Browse Source
The test makes use of a nextRevocationProducer that is only used during integration tests.master
eugene
3 years ago
2 changed files with 231 additions and 0 deletions
@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
|
||||
// +build rpctest
|
||||
|
||||
package lnwallet |
||||
|
||||
import ( |
||||
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg/chainhash" |
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/keychain" |
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/shachain" |
||||
) |
||||
|
||||
// nextRevocationProducer creates a new revocation producer, deriving the
|
||||
// revocation root by applying ECDH to a new key from our revocation root family
|
||||
// and the multisig key we use for the channel.
|
||||
func (l *LightningWallet) nextRevocationProducer(res *ChannelReservation, |
||||
keyRing keychain.KeyRing) (shachain.Producer, error) { |
||||
|
||||
// Derive the next key in the revocation root family.
|
||||
nextRevocationKeyDesc, err := keyRing.DeriveNextKey( |
||||
keychain.KeyFamilyRevocationRoot, |
||||
) |
||||
if err != nil { |
||||
return nil, err |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
// Within our itests, we want to make sure we can still restore channel
|
||||
// backups created with the old revocation root derivation method. To
|
||||
// create a channel in the legacy format during the test, we signal this
|
||||
// by setting an explicit pending channel ID. The ID is the hex
|
||||
// representation of the string "legacy-revocation".
|
||||
itestLegacyFormatChanID := [32]byte{ |
||||
0x6c, 0x65, 0x67, 0x61, 0x63, 0x79, 0x2d, 0x72, 0x65, 0x76, |
||||
0x6f, 0x63, 0x61, 0x74, 0x69, 0x6f, 0x6e, |
||||
} |
||||
if res.pendingChanID == itestLegacyFormatChanID { |
||||
revocationRoot, err := l.DerivePrivKey(nextRevocationKeyDesc) |
||||
if err != nil { |
||||
return nil, err |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
// Once we have the root, we can then generate our shachain
|
||||
// producer and from that generate the per-commitment point.
|
||||
revRoot, err := chainhash.NewHash(revocationRoot.Serialize()) |
||||
if err != nil { |
||||
return nil, err |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
return shachain.NewRevocationProducer(*revRoot), nil |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
// If the DeriveNextKey call returns the first key with Index 0, we need
|
||||
// to re-derive the key as the keychain/btcwallet.go DerivePrivKey call
|
||||
// special-cases Index 0.
|
||||
if nextRevocationKeyDesc.Index == 0 { |
||||
nextRevocationKeyDesc, err = keyRing.DeriveNextKey( |
||||
keychain.KeyFamilyRevocationRoot, |
||||
) |
||||
if err != nil { |
||||
return nil, err |
||||
} |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
res.nextRevocationKeyLoc = nextRevocationKeyDesc.KeyLocator |
||||
|
||||
// Perform an ECDH operation between the private key described in
|
||||
// nextRevocationKeyDesc and our public multisig key. The result will be
|
||||
// used to seed the revocation producer.
|
||||
revRoot, err := l.ECDH( |
||||
nextRevocationKeyDesc, res.ourContribution.MultiSigKey.PubKey, |
||||
) |
||||
if err != nil { |
||||
return nil, err |
||||
} |
||||
|
||||
// Once we have the root, we can then generate our shachain producer
|
||||
// and from that generate the per-commitment point.
|
||||
return shachain.NewRevocationProducer(revRoot), nil |
||||
} |
Loading…
Reference in new issue