2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
package htlcswitch_test
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import (
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
"bytes"
|
|
|
|
"io/ioutil"
|
|
|
|
"reflect"
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-31 10:17:17 +03:00
|
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcd/btcec"
|
|
|
|
bitcoinCfg "github.com/btcsuite/btcd/chaincfg"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/btcsuite/btcutil"
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-onion"
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/channeldb"
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/htlcswitch"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
hash1 = [32]byte{0x01}
|
|
|
|
hash2 = [32]byte{0x02}
|
|
|
|
hash3 = [32]byte{0x03}
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// sphinxPrivKey is the private key given to freshly created sphinx
|
|
|
|
// routers.
|
|
|
|
sphinxPrivKey *btcec.PrivateKey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// testEphemeralKey is the ephemeral key that will be extracted to
|
|
|
|
// create onion obfuscators.
|
|
|
|
testEphemeralKey *btcec.PublicKey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// testExtracter is a precomputed extraction of testEphemeralKey, using
|
|
|
|
// the sphinxPrivKey.
|
|
|
|
testExtracter *htlcswitch.SphinxErrorEncrypter
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
func init() {
|
|
|
|
// Generate a fresh key for our sphinx router.
|
|
|
|
var err error
|
|
|
|
sphinxPrivKey, err = btcec.NewPrivateKey(btcec.S256())
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
panic(err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
// And another, whose public key will serve as the test ephemeral key.
|
|
|
|
testEphemeralPriv, err := btcec.NewPrivateKey(btcec.S256())
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
panic(err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
testEphemeralKey = testEphemeralPriv.PubKey()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finally, properly initialize the test extracter
|
|
|
|
initTestExtracter()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// initTestExtracter spins up a new onion processor specifically for the purpose
|
|
|
|
// of generating our testExtracter, which should be derived from the
|
|
|
|
// testEphemeralKey, and which randomly-generated key is used to init the sphinx
|
|
|
|
// router.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: This should be called in init(), after testEphemeralKey has been
|
|
|
|
// properly initialized.
|
|
|
|
func initTestExtracter() {
|
|
|
|
onionProcessor := newOnionProcessor(nil)
|
|
|
|
defer onionProcessor.Stop()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
obfuscator, _ := onionProcessor.ExtractErrorEncrypter(
|
|
|
|
testEphemeralKey,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sphinxExtracter, ok := obfuscator.(*htlcswitch.SphinxErrorEncrypter)
|
|
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
|
|
panic("did not extract sphinx error encrypter")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
testExtracter = sphinxExtracter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We also set this error extracter on startup, otherwise it will be nil
|
|
|
|
// at compile-time.
|
|
|
|
halfCircuitTests[2].encrypter = testExtracter
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// newOnionProcessor creates starts a new htlcswitch.OnionProcessor using a temp
|
|
|
|
// db and no garbage collection.
|
|
|
|
func newOnionProcessor(t *testing.T) *htlcswitch.OnionProcessor {
|
|
|
|
sphinxRouter := sphinx.NewRouter(
|
2018-03-26 20:10:47 +03:00
|
|
|
sphinxPrivKey, &bitcoinCfg.SimNetParams, sphinx.NewMemoryReplayLog(),
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if err := sphinxRouter.Start(); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to start sphinx router: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return htlcswitch.NewOnionProcessor(sphinxRouter)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// newCircuitMap creates a new htlcswitch.CircuitMap using a temp db and a
|
|
|
|
// fresh sphinx router.
|
|
|
|
func newCircuitMap(t *testing.T) (*htlcswitch.CircuitMapConfig,
|
|
|
|
htlcswitch.CircuitMap) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
onionProcessor := newOnionProcessor(t)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuitMapCfg := &htlcswitch.CircuitMapConfig{
|
2018-10-07 05:34:32 +03:00
|
|
|
DB: makeCircuitDB(t, ""),
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
ExtractErrorEncrypter: onionProcessor.ExtractErrorEncrypter,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuitMap, err := htlcswitch.NewCircuitMap(circuitMapCfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create persistent circuit map: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
return circuitMapCfg, circuitMap
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TestCircuitMapInit is a quick check to ensure that we can start and restore
|
|
|
|
// the circuit map, as this will be used extensively in this suite.
