Before this commit, during a reservation, we wouldn’t ever specify our
minHTL value. We don’t yet fully validate all channel constrains, but
doing this now serves to ensure that once those features are merged,
we’ll actually be setting a valid value for minHTLC.
Adding 99 here didn’t really do anything but obfuscate when we were
trying to compute. We’re just using internet division to calculate 1%
of the channel capacity amount. This is the amount that the remote
party must remain above at all times.
In this commit, we modify the funding reservation workflow slightly to
allow callers to specify their own custom fee when initialization a
funding workflow. This gives power-users the ability to control exactly
how much in fees are paid for each new funding transaction.
This commit adds to methods to the ChannelReservation struct: one for
generating the channel constraints we require for the remote party, and
one for validating their desired constraints, and committing them to
our ChannelConfig.
With these two new methods, we can now begin to properly store and
adhere to the current set of channel flow control constraints.
This commit updates the channel reservation workflow in order to
properly implement the new funding workflow defined in BOLT-0002.
The workflow itself hasn’t changed significantly, but the contents of
the contributions of both sides have. The bulk of the fields within the
contribution of both sides has been boiled down into a pointer to the
ChannelConfig which houses all the data required to handle all states
of the channel, and commitment state machine.
For the two portions which are dictated by the other party, we now add
builder-like modifiers to allow specifying the constraints after the
initial portion of the workflow.
The remote balance in the case of a single funder workflow is simply
what ever the pushSat amount is. The capacity - fundingAmt in this
scenario would always be zero, so we simply just set it directly to
pushSat.
This commit replaces the hard-coded 5000 satoshi fees with calls to the
FeeEstimator interface. This should provide a way to cleanly plug in
additional fee calculation algorithms in the future. This change
affected quite a few tests. When possible, the tests were changed to
assert amounts sent rather than balances so that fees wouldn't need to
be taken into account. There were several tests for which this wasn't
possible, so calls to the static fee calculator were made.
In order to cleanly handle shutdowns and restarts during state machine operation, the fee for the current
commitment transaction must be persisted. This allows the fee to be
reapplied when the current state is reloaded.
In order to make the node's dust limit available to the wallet during
the initial stages of the funding process, add and set a
DustLimit field in the Contribution.
Once a channel funding process has advanced to the point of broadcasting
the funding transaction, the state of the channel should be persisted
so that the nodes can disconnect or go down without having to wait for the
funding transaction to be confirmed on the blockchain.
Previously, the finalization of the funding process was handled by a
combination of the funding manager, the peer and the wallet, but if
the remote peer is no longer online or no longer connected, this flow
will no longer work. This commit moves all funding steps following
the transaction broadcast into the funding manager, which is available
as long as the daemon is running.
In order to facilitate persistence during the funding process, added
the isPending flag to channels so that when the daemon restarts, we can
properly re-initialize the chain notifier and update the state of
channels that were going through the funding process.
This commit ensures that we now properly handle and propagate errors
that arise when attempting to create a new channel after the funding
transaction is believed to be confirmed.
A previous edge case would arise when a user attempted to create a new
channel, but their corresponding btcd node wasn’t yet fully synced.
This commit fixes a prior bug in the wallet triggered by the creation
of a channel using the single funder workflow, but pushing exactly
*half* of the channel over to the other side. The prior logic to
determine who the initiator would result in a disagreement over who
created the channel initially. This wouldn’t manifest until the channel
was attempted to be closed cooperatively. As both side disagreed about
who created the channel they would apply the closing fee to different
outputs, thereby creating mismatched closing transaction. The signature
would fail to validate as the closer will create a different
transaction from that of the responder.
This commit fixes the issue by properly detecting who initially created
the channel.
This commit adds support to the wallet’s internal funding workflow for
pushing a certain amount of BTC to the responder’s side for a single
funder workflow as part of the first commitment.
This commit slightly modifies the channel reservation workflow to
expose the new information conerning the exact confirmation location of
the channel provided by the ChainNotifier. The DispatchChan() method of
the ChannelReservation now also returns the blockHeight and txIndex
where the transaction was ultimately confirmed. This information will
be needed by the fundingManager so it can properly generate the
authenticated channel announcement proofs.
This commit finalizes the implementation of #58 by integrating passing
around the obfuscate state hints into the funding workflow of the
wallet, and also the daemon’s funding manager.
