Similar to the previous commit, we fix a bug resulting in the wrong
commit weight being calculated when an HTLC just above the remote's
duslimit was added from the remote. This was a result of using the
successFee instead of the timeoutFee when checking whether it was dust,
making us consider it dust when it shouldn't have been.
In this commit we fix a bug resulting in the wrong commit weight being
calculated when an HTLC just below the remote's duslimit was added. This
was a result of using the timeoutFee instead of the successFee when
checking whether it was dust, making us consider it non-dust when it
should have been.
To be spec compliant, we require the initiator to not pay the anchor
values into fees on coop close. We extract the balance calculation into
commitment.go, and add back the value of the anchors to the initiator's
balance.
This commit includes a regression test that checks that we remember
to restore updates that we sent to the peer but they haven't sent
us a signature for yet.
This commit moves the deletion of all updates under the unsigned
acked updates key from AppendRemoteCommitChain to
AdvanceCommitChainTail. This is done because if we went down after
signing for these updates but before receiving a revocation, we would
incorrectly reject their commitment signature:
Alice Bob
-----add----->
-----sig----->
<----rev------
<----sig------
-----rev----->
<----fail-----
<----sig------
-----rev----->
-----sig----->
*reconnect*
<----rev------
<----add------
x----sig------
It is also important to note that filtering is required when we
receive a revocation to ensure that we aren't erroneously deleting
remote updates. Take the following state transitions:
Alice Bob
-----add----->
-----sig----->
<----rev------
<----sig------
-----rev----->
-----add----->
-----sig----->
<----fail-----
<----sig------
-----rev-----> (alice stores updates here)
<----rev------
In the above case, if Alice deleted all updates rather than filtering
when receiving the final revocation from Bob, then Alice would have
to force close the channel due to missing updates. Since Alice hasn't
signed for any of the unsigned acked updates, she should not filter any
of them out.
The `restoreStateLogs` function now properly restores the
`addCommitHeightLocal` field of a settle or fail's parent add.
Previously, any updates' parent in unsignedAckedUpdates would have
the field set to the default value of 0. This would cause a force
closure when receiving a commitment due to our belt-and-suspenders
checks for update logs during commitment validation.
The bug in question occurs because the `addCommitHeightLocal` field
is only populated for a restored add if the add is on the local
commitment. `TestChannelRestoreCommitHeight` is expanded in
`lnwallet/channel_test.go` to demonstrate restoration now works.
The faulty state transition:
```
<----fail----
<----sig-----
-----rev----> (add no longer on Alice's commitment)
*Alice restores* (addCommitHeightLocal of failed htlc is 0)
```
NOTE: Alice dies after sending a revocation but before signing a
commitment. This is possible because there is a select block in the link
that can potentially exit after sending over the revocation but before
signing the next commitment state for the counterparty.
This enforces the _actualized_ fee rate of the commitment transaction,
rather than the fee floor used for estimation. The new value of 250
sat/kw corresponds to 1 sat/byte, rather than 253 which is only rounded
up during estimation to account for the fact that BOLT 3 rounds down to
the nearest satoshi and that the vbyte fee estimation is lossy.
Previously we would incorrectly fail to sign the next commitment even
though the fee was technically high enough. Restarting with this commit
should solve the issue as long as the channel hasn't already gone to
chain.
This commit adds an additional santity check that rejects zero-value
HTLCs, preventing them from being added to the channel state even if the
channel config's minhtlc value is zero.
This commit adds a test to exercise that HTLC signatures are sent in the
correct order, i.e. they match the sorting of the HTLC outputs on the
commitment after applying BOLT 3's BIP69+CLTV sort.
Since our HTLC must also be added to the remote commitment, we do the
balance caluclation also from the remote chain perspective and report
our minimum balance from the two commit views as our available balance.
When we send non-dust HTLCs as the non-initiator, the remote party will
have to pay the extra commitment fee. To account for this we figure out
if they can afford paying this fee, if not we report that we only have
balance available for dust HTLCs, since these HTLCs won't increase the
commitment fee.
Since we want to handle the edge case where paying the HTLC fee would
take the initiator below the reserve, we move the subtraction of the
reserve into availableBalance where this calculation will be performed.
This commit adds an extra validation step when adding HTLCs. Previously
we would only validate the remote commitment resulting from adding an
HTLC, which in most cases is enough. However, there are situations where
the dustlimits are different, which could lead to the resulting remote
commitment from adding the HTLC being valid, but not the local
commitment.
Now we also validate the local commitment. A test to trigger the case is
added.
This commit fixes the TestMaxAcceptedHTLCs, TestMaxPendingAmount,
TestMinHTLC, & TestChanReserve unit tests to pass with the new
ReceiveHTLC logic. Instead of asserting specific failures upon
receiving a new commitment signature, the various assertions were
moved to assert on the error returned from ReceiveHTLC.
The unit test TestNewBreachRetributionSkipsDustHtlcs triggered a state
transition from Bob, even though it was Alice that had added the HTLCs.