|
|
|
|
func TestCircuitMapInit(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cfg, _ := newCircuitMap(t)
|
|
|
|
restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var halfCircuitTests = []struct {
|
|
|
|
hash [32]byte
|
|
|
|
inValue btcutil.Amount
|
|
|
|
outValue btcutil.Amount
|
|
|
|
chanID lnwire.ShortChannelID
|
|
|
|
htlcID uint64
|
|
|
|
encrypter htlcswitch.ErrorEncrypter
|
|
|
|
}{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
hash: hash1,
|
|
|
|
inValue: 0,
|
|
|
|
outValue: 1000,
|
|
|
|
chanID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1),
|
|
|
|
htlcID: 1,
|
|
|
|
encrypter: nil,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
hash: hash2,
|
|
|
|
inValue: 2100,
|
|
|
|
outValue: 2000,
|
|
|
|
chanID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2),
|
|
|
|
htlcID: 2,
|
|
|
|
encrypter: htlcswitch.NewMockObfuscator(),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
{
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
hash: hash3,
|
|
|
|
inValue: 10000,
|
|
|
|
outValue: 9000,
|
|
|
|
chanID: lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(3),
|
|
|
|
htlcID: 3,
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: The value of testExtracter is nil at compile-time, it
|
|
|
|
// is fully-initialized in initTestExtracter, which should
|
|
|
|
// repopulate this encrypter.
|
|
|
|
encrypter: testExtracter,
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TestHalfCircuitSerialization checks that the half circuits can be properly
|
|
|
|
// encoded and decoded properly. A critical responsibility of this test is to
|
|
|
|
// verify that the various ErrorEncrypter implementations can be properly
|
|
|
|
// reconstructed from a serialized half circuit.
|
|
|
|
func TestHalfCircuitSerialization(t *testing.T) {
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
onionProcessor := newOnionProcessor(t)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
for i, test := range halfCircuitTests {
|
|
|
|
circuit := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
PaymentHash: test.hash,
|
|
|
|
IncomingAmount: lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(test.inValue),
|
|
|
|
OutgoingAmount: lnwire.NewMSatFromSatoshis(test.outValue),
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: test.chanID,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: test.htlcID,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: test.encrypter,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Write the half circuit to our buffer.
|
|
|
|
var b bytes.Buffer
|
|
|
|
if err := circuit.Encode(&b); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to encode half payment circuit test=%d: %v", i, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Then try to decode the serialized bytes.
|
|
|
|
var circuit2 htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit
|
|
|
|
circuitReader := bytes.NewReader(b.Bytes())
|
|
|
|
if err := circuit2.Decode(circuitReader); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to decode half payment circuit test=%d: %v", i, err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
// If the error encrypter is initialized, we will need to
|
|
|
|
// reextract it from it's decoded state, as this requires an
|
|
|
|
// ECDH with the onion processor's private key. For mock error
|
|
|
|
// encrypters, this will be a NOP.
|
|
|
|
if circuit2.ErrorEncrypter != nil {
|
|
|
|
err := circuit2.ErrorEncrypter.Reextract(
|
|
|
|
onionProcessor.ExtractErrorEncrypter,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to reextract sphinx error "+
|
|
|
|
"encrypter: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
// Reconstructed half circuit should match the original.
|
|
|
|
if !equalIgnoreLFD(circuit, &circuit2) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected half circuit test=%d, want %v, got %v",
|
|
|
|
i, circuit, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func TestCircuitMapPersistence(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
chan1 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1)
|
|
|
|
chan2 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2)
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap
|
|
|
|
err error
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap := newCircuitMap(t)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-08-03 23:27:35 +03:00
|
|
|
circuit := circuitMap.LookupCircuit(htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 0,
|
|
|
|
})
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
if circuit != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("LookupByHTLC returned a circuit before any were added: %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
circuit1 := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan2,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 1,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
PaymentHash: hash1,
|
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: htlcswitch.NewMockObfuscator(),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if _, err := circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit1); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to add half circuit: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Circuit map should have one circuit that has not been fully opened.
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 0)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 0)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
// Add multiple circuits with same destination channel but different HTLC
|
|
|
|
// IDs and payment hashes.
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
keystone1 := htlcswitch.Keystone{
|
|
|
|
InKey: circuit1.Incoming,
|
|
|
|
OutKey: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 0,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
circuit1.Outgoing = &keystone1.OutKey
|
|
|
|
if err := circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystone1); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to add full circuit: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
// Circuit map should reflect addition of circuit1, and the change
|
|
|
|
// should survive a restart.
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone1.OutKey, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone1.OutKey, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit2 := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan2,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 2,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-10-30 21:56:51 +03:00
|
|
|
PaymentHash: hash2,
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: htlcswitch.NewMockObfuscator(),
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if _, err := circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit2); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to add half circuit: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit2)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
keystone2 := htlcswitch.Keystone{
|
|
|
|
InKey: circuit2.Incoming,
|
|
|
|
OutKey: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 1,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
circuit2.Outgoing = &keystone2.OutKey
|
|
|
|
if err := circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystone2); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to add full circuit: %v", err)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
// Should have two full circuits, one under hash1 and another under
|
|
|
|
// hash2. Both half payment circuits should have been removed when the
|
|
|
|
// full circuits were added.
