Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Olaoluwa Osuntokun
f972378140
lnwallet: modify CommitSpendTimeout to expect proper input sequence num and tx version 2016-09-12 19:07:20 -07:00
Olaoluwa Osuntokun
e858bb5ca2
lnwallet: convert CommitSpendTimeout to user the Signer interface 2016-09-12 19:07:12 -07:00
Olaoluwa Osuntokun
564316a846
lnwallet: publicly export several functions within script_utils.go 2016-09-08 12:25:44 -07:00
Olaoluwa Osuntokun
1b490c52ed
lnwallet: createCommitTx now a revocation key 2016-06-30 12:12:19 -07:00
Olaoluwa Osuntokun
f3a6f8ffe6
lnd: implement the sendcoins RPC request
This commit implements the “send coins” RPC request which was
introduced at both the lnrpc and command line level in a prior commit.

A small refactoring has taken place w.r.t to sendmany+sendcoins in
order to eliminate some code duplication.
2016-06-29 11:31:34 -07:00
Olaoluwa Osuntokun
e22734f9cf
lnwallet: update HTLC+commitment scripts
This commit updates the previous HTLC and commitment scripts to their
current latest evolution.

The HTLC scripts have been optimized for space savings, the
functionality itself has remained relatively unchanged. A trade off was
made to add additional bytes into the sigScript in order to avoid
extraneous CHECKSIG’s. The rationale is that an extra 1-2 bytes in the
sigScript to guide execution, are worthwhile since they’re in the
witness, and witness data may be pruned in the near future.

The primary change is within the commitment transaction itself. Instead
of using revocation hashes, we now use signature based revocation. This
saves space in the Script, and optimizes away an extra hashing
operation. Elkrem/shachain is still used but, we now use the pre-images
to homomorphically derive a public key which the other party will be
able to sign with, once we disclose the pre-image itself.

Finally, we have switched to using SHA-256 everywhere uniformly for
both revocation hashes, and payment hashes. The rationale is that the
output of ripemd160 is too small for modern security margins, and that
other coins/chains are more likely to have SHA-256 implemented, than
ripemd160.

A set of tests has also been included which contain (mostly) exhaustive
tests of all possible redemption paths for both commitment and HTLC.
2016-06-27 11:35:32 -07:00