2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
package routing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
|
|
"crypto/rand"
|
|
|
|
"sync/atomic"
|
|
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcutil"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/go-errors/errors"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/channeldb"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/clock"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/htlcswitch"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntypes"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/routing/route"
|
2021-04-23 09:39:41 +03:00
|
|
|
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
const stepTimeout = 5 * time.Second
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
// createTestRoute builds a route a->b->c paying the given amt to c.
|
|
|
|
func createTestRoute(amt lnwire.MilliSatoshi,
|
|
|
|
aliasMap map[string]route.Vertex) (*route.Route, error) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hopFee := lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(3)
|
|
|
|
hop1 := aliasMap["b"]
|
|
|
|
hop2 := aliasMap["c"]
|
|
|
|
hops := []*route.Hop{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ChannelID: 1,
|
|
|
|
PubKeyBytes: hop1,
|
|
|
|
LegacyPayload: true,
|
|
|
|
AmtToForward: amt + hopFee,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ChannelID: 2,
|
|
|
|
PubKeyBytes: hop2,
|
|
|
|
LegacyPayload: true,
|
|
|
|
AmtToForward: amt,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We create a simple route that we will supply every time the router
|
|
|
|
// requests one.
|
|
|
|
return route.NewRouteFromHops(
|
|
|
|
amt+2*hopFee, 100, aliasMap["a"], hops,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// paymentLifecycleTestCase contains the steps that we expect for a payment
|
|
|
|
// lifecycle test, and the routes that pathfinding should deliver.
|
|
|
|
type paymentLifecycleTestCase struct {
|
|
|
|
name string
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// steps is a list of steps to perform during the testcase.
|
|
|
|
steps []string
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// routes is the sequence of routes we will provide to the
|
|
|
|
// router when it requests a new route.
|
|
|
|
routes []*route.Route
|
2021-04-23 09:39:41 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// paymentErr is the error we expect our payment to fail with. This
|
|
|
|
// should be nil for tests with paymentSuccess steps and non-nil for
|
|
|
|
// payments with paymentError steps.
|
|
|
|
paymentErr error
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const (
|
|
|
|
// routerInitPayment is a test step where we expect the router
|
|
|
|
// to call the InitPayment method on the control tower.
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment = "Router:init-payment"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// routerRegisterAttempt is a test step where we expect the
|
|
|
|
// router to call the RegisterAttempt method on the control
|
|
|
|
// tower.
|
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt = "Router:register-attempt"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// routerSettleAttempt is a test step where we expect the
|
|
|
|
// router to call the SettleAttempt method on the control
|
|
|
|
// tower.
|
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt = "Router:settle-attempt"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// routerFailAttempt is a test step where we expect the router
|
|
|
|
// to call the FailAttempt method on the control tower.
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt = "Router:fail-attempt"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// routerFailPayment is a test step where we expect the router
|
|
|
|
// to call the Fail method on the control tower.
|
|
|
|
routerFailPayment = "Router:fail-payment"
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
// routeRelease is a test step where we unblock pathfinding and
|
|
|
|
// allow it to respond to our test with a route.
|
|
|
|
routeRelease = "PaymentSession:release"
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// sendToSwitchSuccess is a step where we expect the router to
|
|
|
|
// call send the payment attempt to the switch, and we will
|
|
|
|
// respond with a non-error, indicating that the payment
|
|
|
|
// attempt was successfully forwarded.
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess = "SendToSwitch:success"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// sendToSwitchResultFailure is a step where we expect the
|
|
|
|
// router to send the payment attempt to the switch, and we
|
|
|
|
// will respond with a forwarding error. This can happen when
|
|
|
|
// forwarding fail on our local links.
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchResultFailure = "SendToSwitch:failure"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// getPaymentResultSuccess is a test step where we expect the
|
|
|
|
// router to call the GetPaymentResult method, and we will
|
|
|
|
// respond with a successful payment result.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess = "GetPaymentResult:success"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// getPaymentResultTempFailure is a test step where we expect the
|
|
|
|
// router to call the GetPaymentResult method, and we will
|
|
|
|
// respond with a forwarding error, expecting the router to retry.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure = "GetPaymentResult:temp-failure"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// getPaymentResultTerminalFailure is a test step where we
|
|
|
|
// expect the router to call the GetPaymentResult method, and
|
|
|
|
// we will respond with a terminal error, expecting the router
|
|
|
|
// to stop making payment attempts.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTerminalFailure = "GetPaymentResult:terminal-failure"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// resendPayment is a test step where we manually try to resend
|
|
|
|
// the same payment, making sure the router responds with an
|
|
|
|
// error indicating that it is already in flight.
