akovalenko/lnd.xprv
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

routing/test: do not test local channel mission control

Browse Source 
This commit updates existing tests to not rely on mission control for
pruning of local channels. Information about local channels should
already be up to date before path finding starts. If not, the problem
should be fixed where bandwidth hints are set up.
This commit is contained in:
Joost Jager 2019-06-18 19:42:51 +02:00
parent 45dacd0df1
commit c39d7a29cd
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: A61B9D4C393C59C7
1 changed files with 35 additions and 39 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

74
routing/router_test.go
View File

@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ func TestSendPaymentRouteFailureFallback(t *testing.T) {
var payHash [32]byte
paymentAmt := lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(1000)
payment := LightningPayment{
Target: ctx.aliases["luoji"],
Target: ctx.aliases["sophon"],
Amount: paymentAmt,
FeeLimit: noFeeLimit,
PaymentHash: payHash,
@ -284,16 +284,16 @@ func TestSendPaymentRouteFailureFallback(t *testing.T) {
copy(preImage[:], bytes.Repeat([]byte{9}, 32))
// We'll modify the SendToSwitch method that's been set within the
// router's configuration to ignore the path that has luo ji as the
// router's configuration to ignore the path that has son goku as the
// first hop. This should force the router to instead take the
// available two hop path (through satoshi).
// the more costly path (through pham nuwen).
ctx.router.cfg.Payer.(*mockPaymentAttemptDispatcher).setPaymentResult(
func(firstHop lnwire.ShortChannelID) ([32]byte, error) {
roasbeefLuoji := lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(689530843)
if firstHop == roasbeefLuoji {
roasbeefSongoku := lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(12345)
if firstHop == roasbeefSongoku {
return [32]byte{}, &htlcswitch.ForwardingError{
FailureSourceIdx: 0,
FailureSourceIdx: 1,
// TODO(roasbeef): temp node failure should be?
FailureMessage: &lnwire.FailTemporaryChannelFailure{},
}
@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ func TestSendPaymentRouteFailureFallback(t *testing.T) {
return preImage, nil
})
// Send off the payment request to the router, route through satoshi
// Send off the payment request to the router, route through pham nuwen
// should've been selected as a fall back and succeeded correctly.
paymentPreImage, route, err := ctx.router.SendPayment(&payment)
if err != nil {
@ -321,10 +321,10 @@ func TestSendPaymentRouteFailureFallback(t *testing.T) {
preImage[:], paymentPreImage[:])
}
// The route should have satoshi as the first hop.
if route.Hops[0].PubKeyBytes != ctx.aliases["satoshi"] {
// The route should have pham nuwen as the first hop.
if route.Hops[0].PubKeyBytes != ctx.aliases["phamnuwen"] {
t.Fatalf("route should go through satoshi as first hop, "+
t.Fatalf("route should go through phamnuwen as first hop, "+
"instead passes through: %v",
getAliasFromPubKey(route.Hops[0].PubKeyBytes,
ctx.aliases))
@ -743,7 +743,7 @@ func TestSendPaymentErrorPathPruning(t *testing.T) {
var payHash [32]byte
paymentAmt := lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(1000)
payment := LightningPayment{
Target: ctx.aliases["luoji"],
Target: ctx.aliases["sophon"],
Amount: paymentAmt,
FeeLimit: noFeeLimit,
PaymentHash: payHash,
@ -752,32 +752,29 @@ func TestSendPaymentErrorPathPruning(t *testing.T) {
var preImage [32]byte
copy(preImage[:], bytes.Repeat([]byte{9}, 32))
roasbeefLuoji := lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(689530843)
roasbeefSongoku := lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(12345)
roasbeefPhanNuwen := lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(999991)
// First, we'll modify the SendToSwitch method to return an error
// indicating that the channel from roasbeef to luoji is not operable
// indicating that the channel from roasbeef to son goku is not operable
// with an UnknownNextPeer.
//
// TODO(roasbeef): filtering should be intelligent enough so just not
// go through satoshi at all at this point.
