lnd.xprv/lntest/itest/log_substitutions.txt

s/[0-9a-f]{64}\:[[:digit:]]+/<chan_point>/g
s/short_chan_id=[[:digit:]]+/short_chan_id=<cid>/g
s/[0-9a-f]{16,}/<hex>/g
s/[[:digit:]]+\.[[:digit:]]+\.[[:digit:]]+\.[[:digit:]]+\:[[:digit:]]+/<ip>/g
s/[[:digit:]]{4}-[[:digit:]]{2}-[[:digit:]]{2} [[:digit:]]{2}:[[:digit:]]{2}:[[:digit:]]{2}\.[[:digit:]]{3}/<time>/g
s/[[:digit:]]{4}-[[:digit:]]{2}-[[:digit:]]{2}T[[:digit:]]{2}:[[:digit:]]{2}:[[:digit:]]{2}\.[[:digit:]]{1,18}Z/<time>/g
s/[[:digit:]]+\:[[:digit:]]+\:[[:digit:]]+/<chan>/g
s/[[:digit:]]+ mSAT/<amt>/g
s/HTLC ID = [[:digit:]]+/HTLC ID = <id>/g
s/height=[[:digit:]]+/height=<height>/g
s/collecting result for shard [[:digit:]]+/collecting result for shard <number>/g
s/sending attempt [[:digit:]]+/sending attempt <number>/g
s/Unable to rewind chain from height [[:digit:]]+ to height -?[[:digit:]]+/Unable to rewind chain from height <height> to height <height>/g
s/NTFN: unable to get missed blocks: starting height [[:digit:]]+ is greater than ending height [[:digit:]]+/NTFN: unable to get missed blocks: starting height <height> is greater than ending height <height>/g
s/BTCN: Broadcast attempt failed: rejected by <ip>: replacement transaction <hex> has an insufficient fee rate: needs more than [[:digit:]]+, has [[:digit:]]+/BTCN: Broadcast attempt failed: rejected by <ip>: replacement transaction <hex> has an insufficient fee rate: needs more than <amt>, has <amt>/g
s/pid=[[:digit:]]+/pid=<pid>/g
s/connid=[[:digit:]]+/connid=<id>/g
s/sync failed with local data loss: remote believes our tail height is [[:digit:]]+, while we have [[:digit:]]+/sync failed with local data loss: remote believes our tail height is <height>, while we have <height>/g
s/sync failed: remote believes our tail height is [[:digit:]]+, while we have [[:digit:]]+/sync failed: remote believes our tail height is <height>, while we have <height>/g
s/sync failed: remote's next commit height is [[:digit:]]+, while we believe it is [[:digit:]]+/sync failed: remote's next commit height is <height>, while we believe it is <height>/g
s/replacement transaction <hex> has an insufficient absolute fee: needs [[:digit:]]+, has [[:digit:]]+/replacement transaction <hex> has an insufficient absolute fee: needs <amt>, has <amt>/g
s/Rescan for [[:digit:]]+ addresses/Rescan for <num> addresses/g
s/unable to get hash from block with height [[:digit:]]+/unable to get hash from block with height <height>/g
itest: check for new errors in logs 2020-04-07 18:22:26 +03:00			`s/[0-9a-f]{64}\:[[:digit:]]+/<chan_point>/g`
itest: fix pattern for short_chan_id in err whitelist 2020-08-21 15:21:19 +03:00			`s/short_chan_id=[[:digit:]]+/short_chan_id=<cid>/g`
itest: check for new errors in logs 2020-04-07 18:22:26 +03:00			`s/[0-9a-f]{16,}/<hex>/g`
			`s/[[:digit:]]+\.[[:digit:]]+\.[[:digit:]]+\.[[:digit:]]+\:[[:digit:]]+/<ip>/g`
			`s/[[:digit:]]{4}-[[:digit:]]{2}-[[:digit:]]{2} [[:digit:]]{2}:[[:digit:]]{2}:[[:digit:]]{2}\.[[:digit:]]{3}/<time>/g`
itest: add RPC errors to whitelist Since we now log RPC errors as the first thing in our interceptor chain, more benign errors bubble up. We add them to the whitelist. 2021-03-08 15:31:55 +03:00			`s/[[:digit:]]{4}-[[:digit:]]{2}-[[:digit:]]{2}T[[:digit:]]{2}:[[:digit:]]{2}:[[:digit:]]{2}\.[[:digit:]]{1,18}Z/<time>/g`
itest: check for new errors in logs 2020-04-07 18:22:26 +03:00			`s/[[:digit:]]+\:[[:digit:]]+\:[[:digit:]]+/<chan>/g`
			`s/[[:digit:]]+ mSAT/<amt>/g`
			`s/HTLC ID = [[:digit:]]+/HTLC ID = <id>/g`
			`s/height=[[:digit:]]+/height=<height>/g`
			`s/collecting result for shard [[:digit:]]+/collecting result for shard <number>/g`
			`s/sending attempt [[:digit:]]+/sending attempt <number>/g`
lntest: wait for chain sync in switch test 2021-05-07 20:11:22 +03:00			`s/Unable to rewind chain from height [[:digit:]]+ to height -?[[:digit:]]+/Unable to rewind chain from height <height> to height <height>/g`
itest: check for new errors in logs 2020-04-07 18:22:26 +03:00			`s/NTFN: unable to get missed blocks: starting height [[:digit:]]+ is greater than ending height [[:digit:]]+/NTFN: unable to get missed blocks: starting height <height> is greater than ending height <height>/g`
			`s/BTCN: Broadcast attempt failed: rejected by <ip>: replacement transaction <hex> has an insufficient fee rate: needs more than [[:digit:]]+, has [[:digit:]]+/BTCN: Broadcast attempt failed: rejected by <ip>: replacement transaction <hex> has an insufficient fee rate: needs more than <amt>, has <amt>/g`
			`s/pid=[[:digit:]]+/pid=<pid>/g`
			`s/connid=[[:digit:]]+/connid=<id>/g`
			`s/sync failed with local data loss: remote believes our tail height is [[:digit:]]+, while we have [[:digit:]]+/sync failed with local data loss: remote believes our tail height is <height>, while we have <height>/g`
			`s/sync failed: remote believes our tail height is [[:digit:]]+, while we have [[:digit:]]+/sync failed: remote believes our tail height is <height>, while we have <height>/g`
			`s/sync failed: remote's next commit height is [[:digit:]]+, while we believe it is [[:digit:]]+/sync failed: remote's next commit height is <height>, while we believe it is <height>/g`
itest: fix flakiness around/startup/reconnect 2020-07-27 15:15:36 +03:00			`s/replacement transaction <hex> has an insufficient absolute fee: needs [[:digit:]]+, has [[:digit:]]+/replacement transaction <hex> has an insufficient absolute fee: needs <amt>, has <amt>/g`
lntest/itest: add whitelist entry for block hash fetch 2020-07-30 06:09:55 +03:00			`s/Rescan for [[:digit:]]+ addresses/Rescan for <num> addresses/g`
itest: add RPC errors to whitelist Since we now log RPC errors as the first thing in our interceptor chain, more benign errors bubble up. We add them to the whitelist. 2021-03-08 15:31:55 +03:00			`s/unable to get hash from block with height [[:digit:]]+/unable to get hash from block with height <height>/g`