In order to amend the tests, the functions to set and receive the state
hints are now publicly exported.
This commit modifies the existing channel reservation workflow slightly
to thread through the IP address that we were able to reach the node
at, or the one which the node reached us via. Additionally, rather than
using OpenChannel.FullSync() at the end of the reservation workflow, we
now use OpenChannel.FullSyncWithAddr() in order to create the
relationship in the database between the channel, and the p2p node we
created the channel with.
All tests, as well as a portion of the fundingManager have been updated
accordingly,
This commit consists of a mass variable renaming to call the pkScript being executed for segwit outputs the `witnessScript` instead of `redeemScript`. The latter naming convention is generally considered to be reserved for the context of BIP 16 execution. With segwit to be deployed soon, we should be using the correct terminology uniformly through the codebase.
In addition some minor typos throughout the codebase has been fixed.
This commit modifies the prior funding workflow to account for fees
when creating the funding output. As a stop gap, the current fee for
the commitment transaction is now hard-coded at 5k satoshis. Once the
fee models are in place this should instead be some high multiple of
the current “average” fee rate within the network, continuing, the
proper fee should be adjusted from the commitment transaction has
outputs are added/removed.
This commit performs a major refactor of the current wallet,
reservation, and channel code in order to call into a WalletController
implementation rather than directly into btcwallet.
The current set of wallets tests have been modified in order to test
against *all* registered WalletController implementations rather than
only btcwallet. As a result, all future WalletControllers primary need
to ensure that their implementation passes the current set of tests
(which will be expanded into the future), providing an easy path of
integration assurance.
Rather than directly holding the private keys throughout funding and
channel creation, the burden of securing keys has been shifted to the
specified WalletController and Signer interfaces. All signing is done
via the Signer interface rather than directly, increasing flexibility
dramatically.
During channel funding, rather than creating a txscript.Engine to
verify commitment signatures, regular ECDSA sig verification is now
used instead. This is faster and more efficient.
Finally certain fields/methods within ChannelReservation and
LightningChannel have been exposed publicly in order to restrict the
amount of modifications the prior tests needed to undergo in order to
support testing directly agains the WalletController interface.
With this commit, the reservation workflow for the single funder use
case is now aware of the usage of revocation keys.
The changes are relatively minor:
* contributions now have RevocationKeys instead of RevocationHashes
* CompleteReservationSingle now takes the initiators revocation key
This unifies some inconstancies across the code-base with hashes being
32 vs 20 bytes. All hashes, whether payment or revocation are now
uniformly 32 bytes everywhere. As a result, only OP_SHA256 will be used
within commitment and HTLC scripts. The rationale for using sha256
instead of hash160 for the HTLC payment pre-image is that alternative
chains are more likely to have sha256 implemented, rather than
ripemd160.
A forthcoming commit will update the current commitment, and HTLC
scripts.
This commit adds 3 methods to lnwallet.ChannelReservation intended to
facilitating a single funder channel workflow between two nodes. A
single funder workflow is characterized as the initiator committing all
the funds to a channel, with the responder only providing public keys,
and a revocation hash.
The workflow remains the same for the initiator of the funding
transaction, however for the responder, the following methods are
instead called in order:
* .ProcessSingleConribution()
* .CompleteSingleContribution()
* .FinalizeReservation()
These methods are required for the responder as they are never able to
construct the full funding transaction, and only receive the out point
of the funding transaction once available.
* Hooks into the ChainNotifier infrastructure to receive a notification
once the funding transaction gets enough notifications.
* Still need to set up the notification grouting within a
LightningChannel to watch for uncooperative closures, and broadcasts
and revoked channel states.
* Workflow along with expected call orders have been documented.
* With this, the initial iteration of ChannelReservation is mostly
complete.
* However, there are still some unfinished steps internally within the
wallet related to processing. Such as factoring proper tx fees,
splitting fees, some node interaction etc.
* Initial draft of brain dump of chandler. Nothing yet set in stone.
* Will most likely move the storage of all structs to a more “column”
oriented approach. Such that, small updates like incrementing the total
satoshi sent don’t result in the entire struct being serialized and
written.
* Some skeleton structs for other possible data we might want to store
are also included.
* Seem valuable to record as much data as possible for record keeping,
visualization, debugging, etc. Will need to set up a time+space+dirty
cache to ensure performance isn’t impacted too much.
