Fix typos in dest_custom_records
comment
This commit is contained in:
parent
49f1169d7c
commit
9ff4b9b652
@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ addholdinvoice call](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/5533).
|
||||
* [Shorten Pull Request check list by referring to the CI checks that are
|
||||
in place](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/5545).
|
||||
* [Added minor fixes to contribution guidelines](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/5503).
|
||||
* [Fixed typo in `dest_custom_records` description comment](https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/pull/5541).
|
||||
|
||||
## Database
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -7926,7 +7926,7 @@ type QueryRoutesRequest struct {
|
||||
//An optional field that can be used to pass an arbitrary set of TLV records
|
||||
//to a peer which understands the new records. This can be used to pass
|
||||
//application specific data during the payment attempt. If the destination
|
||||
//does not support the specified recrods, and error will be returned.
|
||||
//does not support the specified records, an error will be returned.
|
||||
//Record types are required to be in the custom range >= 65536. When using
|
||||
//REST, the values must be encoded as base64.
|
||||
DestCustomRecords map[uint64][]byte `protobuf:"bytes,13,rep,name=dest_custom_records,json=destCustomRecords,proto3" json:"dest_custom_records,omitempty" protobuf_key:"varint,1,opt,name=key,proto3" protobuf_val:"bytes,2,opt,name=value,proto3"`
|
||||
|
@ -2399,7 +2399,7 @@ message QueryRoutesRequest {
|
||||
An optional field that can be used to pass an arbitrary set of TLV records
|
||||
to a peer which understands the new records. This can be used to pass
|
||||
application specific data during the payment attempt. If the destination
|
||||
does not support the specified recrods, and error will be returned.
|
||||
does not support the specified records, an error will be returned.
|
||||
Record types are required to be in the custom range >= 65536. When using
|
||||
REST, the values must be encoded as base64.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user