htlcswitch: add new tests for excising link bandwidth consistency

This commit adds a new test for the current default ChannelLink
implementation to ensure that the bandwidth updates for a link are
externally consistent from the PoV of callers after a modifying action.
This commit is contained in:
Olaoluwa Osuntokun 2017-09-25 12:50:00 -07:00
parent fe2b8ccb29
commit ead5b710d6
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 964EA263DD637C21

@ -3,6 +3,8 @@ package htlcswitch
import ( import (
"bytes" "bytes"
"fmt" "fmt"
"runtime"
"sync"
"testing" "testing"
"time" "time"
@ -14,6 +16,7 @@ import (
"github.com/davecgh/go-spew/spew" "github.com/davecgh/go-spew/spew"
"github.com/go-errors/errors" "github.com/go-errors/errors"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/chainntnfs"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwallet" "github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwallet"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire" "github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
"github.com/roasbeef/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash" "github.com/roasbeef/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash"
@ -134,7 +137,7 @@ func TestChannelLinkSingleHopPayment(t *testing.T) {
} }
if aliceBandwidthBefore-amount != n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth() { if aliceBandwidthBefore-amount != n.aliceChannelLink.Bandwidth() {
t.Fatal("alice bandwidth should have descreased on payment " + t.Fatal("alice bandwidth should have decrease on payment " +
"amount") "amount")
} }
@ -1113,3 +1116,225 @@ func TestChannelLinkSingleHopMessageOrdering(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatalf("unable to make the payment: %v", err) t.Fatalf("unable to make the payment: %v", err)
} }
} }
type mockPeer struct {
sync.Mutex
sentMsgs []lnwire.Message
}
func (m *mockPeer) SendMessage(msg lnwire.Message) error {
m.Lock()
m.sentMsgs = append(m.sentMsgs, msg)
m.Unlock()
return nil
}
func (m *mockPeer) WipeChannel(*lnwallet.LightningChannel) error {
return nil
}
func (m *mockPeer) PubKey() [33]byte {
return [33]byte{}
}
func (m *mockPeer) Disconnect(reason error) {
}
func (m *mockPeer) popSentMsg() lnwire.Message {
m.Lock()
msg := m.sentMsgs[0]
m.sentMsgs[0] = nil
m.sentMsgs = m.sentMsgs[1:]
m.Unlock()
return msg
}
var _ Peer = (*mockPeer)(nil)
func newSingleLinkTestHarness(chanAmt btcutil.Amount) (ChannelLink, func(), error) {
globalEpoch := &chainntnfs.BlockEpochEvent{
Epochs: make(chan *chainntnfs.BlockEpoch),
Cancel: func() {
},
}
chanID := lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(4)
aliceChannel, _, fCleanUp, err := createTestChannel(
alicePrivKey, bobPrivKey, chanAmt, chanAmt, chanID,
)
if err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
var (
invoiveRegistry = newMockRegistry()
decoder = &mockIteratorDecoder{}
obfuscator = newMockObfuscator()
alicePeer mockPeer
globalPolicy = ForwardingPolicy{
MinHTLC: lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(5),
BaseFee: lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(1),
TimeLockDelta: 6,
}
)
aliceCfg := ChannelLinkConfig{
FwrdingPolicy: globalPolicy,
Peer: &alicePeer,
Switch: nil,
DecodeHopIterator: decoder.DecodeHopIterator,
DecodeOnionObfuscator: func(io.Reader) (Obfuscator, lnwire.FailCode) {
return obfuscator, lnwire.CodeNone
},
GetLastChannelUpdate: mockGetChanUpdateMessage,
Registry: invoiveRegistry,
BlockEpochs: globalEpoch,
}
const startingHeight = 100
aliceLink := NewChannelLink(aliceCfg, aliceChannel, startingHeight)
if err := aliceLink.Start(); err != nil {
return nil, nil, err
}
cleanUp := func() {
defer fCleanUp()
defer aliceLink.Stop()
}
return aliceLink, cleanUp, nil
}
func assertLinkBandwidth(t *testing.T, link ChannelLink,
expected lnwire.MilliSatoshi) {
currentBandwidth := link.Bandwidth()
_, _, line, _ := runtime.Caller(1)
if currentBandwidth != expected {
t.Fatalf("line %v: alice's link bandwidth is incorrect: "+
"expected %v, got %v", line, expected, currentBandwidth)
}
}
// TestChannelLinkBandwidthConsistency ensures that the reported bandwidth of a
// given ChannelLink is properly updated in response to downstream messages
// from the switch, and upstream messages from its channel peer.
