akovalenko/lnd.xprv
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Merge pull request #3558 from joostjager/non-strict-pathfinding

Browse Source 
routing: non-strict path finding
This commit is contained in:
Joost Jager 2019-10-30 08:42:28 +01:00 committed by GitHub
commit a8f077a841
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
6 changed files with 479 additions and 316 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
lnwire/msat.go
View File

@ -6,9 +6,15 @@ import (
"github.com/btcsuite/btcutil"
)
// mSatScale is a value that's used to scale satoshis to milli-satoshis, and
// the other way around.
const mSatScale uint64 = 1000
const (
// mSatScale is a value that's used to scale satoshis to milli-satoshis, and
// the other way around.
mSatScale uint64 = 1000
// MaxMilliSatoshi is the maximum number of msats that can be expressed
// in this data type.
MaxMilliSatoshi = ^MilliSatoshi(0)
)
// MilliSatoshi are the native unit of the Lightning Network. A milli-satoshi
// is simply 1/1000th of a satoshi. There are 1000 milli-satoshis in a single

119
routing/pathfind.go
View File

@ -392,32 +392,11 @@ func findPath(g *graphParams, r *RestrictParams, cfg *PathFindingConfig,
// processEdge is a helper closure that will be used to make sure edges
// satisfy our specific requirements.
processEdge := func(fromVertex route.Vertex, bandwidth lnwire.MilliSatoshi,
processEdge := func(fromVertex route.Vertex,
edge *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy, toNodeDist *nodeWithDist) {
edgesExpanded++
// If this is not a local channel and it is disabled, we will
// skip it.
// TODO(halseth): also ignore disable flags for non-local
// channels if bandwidth hint is set?
isSourceChan := fromVertex == source
edgeFlags := edge.ChannelFlags
isDisabled := edgeFlags&lnwire.ChanUpdateDisabled != 0
if !isSourceChan && isDisabled {
return
}
// If we have an outgoing channel restriction and this is not
// the specified channel, skip it.
if isSourceChan && r.OutgoingChannelID != nil &&
*r.OutgoingChannelID != edge.ChannelID {
return
}
// Calculate amount that the candidate node would have to sent
// out.
amountToSend := toNodeDist.amountToReceive
@ -438,25 +417,6 @@ func findPath(g *graphParams, r *RestrictParams, cfg *PathFindingConfig,
return
}
// If the estimated bandwidth of the channel edge is not able
// to carry the amount that needs to be send, return.
if bandwidth < amountToSend {
return
}
// If the amountToSend is less than the minimum required
// amount, return.
if amountToSend < edge.MinHTLC {
return
}
// If this edge was constructed from a hop hint, we won't have access to
// its max HTLC. Therefore, only consider discarding this edge here if
// the field is set.
if edge.MaxHTLC != 0 && edge.MaxHTLC < amountToSend {
return
}
// Compute fee that fromVertex is charging. It is based on the
// amount that needs to be sent to the next node in the route.
//
@ -585,67 +545,34 @@ func findPath(g *graphParams, r *RestrictParams, cfg *PathFindingConfig,
break
}
cb := func(_ *bbolt.Tx, edgeInfo *channeldb.ChannelEdgeInfo, _,
inEdge *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy) error {
// Create unified policies for all incoming connections.
u := newUnifiedPolicies(source, pivot, r.OutgoingChannelID)
// If there is no edge policy for this candidate
// node, skip. Note that we are searching backwards
// so this node would have come prior to the pivot
// node in the route.
if inEdge == nil {
return nil
}
// We'll query the lower layer to see if we can obtain
// any more up to date information concerning the
// bandwidth of this edge.
edgeBandwidth, ok := g.bandwidthHints[edgeInfo.ChannelID]
if !ok {
// If we don't have a hint for this edge, then
// we'll just use the known Capacity/MaxHTLC as
// the available bandwidth. It's possible for
// the capacity to be unknown when operating
// under a light client.
edgeBandwidth = inEdge.MaxHTLC
if edgeBandwidth == 0 {
edgeBandwidth = lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(
edgeInfo.Capacity,
)
}
}
// Before we can process the edge, we'll need to fetch
// the node on the _other_ end of this channel as we
// may later need to iterate over the incoming edges of
// this node if we explore it further.
chanSource, err := edgeInfo.OtherNodeKeyBytes(pivot[:])
if err != nil {
return err
}
// Check if this candidate node is better than what we
// already have.