This is wrong since it will lead to Bob still owing Alice a commitment,
which is not accounted for in the unit tests.
We add a sanity check that the add heights has been set for all entries
found in the logs, and return an error otherwise. This won't happen
during normal operation, but it does reveal the mistake in the unit
test, which is fixed by making Alice trigger the transition.
In addition we resolve a long standing TODO by removing a (purposeful)
panic in the channel state machine. Old version of lnd had a bug that
could lead to the parent entries being lost during channel restore. A
panic was added to get to the bottom of if.
This is now fixed, so new nodes shouldn't encounter it. However, to be
on the safe side, instead of panicking we return an error back to
gracefully exit the channel state machine.
Updates were always restored with the same log index. This could cause a
crash when the logs were compacted and possibly other problems
elsewhere.
Extended unit test to cover the crash scenario.
This commit updates the channel state machine to
persistently store remote updates that we have received a
signature for, but that we haven't yet included in a commit
signature of our own.
Previously those updates were only stored in memory and
dropped across restarts. This lead to the production of
an invalid signature and channel force closure. The remote
party expects us to include those updates.
This test asserts that remote updates that are locked-in on the local
commitment, but haven't been signed for on the remote commitment, are
properly restored after a restart.
In this commit, we create a new chainfee package, that houses all fee
related functionality used within the codebase. The creation of this new
package furthers our long-term goal of extracting functionality from the
bloated `lnwallet` package into new distinct packages. Additionally,
this new packages resolves a class of import cycle that could arise if a
new package that was imported by something in `lnwallet` wanted to use
the existing fee related functions in the prior `lnwallet` package.
Without this, it was possible for a combination of our balance and max
fee allocation to result in a fee rate below the fee floor causing the
remote party to reject the update and close the channel.
In this commit, we update the channel state machine to be aware of
tweakless commits. In several areas, we'll now check the channel's type
to see if it's `SingleFunderTweakless`. If so, then we'll opt to use the
remote party's non-delay based point directly in the script, skipping
any additional cryptographic operations. Along the way we move the
`validateCommitmentSanity` method to be defined _before_ it's used as is
cutomary within the codebase.
Notably, within the `NewUnilateralCloseSummary` method, we'll now _blank
out_ the `SingleTweak` value if the commitment is tweakless. This
indicates to callers the witness type they should map to, as the value
isn't needed at all any longer when sweeping a non-delay output.
We also update the signing+verification tests to also test that we're
able to properly generate a valid witness for the new tweakless
commitment format.
This commit converts the ErrCommitSyncLocalDataLoss error into a struct,
that also holds the received last unrevoked commit point from the remote
party.
In this commit, we fix a lingering TOOD statement in the channel arb.
Before this commitment, we would simply wipe our our local HTLC set of
the HTLC set that was on the remote commitment transaction on force
close. This was incorrect as if our commitment transaction had an HTLC
that the remote commitment didn't, then we would fail to cancel that
back, and cause both channels to time out on chain.
In order to remedy this, we introduce a new `HtlcSetKey` struct to track
all 3 possible in-flight set of HTLCs: ours, theirs, and their pending.
We also we start to tack on additional data to all the unilateral close
messages we send to subscribers. This new data is the CommitSet, or the
set of valid commitments at channel closure time. This new information
will be used by the channel arb in an upcoming commit to ensure it will
cancel back HTLCs in the case of split commitment state.
Finally, we start to thread through an optional *CommitSet to the
advanceState method. This additional information will give the channel
arb addition information it needs to ensure it properly cancels back
HTLCs that are about to time out or may time out depending on which
commitment is played.
Within the htlcswitch pakage, we modify the `SignNextCommitment` method
to return the new set of pending HTLCs for the remote party's commitment
transaction and `ReceiveRevocation` to return the latest set of
commitment transactions on the remote party's commitment as well. This
is a preparatory change which is part of a larger change to address a
lingering TODO in the cnct.
Additionally, rather than just send of the set of HTLCs after the we
revoke, we'll also send of the set of HTLCs after the remote party
revokes, and we create a pending commitment state for it.
Now that the success resolver preimage field is always populated by the
incoming contest resolver, preimage lookups earlier in the
process (channel and channel arbitrator) can mostly be removed.
In this commit, we modify the `ChanSyncMsg` to send an invalid
commitment secret in `ChanSyncMsg`. We do this in order to force the
remote party to force close off-chain, if we're restoring a channel from
scratch and we never had any state updates within the channel. We need
to do this, as otherwise the remote party will think we can resume as
they're able to verify their own commit secret for state zero.
In this commit, we update the `TestChanSyncFailure` method to pass given
the new behavior around updating borked channel states. In order to do
this, we add a new method to allow the test to clear an existing channel
state. This method may be of independent use in other areas in the
codebase in the future as well.
In this commit, we add a new test: `TestForceCloseBorkedState`. This
ensures that it isn't possible to update the channel state once a
channel has been marked as borked. This assumes that all calls to
`ForceClose` will also mark the channel as borked. This isn't the case
yet, so this test fails as is.