|
|
|
|
resendPayment = "ResendPayment"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// startRouter is a step where we manually start the router,
|
|
|
|
// used to test that it automatically will resume payments at
|
|
|
|
// startup.
|
|
|
|
startRouter = "StartRouter"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// stopRouter is a test step where we manually make the router
|
|
|
|
// shut down.
|
|
|
|
stopRouter = "StopRouter"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// paymentSuccess is a step where assert that we receive a
|
|
|
|
// successful result for the original payment made.
|
|
|
|
paymentSuccess = "PaymentSuccess"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// paymentError is a step where assert that we receive an error
|
|
|
|
// for the original payment made.
|
|
|
|
paymentError = "PaymentError"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// resentPaymentSuccess is a step where assert that we receive
|
|
|
|
// a successful result for a payment that was resent.
|
|
|
|
resentPaymentSuccess = "ResentPaymentSuccess"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// resentPaymentError is a step where assert that we receive an
|
|
|
|
// error for a payment that was resent.
|
|
|
|
resentPaymentError = "ResentPaymentError"
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
// TestRouterPaymentStateMachine tests that the router interacts as expected
|
|
|
|
// with the ControlTower during a payment lifecycle, such that it payment
|
|
|
|
// attempts are not sent twice to the switch, and results are handled after a
|
|
|
|
// restart.
|
|
|
|
func TestRouterPaymentStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const startingBlockHeight = 101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Setup two simple channels such that we can mock sending along this
|
|
|
|
// route.
|
|
|
|
chanCapSat := btcutil.Amount(100000)
|
|
|
|
testChannels := []*testChannel{
|
|
|
|
symmetricTestChannel("a", "b", chanCapSat, &testChannelPolicy{
|
|
|
|
Expiry: 144,
|
|
|
|
FeeRate: 400,
|
|
|
|
MinHTLC: 1,
|
|
|
|
MaxHTLC: lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(chanCapSat),
|
|
|
|
}, 1),
|
|
|
|
symmetricTestChannel("b", "c", chanCapSat, &testChannelPolicy{
|
|
|
|
Expiry: 144,
|
|
|
|
FeeRate: 400,
|
|
|
|
MinHTLC: 1,
|
|
|
|
MaxHTLC: lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(chanCapSat),
|
|
|
|
}, 2),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
testGraph, err := createTestGraphFromChannels(testChannels, "a")
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create graph: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
defer testGraph.cleanUp()
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
paymentAmt := lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(1000)
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We create a simple route that we will supply every time the router
|
|
|
|
// requests one.
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
rt, err := createTestRoute(paymentAmt, testGraph.aliasMap)
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create route: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:42 +03:00
|
|
|
halfShard, err := createTestRoute(paymentAmt/2, testGraph.aliasMap)
|
|
|
|
require.NoError(t, err, "unable to create half route")
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
shard, err := createTestRoute(paymentAmt/4, testGraph.aliasMap)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create route: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
tests := []paymentLifecycleTestCase{
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Tests a normal payment flow that succeeds.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "single shot success",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
paymentSuccess,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{rt},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// A payment flow with a failure on the first attempt,
|
|
|
|
// but that succeeds on the second attempt.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "single shot retry",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make the first sent attempt fail.
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The router should retry.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make the second sent attempt succeed.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
paymentSuccess,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{rt, rt},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// A payment flow with a forwarding failure first time
|
|
|
|
// sending to the switch, but that succeeds on the
|
|
|
|
// second attempt.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "single shot switch failure",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make the first sent attempt fail.
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchResultFailure,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The router should retry.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make the second sent attempt succeed.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
paymentSuccess,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{rt, rt},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// A payment that fails on the first attempt, and has
|
|
|
|
// only one route available to try. It will therefore
|
|
|
|
// fail permanently.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "single shot route fails",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make the first sent attempt fail.
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
// Since there are no more routes to try, the
|
|
|
|
// payment should fail.
