lnd.xprv/invoices/invoiceregistry_test.go

1763 lines
50 KiB
Go
Raw Permalink Normal View History

package invoices
import (
"crypto/rand"
"math"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/amp"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/chainntnfs"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/channeldb"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/clock"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lntypes"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/lnwire"
"github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/record"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
// TestSettleInvoice tests settling of an invoice and related notifications.
func TestSettleInvoice(t *testing.T) {
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
allSubscriptions, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeNotifications(0, 0)
require.Nil(t, err)
defer allSubscriptions.Cancel()
// Subscribe to the not yet existing invoice.
subscription, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeSingleInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer subscription.Cancel()
require.Equal(t, subscription.invoiceRef.PayHash(), &testInvoicePaymentHash)
// Add the invoice.
addIdx, err := ctx.registry.AddInvoice(testInvoice, testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if addIdx != 1 {
t.Fatalf("expected addIndex to start with 1, but got %v",
addIdx)
}
// We expect the open state to be sent to the single invoice subscriber.
select {
case update := <-subscription.Updates:
if update.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
update.State)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
// We expect a new invoice notification to be sent out.
select {
case newInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.NewInvoices:
if newInvoice.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
newInvoice.State)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
hodlChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
// Try to settle invoice with an htlc that expires too soon.
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, testInvoice.Terms.Value,
uint32(testCurrentHeight)+testInvoiceCltvDelta-1,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(10), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
failResolution := checkFailResolution(
t, resolution, ResultExpiryTooSoon,
)
require.Equal(t, testCurrentHeight, failResolution.AcceptHeight)
// Settle invoice with a slightly higher amount.
amtPaid := lnwire.MilliSatoshi(100500)
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amtPaid, testHtlcExpiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(0), hodlChan,
testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
settleResolution := checkSettleResolution(
t, resolution, testInvoicePreimage,
)
require.Equal(t, ResultSettled, settleResolution.Outcome)
// We expect the settled state to be sent to the single invoice
// subscriber.
select {
case update := <-subscription.Updates:
if update.State != channeldb.ContractSettled {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
update.State)
}
if update.AmtPaid != amtPaid {
t.Fatal("invoice AmtPaid incorrect")
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
// We expect a settled notification to be sent out.
select {
case settledInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.SettledInvoices:
if settledInvoice.State != channeldb.ContractSettled {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
settledInvoice.State)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
// Try to settle again with the same htlc id. We need this idempotent
// behaviour after a restart.
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amtPaid, testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight,
getCircuitKey(0), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected NotifyExitHopHtlc error: %v", err)
}
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
settleResolution = checkSettleResolution(
t, resolution, testInvoicePreimage,
)
require.Equal(t, ResultReplayToSettled, settleResolution.Outcome)
// Try to settle again with a new higher-valued htlc. This payment
// should also be accepted, to prevent any change in behaviour for a
// paid invoice that may open up a probe vector.
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amtPaid+600, testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight,
getCircuitKey(1), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected NotifyExitHopHtlc error: %v", err)
}
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
settleResolution = checkSettleResolution(
t, resolution, testInvoicePreimage,
)
require.Equal(t, ResultDuplicateToSettled, settleResolution.Outcome)
// Try to settle again with a lower amount. This should fail just as it
// would have failed if it were the first payment.
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amtPaid-600, testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight,
getCircuitKey(2), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("unexpected NotifyExitHopHtlc error: %v", err)
}
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
checkFailResolution(t, resolution, ResultAmountTooLow)
invoices: replay awareness Previously the invoice registry wasn't aware of replayed htlcs. This was dealt with by keeping the invoice accept/settle logic idempotent, so that a replay wouldn't have an effect. This mechanism has two limitations: 1. No accurate tracking of the total amount paid to an invoice. The total amount couldn't just be increased with every htlc received, because it could be a replay which would lead to counting the htlc amount multiple times. Therefore the total amount was set to the amount of the first htlc that was received, even though there may have been multiple htlcs paying to the invoice. 2. Impossible to check htlc expiry consistently for hodl invoices. When an htlc is new, its expiry needs to be checked against the invoice cltv delta. But for a replay, that check must be skipped. The htlc was accepted in time, the invoice was moved to the accepted state and a replay some blocks later shouldn't lead to that htlc being cancelled. Because the invoice registry couldn't recognize replays, it stopped checking htlc expiry heights when the invoice reached the accepted state. This prevents hold htlcs from being cancelled after a restart. But unfortunately this also caused additional htlcs to be accepted on an already accepted invoice without their expiry being checked. In this commit, the invoice registry starts to persistently track htlcs so that replays can be recognized. For replays, an htlc resolution action is returned early. This fixes both limitations mentioned above.