processEdge(chanSource, edgeBandwidth, inEdge, partialPath)
return nil
}
// Now that we've found the next potential step to take we'll
// examine all the incoming edges (channels) from this node to
// further our graph traversal.
err := g.graph.ForEachNodeChannel(tx, pivot[:], cb)
err := u.addGraphPolicies(g.graph, tx)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// Then, we'll examine all the additional edges from the node
// we're currently visiting. Since we don't know the capacity
// of the private channel, we'll assume it was selected as a
// routing hint due to having enough capacity for the payment
// and use the payment amount as its capacity.
bandWidth := partialPath.amountToReceive
for _, reverseEdge := range additionalEdgesWithSrc[pivot] {
processEdge(reverseEdge.sourceNode, bandWidth,
reverseEdge.edge, partialPath)
u.addPolicy(reverseEdge.sourceNode, reverseEdge.edge, 0)
}
amtToSend := partialPath.amountToReceive
// Expand all connections using the optimal policy for each
// connection.
for fromNode, unifiedPolicy := range u.policies {
policy := unifiedPolicy.getPolicy(
amtToSend, g.bandwidthHints,
)
if policy == nil {
continue
}
// Check if this candidate node is better than what we
// already have.
processEdge(fromNode, policy, partialPath)
}
}

272
routing/router.go
View File

@ -2254,90 +2254,6 @@ func generateBandwidthHints(sourceNode *channeldb.LightningNode,
return bandwidthHints, nil
}
// runningAmounts keeps running amounts while the route is traversed.
type runningAmounts struct {
// amt is the intended amount to send via the route.
amt lnwire.MilliSatoshi
// max is the running maximum that the route can carry.
max lnwire.MilliSatoshi
}
// prependChannel returns a new set of running amounts that would result from
// prepending the given channel to the route. If canIncreaseAmt is set, the
// amount may be increased if it is too small to satisfy the channel's minimum
// htlc amount.
func (r *runningAmounts) prependChannel(policy *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy,
capacity btcutil.Amount, localChan bool, canIncreaseAmt bool) (
runningAmounts, error) {
// Determine max htlc value.
maxHtlc := lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(capacity)
if policy.MessageFlags.HasMaxHtlc() {
maxHtlc = policy.MaxHTLC
}
amt := r.amt
// If we have a specific amount for which we are building the route,
// validate it against the channel constraints and return the new
// running amount.
if !canIncreaseAmt {
if amt < policy.MinHTLC || amt > maxHtlc {
return runningAmounts{}, fmt.Errorf("channel htlc "+
"constraints [%v - %v] violated with amt %v",
policy.MinHTLC, maxHtlc, amt)
}
// Update running amount by adding the fee for non-local
// channels.
if !localChan {
amt += policy.ComputeFee(amt)
}
return runningAmounts{
amt: amt,
}, nil
}
// Adapt the minimum amount to what this channel allows.
if policy.MinHTLC > r.amt {
amt = policy.MinHTLC
}
// Update the maximum amount too to be able to detect incompatible
// channels.
max := r.max
if maxHtlc < r.max {
max = maxHtlc
}
// If we get in the situation that the minimum amount exceeds the
// maximum amount (enforced further down stream), we have incompatible
// channel policies.
//
// There is possibility with pubkey addressing that we should have
// selected a different channel downstream, but we don't backtrack to
// try to fix that. It would complicate path finding while we expect
// this situation to be rare. The spec recommends to keep all policies
// towards a peer identical. If that is the case, there isn't a better
// channel that we should have selected.
if amt > max {
return runningAmounts{},
fmt.Errorf("incompatible channel policies: %v "+
"exceeds %v", amt, max)
}
// Add fees to the running amounts. Skip the source node fees as
// those do not need to be paid.
if !localChan {
amt += policy.ComputeFee(amt)
max += policy.ComputeFee(max)
}
return runningAmounts{amt: amt, max: max}, nil
}
// ErrNoChannel is returned when a route cannot be built because there are no
// channels that satisfy all requirements.
type ErrNoChannel struct {
@ -2374,24 +2290,21 @@ func (r *ChannelRouter) BuildRoute(amt *lnwire.MilliSatoshi,
return nil, err
}
// Allocate a list that will contain the selected channels for this
// Allocate a list that will contain the unified policies for this
// route.
edges := make([]*channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy, len(hops))
edges := make([]*unifiedPolicy, len(hops))
// Keep a running amount and the maximum for this route.
amts := runningAmounts{
max: lnwire.MilliSatoshi(^uint64(0)),
}
var runningAmt lnwire.MilliSatoshi
if useMinAmt {
// For minimum amount routes, aim to deliver at least 1 msat to
// the destination. There are nodes in the wild that have a
// min_htlc channel policy of zero, which could lead to a zero
// amount payment being made.
amts.amt = 1
runningAmt = 1
} else {
// If an amount is specified, we need to build a route that
// delivers exactly this amount to the final destination.
amts.amt = *amt
runningAmt = *amt
}
// Traverse hops backwards to accumulate fees in the running amounts.
