In this commit, we clean up the tor package to better follow the
Effective Go guidelines. Most of the changes revolve around naming,
where we'd have things like `torsvc.TorDial`. This was simplified to
`tor.Dial` along with many others.
In this commit, we fix an existing panic bug related to the recently
added routing hints feature. If it's the case that the remote node
didn't send us their edge, then when we go to compare the public keys to
see if they match, we may attempt to deref an nil pointer.
In order to fix this, we'll instead check the edgeInfo, which is
guaranteed to also exist if the channel was found in the database. As a
defensive step, before we go to actually aces the struct, we'll check
that's it's non-nil and proceed if it is nil.
In this commit, we fix an existing deadlock in the
gossiper->server->peer pipeline by ensuring that we're not holding the
syncer mutex while we attempt to have a syncer filter out the rest of
gossip messages.
In this commit, we modify the waiting proof slightly to acept dupliacte
waiting proofs, rather than reject them. Otherwise, it's possible that
the remote node first sends us their half of the waiting proof (before
we do), we write that to disk, then upon restart, we'll try to add it
again, but be rejected by the system.
Fixes#1315.
In this commit, we fix a slight bug in the parsing of encoded short
channel ID's. Before this commit, we would always assume that the remote
peer was sending us the sorted+encoded variant of the short channel
ID's. In the case that they weren't (as there isn't yet a feature bit),
we would assert this check and fail early as atm we don't support any
sort of compression.
We check if the channel is FullySynced instead of comparing the local
and remote commit chain heights, as the heights might not be in sync.
Instead we call FullySynced which recently was modified to use compare
the message indexes instead, which is _should_ really be in sync between
the chains.
The test TestChanSyncOweRevocationAndCommitForceTransition is altered to
ensure the two chains at different heights before the test is started, to
trigger the case that would previously fail to resend the commitment
signature.
This commit changes cancelReservationCtx to gold the resMtx from start
to finish. Earlier it would lock at different times only when accessing
the maps, meaning that other goroutines (I'm looking at you
PeerTerminationWatcher) could come in and grab the context in between
locks, possibly leading to a race.
This commit moves the responsibility of sending a funding error on the
reservation error channel inside failFundingFlow, reducing the places we
need to keep track of sending it.
In this commit we fix an existing bug caused by a scheduling race
condition. We'll now ensure that if we get a gossip message from a peer
before we create an instance for it, then we create one on the spot so
we can service the message. Before this commit, we would drop the first
message, and therefore never sync up with the peer at all, causing them
to miss channel announcements.
In this commit, we extend the AuthenticatedGossiper to take advantage of
the new query features in the case that it gets a channel update w/o
first receiving the full channel announcement. If this happens, we'll
attempt to find a syncer that's fully synced, and request the channel
announcement from it.
This new method allows outside callers to sample the current state of
the gossipSyncer in a concurrent-safe manner. In order to achieve this,
we now only modify the g.state variable atomically.
In this commit, we ensure that all indexes for a particular channel have
any relevant keys deleted once a channel is removed from the database.
Before this commit, if we pruned a channel due to closing, then its
entry in the channel update index would ever be removed.
In this commit, we add a new command line option to allow (ideally
routing nodes) to disable receiving up-to-date channel updates all
together. This may be desired as it'll allow routing nodes to save on
bandwidth as they don't need the channel updates to passively forward
HTLCs. In the scenario that they _do_ want to update their routing
policies, the first failed HTLC due to policy inconsistency will then
allow the routing node to propagate the new update to potential nodes
trying to route through it.