2019-08-09 16:09:57 +03:00
// Check that settled amount is equal to the sum of values of the htlcs
// 0 and 1.
inv, err := ctx.registry.LookupInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
invoices: replay awareness Previously the invoice registry wasn't aware of replayed htlcs. This was dealt with by keeping the invoice accept/settle logic idempotent, so that a replay wouldn't have an effect. This mechanism has two limitations: 1. No accurate tracking of the total amount paid to an invoice. The total amount couldn't just be increased with every htlc received, because it could be a replay which would lead to counting the htlc amount multiple times. Therefore the total amount was set to the amount of the first htlc that was received, even though there may have been multiple htlcs paying to the invoice. 2. Impossible to check htlc expiry consistently for hodl invoices. When an htlc is new, its expiry needs to be checked against the invoice cltv delta. But for a replay, that check must be skipped. The htlc was accepted in time, the invoice was moved to the accepted state and a replay some blocks later shouldn't lead to that htlc being cancelled. Because the invoice registry couldn't recognize replays, it stopped checking htlc expiry heights when the invoice reached the accepted state. This prevents hold htlcs from being cancelled after a restart. But unfortunately this also caused additional htlcs to be accepted on an already accepted invoice without their expiry being checked. In this commit, the invoice registry starts to persistently track htlcs so that replays can be recognized. For replays, an htlc resolution action is returned early. This fixes both limitations mentioned above.
2019-08-09 16:09:57 +03:00
if inv.AmtPaid != amtPaid+amtPaid+600 {
t.Fatal("amount incorrect")
}
// Try to cancel.
err = ctx.registry.CancelInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != channeldb.ErrInvoiceAlreadySettled {
t.Fatal("expected cancelation of a settled invoice to fail")
}
// As this is a direct sette, we expect nothing on the hodl chan.
select {
case <-hodlChan:
t.Fatal("unexpected resolution")
default:
}
}
func testCancelInvoice(t *testing.T, gc bool) {
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
// If set to true, then also delete the invoice from the DB after
// cancellation.
ctx.registry.cfg.GcCanceledInvoicesOnTheFly = gc
allSubscriptions, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeNotifications(0, 0)
require.Nil(t, err)
defer allSubscriptions.Cancel()
// Try to cancel the not yet existing invoice. This should fail.
err = ctx.registry.CancelInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != channeldb.ErrInvoiceNotFound {
t.Fatalf("expected ErrInvoiceNotFound, but got %v", err)
}
// Subscribe to the not yet existing invoice.
subscription, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeSingleInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer subscription.Cancel()
require.Equal(t, subscription.invoiceRef.PayHash(), &testInvoicePaymentHash)
// Add the invoice.
amt := lnwire.MilliSatoshi(100000)
_, err = ctx.registry.AddInvoice(testInvoice, testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// We expect the open state to be sent to the single invoice subscriber.
select {
case update := <-subscription.Updates:
if update.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf(
"expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
update.State,
)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
// We expect a new invoice notification to be sent out.
select {
case newInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.NewInvoices:
if newInvoice.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf(
"expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
newInvoice.State,
)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
// Cancel invoice.
err = ctx.registry.CancelInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// We expect the canceled state to be sent to the single invoice
// subscriber.
select {
case update := <-subscription.Updates:
if update.State != channeldb.ContractCanceled {
t.Fatalf(
"expected state ContractCanceled, but got %v",
update.State,
)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
if gc {
// Check that the invoice has been deleted from the db.
_, err = ctx.cdb.LookupInvoice(
channeldb.InvoiceRefByHash(testInvoicePaymentHash),
)
require.Error(t, err)
}
// We expect no cancel notification to be sent to all invoice
// subscribers (backwards compatibility).
// Try to cancel again. Expect that we report ErrInvoiceNotFound if the
// invoice has been garbage collected (since the invoice has been
// deleted when it was canceled), and no error otherwise.
err = ctx.registry.CancelInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
if gc {
require.Error(t, err, channeldb.ErrInvoiceNotFound)
} else {
require.NoError(t, err)
}
// Notify arrival of a new htlc paying to this invoice. This should
// result in a cancel resolution.
hodlChan := make(chan interface{})
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amt, testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight,
getCircuitKey(0), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal("expected settlement of a canceled invoice to succeed")
}
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
// If the invoice has been deleted (or not present) then we expect the
// outcome to be ResultInvoiceNotFound instead of when the invoice is
// in our database in which case we expect ResultInvoiceAlreadyCanceled.
var failResolution *HtlcFailResolution
if gc {
failResolution = checkFailResolution(
t, resolution, ResultInvoiceNotFound,
)
} else {
failResolution = checkFailResolution(
t, resolution, ResultInvoiceAlreadyCanceled,
)
}
require.Equal(t, testCurrentHeight, failResolution.AcceptHeight)
}
// TestCancelInvoice tests cancelation of an invoice and related notifications.
func TestCancelInvoice(t *testing.T) {
// Test cancellation both with garbage collection (meaning that canceled
// invoice will be deleted) and without (meain it'll be kept).
t.Run("garbage collect", func(t *testing.T) {
testCancelInvoice(t, true)
})
t.Run("no garbage collect", func(t *testing.T) {
testCancelInvoice(t, false)
})
}
// TestSettleHoldInvoice tests settling of a hold invoice and related
// notifications.
func TestSettleHoldInvoice(t *testing.T) {
defer timeout()()
cdb, cleanup, err := newTestChannelDB(clock.NewTestClock(time.Time{}))
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer cleanup()
// Instantiate and start the invoice ctx.registry.
