In this commit, we address an issue that could arise when using the
SendToRoute RPC. In this RPC, we specify the exact hops that a payment
should take. However, within the switch, we would set a constraint for
the first hop to be any hop as long as the first peer was at the end of
it. This would cause discrepancies when attempting to use the RPC as the
payment would actually go through another hop with the same peer. We fix
this by explicitly specifying the channel ID of the first hop.
Fixes#1500.
Fixes#1515.
This commit adds a test that verifies Stop does not block
if the link is concurrently forwarding incoming Adds to
the switch. This test fails prior to the commits that
thread through the link's quit channel.
In this commit, we modify the InvoiceDatabase slightly to allow the link
to record what the final payment about for an invoice was. It may be the
case that the invoice actually had no specified value, or that the payer
paid more than necessary. As a result, it's important that our on-disk
records properly reflect this.
To fix this issue, the SettleInvoice method now also accepts the final
amount paid.
Fixes#856.
In this commit, we modify the existing logic that would attempt to read
the min CLTV information from the invoice directly. With this route, we
avoid any sort of DB index modifications, as this information is already
stored within the payment request, which is already available to the
outside callers. By modifying the InvoiceDatabase interface, we avoid
having to make the switch aware of what the "primary" chain is.
In this commit, we add a new test to the switch:
TestForwardingAsymmetricTimeLockPolicies. This test ensures that a link
has two channels, one of which has a greater CLTV delta than the latter,
that a payment will successfully be routed across the channels. Atm, the
test fails (including the fix to hop payload generation included in the
next commit).
Atm, due to the way that we check forwarding policies, we'll reject this
payment as we're attempting to enforce the policy of the incoming link
(cltv delta of 7), instead of that of the outgoing link (cltv delta of
6). As a result, atm, the incoming link checks if (incoming_timeout -
delta < outgoing_timeout). For the values in the test case: 112 - 7 <
106 -> 105 < 106, this check fails. The payload is proper, but the check
itself should be applied at the outgoing hop.
In this commit, we move the block height dependency from the links in
the switch to the switch itself. This is possible due to a recent change
on the links no longer depending on the block height to update their
commitment fees.
We'll now only have the switch be alerted of new blocks coming in and
links will retrieve the height from it atomically.
In this commit, we modify the behavior of links updating their
commitment fees. Rather than attempting to update the commitment fee for
each link every time a new block comes in, we'll use a timer with a
random interval between 10 and 60 minutes for each link to determine
when to update their corresponding commitment fee. This prevents us from
oscillating the fee rate for our various commitment transactions.
This commit adds a test where we trigger a situation which would
previously make the link think it was never in sync, and potentially
create a lot of empty state updates. This would happen if we were
waiting for a revocation, while still receiving updates from the remote.
Since in this case we could not ACK the updates because of the exhausted
revocation window, our local commitchain would extend, while the remote
chain would stall. When we finally got the revocation the local
commitment height would be far larger than the remote, and FullySynced
would return false from that point on.
This commit adds a new test that makes sure we don't try to send
commitments for states where there are now new updates. Before the
recent change to FullySynced we would do this in this test scenario, as
the local an remote commitment heights would differ.
The test makes the local commitment chain extend by 1 vs the remote,
which would earlier trigger another state update, and checks taht no
such state update is made.
In this commit, we ensure that any time we send a TempChannelFailure
that's destined for a multi-hop source sender, then we'll always package
the latest channel update along with it.
In this commit, we fix a race in the set of TestChannelLinkTrimCircuits*
tests. Before this commit, we would trim the circuits in the htlcManager
goroutine. However, this was problematic as the scheduling order of
goroutines isn't predictable. Instead, we'll now trim the circuits in
the Start method.
Additionally, we fix a series of off-by-2 bugs in the tests themselves.
In this commit, we fix the TestUpdateForwardingPolicy test case after
the recent modification in the way we handling validating constraints
within the link. After the recent set of changes, Bob will properly use
his outgoing link to validate the set of fee related constraints rather
than the incoming link. As a result, we need to modify the second
channel link, not the first for the test to still be applicable.
In this commit, add a new argument to the SendMessage method to allow
callers to request that the method block until the message has been sent
on the socket to the remote peer.
