The reason we need to do this for now, is that we don’t
properly track the exact state of the remote party’s commitment. In
this test case, the resulting HTLC’s added are dust to one party, but
non-dust to another. So upon restart, the states (balance wise) has
diverged.
This commit adds the possibility for the initiator of a
channel to send the update_fee message, as specified
in BOLT#2. After the message is sent and both parties
have committed to the updated fee, all new commitment
messages in the channel will use the specified fee.
If an HTLC’s value is below a node’s dust limit, the amount for that
HTLC should be applied to to the fee used for the channel’s commitment
transaction.
