contractcourt: switch to table based testCommitSweepResolverDelay
This improves readability since both instances of the test are very similar.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2110bfa40b
commit
9ed14a50a4
@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
|
|||||||
package contractcourt
|
package contractcourt
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
import (
|
import (
|
||||||
"reflect"
|
|
||||||
"testing"
|
"testing"
|
||||||
"time"
|
"time"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -169,12 +168,13 @@ func TestCommitSweepResolverNoDelay(t *testing.T) {
|
|||||||
ctx.waitForResult()
|
ctx.waitForResult()
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// TestCommitSweepResolverDelay tests resolution of a direct commitment output
|
// testCommitSweepResolverDelay tests resolution of a direct commitment output
|
||||||
// that is encumbered by a time lock.
|
// that is encumbered by a time lock. sweepErr indicates whether the local node
|
||||||
func TestCommitSweepResolverDelay(t *testing.T) {
|
// fails to sweep the output.
|
||||||
t.Parallel()
|
func testCommitSweepResolverDelay(t *testing.T, sweepErr error) {
|
||||||
defer timeout(t)()
|
defer timeout(t)()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
const sweepProcessInterval = 100 * time.Millisecond
|
||||||
amt := int64(100)
|
amt := int64(100)
|
||||||
outpoint := wire.OutPoint{
|
outpoint := wire.OutPoint{
|
||||||
Index: 5,
|
Index: 5,
|
||||||
@ -192,87 +192,9 @@ func TestCommitSweepResolverDelay(t *testing.T) {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
ctx := newCommitSweepResolverTestContext(t, &res)
|
ctx := newCommitSweepResolverTestContext(t, &res)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
report := ctx.resolver.report()
|
// Setup whether we expect the sweeper to receive a sweep error in this
|
||||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(report, &ContractReport{
|
// test case.
|
||||||
Outpoint: outpoint,
|
ctx.sweeper.sweepErr = sweepErr
|
||||||
Type: ReportOutputUnencumbered,
|
|
||||||
Amount: btcutil.Amount(amt),
|
|
||||||
LimboBalance: btcutil.Amount(amt),
|
|
||||||
}) {
|
|
||||||
t.Fatal("unexpected resolver report")
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ctx.resolve()
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ctx.notifier.confChan <- &chainntnfs.TxConfirmation{
|
|
||||||
BlockHeight: testInitialBlockHeight - 1,
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Allow resolver to process confirmation.
|
|
||||||
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Expect report to be updated.
|
|
||||||
report = ctx.resolver.report()
|
|
||||||
if report.MaturityHeight != testInitialBlockHeight+2 {
|
|
||||||
t.Fatal("report maturity height incorrect")
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Notify initial block height. The csv lock is still in effect, so we
|
|
||||||
// don't expect any sweep to happen yet.
|
|
||||||
ctx.notifyEpoch(testInitialBlockHeight)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
select {
|
|
||||||
case <-ctx.sweeper.sweptInputs:
|
|
||||||
t.Fatal("no sweep expected")
|
|
||||||
case <-time.After(100 * time.Millisecond):
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// A new block arrives. The commit tx confirmed at height -1 and the csv
|
|
||||||
// is 3, so a spend will be valid in the first block after height +1.
|
|
||||||
ctx.notifyEpoch(testInitialBlockHeight + 1)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
<-ctx.sweeper.sweptInputs
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ctx.waitForResult()
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
report = ctx.resolver.report()
|
|
||||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(report, &ContractReport{
|
|
||||||
Outpoint: outpoint,
|
|
||||||
Type: ReportOutputUnencumbered,
|
|
||||||
Amount: btcutil.Amount(amt),
|
|
||||||
RecoveredBalance: btcutil.Amount(amt),
|
|
||||||
MaturityHeight: testInitialBlockHeight + 2,
|
|
||||||
}) {
|
|
||||||
t.Fatal("unexpected resolver report")
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// TestCommitSweepResolverLocalBreach tests resolution when the local node
|
|
||||||
// publishes a breached output (one that is swept by the remote party).