2019-12-04 20:47:53 +03:00
cfg := RegistryConfig{
FinalCltvRejectDelta: testFinalCltvRejectDelta,
Clock: clock.NewTestClock(testTime),
2019-12-04 20:47:53 +03:00
}
expiryWatcher := NewInvoiceExpiryWatcher(
cfg.Clock, 0, uint32(testCurrentHeight), nil, newMockNotifier(),
)
registry := NewRegistry(cdb, expiryWatcher, &cfg)
err = registry.Start()
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer registry.Stop()
allSubscriptions, err := registry.SubscribeNotifications(0, 0)
require.Nil(t, err)
defer allSubscriptions.Cancel()
// Subscribe to the not yet existing invoice.
subscription, err := registry.SubscribeSingleInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer subscription.Cancel()
require.Equal(t, subscription.invoiceRef.PayHash(), &testInvoicePaymentHash)
// Add the invoice.
_, err = registry.AddInvoice(testHodlInvoice, testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// We expect the open state to be sent to the single invoice subscriber.
update := <-subscription.Updates
if update.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
update.State)
}
// We expect a new invoice notification to be sent out.
newInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.NewInvoices
if newInvoice.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
newInvoice.State)
}
// Use slightly higher amount for accept/settle.
amtPaid := lnwire.MilliSatoshi(100500)
hodlChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
// NotifyExitHopHtlc without a preimage present in the invoice registry
// should be possible.
resolution, err := registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amtPaid, testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight,
getCircuitKey(0), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected settle to succeed but got %v", err)
}
if resolution != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected htlc to be held")
}
// Test idempotency.
resolution, err = registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amtPaid, testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight,
getCircuitKey(0), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected settle to succeed but got %v", err)
}
if resolution != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected htlc to be held")
}
// Test replay at a higher height. We expect the same result because it
// is a replay.
resolution, err = registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amtPaid, testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight+10,
getCircuitKey(0), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected settle to succeed but got %v", err)
}
if resolution != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected htlc to be held")
}
// Test a new htlc coming in that doesn't meet the final cltv delta
invoices: replay awareness Previously the invoice registry wasn't aware of replayed htlcs. This was dealt with by keeping the invoice accept/settle logic idempotent, so that a replay wouldn't have an effect. This mechanism has two limitations: 1. No accurate tracking of the total amount paid to an invoice. The total amount couldn't just be increased with every htlc received, because it could be a replay which would lead to counting the htlc amount multiple times. Therefore the total amount was set to the amount of the first htlc that was received, even though there may have been multiple htlcs paying to the invoice. 2. Impossible to check htlc expiry consistently for hodl invoices. When an htlc is new, its expiry needs to be checked against the invoice cltv delta. But for a replay, that check must be skipped. The htlc was accepted in time, the invoice was moved to the accepted state and a replay some blocks later shouldn't lead to that htlc being cancelled. Because the invoice registry couldn't recognize replays, it stopped checking htlc expiry heights when the invoice reached the accepted state. This prevents hold htlcs from being cancelled after a restart. But unfortunately this also caused additional htlcs to be accepted on an already accepted invoice without their expiry being checked. In this commit, the invoice registry starts to persistently track htlcs so that replays can be recognized. For replays, an htlc resolution action is returned early. This fixes both limitations mentioned above.
2019-08-09 16:09:57 +03:00
// requirement. It should be rejected.
resolution, err = registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amtPaid, 1, testCurrentHeight,
getCircuitKey(1), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected settle to succeed but got %v", err)
}
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
checkFailResolution(t, resolution, ResultExpiryTooSoon)
// We expect the accepted state to be sent to the single invoice
// subscriber. For all invoice subscribers, we don't expect an update.
// Those only get notified on settle.
update = <-subscription.Updates
if update.State != channeldb.ContractAccepted {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractAccepted, but got %v",
update.State)
}
if update.AmtPaid != amtPaid {
t.Fatal("invoice AmtPaid incorrect")
}
// Settling with preimage should succeed.
err = registry.SettleHodlInvoice(testInvoicePreimage)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal("expected set preimage to succeed")
}
htlcResolution := (<-hodlChan).(HtlcResolution)
require.NotNil(t, htlcResolution)
settleResolution := checkSettleResolution(
t, htlcResolution, testInvoicePreimage,
)
require.Equal(t, testCurrentHeight, settleResolution.AcceptHeight)
require.Equal(t, ResultSettled, settleResolution.Outcome)
// We expect a settled notification to be sent out for both all and
// single invoice subscribers.
settledInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.SettledInvoices
if settledInvoice.State != channeldb.ContractSettled {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractSettled, but got %v",
settledInvoice.State)
}
if settledInvoice.AmtPaid != amtPaid {
t.Fatalf("expected amount to be %v, but got %v",
amtPaid, settledInvoice.AmtPaid)
}
update = <-subscription.Updates
if update.State != channeldb.ContractSettled {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractSettled, but got %v",
update.State)
}
// Idempotency.
err = registry.SettleHodlInvoice(testInvoicePreimage)
if err != channeldb.ErrInvoiceAlreadySettled {
t.Fatalf("expected ErrInvoiceAlreadySettled but got %v", err)
}
// Try to cancel.
err = registry.CancelInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err == nil {
t.Fatal("expected cancelation of a settled invoice to fail")
}
}
// TestCancelHoldInvoice tests canceling of a hold invoice and related
// notifications.
func TestCancelHoldInvoice(t *testing.T) {
defer timeout()()
cdb, cleanup, err := newTestChannelDB(clock.NewTestClock(time.Time{}))
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer cleanup()
// Instantiate and start the invoice ctx.registry.