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone1.OutKey, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash2, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone2.OutKey, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone1.OutKey, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash2, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone2.OutKey, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, 0)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit3 := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 2,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
PaymentHash: hash3,
|
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: htlcswitch.NewMockObfuscator(),
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
if _, err := circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit3); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to add half circuit: %v", err)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit3)
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add another circuit with an already-used HTLC ID but different
|
|
|
|
// destination channel.
|
|
|
|
keystone3 := htlcswitch.Keystone{
|
|
|
|
InKey: circuit3.Incoming,
|
|
|
|
OutKey: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan2,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 0,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
circuit3.Outgoing = &keystone3.OutKey
|
|
|
|
if err := circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystone3); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to add full circuit: %v", err)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
// Check that all have been marked as full circuits, and that no half
|
|
|
|
// circuits are currently being tracked.
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone1.OutKey, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone2.OutKey, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone3.OutKey, circuit3)
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone1.OutKey, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone2.OutKey, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone3.OutKey, circuit3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Even though a circuit was added with chan1, HTLC ID 2 as the source,
|
|
|
|
// the lookup should go by destination channel, HTLC ID.
|
|
|
|
invalidKeystone := htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 2,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
circuit = circuitMap.LookupOpenCircuit(invalidKeystone)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
if circuit != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("LookupByHTLC returned a circuit without being added: %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
circuit4 := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan2,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2017-10-30 21:56:51 +03:00
|
|
|
PaymentHash: hash1,
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: htlcswitch.NewMockObfuscator(),
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
if _, err := circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit4); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to add half circuit: %v", err)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
// Circuit map should still only show one circuit with hash1, since we
|
|
|
|
// have not set the keystone for circuit4.
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit4)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Add a circuit with a destination channel and payment hash that are
|
|
|
|
// already added but a different HTLC ID.
|
|
|
|
keystone4 := htlcswitch.Keystone{
|
|
|
|
InKey: circuit4.Incoming,
|
|
|
|
OutKey: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
circuit4.Outgoing = &keystone4.OutKey
|
|
|
|
if err := circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystone4); err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to add full circuit: %v", err)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
// Verify that all circuits have been fully added.
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone1.OutKey, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone2.OutKey, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit3)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone3.OutKey, circuit3)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit4)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone4.OutKey, circuit4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Verify that each circuit is exposed via the proper hash bucketing.
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 2)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, circuit4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash2, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash2, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, circuit3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Restart, then run checks again.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Verify that all circuits have been fully added.
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone1.OutKey, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone2.OutKey, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit3)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone3.OutKey, circuit3)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuit(t, circuitMap, circuit4)
|
|
|
|
assertHasKeystone(t, circuitMap, keystone4.OutKey, circuit4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Verify that each circuit is exposed via the proper hash bucketing.
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 2)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, circuit1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, circuit4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash2, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash2, circuit2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, circuit3)
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
// Test removing circuits and the subsequent lookups.
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.DeleteCircuits(circuit1.Incoming)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Remove returned unexpected error: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
// There should be exactly one remaining circuit with hash1, and it
|
|
|
|
// should be circuit4.
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, circuit4)
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, circuit4)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Removing already-removed circuit should return an error.
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.DeleteCircuits(circuit1.Incoming)
|
2018-07-27 12:27:02 +03:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatal("Unexpected failure when deleting already "+
|
|
|
|
"deleted circuit: %v", err)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
// Verify that nothing related to hash1 has changed
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertHasCircuitForHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, circuit4)
|
|
|
|
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
// Remove last remaining circuit with payment hash hash1.
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.DeleteCircuits(circuit4.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Remove returned unexpected error: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 0)
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash2, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, 1)
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash1, 0)
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash2, 1)
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Remove last remaining circuit with payment hash hash2.
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.DeleteCircuits(circuit2.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Remove returned unexpected error: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// There should now only be one remaining circuit, with hash3.
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash2, 0)
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, 1)
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash2, 0)
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, 1)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-27 12:27:02 +03:00
|
|
|
// In removing the final circuit, we will try and remove all other known
|
|
|
|
// circuits as well. Any circuits that are unknown to the circuit map
|
|
|
|
// will be ignored, and only circuit 3 should be cause any change in the
|
|
|
|
// state.