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerFailPayment,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
paymentError,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2021-04-23 09:39:41 +03:00
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{rt},
|
|
|
|
paymentErr: channeldb.FailureReasonNoRoute,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// We expect the payment to fail immediately if we have
|
|
|
|
// no routes to try.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "single shot no route",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerFailPayment,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
paymentError,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2021-04-23 09:39:41 +03:00
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{},
|
|
|
|
paymentErr: channeldb.FailureReasonNoRoute,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// A normal payment flow, where we attempt to resend
|
|
|
|
// the same payment after each step. This ensures that
|
|
|
|
// the router don't attempt to resend a payment already
|
|
|
|
// in flight.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "single shot resend",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Manually resend the payment, the router
|
|
|
|
// should attempt to init with the control
|
|
|
|
// tower, but fail since it is already in
|
|
|
|
// flight.
|
|
|
|
resendPayment,
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
|
|
|
resentPaymentError,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The original payment should proceed as
|
|
|
|
// normal.
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Again resend the payment and assert it's not
|
|
|
|
// allowed.
|
|
|
|
resendPayment,
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
|
|
|
resentPaymentError,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Notify about a success for the original
|
|
|
|
// payment.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now that the original payment finished,
|
|
|
|
// resend it again to ensure this is not
|
|
|
|
// allowed.
|
|
|
|
resendPayment,
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
|
|
|
resentPaymentError,
|
|
|
|
paymentSuccess,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{rt},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Tests that the router is able to handle the
|
|
|
|
// receieved payment result after a restart.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "single shot restart",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Shut down the router. The original caller
|
|
|
|
// should get notified about this.
|
|
|
|
stopRouter,
|
|
|
|
paymentError,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Start the router again, and ensure the
|
|
|
|
// router registers the success with the
|
|
|
|
// control tower.
|
|
|
|
startRouter,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
2021-04-23 09:39:41 +03:00
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{rt},
|
|
|
|
paymentErr: ErrRouterShuttingDown,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Tests that we are allowed to resend a payment after
|
|
|
|
// it has permanently failed.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "single shot resend fail",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Resending the payment at this stage should
|
|
|
|
// not be allowed.
|
|
|
|
resendPayment,
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
|
|
|
resentPaymentError,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make the first attempt fail.
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Since we have no more routes to try, the
|
|
|
|
// original payment should fail.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerFailPayment,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
paymentError,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now resend the payment again. This should be
|
|
|
|
// allowed, since the payment has failed.
|
|
|
|
resendPayment,
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
resentPaymentSuccess,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2021-04-23 09:39:41 +03:00
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{rt},
|
|
|
|
paymentErr: channeldb.FailureReasonNoRoute,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// =====================================
|
|
|
|
// || MPP scenarios ||
|
|
|
|
// =====================================
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// Tests a simple successful MP payment of 4 shards.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "MP success",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 0
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 1
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 2
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 3
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// All shards succeed.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Router should settle them all.
|
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// And the final result is obviously
|
|
|
|
// successful.
|
|
|
|
paymentSuccess,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{shard, shard, shard, shard},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// An MP payment scenario where we need several extra
|
|
|
|
// attempts before the payment finally settle.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "MP failed shards",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 0
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 1
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 2
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 3
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First two shards fail, two new ones are sent.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The four shards settle.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Overall payment succeeds.
|
|
|
|
paymentSuccess,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{
|
|
|
|
shard, shard, shard, shard, shard, shard,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-04-23 09:39:42 +03:00
|
|
|
// An MP payment scenario where one of the shards fails,
|
|
|
|
// but we still receive a single success shard.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "MP one shard success",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 0
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 1
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:42 +03:00
|
|
|
// shard 0 fails, and should be failed by the
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
// router.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
// We will try one more shard because we haven't
|
|
|
|
// sent the full payment amount.
|
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:42 +03:00
|
|
|
// The second shard succeed against all odds,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
// making the overall payment succeed.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultSuccess,
|
|
|
|
routerSettleAttempt,
|
|
|
|
paymentSuccess,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2021-04-23 09:39:42 +03:00
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{halfShard, halfShard},
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// An MP payment scenario a shard fail with a terminal
|
|
|
|
// error, causing the router to stop attempting.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "MP terminal",
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 0
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 1
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 2
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 3
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The first shard fail with a terminal error.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTerminalFailure,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerFailPayment,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Remaining 3 shards fail.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Payment fails.