@ -2408,142 +2321,85 @@ func (r *ChannelRouter) BuildRoute(amt *lnwire.MilliSatoshi,
localChan := i == 0
// Iterate over candidate channels to select the channel
// to use for the final route.
var (
bestEdge *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy
bestAmts *runningAmounts
bestBandwidth lnwire.MilliSatoshi
)
// Build unified policies for this hop based on the channels
// known in the graph.
u := newUnifiedPolicies(source, toNode, outgoingChan)
cb := func(tx *bbolt.Tx,
edgeInfo *channeldb.ChannelEdgeInfo,
_, inEdge *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy) error {
chanID := edgeInfo.ChannelID
// Apply outgoing channel restriction is active.
if localChan && outgoingChan != nil &&
chanID != *outgoingChan {
return nil
}
// No unknown policy channels.
if inEdge == nil {
return nil
}
// Before we can process the edge, we'll need to
// fetch the node on the _other_ end of this
// channel as we may later need to iterate over
// the incoming edges of this node if we explore
// it further.
chanFromNode, err := edgeInfo.FetchOtherNode(
tx, toNode[:],
)
if err != nil {
return err
}
// Continue searching if this channel doesn't
// connect with the previous hop.
if chanFromNode.PubKeyBytes != fromNode {
return nil
}
// Validate whether this channel's policy is satisfied
// and obtain the new running amounts if this channel
// was to be selected.
newAmts, err := amts.prependChannel(
inEdge, edgeInfo.Capacity, localChan,
useMinAmt,
)
if err != nil {
log.Tracef("Skipping chan %v: %v",
inEdge.ChannelID, err)
return nil
}
// If we already have a best edge, check whether this
// edge is better.
bandwidth := bandwidthHints[chanID]
if bestEdge != nil {
if localChan {
// For local channels, better is defined
// as having more bandwidth. We try to
// maximize the chance that the returned
// route succeeds.
if bandwidth < bestBandwidth {
return nil
}
} else {
// For other channels, better is defined
// as lower fees for the amount to send.
// Normally all channels between two
// nodes should have the same policy,
// but in case not we minimize our cost
// here. Regular path finding would do
// the same.
if newAmts.amt > bestAmts.amt {
return nil
}
}
}
// If we get here, the current edge is better. Replace
// the best.
bestEdge = inEdge
bestAmts = &newAmts
bestBandwidth = bandwidth
return nil
}
err := r.cfg.Graph.ForEachNodeChannel(nil, toNode[:], cb)
err := u.addGraphPolicies(r.cfg.Graph, nil)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
// There is no matching channel. Stop building the route here.
if bestEdge == nil {
// Exit if there are no channels.
unifiedPolicy, ok := u.policies[fromNode]
if !ok {
return nil, ErrNoChannel{
fromNode: fromNode,
position: i,
}
}
log.Tracef("Select channel %v at position %v", bestEdge.ChannelID, i)
// If using min amt, increase amt if needed.
if useMinAmt {
min := unifiedPolicy.minAmt()
if min > runningAmt {
runningAmt = min
}
}
edges[i] = bestEdge
amts = *bestAmts
// Get a forwarding policy for the specific amount that we want
// to forward.
policy := unifiedPolicy.getPolicy(runningAmt, bandwidthHints)
if policy == nil {
return nil, ErrNoChannel{
fromNode: fromNode,
position: i,
}
}
// Add fee for this hop.
if !localChan {
runningAmt += policy.ComputeFee(runningAmt)
}
log.Tracef("Select channel %v at position %v", policy.ChannelID, i)
edges[i] = unifiedPolicy
}
// Now that we arrived at the start of the route and found out the route
// total amount, we make a forward pass. Because the amount may have
// been increased in the backward pass, fees need to be recalculated and
// amount ranges re-checked.
var pathEdges []*channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy
receiverAmt := runningAmt
for i, edge := range edges {
policy := edge.getPolicy(receiverAmt, bandwidthHints)
if policy == nil {
return nil, ErrNoChannel{
fromNode: hops[i-1],
position: i,
}
}
if i > 0 {
// Decrease the amount to send while going forward.
receiverAmt -= policy.ComputeFeeFromIncoming(
receiverAmt,
)
}
pathEdges = append(pathEdges, policy)
}
// Build and return the final route.