2019-12-04 20:47:53 +03:00
cfg := RegistryConfig{
FinalCltvRejectDelta: testFinalCltvRejectDelta,
Clock: clock.NewTestClock(testTime),
2019-12-04 20:47:53 +03:00
}
expiryWatcher := NewInvoiceExpiryWatcher(
cfg.Clock, 0, uint32(testCurrentHeight), nil, newMockNotifier(),
)
registry := NewRegistry(cdb, expiryWatcher, &cfg)
err = registry.Start()
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
defer func() {
if err := registry.Stop(); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to stop invoice registry: %v", err)
}
}()
// Add the invoice.
_, err = registry.AddInvoice(testHodlInvoice, testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
amtPaid := lnwire.MilliSatoshi(100000)
hodlChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
// NotifyExitHopHtlc without a preimage present in the invoice registry
// should be possible.
resolution, err := registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amtPaid, testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight,
getCircuitKey(0), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected settle to succeed but got %v", err)
}
if resolution != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected htlc to be held")
}
// Cancel invoice.
err = registry.CancelInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal("cancel invoice failed")
}
htlcResolution := (<-hodlChan).(HtlcResolution)
require.NotNil(t, htlcResolution)
checkFailResolution(t, htlcResolution, ResultCanceled)
// Offering the same htlc again at a higher height should still result
// in a rejection. The accept height is expected to be the original
// accept height.
resolution, err = registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amtPaid, testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight+1,
getCircuitKey(0), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("expected settle to succeed but got %v", err)
}
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
failResolution := checkFailResolution(
t, resolution, ResultReplayToCanceled,
)
require.Equal(t, testCurrentHeight, failResolution.AcceptHeight)
}
// TestUnknownInvoice tests that invoice registry returns an error when the
// invoice is unknown. This is to guard against returning a cancel htlc
// resolution for forwarded htlcs. In the link, NotifyExitHopHtlc is only called
// if we are the exit hop, but in htlcIncomingContestResolver it is called with
// forwarded htlc hashes as well.
func TestUnknownInvoice(t *testing.T) {
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
// Notify arrival of a new htlc paying to this invoice. This should
// succeed.
hodlChan := make(chan interface{})
amt := lnwire.MilliSatoshi(100000)
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, amt, testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight,
getCircuitKey(0), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal("unexpected error")
}
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
checkFailResolution(t, resolution, ResultInvoiceNotFound)
}
// TestKeySend tests receiving a spontaneous payment with and without keysend
// enabled.
func TestKeySend(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("enabled", func(t *testing.T) {
testKeySend(t, true)
})
t.Run("disabled", func(t *testing.T) {
testKeySend(t, false)
})
}
// testKeySend is the inner test function that tests keysend for a particular
// enabled state on the receiver end.
func testKeySend(t *testing.T, keySendEnabled bool) {
defer timeout()()
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
ctx.registry.cfg.AcceptKeySend = keySendEnabled
allSubscriptions, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeNotifications(0, 0)
require.Nil(t, err)
defer allSubscriptions.Cancel()
hodlChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
amt := lnwire.MilliSatoshi(1000)
expiry := uint32(testCurrentHeight + 20)
// Create key for keysend.
preimage := lntypes.Preimage{1, 2, 3}
hash := preimage.Hash()
// Try to settle invoice with an invalid keysend htlc.
invalidKeySendPayload := &mockPayload{
customRecords: map[uint64][]byte{
record.KeySendType: {1, 2, 3},
},
}
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
hash, amt, expiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(10), hodlChan,
invalidKeySendPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
if !keySendEnabled {
checkFailResolution(t, resolution, ResultInvoiceNotFound)
} else {
checkFailResolution(t, resolution, ResultKeySendError)
}
// Try to settle invoice with a valid keysend htlc.
keySendPayload := &mockPayload{
customRecords: map[uint64][]byte{
record.KeySendType: preimage[:],
},
}
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
hash, amt, expiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(10), hodlChan, keySendPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// Expect a cancel resolution if keysend is disabled.
if !keySendEnabled {
checkFailResolution(t, resolution, ResultInvoiceNotFound)
return
}
checkSubscription := func() {
// We expect a new invoice notification to be sent out.
newInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.NewInvoices
require.Equal(t, newInvoice.State, channeldb.ContractOpen)
// We expect a settled notification to be sent out.
settledInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.SettledInvoices
require.Equal(t, settledInvoice.State, channeldb.ContractSettled)
}
checkSettleResolution(t, resolution, preimage)
checkSubscription()
// Replay the same keysend payment. We expect an identical resolution,
// but no event should be generated.