|
|
|
|
paymentError,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{
|
|
|
|
shard, shard, shard, shard, shard, shard,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2021-04-23 09:39:41 +03:00
|
|
|
paymentErr: channeldb.FailureReasonPaymentDetails,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
2021-04-23 09:39:44 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// A MP payment scenario when our path finding returns
|
|
|
|
// after we've just received a terminal failure, and
|
2021-04-23 09:39:46 +03:00
|
|
|
// attempts to dispatch a new shard. Testing that we
|
|
|
|
// correctly abandon the shard and conclude the payment.
|
2021-04-23 09:39:44 +03:00
|
|
|
name: "MP path found after failure",
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 0
|
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The first shard fail with a terminal error.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTerminalFailure,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerFailPayment,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 1 fails because we've had a terminal
|
|
|
|
// failure.
|
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Payment fails.
|
|
|
|
paymentError,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{
|
|
|
|
shard, shard,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2021-04-23 09:39:46 +03:00
|
|
|
paymentErr: channeldb.FailureReasonPaymentDetails,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:44 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
2021-04-23 09:39:45 +03:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// A MP payment scenario when our path finding returns
|
|
|
|
// after we've just received a terminal failure, and
|
|
|
|
// we have another shard still in flight.
|
|
|
|
name: "MP shard in flight after terminal",
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
steps: []string{
|
|
|
|
routerInitPayment,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 0
|
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 1
|
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 2
|
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
sendToSwitchSuccess,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We find a path for another shard.
|
|
|
|
routeRelease,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// shard 0 fails with a terminal error.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTerminalFailure,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerFailPayment,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We try to register our final shard after
|
|
|
|
// processing a terminal failure.
|
|
|
|
routerRegisterAttempt,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Our in-flight shards fail.
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
|
|
|
getPaymentResultTempFailure,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
routerFailAttempt,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Payment fails.
|
|
|
|
paymentError,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
routes: []*route.Route{
|
|
|
|
shard, shard, shard, shard,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2021-04-23 09:39:46 +03:00
|
|
|
paymentErr: channeldb.FailureReasonPaymentDetails,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:45 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
for _, test := range tests {
|
|
|
|
test := test
|
|
|
|
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
testPaymentLifecycle(
|
|
|
|
t, test, paymentAmt, startingBlockHeight,
|
|
|
|
testGraph,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func testPaymentLifecycle(t *testing.T, test paymentLifecycleTestCase,
|
|
|
|
paymentAmt lnwire.MilliSatoshi, startingBlockHeight uint32,
|
|
|
|
testGraph *testGraphInstance) {
|
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
// Create a mock control tower with channels set up, that we use to
|
|
|
|
// synchronize and listen for events.
|
|
|
|
control := makeMockControlTower()
|
2021-04-23 09:39:38 +03:00
|
|
|
control.init = make(chan initArgs)
|
|
|
|
control.registerAttempt = make(chan registerAttemptArgs)
|
|
|
|
control.settleAttempt = make(chan settleAttemptArgs)
|
|
|
|
control.failAttempt = make(chan failAttemptArgs)
|
|
|
|
control.failPayment = make(chan failPaymentArgs)
|
|
|
|
control.fetchInFlight = make(chan struct{})
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// setupRouter is a helper method that creates and starts the router in
|
|
|
|
// the desired configuration for this test.
|
|
|
|
setupRouter := func() (*ChannelRouter, chan error,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:40 +03:00
|
|
|
chan *htlcswitch.PaymentResult) {
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
chain := newMockChain(startingBlockHeight)
|
|
|
|
chainView := newMockChainView(chain)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We set uo the use the following channels and a mock Payer to
|
|
|
|
// synchonize with the interaction to the Switch.