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.DeleteCircuits(
|
|
|
|
circuit1.Incoming, circuit2.Incoming,
|
|
|
|
circuit3.Incoming, circuit4.Incoming,
|
|
|
|
)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
2018-07-27 12:27:02 +03:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("Unexpected failure when removing circuit while also "+
|
|
|
|
"deleting already deleted circuits: %v", err)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
// Check that the circuit map is empty, even after restarting.
|
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, 0)
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t, circuitMap, hash3, 0)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// assertHasKeystone tests that the circuit map contains the provided payment
|
|
|
|
// circuit.
|
|
|
|
func assertHasKeystone(t *testing.T, cm htlcswitch.CircuitMap,
|
|
|
|
outKey htlcswitch.CircuitKey, c *htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit := cm.LookupOpenCircuit(outKey)
|
|
|
|
if !equalIgnoreLFD(circuit, c) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected circuit, want: %v, got %v", c, circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// assertDoesNotHaveKeystone tests that the circuit map does not contain a
|
|
|
|
// circuit for the provided outgoing circuit key.
|
|
|
|
func assertDoesNotHaveKeystone(t *testing.T, cm htlcswitch.CircuitMap,
|
|
|
|
outKey htlcswitch.CircuitKey) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit := cm.LookupOpenCircuit(outKey)
|
|
|
|
if circuit != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected no circuit for keystone %s, found %v",
|
|
|
|
outKey, circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// assertHasCircuitForHash tests that the provided circuit appears in the list
|
|
|
|
// of circuits for the given hash.
|
|
|
|
func assertHasCircuitForHash(t *testing.T, cm htlcswitch.CircuitMap, hash [32]byte,
|
|
|
|
circuit *htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuits := cm.LookupByPaymentHash(hash)
|
|
|
|
for _, c := range circuits {
|
|
|
|
if equalIgnoreLFD(c, circuit) {
|
|
|
|
return
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to find circuit: %v by hash: %v", circuit, hash)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// assertNumCircuitsWithHash tests that the circuit has the right number of full
|
|
|
|
// circuits, indexed by the given hash.
|
|
|
|
func assertNumCircuitsWithHash(t *testing.T, cm htlcswitch.CircuitMap,
|
|
|
|
hash [32]byte, expectedNum int) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuits := cm.LookupByPaymentHash(hash)
|
|
|
|
if len(circuits) != expectedNum {
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("LookupByPaymentHash returned wrong number of circuits for "+
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
"hash=%v: expecected %d, got %d", hash, expectedNum,
|
|
|
|
len(circuits))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// assertHasCircuit queries the circuit map using the half-circuit's half
|
|
|
|
// key, and fails if the returned half-circuit differs from the provided one.
|
|
|
|
func assertHasCircuit(t *testing.T, cm htlcswitch.CircuitMap,
|
|
|
|
c *htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c2 := cm.LookupCircuit(c.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if !equalIgnoreLFD(c, c2) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected circuit: %v, got %v", c, c2)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// equalIgnoreLFD compares two payment circuits, but ignores the current value
|
|
|
|
// of LoadedFromDisk. The value is temporarily set to false for the comparison
|
|
|
|
// and then restored.
|
|
|
|
func equalIgnoreLFD(c, c2 *htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit) bool {
|
|
|
|
ogLFD := c.LoadedFromDisk
|
|
|
|
ogLFD2 := c2.LoadedFromDisk
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c.LoadedFromDisk = false
|
|
|
|
c2.LoadedFromDisk = false
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
isEqual := reflect.DeepEqual(c, c2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c.LoadedFromDisk = ogLFD
|
|
|
|
c2.LoadedFromDisk = ogLFD2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return isEqual
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// assertDoesNotHaveCircuit queries the circuit map using the circuit's
|
|
|
|
// incoming circuit key, and fails if it is found.
|
|
|
|
func assertDoesNotHaveCircuit(t *testing.T, cm htlcswitch.CircuitMap,
|
|
|
|
c *htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
c2 := cm.LookupCircuit(c.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if c2 != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected no circuit for %v, got %v", c, c2)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// makeCircuitDB initializes a new test channeldb for testing the persistence of
|
|
|
|
// the circuit map. If an empty string is provided as a path, a temp directory
|
|
|
|
// will be created.