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
hash, amt, expiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(10), hodlChan, keySendPayload,
)
require.Nil(t, err)
checkSettleResolution(t, resolution, preimage)
select {
case <-allSubscriptions.NewInvoices:
t.Fatalf("replayed keysend should not generate event")
case <-time.After(time.Second):
}
// Finally, test that we can properly fulfill a second keysend payment
// with a unique preiamge.
preimage2 := lntypes.Preimage{1, 2, 3, 4}
hash2 := preimage2.Hash()
keySendPayload2 := &mockPayload{
customRecords: map[uint64][]byte{
record.KeySendType: preimage2[:],
},
}
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
hash2, amt, expiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(20), hodlChan, keySendPayload2,
)
require.Nil(t, err)
checkSettleResolution(t, resolution, preimage2)
checkSubscription()
}
// TestHoldKeysend tests receiving a spontaneous payment that is held.
func TestHoldKeysend(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("settle", func(t *testing.T) {
testHoldKeysend(t, false)
})
t.Run("timeout", func(t *testing.T) {
testHoldKeysend(t, true)
})
}
// testHoldKeysend is the inner test function that tests hold-keysend.
func testHoldKeysend(t *testing.T, timeoutKeysend bool) {
defer timeout()()
const holdDuration = time.Minute
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
ctx.registry.cfg.AcceptKeySend = true
ctx.registry.cfg.KeysendHoldTime = holdDuration
allSubscriptions, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeNotifications(0, 0)
require.Nil(t, err)
defer allSubscriptions.Cancel()
hodlChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
amt := lnwire.MilliSatoshi(1000)
expiry := uint32(testCurrentHeight + 20)
// Create key for keysend.
preimage := lntypes.Preimage{1, 2, 3}
hash := preimage.Hash()
// Try to settle invoice with a valid keysend htlc.
keysendPayload := &mockPayload{
customRecords: map[uint64][]byte{
record.KeySendType: preimage[:],
},
}
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
hash, amt, expiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(10), hodlChan, keysendPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
// No immediate resolution is expected.
require.Nil(t, resolution, "expected hold resolution")
// We expect a new invoice notification to be sent out.
newInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.NewInvoices
if newInvoice.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
newInvoice.State)
}
// We expect no further invoice notifications yet (on the all invoices
// subscription).
select {
case <-allSubscriptions.NewInvoices:
t.Fatalf("no invoice update expected")
case <-time.After(100 * time.Millisecond):
}
if timeoutKeysend {
// Advance the clock to just past the hold duration.
ctx.clock.SetTime(ctx.clock.Now().Add(
holdDuration + time.Millisecond),
)
// Expect the keysend payment to be failed.
res := <-hodlChan
failResolution, ok := res.(*HtlcFailResolution)
require.Truef(
t, ok, "expected fail resolution, got: %T",
resolution,
)
require.Equal(
t, ResultCanceled, failResolution.Outcome,
"expected keysend payment to be failed",
)
return
}
// Settle keysend payment manually.
require.Nil(t, ctx.registry.SettleHodlInvoice(
*newInvoice.Terms.PaymentPreimage,
))
// We expect a settled notification to be sent out.
settledInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.SettledInvoices
require.Equal(t, settledInvoice.State, channeldb.ContractSettled)
}
// TestMppPayment tests settling of an invoice with multiple partial payments.
// It covers the case where there is a mpp timeout before the whole invoice is
// paid and the case where the invoice is settled in time.
func TestMppPayment(t *testing.T) {
defer timeout()()
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
// Add the invoice.
_, err := ctx.registry.AddInvoice(testInvoice, testInvoicePaymentHash)
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
mppPayload := &mockPayload{
mpp: record.NewMPP(testInvoiceAmt, [32]byte{}),
}
// Send htlc 1.
hodlChan1 := make(chan interface{}, 1)
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, testInvoice.Terms.Value/2,
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
testHtlcExpiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(10), hodlChan1, mppPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if resolution != nil {
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
t.Fatal("expected no direct resolution")
}
// Simulate mpp timeout releasing htlc 1.
ctx.clock.SetTime(testTime.Add(30 * time.Second))
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
htlcResolution := (<-hodlChan1).(HtlcResolution)
failResolution, ok := htlcResolution.(*HtlcFailResolution)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected fail resolution, got: %T",
resolution)
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
}
if failResolution.Outcome != ResultMppTimeout {
t.Fatalf("expected mpp timeout, got: %v",
failResolution.Outcome)
}
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
// Send htlc 2.
hodlChan2 := make(chan interface{}, 1)
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, testInvoice.Terms.Value/2,
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
testHtlcExpiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(11), hodlChan2, mppPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if resolution != nil {
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
t.Fatal("expected no direct resolution")
}
// Send htlc 3.
