In this commit, we fix a very old, lingering bug within the link. When
accepting an HTLC we are meant to validate the fee against the
constraints of the *outgoing* link. This is due to the fact that we're
offering a payment transit service on our outgoing link. Before this
commit, we would use the policies of the *incoming* link. This would at
times lead to odd routing errors as we would go to route, get an error
update and then route again, repeating the process.
With this commit, we'll properly use the incoming link for timelock
related constraints, and the outgoing link for fee related constraints.
We do this by introducing a new HtlcSatisfiesPolicy method in the link.
This method should return a non-nil error if the link can carry the HTLC
as it satisfies its current forwarding policy. We'll use this method now
at *forwarding* time to ensure that we only forward to links that
actually accept the policy. This fixes a number of bugs that existed
before that could result in a link accepting an HTLC that actually
violated its policy. In the case that the policy is violated for *all*
links, we take care to return the error returned by the *target* link so
the caller can update their sending accordingly.
In this commit, we also remove the prior linkControl channel in the
channelLink. Instead, of sending a message to update the internal link
policy, we'll use a mutex in place. This simplifies the code, and also
adds some necessary refactoring in anticipation of the next follow up
commit.
In this commit, we fix a slight bug in lnd. Before this commit, we would
send the error to the remote peer, but in an async manner. As a result,
it was possible for the connections to be closed _before_ the error
actually reached the remote party. The fix is simple: wait for the error
to be returned when sending the message. This ensures that the error
reaches the remote party before we kill the connection.
In this commit, we relax the constraints on accepting an exit hop
payment a bit. We'll now accept any incoming payment that _at least_
pays the invoice amount. This puts us further inline with the
specification, which recommends that nodes accept overpayment by a
certain margin.
Fixes#1002.
In this commit, we remove a ton of unnecessary indentation in the
processRemoteAdds method. Before this commit, we had a switch statement
on the type of the entry. This was required before when the method was
generic, but now since we already know that it’s an Add, we no longer
require such a statement.
In this commit, we remove the DecodeHopIterator method from the
ChannelLinkConfig struct. We do this as we no longer use this method,
since we only ever use the DecodeHopIterators method now.
In this commit, we fix a bug that was uncovered by the recent change to
lnwire.MilliSatoshi. Rather than manually compute the diff in fees,
we’ll directly compare the fee that is given against the fee that we
expect.
In this commit, we fix an existing bug that would result in some
payments getting “stuck”. This would happen if one side restarted
before the channel was fully locked in. In this case, since upon
re-connection, the link will get added to the switch with a *short
channel ID of zero*. If A then tries to make a multi-hop payment
through B, B will fail to forward the payment, as it’ll mistakenly
think that the payment originated from a local-subsystem as the channel
ID is zero. A short channel ID of zero is used to map local payments
back to their caller.
With fix this by allowing the funding manager to dynamically update the
short channel ID of a link after it discovers the short channel ID.
In this commit, we fix a second instance of reported “stuck” payments
by users.
This commit introduces a new Ticker interface, that can be used
to control when the batch timer should tick. This is done to be
able to more easily control the ticker during tests. The batch
timer is wrapped in the new BatchTicker struct, and made part
of the config together with BatchSize.
In this commit, we add 6 new integration tests to test the various
actions that may need to be performed when either side goes on-chain to
fully resolve HTLC’s. Many of the tests are mirrors of each other as
they test sweeping/resolving HTLC’s from both commitment transactions.
In this commit, we address a lingering TODO: before this if we had a
set of HTLC’s that we knew the pre-image to on our commitment
transaction after a restart, then we wouldn’t attempt to settle them.
With this new change, we’ll check that we didn’t already retransmit the
settles for them, and check the preimage cache to see if we already
know the preimage. If we do, then we’ll immediately settle them.
In this commit, we add some additional logic to the case when we
receive a pre-image from an upstream peer. We’ll immediately add it to
the witness cache, as an incoming HTLC might be waiting on-chain to
fully resolve the HTLC with knowledge of the newly discovered
pre-image.
Before this commit, if the htlcManager unexpectedly exited (due to a
protocol error, etc), the underlying block epoch notification intent
that was created for it would never be cancelled. This would result in
tens, or hundreds of goroutine leaks as the client would never consume
those notifications.
To fix this, we move cancellation of the block epoch intent from the
Stop() method of the channel link, to the defer statement at the top of
the htlcManager.
In this commit, we add an additional case when handling a failed
commitment signature. If we detect that it’s a InvalidCommitSigError,
then we’ll send over an lnwire.Error message with the full details. We
don’t yet properly dispatch this error on the reciting side, but that
will be done in a follow up a commit.
In this commit, we modify the way the link handles HTLC’s that it
detects is destined for itself. Before this commit if a payment hash
came across for an invoice we’d already settled, then we’d gladly
accept the payment _again_. As we’d like to enforce the norm that an
invoice is NEVER to be used twice, this commit modifies that behavior
to instead reject an incoming payment that attempts to re-use an
invoice.
Fixes#560.
This simplifies the pending payment handling code because it allows it
be handled in nearly the same way as forwarded HTLCs by treating an
empty channel ID as local dispatch.
The src/dest terminology for routing packets is kind of confusing
because the source HTLC may not be the source of the packet for
settles/fails traversing the circuit in the opposite direction. This
changes the nomenclature to incoming/outgoing and always references
the HTLCs themselves.
Previously, some methods on a LightningChannel like SettleHTLC and
FailHTLC would identify HTLCs by payment hash. This would not always
work correctly if there are multiple HTLCs with the same payment hash,
so instead we change these methods to identify HTLCs by their unique
identifiers instead.
This changes the circuit map internals and API to reference circuits
by a primary key of (channel ID, HTLC ID) instead of paymnet
hash. This is because each circuit has a unique offered HTLC, but
there may be multiple circuits for a payment hash with different
source or destination channels.
The constructor functions have no additional logic other than passing
function parameters into struct fields. Given the large function
signatures, it is more clear to directly construct the htlcPacket in
client code than call a function with lots of positional arguments.
In this commit, we modify the existing logic to handle
UpdateFailMalformedHLTC message from an incoming peer. Rather than fail
the Chanel if they give us an invalid failure code, we’ll instead treat
it as a temporary channel failure so we can continue to forward the
error.
This commit is a follow up to a prior commit which skipped sending the
commitment sig message (and sending out the update fee) message if the
channel wasn’t yet able to forward any HTLC’s. We’ll modify the prior
commit to not add the fee update to the channel at all. Otherwise, we
risk a state desynchronization.
This commit adds a check to `updateChannelFee` which skipssending the
`update_fee` message when the channel is not eligable for forwarding
messages (likely due to the channel's `RemoteNextRevocation` not yet
being set).
This addresses #470.