|
|
|
|
func makeCircuitDB(t *testing.T, path string) *channeldb.DB {
|
|
|
|
if path == "" {
|
|
|
|
var err error
|
|
|
|
path, err = ioutil.TempDir("", "circuitdb")
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to create temp path: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
db, err := channeldb.Open(path)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to open channel db: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return db
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Creates a new circuit map, backed by a freshly opened channeldb. The existing
|
|
|
|
// channeldb is closed in order to simulate a complete restart.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
func restartCircuitMap(t *testing.T, cfg *htlcswitch.CircuitMapConfig) (
|
|
|
|
*htlcswitch.CircuitMapConfig, htlcswitch.CircuitMap) {
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Record the current temp path and close current db.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
dbPath := cfg.DB.Path()
|
|
|
|
cfg.DB.Close()
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Reinitialize circuit map with same db path.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg2 := &htlcswitch.CircuitMapConfig{
|
2018-10-07 05:34:32 +03:00
|
|
|
DB: makeCircuitDB(t, dbPath),
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
ExtractErrorEncrypter: cfg.ExtractErrorEncrypter,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cm2, err := htlcswitch.NewCircuitMap(cfg2)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to recreate persistent circuit map: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
return cfg2, cm2
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TestCircuitMapCommitCircuits tests the following behavior of CommitCircuits:
|
|
|
|
// 1. New circuits are successfully added.
|
|
|
|
// 2. Duplicate circuits are dropped anytime before circuit map shutsdown.
|
|
|
|
// 3. Duplicate circuits are failed anytime after circuit map restarts.
|
|
|
|
func TestCircuitMapCommitCircuits(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
chan1 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1)
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap
|
|
|
|
err error
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap := newCircuitMap(t)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: testExtracter,
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First we will try to add an new circuit to the circuit map, this
|
|
|
|
// should succeed.
|
|
|
|
actions, err := circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Drops) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("new circuit should not have been dropped")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Fails) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("new circuit should not have failed")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Adds) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("only one circuit should have been added, found %d",
|
|
|
|
len(actions.Adds))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit2 := circuitMap.LookupCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(circuit, circuit2) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected committed circuit: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit2, circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Then we will try to readd the same circuit again, this should result
|
|
|
|
// in the circuit being dropped. This can happen if the incoming link
|
|
|
|
// flaps.
|
|
|
|
actions, err = circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Adds) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("duplicate circuit should not have been added to circuit map")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Fails) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("duplicate circuit should not have failed")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Drops) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("only one circuit should have been dropped, found %d",
|
|
|
|
len(actions.Drops))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Finally, restart the circuit map, which will cause the added circuit
|
|
|
|
// to be loaded from disk. Since the keystone was never set, subsequent
|
|
|
|
// attempts to commit the circuit should cause the circuit map to
|
2018-04-18 05:03:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// indicate that the HTLC should be failed back.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
actions, err = circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Adds) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("duplicate circuit with incomplete forwarding " +
|
|
|
|
"decision should not have been added to circuit map")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Drops) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("duplicate circuit with incomplete forwarding " +
|
|
|
|
"decision should not have been dropped by circuit map")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Fails) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("only one duplicate circuit with incomplete "+
|
|
|
|
"forwarding decision should have been failed, found: "+
|
|
|
|
"%d", len(actions.Fails))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Lookup the committed circuit again, it should be identical apart from
|
|
|
|
// the loaded from disk flag.
|
|
|
|
circuit2 = circuitMap.LookupCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if !equalIgnoreLFD(circuit, circuit2) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected committed circuit: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit2, circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TestCircuitMapOpenCircuits checks that circuits are properly opened, and that
|
|
|
|
// duplicate attempts to open a circuit will result in an error.
|
|
|
|
func TestCircuitMapOpenCircuits(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
chan1 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1)
|
|
|
|
chan2 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2)
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap
|
|
|
|
err error
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap := newCircuitMap(t)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: testExtracter,
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First we will try to add an new circuit to the circuit map, this
|
|
|
|
// should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
keystone := htlcswitch.Keystone{
|
|
|
|
InKey: circuit.Incoming,
|
|
|
|
OutKey: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan2,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 2,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Open the circuit for the first time.
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystone)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to open circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that we can retrieve the open circuit if the circuit map before
|
|
|
|
// the circuit map is restarted.
|
|
|
|
circuit2 := circuitMap.LookupOpenCircuit(keystone.OutKey)
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(circuit, circuit2) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected open circuit: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit2, circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !circuit2.HasKeystone() {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("open circuit should have keystone")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(&keystone.OutKey, circuit2.Outgoing) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected open circuit to have outgoing key: %v, found %v",
|
|
|
|
&keystone.OutKey, circuit2.Outgoing)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Open the circuit for a second time, which should fail due to a
|
|
|
|
// duplicate keystone
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystone)
|
|
|
|
if err != htlcswitch.ErrDuplicateKeystone {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to open circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Then we will try to readd the same circuit again, this should result
|
|
|
|
// in the circuit being dropped. This can happen if the incoming link
|
|
|
|
// flaps OR the switch is entirely restarted and the outgoing link has
|
|
|
|
// not received a response.