|
|
|
|
sendResult := make(chan error)
|
|
|
|
paymentResult := make(chan *htlcswitch.PaymentResult)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
payer := &mockPayer{
|
2021-04-23 09:39:40 +03:00
|
|
|
sendResult: sendResult,
|
|
|
|
paymentResult: paymentResult,
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
router, err := New(Config{
|
|
|
|
Graph: testGraph.graph,
|
|
|
|
Chain: chain,
|
|
|
|
ChainView: chainView,
|
|
|
|
Control: control,
|
|
|
|
SessionSource: &mockPaymentSessionSource{},
|
|
|
|
MissionControl: &mockMissionControl{},
|
|
|
|
Payer: payer,
|
|
|
|
ChannelPruneExpiry: time.Hour * 24,
|
|
|
|
GraphPruneInterval: time.Hour * 2,
|
|
|
|
QueryBandwidth: func(e *channeldb.ChannelEdgeInfo) lnwire.MilliSatoshi {
|
|
|
|
return lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(e.Capacity)
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
NextPaymentID: func() (uint64, error) {
|
|
|
|
next := atomic.AddUint64(&uniquePaymentID, 1)
|
|
|
|
return next, nil
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
Clock: clock.NewTestClock(time.Unix(1, 0)),
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create router %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// On startup, the router should fetch all pending payments
|
|
|
|
// from the ControlTower, so assert that here.
|
|
|
|
errCh := make(chan error)
|
|
|
|
go func() {
|
|
|
|
close(errCh)
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case <-control.fetchInFlight:
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(1 * time.Second):
|
|
|
|
errCh <- errors.New("router did not fetch in flight " +
|
|
|
|
"payments")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err := router.Start(); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to start router: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case err := <-errCh:
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("error in anonymous goroutine: %s", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(1 * time.Second):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not fetch in flight payments at startup")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:40 +03:00
|
|
|
return router, sendResult, paymentResult
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:40 +03:00
|
|
|
router, sendResult, getPaymentResult := setupRouter()
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
defer func() {
|
|
|
|
if err := router.Stop(); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// Craft a LightningPayment struct.
|
|
|
|
var preImage lntypes.Preimage
|
|
|
|
if _, err := rand.Read(preImage[:]); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to generate preimage")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
payHash := preImage.Hash()
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
payment := LightningPayment{
|
|
|
|
Target: testGraph.aliasMap["c"],
|
|
|
|
Amount: paymentAmt,
|
|
|
|
FeeLimit: noFeeLimit,
|
|
|
|
PaymentHash: payHash,
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
// Setup our payment session source to block on release of
|
|
|
|
// routes.
|
|
|
|
routeChan := make(chan struct{})
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
router.cfg.SessionSource = &mockPaymentSessionSource{
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
routes: test.routes,
|
|
|
|
routeRelease: routeChan,
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
router.cfg.MissionControl = &mockMissionControl{}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// Send the payment. Since this is new payment hash, the
|
|
|
|
// information should be registered with the ControlTower.
|
|
|
|
paymentResult := make(chan error)
|
|
|
|
done := make(chan struct{})
|
|
|
|
go func() {
|
|
|
|
_, _, err := router.SendPayment(&payment)
|
|
|
|
paymentResult <- err
|
|
|
|
close(done)
|
|
|
|
}()
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
var resendResult chan error
|
|
|
|
for _, step := range test.steps {
|
|
|
|
switch step {
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
case routerInitPayment:
|
|
|
|
var args initArgs
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case args = <-control.init:
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("no init payment with control")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
if args.c == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected non-nil CreationInfo")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:43 +03:00
|
|
|
case routeRelease:
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case <-routeChan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("no route requested")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// In this step we expect the router to make a call to
|
|
|
|
// register a new attempt with the ControlTower.
|
|
|
|
case routerRegisterAttempt:
|
|
|
|
var args registerAttemptArgs
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case args = <-control.registerAttempt:
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("attempt not registered " +
|
|
|
|
"with control")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
if args.a == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected non-nil AttemptInfo")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// In this step we expect the router to call the
|
|
|
|
// ControlTower's SettleAttempt method with the preimage.
|
|
|
|
case routerSettleAttempt:
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case <-control.settleAttempt:
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("attempt settle not " +
|
|
|
|
"registered with control")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// In this step we expect the router to call the
|
|
|
|
// ControlTower's FailAttempt method with a HTLC fail
|
|
|
|
// info.
|
|
|
|
case routerFailAttempt:
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case <-control.failAttempt:
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("attempt fail not " +
|
|
|
|
"registered with control")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// In this step we expect the router to call the
|
|
|
|
// ControlTower's Fail method, to indicate that the
|
|
|
|
// payment failed.
|
|
|
|
case routerFailPayment:
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case <-control.failPayment:
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("payment fail not " +
|
|
|
|
"registered with control")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// In this step we expect the SendToSwitch method to be
|
|
|
|
// called, and we respond with a nil-error.