hodlChan3 := make(chan interface{}, 1)
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, testInvoice.Terms.Value/2,
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
testHtlcExpiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(12), hodlChan3, mppPayload,
)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
settleResolution, ok := resolution.(*HtlcSettleResolution)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected settle resolution, got: %T",
htlcResolution)
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
}
if settleResolution.Outcome != ResultSettled {
t.Fatalf("expected result settled, got: %v",
settleResolution.Outcome)
}
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
// Check that settled amount is equal to the sum of values of the htlcs
// 2 and 3.
inv, err := ctx.registry.LookupInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
2019-09-03 13:23:39 +03:00
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
if inv.State != channeldb.ContractSettled {
t.Fatal("expected invoice to be settled")
}
if inv.AmtPaid != testInvoice.Terms.Value {
t.Fatalf("amount incorrect, expected %v but got %v",
testInvoice.Terms.Value, inv.AmtPaid)
}
}
// Tests that invoices are canceled after expiration.
func TestInvoiceExpiryWithRegistry(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
cdb, cleanup, err := newTestChannelDB(clock.NewTestClock(time.Time{}))
defer cleanup()
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
testClock := clock.NewTestClock(testTime)
cfg := RegistryConfig{
FinalCltvRejectDelta: testFinalCltvRejectDelta,
Clock: testClock,
}
expiryWatcher := NewInvoiceExpiryWatcher(
cfg.Clock, 0, uint32(testCurrentHeight), nil, newMockNotifier(),
)
registry := NewRegistry(cdb, expiryWatcher, &cfg)
// First prefill the Channel DB with some pre-existing invoices,
// half of them still pending, half of them expired.
const numExpired = 5
const numPending = 5
existingInvoices := generateInvoiceExpiryTestData(
t, testTime, 0, numExpired, numPending,
)
var expectedCancellations []lntypes.Hash
for paymentHash, expiredInvoice := range existingInvoices.expiredInvoices {
if _, err := cdb.AddInvoice(expiredInvoice, paymentHash); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("cannot add invoice to channel db: %v", err)
}
expectedCancellations = append(expectedCancellations, paymentHash)
}
for paymentHash, pendingInvoice := range existingInvoices.pendingInvoices {
if _, err := cdb.AddInvoice(pendingInvoice, paymentHash); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("cannot add invoice to channel db: %v", err)
}
}
if err = registry.Start(); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("cannot start registry: %v", err)
}
// Now generate pending and invoices and add them to the registry while
// it is up and running. We'll manipulate the clock to let them expire.
newInvoices := generateInvoiceExpiryTestData(
t, testTime, numExpired+numPending, 0, numPending,
)
var invoicesThatWillCancel []lntypes.Hash
for paymentHash, pendingInvoice := range newInvoices.pendingInvoices {
_, err := registry.AddInvoice(pendingInvoice, paymentHash)
invoicesThatWillCancel = append(invoicesThatWillCancel, paymentHash)
if err != nil {
t.Fatal(err)
}
}
// Check that they are really not canceled until before the clock is
// advanced.
for i := range invoicesThatWillCancel {
invoice, err := registry.LookupInvoice(invoicesThatWillCancel[i])
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("cannot find invoice: %v", err)
}
if invoice.State == channeldb.ContractCanceled {
t.Fatalf("expected pending invoice, got canceled")
}
}
// Fwd time 1 day.
testClock.SetTime(testTime.Add(24 * time.Hour))
// Give some time to the watcher to cancel everything.
time.Sleep(500 * time.Millisecond)
if err = registry.Stop(); err != nil {
t.Fatalf("failed to stop invoice registry: %v", err)
}
// Create the expected cancellation set before the final check.
expectedCancellations = append(
expectedCancellations, invoicesThatWillCancel...,
)
// Retrospectively check that all invoices that were expected to be canceled
// are indeed canceled.
for i := range expectedCancellations {
invoice, err := registry.LookupInvoice(expectedCancellations[i])
if err != nil {
t.Fatalf("cannot find invoice: %v", err)
}
if invoice.State != channeldb.ContractCanceled {
t.Fatalf("expected canceled invoice, got: %v", invoice.State)
}
}
}
// TestOldInvoiceRemovalOnStart tests that we'll attempt to remove old canceled
// invoices upon start while keeping all settled ones.
func TestOldInvoiceRemovalOnStart(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
testClock := clock.NewTestClock(testTime)
cdb, cleanup, err := newTestChannelDB(testClock)
defer cleanup()
require.NoError(t, err)
cfg := RegistryConfig{
FinalCltvRejectDelta: testFinalCltvRejectDelta,
Clock: testClock,
GcCanceledInvoicesOnStartup: true,
}
expiryWatcher := NewInvoiceExpiryWatcher(
cfg.Clock, 0, uint32(testCurrentHeight), nil, newMockNotifier(),
)
registry := NewRegistry(cdb, expiryWatcher, &cfg)
// First prefill the Channel DB with some pre-existing expired invoices.
const numExpired = 5
const numPending = 0
existingInvoices := generateInvoiceExpiryTestData(
t, testTime, 0, numExpired, numPending,
)
i := 0
for paymentHash, invoice := range existingInvoices.expiredInvoices {
// Mark half of the invoices as settled, the other hald as
// canceled.
