invoices+test: replace DeepEqual + spew dump with testify
This commit replaces reflect.DeepEqual tests and spew.Dump prints with testify's require.Equal to make diffs smaller and test outputs more readable.
This commit is contained in:
parent
be36776120
commit
574bbe5eba
@ -2,16 +2,16 @@ package channeldb
|
||||
|
||||
import (
|
||||
"crypto/rand"
|
||||
"fmt"
|
||||
"math"
|
||||
"reflect"
|
||||
"testing"
|
||||
"time"
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/davecgh/go-spew/spew"
|
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntypes"
|
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
|
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/record"
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
var (
|
||||
@ -185,10 +185,11 @@ func testInvoiceWorkflow(t *testing.T, test invWorkflowTest) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
return
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(*fakeInvoice, dbInvoice) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("invoice fetched from db doesn't match original %v vs %v",
|
||||
spew.Sdump(fakeInvoice), spew.Sdump(dbInvoice))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
require.Equal(t,
|
||||
*fakeInvoice, dbInvoice,
|
||||
"invoice fetched from db doesn't match original",
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// The add index of the invoice retrieved from the database should now
|
||||
// be fully populated. As this is the first index written to the DB,
|
||||
@ -280,11 +281,10 @@ func testInvoiceWorkflow(t *testing.T, test invWorkflowTest) {
|
||||
// order (and the primary key should be incremented with each
|
||||
// insertion).
|
||||
for i := 0; i < len(invoices); i++ {
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(*invoices[i], response.Invoices[i]) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("retrieved invoices don't match %v vs %v",
|
||||
spew.Sdump(invoices[i]),
|
||||
spew.Sdump(response.Invoices[i]))
|
||||
}
|
||||
assert.Equal(t,
|
||||
*invoices[i], response.Invoices[i],
|
||||
"retrieved invoice doesn't match",
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -501,9 +501,13 @@ func TestInvoiceAddTimeSeries(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unable to query: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(query.resp, resp) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("test #%v: expected %v, got %v", i,
|
||||
spew.Sdump(query.resp), spew.Sdump(resp))
|
||||
require.Equal(t, len(query.resp), len(resp))
|
||||
|
||||
for j := 0; j < len(query.resp); j++ {
|
||||
require.Equal(t,
|
||||
query.resp[j], resp[j],
|
||||
fmt.Sprintf("test: #%v, item: #%v", i, j),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -566,9 +570,13 @@ func TestInvoiceAddTimeSeries(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unable to query: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(query.resp, resp) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("test #%v: expected %v, got %v", i,
|
||||
spew.Sdump(query.resp), spew.Sdump(resp))
|
||||
require.Equal(t, len(query.resp), len(resp))
|
||||
|
||||
for j := 0; j < len(query.resp); j++ {
|
||||
require.Equal(t,
|
||||
query.resp[j], resp[j],
|
||||
fmt.Sprintf("test: #%v, item: #%v", i, j),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -654,14 +662,11 @@ func TestFetchAllInvoicesWithPaymentHash(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
pendingInvoices[i].PaymentHash)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Zero out add index to not confuse DeepEqual.
|
||||
// Zero out add index to not confuse require.Equal.
|
||||
pendingInvoices[i].Invoice.AddIndex = 0
|
||||
expected.AddIndex = 0
|
||||
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(*expected, pendingInvoices[i].Invoice) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected: %v, got: %v",
|
||||
spew.Sdump(expected), spew.Sdump(pendingInvoices[i].Invoice))
|
||||
}
|
||||
require.Equal(t, *expected, pendingInvoices[i].Invoice)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for i := range allInvoices {
|
||||
@ -671,14 +676,11 @@ func TestFetchAllInvoicesWithPaymentHash(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
allInvoices[i].PaymentHash)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Zero out add index to not confuse DeepEqual.
|
||||
// Zero out add index to not confuse require.Equal.
|
||||
allInvoices[i].Invoice.AddIndex = 0
|
||||
expected.AddIndex = 0
|
||||
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(*expected, allInvoices[i].Invoice) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected: %v, got: %v",
|
||||
spew.Sdump(expected), spew.Sdump(allInvoices[i].Invoice))
|
||||
}
|
||||
require.Equal(t, *expected, allInvoices[i].Invoice)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -732,10 +734,7 @@ func TestDuplicateSettleInvoice(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We should get back the exact same invoice that we just inserted.
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(dbInvoice, invoice) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("wrong invoice after settle, expected %v got %v",
|
||||
spew.Sdump(invoice), spew.Sdump(dbInvoice))
|
||||
}
|
||||
require.Equal(t, invoice, dbInvoice, "wrong invoice after settle")
|
||||
|
||||
// If we try to settle the invoice again, then we should get the very
|
||||
// same invoice back, but with an error this time.
|
||||
@ -749,10 +748,7 @@ func TestDuplicateSettleInvoice(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
invoice.SettleDate = dbInvoice.SettleDate
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(dbInvoice, invoice) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("wrong invoice after second settle, expected %v got %v",
|
||||
spew.Sdump(invoice), spew.Sdump(dbInvoice))
|
||||
}
|
||||
require.Equal(t, invoice, dbInvoice, "wrong invoice after second settle")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestQueryInvoices ensures that we can properly query the invoice database for
|
||||
@ -1020,11 +1016,13 @@ func TestQueryInvoices(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("unable to query invoice database: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(response.Invoices, testCase.expected) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("test #%d: query returned incorrect set of "+
|
||||
"invoices: expcted %v, got %v", i,
|
||||
spew.Sdump(response.Invoices),
|
||||
spew.Sdump(testCase.expected))
|
||||
require.Equal(t, len(testCase.expected), len(response.Invoices))
|
||||
|
||||
for j, expected := range testCase.expected {
|
||||
require.Equal(t,
|
||||
expected, response.Invoices[j],
|
||||
fmt.Sprintf("test: #%v, item: #%v", i, j),
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1118,9 +1116,11 @@ func TestCustomRecords(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
if len(dbInvoice.Htlcs) != 1 {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected the htlc to be added")
|
||||
}
|
||||
if !reflect.DeepEqual(records, dbInvoice.Htlcs[key].CustomRecords) {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("invalid custom records")
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
require.Equal(t,
|
||||
records, dbInvoice.Htlcs[key].CustomRecords,
|
||||
"invalid custom records",
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// TestInvoiceRef asserts that the proper identifiers are returned from an
|
||||
@ -1132,12 +1132,12 @@ func TestInvoiceRef(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// An InvoiceRef by hash should return the provided hash and a nil
|
||||
// payment addr.
|
||||
refByHash := InvoiceRefByHash(payHash)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, payHash, refByHash.PayHash())
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, (*[32]byte)(nil), refByHash.PayAddr())
|
||||
require.Equal(t, payHash, refByHash.PayHash())
|
||||
require.Equal(t, (*[32]byte)(nil), refByHash.PayAddr())
|
||||
|
||||
// An InvoiceRef by hash and addr should return the payment hash and
|
||||
// payment addr passed to the constructor.
|
||||
refByHashAndAddr := InvoiceRefByHashAndAddr(payHash, payAddr)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, payHash, refByHashAndAddr.PayHash())
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, &payAddr, refByHashAndAddr.PayAddr())
|
||||
require.Equal(t, payHash, refByHashAndAddr.PayHash())
|
||||
require.Equal(t, &payAddr, refByHashAndAddr.PayAddr())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user