|
|
|
|
actions, err := circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Adds) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("duplicate circuit should not have been added to circuit map")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Fails) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("duplicate circuit should not have failed")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Drops) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("only one circuit should have been dropped, found %d",
|
|
|
|
len(actions.Drops))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now, restart the circuit map, which will cause the opened circuit to
|
|
|
|
// be loaded from disk. Since we set the keystone on this circuit, it
|
|
|
|
// should be restored as such in memory.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: The channel db doesn't have any channel data, so no keystones
|
|
|
|
// will be trimmed.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that we can still query for the open circuit.
|
|
|
|
circuit2 = circuitMap.LookupOpenCircuit(keystone.OutKey)
|
|
|
|
if !equalIgnoreLFD(circuit, circuit2) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected open circuit: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit2, circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Try to open the circuit again, we expect this to fail since the open
|
|
|
|
// circuit was restored.
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystone)
|
|
|
|
if err != htlcswitch.ErrDuplicateKeystone {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to open circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Lastly, with the circuit map restarted, try one more time to recommit
|
|
|
|
// the open circuit. This should be dropped, and is expected to happen
|
|
|
|
// if the incoming link flaps OR the switch is entirely restarted and
|
|
|
|
// the outgoing link has not received a response.
|
|
|
|
actions, err = circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Adds) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("duplicate circuit should not have been added to circuit map")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Fails) > 0 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("duplicate circuit should not have failed")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if len(actions.Drops) != 1 {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("only one circuit should have been dropped, found %d",
|
|
|
|
len(actions.Drops))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func assertCircuitsOpenedPreRestart(t *testing.T,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits []*htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit,
|
|
|
|
keystones []htlcswitch.Keystone) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for i, circuit := range circuits {
|
|
|
|
keystone := keystones[i]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
openCircuit := circuitMap.LookupOpenCircuit(keystone.OutKey)
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(circuit, openCircuit) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected open circuit %d: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
i, openCircuit, circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !openCircuit.HasKeystone() {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("open circuit %d should have keystone", i)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(&keystone.OutKey, openCircuit.Outgoing) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected open circuit %d to have outgoing "+
|
|
|
|
"key: %v, found %v", i,
|
|
|
|
&keystone.OutKey, openCircuit.Outgoing)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func assertCircuitsOpenedPostRestart(t *testing.T,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits []*htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit,
|
|
|
|
keystones []htlcswitch.Keystone) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for i, circuit := range circuits {
|
|
|
|
keystone := keystones[i]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
openCircuit := circuitMap.LookupOpenCircuit(keystone.OutKey)
|
|
|
|
if !equalIgnoreLFD(circuit, openCircuit) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected open circuit %d: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
i, openCircuit, circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if !openCircuit.HasKeystone() {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("open circuit %d should have keystone", i)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(&keystone.OutKey, openCircuit.Outgoing) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected open circuit %d to have outgoing "+
|
|
|
|
"key: %v, found %v", i,
|
|
|
|
&keystone.OutKey, openCircuit.Outgoing)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
func assertCircuitsNotOpenedPreRestart(t *testing.T,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits []*htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit,
|
|
|
|
keystones []htlcswitch.Keystone,
|
|
|
|
offset int) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for i := range circuits {
|
|
|
|
keystone := keystones[i]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
openCircuit := circuitMap.LookupOpenCircuit(keystone.OutKey)
|
|
|
|
if openCircuit != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected circuit %d not to be open",
|
|
|
|
offset+i)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit := circuitMap.LookupCircuit(keystone.InKey)
|
|
|
|
if circuit == nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to find unopened circuit %d",
|
|
|
|
offset+i)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if circuit.HasKeystone() {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("circuit %d should not have keystone",
|
|
|
|
offset+i)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TestCircuitMapTrimOpenCircuits verifies that the circuit map properly removes
|
|
|
|
// circuits from disk and the in-memory state when TrimOpenCircuits is used.
|
|
|
|
// This test checks that a successful trim survives a restart, and that circuits
|
|
|
|
// added before the restart can also be trimmed.
|
|
|
|
func TestCircuitMapTrimOpenCircuits(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
chan1 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1)
|
|
|
|
chan2 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2)
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap
|
|
|
|
err error
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap := newCircuitMap(t)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const nCircuits = 10
|
|
|
|
const firstTrimIndex = 7
|
|
|
|
const secondTrimIndex = 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Create a list of all circuits that will be committed in the circuit
|
|
|
|
// map. The incoming HtlcIDs are chosen so that there is overlap with
|
|
|
|
// the outgoing HtlcIDs, but ensures that the test is not dependent on
|
|
|
|
// them being equal.