if i%2 == 0 {
invoice.State = channeldb.ContractSettled
} else {
invoice.State = channeldb.ContractCanceled
}
_, err := cdb.AddInvoice(invoice, paymentHash)
require.NoError(t, err)
i++
}
// Collect all settled invoices for our expectation set.
var expected []channeldb.Invoice
// Perform a scan query to collect all invoices.
query := channeldb.InvoiceQuery{
IndexOffset: 0,
NumMaxInvoices: math.MaxUint64,
}
response, err := cdb.QueryInvoices(query)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Save all settled invoices for our expectation set.
for _, invoice := range response.Invoices {
if invoice.State == channeldb.ContractSettled {
expected = append(expected, invoice)
}
}
// Start the registry which should collect and delete all canceled
// invoices upon start.
err = registry.Start()
require.NoError(t, err, "cannot start the registry")
// Perform a scan query to collect all invoices.
response, err = cdb.QueryInvoices(query)
require.NoError(t, err)
// Check that we really only kept the settled invoices after the
// registry start.
require.Equal(t, expected, response.Invoices)
}
// TestHeightExpiryWithRegistry tests our height-based invoice expiry for
// invoices paid with single and multiple htlcs, testing the case where the
// invoice is settled before expiry (and thus not canceled), and the case
// where the invoice is expired.
func TestHeightExpiryWithRegistry(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("single shot settled before expiry", func(t *testing.T) {
testHeightExpiryWithRegistry(t, 1, true)
})
t.Run("single shot expires", func(t *testing.T) {
testHeightExpiryWithRegistry(t, 1, false)
})
t.Run("mpp settled before expiry", func(t *testing.T) {
testHeightExpiryWithRegistry(t, 2, true)
})
t.Run("mpp expires", func(t *testing.T) {
testHeightExpiryWithRegistry(t, 2, false)
})
}
func testHeightExpiryWithRegistry(t *testing.T, numParts int, settle bool) {
t.Parallel()
defer timeout()()
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
require.Greater(t, numParts, 0, "test requires at least one part")
// Add a hold invoice, we set a non-nil payment request so that this
// invoice is not considered a keysend by the expiry watcher.
invoice := *testInvoice
invoice.HodlInvoice = true
invoice.PaymentRequest = []byte{1, 2, 3}
_, err := ctx.registry.AddInvoice(&invoice, testInvoicePaymentHash)
require.NoError(t, err)
payLoad := testPayload
if numParts > 1 {
payLoad = &mockPayload{
mpp: record.NewMPP(testInvoiceAmt, [32]byte{}),
}
}
htlcAmt := invoice.Terms.Value / lnwire.MilliSatoshi(numParts)
hodlChan := make(chan interface{}, numParts)
for i := 0; i < numParts; i++ {
// We bump our expiry height for each htlc so that we can test
// that the lowest expiry height is used.
expiry := testHtlcExpiry + uint32(i)
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, htlcAmt, expiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(uint64(i)), hodlChan,
payLoad,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Nil(t, resolution, "did not expect direct resolution")
}
require.Eventually(t, func() bool {
inv, err := ctx.registry.LookupInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
require.NoError(t, err)
return inv.State == channeldb.ContractAccepted
}, time.Second, time.Millisecond*100)
// Now that we've added our htlc(s), we tick our test clock to our
// invoice expiry time. We don't expect the invoice to be canceled
// based on its expiry time now that we have active htlcs.
ctx.clock.SetTime(invoice.CreationDate.Add(invoice.Terms.Expiry + 1))
// The expiry watcher loop takes some time to process the new clock
// time. We mine the block before our expiry height, our mock will block
// until the expiry watcher consumes this height, so we can be sure
// that the expiry loop has run at least once after this block is
// consumed.
ctx.notifier.blockChan <- &chainntnfs.BlockEpoch{
Height: int32(testHtlcExpiry - 1),
}
// If we want to settle our invoice in this test, we do so now.
if settle {
err = ctx.registry.SettleHodlInvoice(testInvoicePreimage)
require.NoError(t, err)
for i := 0; i < numParts; i++ {
htlcResolution := (<-hodlChan).(HtlcResolution)
require.NotNil(t, htlcResolution)
settleResolution := checkSettleResolution(
t, htlcResolution, testInvoicePreimage,
)
require.Equal(t, ResultSettled, settleResolution.Outcome)
}
}
// Now we mine our htlc's expiry height.
ctx.notifier.blockChan <- &chainntnfs.BlockEpoch{
Height: int32(testHtlcExpiry),
}
// If we did not settle the invoice before its expiry, we now expect
// a cancelation.
expectedState := channeldb.ContractSettled
if !settle {
expectedState = channeldb.ContractCanceled
htlcResolution := (<-hodlChan).(HtlcResolution)
require.NotNil(t, htlcResolution)
checkFailResolution(
t, htlcResolution, ResultCanceled,
)
}
// Finally, lookup the invoice and assert that we have the state we
// expect.