_, height, err := r.cfg.Chain.GetBestBlock()
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
var receiverAmt lnwire.MilliSatoshi
if useMinAmt {
// We've calculated the minimum amount for the htlc that the
// source node hands out. The newRoute call below expects the
// amount that must reach the receiver after subtraction of fees
// along the way. Iterate over all edges to calculate the
// receiver amount.
receiverAmt = amts.amt
for _, edge := range edges[1:] {
receiverAmt -= edge.ComputeFeeFromIncoming(receiverAmt)
}
} else {
// Deliver the specified amount to the receiver.
receiverAmt = *amt
}
// Build and return the final route.
return newRoute(
receiverAmt, source, edges, uint32(height),
receiverAmt, source, pathEdges, uint32(height),
uint16(finalCltvDelta), nil,
)
}

20
routing/router_test.go
View File

@ -3410,6 +3410,8 @@ func TestBuildRoute(t *testing.T) {
defer cleanUp()
checkHops := func(rt *route.Route, expected []uint64) {
t.Helper()
if len(rt.Hops) != len(expected) {
t.Fatal("hop count mismatch")
}
@ -3437,10 +3439,10 @@ func TestBuildRoute(t *testing.T) {
}
// Check that we get the expected route back. The total amount should be
// the amount to deliver to hop c (100 sats) plus the fee for hop b (5
// sats).
checkHops(rt, []uint64{1, 2})
if rt.TotalAmount != 105000 {
// the amount to deliver to hop c (100 sats) plus the max fee for the
// connection b->c (6 sats).
checkHops(rt, []uint64{1, 7})
if rt.TotalAmount != 106000 {
t.Fatalf("unexpected total amount %v", rt.TotalAmount)
}
@ -3453,11 +3455,11 @@ func TestBuildRoute(t *testing.T) {
}
// Check that we get the expected route back. The minimum that we can
// send from b to c is 20 sats. Hop b charges 1 sat for the forwarding.
// The channel between hop a and b can carry amounts in the range [5,
// 100], so 21 sats is the minimum amount for this route.
checkHops(rt, []uint64{1, 2})
if rt.TotalAmount != 21000 {
// send from b to c is 20 sats. Hop b charges 1200 msat for the
// forwarding. The channel between hop a and b can carry amounts in the
// range [5, 100], so 21200 msats is the minimum amount for this route.
checkHops(rt, []uint64{1, 7})
if rt.TotalAmount != 21200 {
t.Fatalf("unexpected total amount %v", rt.TotalAmount)
}

281
routing/unified_policies.go Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,281 @@
package routing
import (
"github.com/btcsuite/btcutil"
"github.com/coreos/bbolt"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/channeldb"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/routing/route"
)
// unifiedPolicies holds all unified policies for connections towards a node.
type unifiedPolicies struct {
// policies contains a unified policy for every from node.
policies map[route.Vertex]*unifiedPolicy
// sourceNode is the sender of a payment. The rules to pick the final
// policy are different for local channels.
sourceNode route.Vertex
// toNode is the node for which the unified policies are instantiated.
toNode route.Vertex
// outChanRestr is an optional outgoing channel restriction for the
// local channel to use.
outChanRestr *uint64
}
// newUnifiedPolicies instantiates a new unifiedPolicies object. Channel
// policies can be added to this object.
func newUnifiedPolicies(sourceNode, toNode route.Vertex,
outChanRestr *uint64) *unifiedPolicies {
return &unifiedPolicies{
policies: make(map[route.Vertex]*unifiedPolicy),
toNode: toNode,
sourceNode: sourceNode,
outChanRestr: outChanRestr,
}
}
// addPolicy adds a single channel policy. Capacity may be zero if unknown
// (light clients).
func (u *unifiedPolicies) addPolicy(fromNode route.Vertex,
edge *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy, capacity btcutil.Amount) {
localChan := fromNode == u.sourceNode
// Skip channels if there is an outgoing channel restriction.
if localChan && u.outChanRestr != nil &&
*u.outChanRestr != edge.ChannelID {
return
}
// Update the policies map.
policy, ok := u.policies[fromNode]
if !ok {
policy = &unifiedPolicy{
localChan: localChan,
}
u.policies[fromNode] = policy
}
policy.edges = append(policy.edges, &unifiedPolicyEdge{
policy: edge,
capacity: capacity,
})
}
// addGraphPolicies adds all policies that are known for the toNode in the
// graph.
func (u *unifiedPolicies) addGraphPolicies(g *channeldb.ChannelGraph,
tx *bbolt.Tx) error {
cb := func(_ *bbolt.Tx, edgeInfo *channeldb.ChannelEdgeInfo, _,
inEdge *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy) error {
// If there is no edge policy for this candidate node, skip.
