itest: add SendPayment AMP itest
This commit is contained in:
parent
a2a61a104f
commit
13c00127da
@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ import (
|
||||
|
||||
"github.com/btcsuite/btcutil"
|
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/amp"
|
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/chainreg"
|
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnrpc"
|
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnrpc/routerrpc"
|
||||
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntest"
|
||||
@ -14,6 +15,129 @@ import (
|
||||
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// testSendPaymentAMP tests that we can send an AMP payment to a specified
|
||||
// destination using SendPaymentV2.
|
||||
func testSendPaymentAMP(net *lntest.NetworkHarness, t *harnessTest) {
|
||||
ctxb := context.Background()
|
||||
|
||||
ctx := newMppTestContext(t, net)
|
||||
defer ctx.shutdownNodes()
|
||||
|
||||
const paymentAmt = btcutil.Amount(300000)
|
||||
|
||||
// Set up a network with three different paths Alice <-> Bob. Channel
|
||||
// capacities are set such that the payment can only succeed if (at
|
||||
// least) three paths are used.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// _ Eve _
|
||||
// / \
|
||||
// Alice -- Carol ---- Bob
|
||||
// \ /
|
||||
// \__ Dave ____/
|
||||
//
|
||||
ctx.openChannel(ctx.carol, ctx.bob, 135000)
|
||||
ctx.openChannel(ctx.alice, ctx.carol, 235000)
|
||||
ctx.openChannel(ctx.dave, ctx.bob, 135000)
|
||||
ctx.openChannel(ctx.alice, ctx.dave, 135000)
|
||||
ctx.openChannel(ctx.eve, ctx.bob, 135000)
|
||||
ctx.openChannel(ctx.carol, ctx.eve, 135000)
|
||||
|
||||
defer ctx.closeChannels()
|
||||
|
||||
ctx.waitForChannels()
|
||||
|
||||
// Increase Dave's fee to make the test deterministic. Otherwise it
|
||||
// would be unpredictable whether pathfinding would go through Charlie
|
||||
// or Dave for the first shard.
|
||||
_, err := ctx.dave.UpdateChannelPolicy(
|
||||
context.Background(),
|
||||
&lnrpc.PolicyUpdateRequest{
|
||||
Scope: &lnrpc.PolicyUpdateRequest_Global{Global: true},
|
||||
BaseFeeMsat: 500000,
|
||||
FeeRate: 0.001,
|
||||
TimeLockDelta: 40,
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
if err != nil {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("dave policy update: %v", err)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ctxt, _ := context.WithTimeout(context.Background(), 4*defaultTimeout)
|
||||
payment := sendAndAssertSuccess(
|
||||
ctxt, t, net.Alice,
|
||||
&routerrpc.SendPaymentRequest{
|
||||
Dest: net.Bob.PubKey[:],
|
||||
Amt: int64(paymentAmt),
|
||||
FinalCltvDelta: chainreg.DefaultBitcoinTimeLockDelta,
|
||||
MaxParts: 10,
|
||||
TimeoutSeconds: 60,
|
||||
FeeLimitMsat: noFeeLimitMsat,
|
||||
Amp: true,
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
// Check that Alice split the payment in at least three shards. Because
|
||||
// the hand-off of the htlc to the link is asynchronous (via a mailbox),
|
||||
// there is some non-determinism in the process. Depending on whether
|
||||
// the new pathfinding round is started before or after the htlc is
|
||||
// locked into the channel, different sharding may occur. Therefore we
|
||||
// can only check if the number of shards isn't below the theoretical
|
||||
// minimum.
|
||||
succeeded := 0
|
||||
for _, htlc := range payment.Htlcs {
|
||||
if htlc.Status == lnrpc.HTLCAttempt_SUCCEEDED {
|
||||
succeeded++
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const minExpectedShards = 3
|
||||
if succeeded < minExpectedShards {
|
||||
t.Fatalf("expected at least %v shards, but got %v",
|
||||
minExpectedShards, succeeded)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Fetch Bob's invoices.
|
||||
invoiceResp, err := net.Bob.ListInvoices(
|
||||
ctxb, &lnrpc.ListInvoiceRequest{},
|
||||
)
|
||||
require.NoError(t.t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
// There should only be one invoice.
|
||||
require.Equal(t.t, 1, len(invoiceResp.Invoices))
|
||||
rpcInvoice := invoiceResp.Invoices[0]
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert that the invoice is settled for the total payment amount and
|
||||
// has the correct payment address.
|
||||
require.True(t.t, rpcInvoice.Settled)
|
||||
require.Equal(t.t, lnrpc.Invoice_SETTLED, rpcInvoice.State)
|
||||
require.Equal(t.t, int64(paymentAmt), rpcInvoice.AmtPaidSat)
|
||||
require.Equal(t.t, int64(paymentAmt*1000), rpcInvoice.AmtPaidMsat)
|
||||
|
||||
// Finally, assert that the same set id is recorded for each htlc, and
|
||||
// that the preimage hash pair is valid.
|
||||
var setID []byte
|
||||
require.Equal(t.t, succeeded, len(rpcInvoice.Htlcs))
|
||||
for _, htlc := range rpcInvoice.Htlcs {
|
||||
require.NotNil(t.t, htlc.Amp)
|
||||
if setID == nil {
|
||||
setID = make([]byte, 32)
|
||||
copy(setID, htlc.Amp.SetId)
|
||||
}
|
||||
require.Equal(t.t, setID, htlc.Amp.SetId)
|
||||
|
||||
// Parse the child hash and child preimage, and assert they are
|
||||
// well-formed.
|
||||
childHash, err := lntypes.MakeHash(htlc.Amp.Hash)
|
||||
require.NoError(t.t, err)
|
||||
childPreimage, err := lntypes.MakePreimage(htlc.Amp.Preimage)
|
||||
require.NoError(t.t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
// Assert that the preimage actually matches the hashes.
|
||||
validPreimage := childPreimage.Matches(childHash)
|
||||
require.True(t.t, validPreimage)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func testSendToRouteAMP(net *lntest.NetworkHarness, t *harnessTest) {
|
||||
ctxb := context.Background()
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -274,6 +274,11 @@ var allTestCases = []*testCase{
|
||||
name: "sendtoroute amp",
|
||||
test: testSendToRouteAMP,
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "sendpayment amp",
|
||||
test: testSendPaymentAMP,
|
||||
},
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
name: "send multi path payment",
|
||||
test: testSendMultiPathPayment,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user