|
|
|
|
case sendToSwitchSuccess:
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case sendResult <- nil:
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to send result")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// In this step we expect the SendToSwitch method to be
|
|
|
|
// called, and we respond with a forwarding error
|
|
|
|
case sendToSwitchResultFailure:
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case sendResult <- htlcswitch.NewForwardingError(
|
|
|
|
&lnwire.FailTemporaryChannelFailure{},
|
|
|
|
1,
|
|
|
|
):
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to send result")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// In this step we expect the GetPaymentResult method
|
|
|
|
// to be called, and we respond with the preimage to
|
|
|
|
// complete the payment.
|
|
|
|
case getPaymentResultSuccess:
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case getPaymentResult <- &htlcswitch.PaymentResult{
|
|
|
|
Preimage: preImage,
|
|
|
|
}:
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to send result")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// In this state we expect the GetPaymentResult method
|
|
|
|
// to be called, and we respond with a forwarding
|
|
|
|
// error, indicating that the router should retry.
|
|
|
|
case getPaymentResultTempFailure:
|
|
|
|
failure := htlcswitch.NewForwardingError(
|
|
|
|
&lnwire.FailTemporaryChannelFailure{},
|
|
|
|
1,
|
|
|
|
)
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case getPaymentResult <- &htlcswitch.PaymentResult{
|
|
|
|
Error: failure,
|
|
|
|
}:
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to get result")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// In this state we expect the router to call the
|
|
|
|
// GetPaymentResult method, and we will respond with a
|
|
|
|
// terminal error, indiating the router should stop
|
|
|
|
// making payment attempts.
|
|
|
|
case getPaymentResultTerminalFailure:
|
|
|
|
failure := htlcswitch.NewForwardingError(
|
|
|
|
&lnwire.FailIncorrectDetails{},
|
|
|
|
1,
|
|
|
|
)
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case getPaymentResult <- &htlcswitch.PaymentResult{
|
|
|
|
Error: failure,
|
|
|
|
}:
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to get result")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
// In this step we manually try to resend the same
|
|
|
|
// payment, making sure the router responds with an
|
|
|
|
// error indicating that it is already in flight.
|
|
|
|
case resendPayment:
|
|
|
|
resendResult = make(chan error)
|
|
|
|
go func() {
|
|
|
|
_, _, err := router.SendPayment(&payment)
|
|
|
|
resendResult <- err
|
|
|
|
}()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// In this step we manually stop the router.
|
|
|
|
case stopRouter:
|
2021-04-23 09:39:40 +03:00
|
|
|
// On shutdown, the switch closes our result channel.
|
|
|
|
// Mimic this behavior in our mock.
|
|
|
|
close(getPaymentResult)
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err := router.Stop(); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to restart: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// In this step we manually start the router.
|
|
|
|
case startRouter:
|
2021-04-23 09:39:40 +03:00
|
|
|
router, sendResult, getPaymentResult = setupRouter()
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// In this state we expect to receive an error for the
|
|
|
|
// original payment made.
|
|
|
|
case paymentError:
|
2021-04-23 09:39:41 +03:00
|
|
|
require.Error(t, test.paymentErr,
|
|
|
|
"paymentError not set")
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case err := <-paymentResult:
|
2021-04-23 09:39:41 +03:00
|
|
|
require.Equal(t, test.paymentErr, err)
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("got no payment result")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// In this state we expect the original payment to
|
|
|
|
// succeed.
|
|
|
|
case paymentSuccess:
|
2021-04-23 09:39:41 +03:00
|
|
|
require.Nil(t, test.paymentErr)
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case err := <-paymentResult:
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not expect "+
|
|
|
|
"error %v", err)
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("got no payment result")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// In this state we expect to receive an error for the
|
|
|
|
// resent payment made.
|
|
|
|
case resentPaymentError:
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case err := <-resendResult:
|
|
|
|
if err == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected error")
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("got no payment result")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// In this state we expect the resent payment to
|
|
|
|
// succeed.
|
|
|
|
case resentPaymentSuccess:
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case err := <-resendResult:
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("did not expect error %v", err)
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
case <-time.After(stepTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("got no payment result")
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-04-23 09:39:36 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unknown step %v", step)
|
2021-04-23 09:39:36 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-04-23 09:39:37 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
select {
|
|
|
|
case <-done:
|
|
|
|
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("SendPayment didn't exit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-04-01 01:13:26 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|