// Note that we are searching backwards so this node would have
// come prior to the pivot node in the route.
if inEdge == nil {
return nil
}
// The node on the other end of this channel is the from node.
fromNode, err := edgeInfo.OtherNodeKeyBytes(u.toNode[:])
if err != nil {
return err
}
// Add this policy to the unified policies map.
u.addPolicy(fromNode, inEdge, edgeInfo.Capacity)
return nil
}
// Iterate over all channels of the to node.
return g.ForEachNodeChannel(tx, u.toNode[:], cb)
}
// unifiedPolicyEdge is the individual channel data that is kept inside an
// unifiedPolicy object.
type unifiedPolicyEdge struct {
policy *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy
capacity btcutil.Amount
}
// amtInRange checks whether an amount falls within the valid range for a
// channel.
func (u *unifiedPolicyEdge) amtInRange(amt lnwire.MilliSatoshi) bool {
// If the capacity is available (non-light clients), skip channels that
// are too small.
if u.capacity > 0 &&
amt > lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(u.capacity) {
return false
}
// Skip channels for which this htlc is too large.
if u.policy.MessageFlags.HasMaxHtlc() &&
amt > u.policy.MaxHTLC {
return false
}
// Skip channels for which this htlc is too small.
if amt < u.policy.MinHTLC {
return false
}
return true
}
// unifiedPolicy is the unified policy that covers all channels between a pair
// of nodes.
type unifiedPolicy struct {
edges []*unifiedPolicyEdge
localChan bool
}
// getPolicy returns the optimal policy to use for this connection given a
// specific amount to send. It differentiates between local and network
// channels.
func (u *unifiedPolicy) getPolicy(amt lnwire.MilliSatoshi,
bandwidthHints map[uint64]lnwire.MilliSatoshi) *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy {
if u.localChan {
return u.getPolicyLocal(amt, bandwidthHints)
}
return u.getPolicyNetwork(amt)
}
// getPolicyLocal returns the optimal policy to use for this local connection
// given a specific amount to send.
func (u *unifiedPolicy) getPolicyLocal(amt lnwire.MilliSatoshi,
bandwidthHints map[uint64]lnwire.MilliSatoshi) *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy {
var (
bestPolicy *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy
maxBandwidth lnwire.MilliSatoshi
)
for _, edge := range u.edges {
// Check valid amount range for the channel.
if !edge.amtInRange(amt) {
continue
}
// For local channels, there is no fee to pay or an extra time
// lock. We only consider the currently available bandwidth for
// channel selection. The disabled flag is ignored for local
// channels.
// Retrieve bandwidth for this local channel. If not
// available, assume this channel has enough bandwidth.
//
// TODO(joostjager): Possibly change to skipping this
// channel. The bandwidth hint is expected to be
// available.
bandwidth, ok := bandwidthHints[edge.policy.ChannelID]
if !ok {
bandwidth = lnwire.MaxMilliSatoshi
}
// Skip channels that can't carry the payment.
if amt > bandwidth {
continue
}
// We pick the local channel with the highest available
// bandwidth, to maximize the success probability. It
// can be that the channel state changes between
// querying the bandwidth hints and sending out the
// htlc.
if bandwidth < maxBandwidth {
continue
}
maxBandwidth = bandwidth
// Update best policy.
bestPolicy = edge.policy
}
return bestPolicy
}
// getPolicyNetwork returns the optimal policy to use for this connection given
// a specific amount to send. The goal is to return a policy that maximizes the
// probability of a successful forward in a non-strict forwarding context.
func (u *unifiedPolicy) getPolicyNetwork(
amt lnwire.MilliSatoshi) *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy {
var (
bestPolicy *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy
maxFee lnwire.MilliSatoshi
maxTimelock uint16
)
for _, edge := range u.edges {
// Check valid amount range for the channel.
if !edge.amtInRange(amt) {
continue
}
// For network channels, skip the disabled ones.