|
|
|
|
circuits := make([]*htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit, nCircuits)
|
|
|
|
for i := range circuits {
|
|
|
|
circuits[i] = &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: uint64(i + 3),
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: htlcswitch.NewMockObfuscator(),
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First we will try to add an new circuit to the circuit map, this
|
|
|
|
// should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuits...)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now create a list of the keystones that we will use to preemptively
|
|
|
|
// open the circuits. We set the index as the outgoing HtlcID to i
|
|
|
|
// simplify the indexing logic of the test.
|
|
|
|
keystones := make([]htlcswitch.Keystone, nCircuits)
|
|
|
|
for i := range keystones {
|
|
|
|
keystones[i] = htlcswitch.Keystone{
|
|
|
|
InKey: circuits[i].Incoming,
|
|
|
|
OutKey: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan2,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: uint64(i),
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Open the circuits for the first time.
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystones...)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to open circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that all circuits are marked open.
|
|
|
|
assertCircuitsOpenedPreRestart(t, circuitMap, circuits, keystones)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now trim up above outgoing htlcid `firstTrimIndex` (7). This should
|
|
|
|
// leave the first 7 circuits open, and the rest should be reverted to
|
|
|
|
// an unopened state.
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.TrimOpenCircuits(chan2, firstTrimIndex)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to trim circuits")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertCircuitsOpenedPreRestart(t,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits[:firstTrimIndex],
|
|
|
|
keystones[:firstTrimIndex],
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertCircuitsNotOpenedPreRestart(
|
|
|
|
t,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits[firstTrimIndex:],
|
|
|
|
keystones[firstTrimIndex:],
|
|
|
|
firstTrimIndex,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-18 05:03:27 +03:00
|
|
|
// Restart the circuit map, verify that the trim is reflected on
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
// startup.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertCircuitsOpenedPostRestart(
|
|
|
|
t,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits[:firstTrimIndex],
|
|
|
|
keystones[:firstTrimIndex],
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertCircuitsNotOpenedPreRestart(
|
|
|
|
t,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits[firstTrimIndex:],
|
|
|
|
keystones[firstTrimIndex:],
|
|
|
|
firstTrimIndex,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now, trim above outgoing htlcid `secondTrimIndex` (3). Only the first
|
|
|
|
// three circuits should be open, with any others being reverted back to
|
|
|
|
// unopened.
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.TrimOpenCircuits(chan2, secondTrimIndex)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to trim circuits")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertCircuitsOpenedPostRestart(
|
|
|
|
t,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits[:secondTrimIndex],
|
|
|
|
keystones[:secondTrimIndex],
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertCircuitsNotOpenedPreRestart(
|
|
|
|
t,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits[secondTrimIndex:],
|
|
|
|
keystones[secondTrimIndex:],
|
|
|
|
secondTrimIndex,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Restart the circuit map one last time to make sure the changes are
|
|
|
|
// persisted.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertCircuitsOpenedPostRestart(
|
|
|
|
t,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits[:secondTrimIndex],
|
|
|
|
keystones[:secondTrimIndex],
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assertCircuitsNotOpenedPreRestart(
|
|
|
|
t,
|
|
|
|
circuitMap,
|
|
|
|
circuits[secondTrimIndex:],
|
|
|
|
keystones[secondTrimIndex:],
|
|
|
|
secondTrimIndex,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TestCircuitMapCloseOpenCircuits asserts that the circuit map can properly
|
|
|
|
// close open circuits, and that it allows at most one response to do so
|
|
|
|
// successfully. It also checks that a circuit is reopened if the close was not
|
|
|
|
// persisted via DeleteCircuits, and can again be closed.
|
|
|
|
func TestCircuitMapCloseOpenCircuits(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
chan1 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1)
|
|
|
|
chan2 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2)
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap
|
|
|
|
err error
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap := newCircuitMap(t)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: &htlcswitch.SphinxErrorEncrypter{
|
|
|
|
EphemeralKey: testEphemeralKey,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First we will try to add an new circuit to the circuit map, this
|
|
|
|
// should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
keystone := htlcswitch.Keystone{
|
|
|
|
InKey: circuit.Incoming,
|
|
|
|
OutKey: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan2,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 2,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Open the circuit for the first time.