//
// TODO(roasbeef): add sync hook into packet processing so can eliminate all
// sleep in this test and the one below
func TestChannelLinkBandwidthConsistency(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
// We'll start the test by creating a single instance of
const chanAmt = btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin * 5
aliceLink, cleanUp, err := newSingleLinkTestHarness(chanAmt)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create link: %v", err)
}
defer cleanUp()
var (
mockBlob [lnwire.OnionPacketSize]byte
coreChan = aliceLink.(*channelLink).channel
defaultCommitFee = coreChan.StateSnapshot().CommitFee
aliceStartingBandwidth = aliceLink.Bandwidth()
)
// The starting bandwidth of the channel should be exactly the amount
// that we created the channel between her and Bob.
expectedBandwidth := lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(chanAmt - defaultCommitFee)
assertLinkBandwidth(t, aliceLink, expectedBandwidth)
// Next, we'll create an HTLC worth 1 BTC, and send it into the link as
// a switch initiated payment. The resulting bandwidth should
// now be decremented to reflect the new HTLC.
htlcAmt := lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(btcutil.SatoshiPerBitcoin)
invoice, htlc, err := generatePayment(htlcAmt, htlcAmt, 5, mockBlob)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create payment: %v", err)
}
addPkt := htlcPacket{
htlc: htlc,
}
aliceLink.HandleSwitchPacket(&addPkt)
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond * 100)
assertLinkBandwidth(t, aliceLink, aliceStartingBandwidth-htlcAmt)
// If we now send in a valid HTLC settle for the prior HTLC we added,
// then the bandwidth should remain unchanged as the remote party will
// gain additional channel balance.
htlcSettle := &lnwire.UpdateFufillHTLC{
ID: 0,
PaymentPreimage: invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage,
}
aliceLink.HandleChannelUpdate(htlcSettle)
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond * 100)
assertLinkBandwidth(t, aliceLink, aliceStartingBandwidth-htlcAmt)
// Next, we'll add another HTLC initiated by the switch (of the same
// amount as the prior one).
invoice, htlc, err = generatePayment(htlcAmt, htlcAmt, 5, mockBlob)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to create payment: %v", err)
}
addPkt = htlcPacket{
htlc: htlc,
}
aliceLink.HandleSwitchPacket(&addPkt)
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond * 100)
assertLinkBandwidth(t, aliceLink, aliceStartingBandwidth-htlcAmt*2)
// With that processed, we'll now generate an HTLC fail (sent by the
// remote peer) to cancel the HTLC we just added. This should return us
// back to the bandwidth of the link right before the HTLC was sent.
failMsg := &lnwire.UpdateFailHTLC{
ID: 1, // As this is the second HTLC.
Reason: lnwire.OpaqueReason([]byte("nop")),
}
aliceLink.HandleChannelUpdate(failMsg)
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond * 100)
assertLinkBandwidth(t, aliceLink, aliceStartingBandwidth-htlcAmt)
// Moving along, we'll now receive a new HTLC from the remote peer,
// with an ID of 0 as this is their first HTLC. The bandwidth should
// remain unchanged.
updateMsg := &lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC{
Amount: htlcAmt,
Expiry: 9,
PaymentHash: htlc.PaymentHash, // Re-using the same payment hash.
}
aliceLink.HandleChannelUpdate(updateMsg)
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond * 100)
assertLinkBandwidth(t, aliceLink, aliceStartingBandwidth-htlcAmt)
// Next, we'll settle the HTLC with our knowledge of the pre-image that
// we eventually learn (simulating a multi-hop payment). The bandwidth
// of the channel should now be re-balanced to the starting point.
settlePkt := htlcPacket{
htlc: &lnwire.UpdateFufillHTLC{
ID: 2,
PaymentPreimage: invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage,
},
}
aliceLink.HandleSwitchPacket(&settlePkt)
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond * 100)
assertLinkBandwidth(t, aliceLink, aliceStartingBandwidth)
// Finally, we'll test the scenario of failing an HTLC received by the
// remote node. This should result in no perceived bandwidth changes.
htlcAdd := &lnwire.UpdateAddHTLC{
Amount: htlcAmt,
Expiry: 9,
PaymentHash: htlc.PaymentHash,
}
aliceLink.HandleChannelUpdate(htlcAdd)
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond * 100)
assertLinkBandwidth(t, aliceLink, aliceStartingBandwidth)
failPkt := htlcPacket{
htlc: &lnwire.UpdateFailHTLC{
ID: 3,
},
payHash: htlc.PaymentHash,
}
aliceLink.HandleSwitchPacket(&failPkt)
time.Sleep(time.Millisecond * 100)
assertLinkBandwidth(t, aliceLink, aliceStartingBandwidth)
}