edgeFlags := edge.policy.ChannelFlags
isDisabled := edgeFlags&lnwire.ChanUpdateDisabled != 0
if isDisabled {
continue
}
// Track the maximum time lock of all channels that are
// candidate for non-strict forwarding at the routing node.
if edge.policy.TimeLockDelta > maxTimelock {
maxTimelock = edge.policy.TimeLockDelta
}
// Use the policy that results in the highest fee for this
// specific amount.
fee := edge.policy.ComputeFee(amt)
if fee < maxFee {
continue
}
maxFee = fee
bestPolicy = edge.policy
}
// Return early if no channel matches.
if bestPolicy == nil {
return nil
}
// We have already picked the highest fee that could be required for
// non-strict forwarding. To also cover the case where a lower fee
// channel requires a longer time lock, we modify the policy by setting
// the maximum encountered time lock. Note that this results in a
// synthetic policy that is not actually present on the routing node.
//
// The reason we do this, is that we try to maximize the chance that we
// get forwarded. Because we penalize pair-wise, there won't be a second
// chance for this node pair. But this is all only needed for nodes that
// have distinct policies for channels to the same peer.
modifiedPolicy := *bestPolicy
modifiedPolicy.TimeLockDelta = maxTimelock
return &modifiedPolicy
}
// minAmt returns the minimum amount that can be forwarded on this connection.
func (u *unifiedPolicy) minAmt() lnwire.MilliSatoshi {
min := lnwire.MaxMilliSatoshi
for _, edge := range u.edges {
if edge.policy.MinHTLC < min {
min = edge.policy.MinHTLC
}
}
return min
}

91
routing/unified_policies_test.go Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
package routing
import (
"testing"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/channeldb"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/routing/route"
)
// TestUnifiedPolicies tests the composition of unified policies for nodes that
// have multiple channels between them.
func TestUnifiedPolicies(t *testing.T) {
source := route.Vertex{1}
toNode := route.Vertex{2}
fromNode := route.Vertex{3}
bandwidthHints := map[uint64]lnwire.MilliSatoshi{}
u := newUnifiedPolicies(source, toNode, nil)
// Add two channels between the pair of nodes.
p1 := channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy{
FeeProportionalMillionths: 100000,
FeeBaseMSat: 30,
TimeLockDelta: 60,
MessageFlags: lnwire.ChanUpdateOptionMaxHtlc,
MaxHTLC: 500,
MinHTLC: 100,
}
p2 := channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy{
FeeProportionalMillionths: 190000,
FeeBaseMSat: 10,
TimeLockDelta: 40,
MessageFlags: lnwire.ChanUpdateOptionMaxHtlc,
MaxHTLC: 400,
MinHTLC: 100,
}
u.addPolicy(fromNode, &p1, 7)
u.addPolicy(fromNode, &p2, 7)
checkPolicy := func(policy *channeldb.ChannelEdgePolicy,
feeBase lnwire.MilliSatoshi, feeRate lnwire.MilliSatoshi,
timeLockDelta uint16) {
t.Helper()
if policy.FeeBaseMSat != feeBase {
t.Fatalf("expected fee base %v, got %v",
feeBase, policy.FeeBaseMSat)
}
if policy.TimeLockDelta != timeLockDelta {
t.Fatalf("expected fee base %v, got %v",
timeLockDelta, policy.TimeLockDelta)
}
if policy.FeeProportionalMillionths != feeRate {
t.Fatalf("expected fee rate %v, got %v",
feeRate, policy.FeeProportionalMillionths)
}
}
policy := u.policies[fromNode].getPolicy(50, bandwidthHints)
if policy != nil {
t.Fatal("expected no policy for amt below min htlc")
}
policy = u.policies[fromNode].getPolicy(550, bandwidthHints)
if policy != nil {
t.Fatal("expected no policy for amt above max htlc")
}
// For 200 sat, p1 yields the highest fee. Use that policy to forward,
// because it will also match p2 in case p1 does not have enough
// balance.
policy = u.policies[fromNode].getPolicy(200, bandwidthHints)
checkPolicy(
policy, p1.FeeBaseMSat, p1.FeeProportionalMillionths,
p1.TimeLockDelta,
)
// For 400 sat, p2 yields the highest fee. Use that policy to forward,
// because it will also match p1 in case p2 does not have enough
// balance. In order to match p1, it needs to have p1's time lock delta.
policy = u.policies[fromNode].getPolicy(400, bandwidthHints)
checkPolicy(
policy, p2.FeeBaseMSat, p2.FeeProportionalMillionths,
p1.TimeLockDelta,
)
}