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystone)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to open circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that we can retrieve the open circuit if the circuit map before
|
|
|
|
// the circuit map is restarted.
|
|
|
|
circuit2 := circuitMap.LookupOpenCircuit(keystone.OutKey)
|
|
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(circuit, circuit2) {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected open circuit: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit2, circuit)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Open the circuit for a second time, which should fail due to a
|
|
|
|
// duplicate keystone
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystone)
|
|
|
|
if err != htlcswitch.ErrDuplicateKeystone {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to open circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Close the open circuit for the first time, which should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.FailCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Closing the circuit a second time should result in a failure.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.FailCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != htlcswitch.ErrCircuitClosing {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now, restart the circuit map, which will cause the opened circuit to
|
|
|
|
// be loaded from disk. Since we set the keystone on this circuit, it
|
|
|
|
// should be restored as such in memory.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: The channel db doesn't have any channel data, so no keystones
|
|
|
|
// will be trimmed.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Close the open circuit for the first time, which should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.FailCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Closing the circuit a second time should result in a failure.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.FailCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != htlcswitch.ErrCircuitClosing {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TestCircuitMapCloseUnopenedCircuit tests that closing an unopened circuit
|
|
|
|
// allows at most semantics, and that the close is not persisted across
|
|
|
|
// restarts.
|
|
|
|
func TestCircuitMapCloseUnopenedCircuit(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
chan1 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1)
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap
|
|
|
|
err error
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap := newCircuitMap(t)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: testExtracter,
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First we will try to add an new circuit to the circuit map, this
|
|
|
|
// should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Close the open circuit for the first time, which should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.FailCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Closing the circuit a second time should result in a failure.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.FailCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != htlcswitch.ErrCircuitClosing {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now, restart the circuit map, which will result in the circuit being
|
|
|
|
// reopened, since no attempt to delete the circuit was made.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Close the open circuit for the first time, which should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.FailCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Closing the circuit a second time should result in a failure.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.FailCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != htlcswitch.ErrCircuitClosing {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TestCircuitMapDeleteUnopenedCircuit checks that an unopened circuit can be
|
|
|
|
// removed persistently from the circuit map.
|
|
|
|
func TestCircuitMapDeleteUnopenedCircuit(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
chan1 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1)
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap
|
|
|
|
err error
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap := newCircuitMap(t)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: testExtracter,
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First we will try to add an new circuit to the circuit map, this
|
|
|
|
// should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Close the open circuit for the first time, which should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.FailCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.DeleteCircuits(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that we can retrieve the open circuit if the circuit map before
|
|
|
|
// the circuit map is restarted.
|
|
|
|
circuit2 := circuitMap.LookupCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if circuit2 != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected open circuit: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit2, nil)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now, restart the circuit map, and check that the deletion survived
|
|
|
|
// the restart.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit2 = circuitMap.LookupCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if circuit2 != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected open circuit: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit2, nil)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// TestCircuitMapDeleteUnopenedCircuit checks that an open circuit can be
|
|
|
|
// removed persistently from the circuit map.
|
|
|
|
func TestCircuitMapDeleteOpenCircuit(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
t.Parallel()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
var (
|
|
|
|
chan1 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(1)
|
|
|
|
chan2 = lnwire.NewShortChanIDFromInt(2)
|
|
|
|
circuitMap htlcswitch.CircuitMap
|
|
|
|
err error
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap := newCircuitMap(t)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit := &htlcswitch.PaymentCircuit{
|
|
|
|
Incoming: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan1,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 3,
|
|
|
|
},
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
ErrorEncrypter: testExtracter,
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// First we will try to add an new circuit to the circuit map, this
|
|
|
|
// should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.CommitCircuits(circuit)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to commit circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
keystone := htlcswitch.Keystone{
|
|
|
|
InKey: circuit.Incoming,
|
|
|
|
OutKey: htlcswitch.CircuitKey{
|
|
|
|
ChanID: chan2,
|
|
|
|
HtlcID: 2,
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Open the circuit for the first time.
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.OpenCircuits(keystone)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("failed to open circuits: %v", err)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Close the open circuit for the first time, which should succeed.
|
|
|
|
_, err = circuitMap.FailCircuit(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Persistently remove the circuit identified by incoming chan id.
|
|
|
|
err = circuitMap.DeleteCircuits(circuit.Incoming)
|
|
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unable to close unopened circuit")
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check that we can no longer retrieve the open circuit.
|
|
|
|
circuit2 := circuitMap.LookupOpenCircuit(keystone.OutKey)
|
|
|
|
if circuit2 != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected open circuit: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit2, nil)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now, restart the circuit map, and check that the deletion survived
|
|
|
|
// the restart.
|
2018-03-12 23:14:50 +03:00
|
|
|
cfg, circuitMap = restartCircuitMap(t, cfg)
|
2018-01-16 13:41:31 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
circuit2 = circuitMap.LookupOpenCircuit(keystone.OutKey)
|
|
|
|
if circuit2 != nil {
|
|
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected open circuit: got %v, want %v",
|
|
|
|
circuit2, nil)
|
2017-10-24 20:54:09 +03:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|