In this commit, we relax the constraints on accepting an exit hop
payment a bit. We'll now accept any incoming payment that _at least_
pays the invoice amount. This puts us further inline with the
specification, which recommends that nodes accept overpayment by a
certain margin.
Fixes#1002.
In this commit, we remove the DecodeHopIterator method from the
ChannelLinkConfig struct. We do this as we no longer use this method,
since we only ever use the DecodeHopIterators method now.
In this commit, we fix a bug that was uncovered by the recent change to
lnwire.MilliSatoshi. Rather than manually compute the diff in fees,
we’ll directly compare the fee that is given against the fee that we
expect.
This commit updates the tests for checking a links Bandwidth()
calculation, after the change that made us use the remoteACKedIndex
instead of the logIndex when calculating it. The main result of this
change is that we never consider incoming updates before they are
acked, when calculating the bandwidth. This is because this was
inconsistent with the state we actually end up signing later on.
In this commit, we modify the way the link handles HTLC’s that it
detects is destined for itself. Before this commit if a payment hash
came across for an invoice we’d already settled, then we’d gladly
accept the payment _again_. As we’d like to enforce the norm that an
invoice is NEVER to be used twice, this commit modifies that behavior
to instead reject an incoming payment that attempts to re-use an
invoice.
Fixes#560.
This simplifies the pending payment handling code because it allows it
be handled in nearly the same way as forwarded HTLCs by treating an
empty channel ID as local dispatch.
Previously, some methods on a LightningChannel like SettleHTLC and
FailHTLC would identify HTLCs by payment hash. This would not always
work correctly if there are multiple HTLCs with the same payment hash,
so instead we change these methods to identify HTLCs by their unique
identifiers instead.
In this commit we add a new case to the main select statement within a
channel link. This select statement will serve as a Sipping Bird which
will check the network fee rate (as returned by the fee estimator) and
compare that to the fee on the commitment transaction. Using the
shouldAdjustCommitFee function, we determine if we should update the
commitment fee. If so, then we’ll send an UpdateFee message and also
trigger a new commitment update.
We also add a new unit test: TestChannelLinkUpdateCommitFee to ensure
that we update the fee accordingly if the fee increases or decreases by
a large portion.
In this commit, we add a new helper function to the link which will be
utilized in a later commit. This helper function will help us determine
if we should update the commitment fee, in response to a change in the
network fee return by our fee estimators.
In this commit we modify the primary InvoiceRegistry interface within
the package to instead return a direct value for LookupInvoice rather
than a pointer. This fixes an existing race condition wherein a caller
could modify or read the value of the returned invoice.
In this commit BOLT№2 retranmission logic for the channel link have
been added. Now if channel link have been initialised with the
'SyncState' field than it will send the lnwire.ChannelReestablish
message and will be waiting for receiving the same message from remote
side. Exchange of this message allow both sides understand which
updates they should exchange with each other in order sync their
states.
This commit where added as a measure to avoid the panic during several
server simultanoius fault. The panic happened becuase *t.Testing
structure is not concurrent safe.
In this commit, we address a lingering TODO within the
TestUpdateForwardingPolicy test case to ensure that Bob will reject the
payment the second time around due to an update in his fee policy.
In this commit, we update the TestLinkForwardTimelockPolicyMismatch to
instead _subtract_ time from the first HTLC extended to the initial
hop. We now subtract instead as giving intermediate hops more time
is.now permitted.
This commit adds a new test case for the default implementation of the
ChannelLink to ensure that the bandwidth is updated properly in the
face of commitment transaction overflows, and the subsequent draining
of said overflown commitment transaction.
This commit adds a new test for the current default ChannelLink
implementation to ensure that the bandwidth updates for a link are
externally consistent from the PoV of callers after a modifying action.
This commit temporary increases the timeout for the
TestChannelLinkBidirectionalOneHopPayments test in order to account for
the slowness of the travis instances that our tests are run on.
This commit modifies the TestChannelLinkBidirectionalOneHopPayments
test to ensure that each payment sent is safely above the dust
threshold. Note that the dust threshold itself is now higher due to the
existence of the HTLC covenant transactions which the HTLC values
themselves must cover.
This change ensure that this test operates under “normal” operation
conditions in order to catch any bugs introduced during a major change.
