htlcswitch/link_test: integrate new channel update APIs

This commit is contained in:
Conner Fromknecht 2018-02-23 22:41:37 -08:00
parent 1fe7c6d431
commit 02c65db0d1
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 39DE78FBE6ACB0EF

@ -1555,7 +1555,7 @@ func handleStateUpdate(link *channelLink,
if !ok {
return fmt.Errorf("expected RevokeAndAck got %T", msg)
}
_, err = remoteChannel.ReceiveRevocation(revoke)
_, _, _, err = remoteChannel.ReceiveRevocation(revoke)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("unable to receive "+
"revocation: %v", err)
@ -1609,7 +1609,7 @@ func updateState(batchTick chan time.Time, link *channelLink,
return fmt.Errorf("expected RevokeAndAck got %T",
msg)
}
_, err = remoteChannel.ReceiveRevocation(revoke)
_, _, _, err = remoteChannel.ReceiveRevocation(revoke)
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("unable to receive "+
"revocation: %v", err)
@ -1743,7 +1743,7 @@ func TestChannelLinkBandwidthConsistency(t *testing.T) {
// If we now send in a valid HTLC settle for the prior HTLC we added,
// then the bandwidth should remain unchanged as the remote party will
// gain additional channel balance.
err = bobChannel.SettleHTLC(invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage, bobIndex)
err = bobChannel.SettleHTLC(invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage, bobIndex, nil, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle htlc: %v", err)
}
@ -1807,7 +1807,7 @@ func TestChannelLinkBandwidthConsistency(t *testing.T) {
// With that processed, we'll now generate an HTLC fail (sent by the
// remote peer) to cancel the HTLC we just added. This should return us
// back to the bandwidth of the link right before the HTLC was sent.
err = bobChannel.FailHTLC(bobIndex, []byte("nop"))
err = bobChannel.FailHTLC(bobIndex, []byte("nop"), nil, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to fail htlc: %v", err)
}
@ -1852,7 +1852,7 @@ func TestChannelLinkBandwidthConsistency(t *testing.T) {
t.Fatalf("unable to add invoice to registry: %v", err)
}
bobIndex, err = bobChannel.AddHTLC(htlc)
bobIndex, err = bobChannel.AddHTLC(htlc, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add htlc: %v", err)
}
@ -1931,7 +1931,7 @@ func TestChannelLinkBandwidthConsistency(t *testing.T) {
// HTLC we add, hence it should have an ID of 1 (Alice's channel
// link will set this automatically for her side).
htlc.ID = 1
bobIndex, err = bobChannel.AddHTLC(htlc)
bobIndex, err = bobChannel.AddHTLC(htlc, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to add htlc: %v", err)
}
@ -2132,7 +2132,7 @@ func TestChannelLinkBandwidthConsistencyOverflow(t *testing.T) {
// will simply transfer over funds to the remote party. However, the
// size of the overflow queue should be decreasing
for i := 0; i < numOverFlowHTLCs; i++ {
err = bobChannel.SettleHTLC(preImages[i], uint64(i))
err = bobChannel.SettleHTLC(preImages[i], uint64(i), nil, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle htlc: %v", err)
}
@ -2280,7 +2280,7 @@ func TestChannelLinkBandwidthChanReserve(t *testing.T) {
// If we now send in a valid HTLC settle for the prior HTLC we added,
// then the bandwidth should remain unchanged as the remote party will
// gain additional channel balance.
err = bobChannel.SettleHTLC(invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage, bobIndex)
err = bobChannel.SettleHTLC(invoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage, bobIndex, nil, nil, nil)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unable to settle htlc: %v", err)
}