ctx.router.cfg.Payer.(*mockPaymentAttemptDispatcher).setPaymentResult(
func(firstHop lnwire.ShortChannelID) ([32]byte, error) {
if firstHop == roasbeefLuoji {
if firstHop == roasbeefSongoku {
// We'll first simulate an error from the first
// outgoing link to simulate the channel from luo ji to
// roasbeef not having enough capacity.
// hop to simulate the channel from songoku to
// sophon not having enough capacity.
return [32]byte{}, &htlcswitch.ForwardingError{
FailureSourceIdx: 0,
FailureSourceIdx: 1,
FailureMessage: &lnwire.FailTemporaryChannelFailure{},
}
}
// Next, we'll create an error from satoshi to indicate
// that the luoji node is not longer online, which should
// prune out the rest of the routes.
roasbeefSatoshi := lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2340213491)
if firstHop == roasbeefSatoshi {
// Next, we'll create an error from phan nuwen to
// indicate that the sophon node is not longer online,
// which should prune out the rest of the routes.
if firstHop == roasbeefPhanNuwen {
return [32]byte{}, &htlcswitch.ForwardingError{
FailureSourceIdx: 1,
FailureMessage: &lnwire.FailUnknownNextPeer{},
@ -804,15 +801,14 @@ func TestSendPaymentErrorPathPruning(t *testing.T) {
ctx.router.cfg.MissionControl.(*MissionControl).ResetHistory()
// Next, we'll modify the SendToSwitch method to indicate that luo ji
// wasn't originally online. This should also halt the send all
// together as all paths contain luoji and he can't be reached.
// Next, we'll modify the SendToSwitch method to indicate that the
// connection between songoku and isn't up.
ctx.router.cfg.Payer.(*mockPaymentAttemptDispatcher).setPaymentResult(
func(firstHop lnwire.ShortChannelID) ([32]byte, error) {
if firstHop == roasbeefLuoji {
if firstHop == roasbeefSongoku {
return [32]byte{}, &htlcswitch.ForwardingError{
FailureSourceIdx: 0,
FailureSourceIdx: 1,
FailureMessage: &lnwire.FailUnknownNextPeer{},
}
}
@ -821,14 +817,14 @@ func TestSendPaymentErrorPathPruning(t *testing.T) {
})
// This shouldn't return an error, as we'll make a payment attempt via
// the satoshi channel based on the assumption that there might be an
// intermittent issue with the roasbeef <-> lioji channel.
// the pham nuwen channel based on the assumption that there might be an
// intermittent issue with the songoku <-> sophon channel.
paymentPreImage, rt, err := ctx.router.SendPayment(&payment)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable send payment: %v", err)
}
// This path should go: roasbeef -> satoshi -> luoji
// This path should go: roasbeef -> pham nuwen -> sophon
if len(rt.Hops) != 2 {
t.Fatalf("incorrect route length: expected %v got %v", 2,
len(rt.Hops))
@ -837,9 +833,9 @@ func TestSendPaymentErrorPathPruning(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatalf("incorrect preimage used: expected %x got %x",
preImage[:], paymentPreImage[:])
}
if rt.Hops[0].PubKeyBytes != ctx.aliases["satoshi"] {
if rt.Hops[0].PubKeyBytes != ctx.aliases["phamnuwen"] {
t.Fatalf("route should go through satoshi as first hop, "+
t.Fatalf("route should go through phamnuwen as first hop, "+
"instead passes through: %v",
getAliasFromPubKey(rt.Hops[0].PubKeyBytes,
ctx.aliases))
@ -853,12 +849,12 @@ func TestSendPaymentErrorPathPruning(t *testing.T) {
ctx.router.cfg.Payer.(*mockPaymentAttemptDispatcher).setPaymentResult(
func(firstHop lnwire.ShortChannelID) ([32]byte, error) {
if firstHop == roasbeefLuoji {
if firstHop == roasbeefSongoku {
// We'll first simulate an error from the first
// outgoing link to simulate the channel from luo ji to
// roasbeef not having enough capacity.
return [32]byte{}, &htlcswitch.ForwardingError{
FailureSourceIdx: 0,
FailureSourceIdx: 1,
FailureMessage: &lnwire.FailTemporaryChannelFailure{},
}
}
@ -886,9 +882,9 @@ func TestSendPaymentErrorPathPruning(t *testing.T) {
}
// The route should have satoshi as the first hop.
if rt.Hops[0].PubKeyBytes != ctx.aliases["satoshi"] {
if rt.Hops[0].PubKeyBytes != ctx.aliases["phamnuwen"] {
t.Fatalf("route should go through satoshi as first hop, "+
t.Fatalf("route should go through phamnuwen as first hop, "+
"instead passes through: %v",
getAliasFromPubKey(rt.Hops[0].PubKeyBytes,
ctx.aliases))