|
|
||||||
func TestCommitSweepResolverLocalBreach(t *testing.T) {
|
|
||||||
t.Parallel()
|
|
||||||
defer timeout(t)()
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
amt := int64(100)
|
|
||||||
outpoint := wire.OutPoint{
|
|
||||||
Index: 5,
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
res := lnwallet.CommitOutputResolution{
|
|
||||||
SelfOutputSignDesc: input.SignDescriptor{
|
|
||||||
Output: &wire.TxOut{
|
|
||||||
Value: amt,
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
WitnessScript: []byte{0},
|
|
||||||
},
|
|
||||||
MaturityDelay: 3,
|
|
||||||
SelfOutPoint: outpoint,
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
ctx := newCommitSweepResolverTestContext(t, &res)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Setup the sweeper so that it returns an error of the output being
|
|
||||||
// already swept.
|
|
||||||
ctx.sweeper.sweepErr = sweep.ErrRemoteSpend
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
report := ctx.resolver.report()
|
report := ctx.resolver.report()
|
||||||
expectedReport := ContractReport{
|
expectedReport := ContractReport{
|
||||||
@ -293,7 +215,7 @@ func TestCommitSweepResolverLocalBreach(t *testing.T) {
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Allow resolver to process confirmation.
|
// Allow resolver to process confirmation.
|
||||||
time.Sleep(100 * time.Millisecond)
|
time.Sleep(sweepProcessInterval)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// Expect report to be updated.
|
// Expect report to be updated.
|
||||||
report = ctx.resolver.report()
|
report = ctx.resolver.report()
|
||||||
@ -308,7 +230,7 @@ func TestCommitSweepResolverLocalBreach(t *testing.T) {
|
|||||||
select {
|
select {
|
||||||
case <-ctx.sweeper.sweptInputs:
|
case <-ctx.sweeper.sweptInputs:
|
||||||
t.Fatal("no sweep expected")
|
t.Fatal("no sweep expected")
|
||||||
case <-time.After(100 * time.Millisecond):
|
case <-time.After(sweepProcessInterval):
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// A new block arrives. The commit tx confirmed at height -1 and the csv
|
// A new block arrives. The commit tx confirmed at height -1 and the csv
|
||||||
@ -319,19 +241,52 @@ func TestCommitSweepResolverLocalBreach(t *testing.T) {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
ctx.waitForResult()
|
ctx.waitForResult()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// If this test case generates a sweep error, we don't expect to be
|
||||||
|
// able to recover anything. This might happen if the local commitment
|
||||||
|
// output was swept by a justice transaction by the remote party.
|
||||||
|
expectedRecoveredBalance := btcutil.Amount(amt)
|
||||||
|
if sweepErr != nil {
|
||||||
|
expectedRecoveredBalance = 0
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
report = ctx.resolver.report()
|
report = ctx.resolver.report()
|
||||||
expectedReport = ContractReport{
|
expectedReport = ContractReport{
|
||||||
Outpoint: outpoint,
|
Outpoint: outpoint,
|
||||||
Type: ReportOutputUnencumbered,
|
Type: ReportOutputUnencumbered,
|
||||||
Amount: btcutil.Amount(amt),
|
Amount: btcutil.Amount(amt),
|
||||||
MaturityHeight: testInitialBlockHeight + 2,
|
MaturityHeight: testInitialBlockHeight + 2,
|
||||||
|
RecoveredBalance: expectedRecoveredBalance,
|
||||||
// RecoveredBalance is zero due to the output having been swept
|
|
||||||
// by the remote party.
|
|
||||||
RecoveredBalance: 0,
|
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
if *report != expectedReport {
|
if *report != expectedReport {
|
||||||
t.Fatalf("unexpected resolver report. want=%v got=%v",
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected resolver report. want=%v got=%v",
|
||||||
expectedReport, report)
|
expectedReport, report)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// TestCommitSweepResolverDelay tests resolution of a direct commitment output
|
||||||
|
// that is encumbered by a time lock.
|
||||||
|
func TestCommitSweepResolverDelay(t *testing.T) {
|
||||||
|
t.Parallel()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
testCases := []struct {
|
||||||
|
name string
|
||||||
|
sweepErr error
|
||||||
|
}{{
|
||||||
|
name: "success",
|
||||||
|
sweepErr: nil,
|
||||||
|
}, {
|
||||||
|
name: "remote spend",
|
||||||
|
sweepErr: sweep.ErrRemoteSpend,
|
||||||
|
}}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
for _, tc := range testCases {
|
||||||
|
tc := tc
|
||||||
|
ok := t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||||
|
testCommitSweepResolverDelay(t, tc.sweepErr)
|
||||||
|
})
|
||||||
|
if !ok {
|
||||||
|
break
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user