inv, err := ctx.registry.LookupInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, expectedState, inv.State, "expected "+
"hold invoice: %v, got: %v", expectedState, inv.State)
}
// TestMultipleSetHeightExpiry pays a hold invoice with two mpp sets, testing
// that the invoice expiry watcher only uses the expiry height of the second,
// successful set to cancel the invoice, and does not cancel early using the
// expiry height of the first set that was canceled back due to mpp timeout.
func TestMultipleSetHeightExpiry(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
defer timeout()()
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
// Add a hold invoice.
invoice := *testInvoice
invoice.HodlInvoice = true
_, err := ctx.registry.AddInvoice(&invoice, testInvoicePaymentHash)
require.NoError(t, err)
mppPayload := &mockPayload{
mpp: record.NewMPP(testInvoiceAmt, [32]byte{}),
}
// Send htlc 1.
hodlChan1 := make(chan interface{}, 1)
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, invoice.Terms.Value/2,
testHtlcExpiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(10), hodlChan1, mppPayload,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Nil(t, resolution, "did not expect direct resolution")
// Simulate mpp timeout releasing htlc 1.
ctx.clock.SetTime(testTime.Add(30 * time.Second))
htlcResolution := (<-hodlChan1).(HtlcResolution)
failResolution, ok := htlcResolution.(*HtlcFailResolution)
require.True(t, ok, "expected fail resolution, got: %T", resolution)
require.Equal(t, ResultMppTimeout, failResolution.Outcome,
"expected MPP Timeout, got: %v", failResolution.Outcome)
// Notify the expiry height for our first htlc. We don't expect the
// invoice to be expired based on block height because the htlc set
// was never completed.
ctx.notifier.blockChan <- &chainntnfs.BlockEpoch{
Height: int32(testHtlcExpiry),
}
// Now we will send a full set of htlcs for the invoice with a higher
// expiry height. We expect the invoice to move into the accepted state.
expiry := testHtlcExpiry + 5
// Send htlc 2.
hodlChan2 := make(chan interface{}, 1)
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, invoice.Terms.Value/2, expiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(11), hodlChan2, mppPayload,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Nil(t, resolution, "did not expect direct resolution")
// Send htlc 3.
hodlChan3 := make(chan interface{}, 1)
resolution, err = ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, invoice.Terms.Value/2, expiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(12), hodlChan3, mppPayload,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Nil(t, resolution, "did not expect direct resolution")
// Assert that we've reached an accepted state because the invoice has
// been paid with a complete set.
inv, err := ctx.registry.LookupInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, channeldb.ContractAccepted, inv.State, "expected "+
"hold invoice accepted")
// Now we will notify the expiry height for the new set of htlcs. We
// expect the invoice to be canceled by the expiry watcher.
ctx.notifier.blockChan <- &chainntnfs.BlockEpoch{
Height: int32(expiry),
}
require.Eventuallyf(t, func() bool {
inv, err := ctx.registry.LookupInvoice(testInvoicePaymentHash)
require.NoError(t, err)
return inv.State == channeldb.ContractCanceled
}, testTimeout, time.Millisecond*100, "invoice not canceled")
}
// TestSettleInvoicePaymentAddrRequired tests that if an incoming payment has
// an invoice that requires the payment addr bit to be set, and the incoming
// payment doesn't include an mpp payload, then the payment is rejected.
func TestSettleInvoicePaymentAddrRequired(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
allSubscriptions, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeNotifications(0, 0)
require.Nil(t, err)
defer allSubscriptions.Cancel()
// Subscribe to the not yet existing invoice.
subscription, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeSingleInvoice(
testInvoicePaymentHash,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
defer subscription.Cancel()
require.Equal(
t, subscription.invoiceRef.PayHash(), &testInvoicePaymentHash,
)
// Add the invoice, which requires the MPP payload to always be
// included due to its set of feature bits.
addIdx, err := ctx.registry.AddInvoice(
testPayAddrReqInvoice, testInvoicePaymentHash,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, int(addIdx), 1)
// We expect the open state to be sent to the single invoice subscriber.
select {
case update := <-subscription.Updates:
if update.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
update.State)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
// We expect a new invoice notification to be sent out.
select {
case newInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.NewInvoices:
if newInvoice.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
newInvoice.State)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
hodlChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
// Now try to settle the invoice, the testPayload doesn't have any mpp
// information, so it should be forced to the updateLegacy path then
// fail as a required feature bit exists.
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, testInvoice.Terms.Value,
uint32(testCurrentHeight)+testInvoiceCltvDelta-1,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(10), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
failResolution, ok := resolution.(*HtlcFailResolution)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected fail resolution, got: %T",
resolution)
}
require.Equal(t, failResolution.AcceptHeight, testCurrentHeight)
require.Equal(t, failResolution.Outcome, ResultAddressMismatch)
}
// TestSettleInvoicePaymentAddrRequiredOptionalGrace tests that if an invoice
// in the database has an optional payment addr required bit set, then we'll
// still allow it to be paid by an incoming HTLC that doesn't include the MPP
// payload. This ensures we don't break payment for any invoices in the wild.
func TestSettleInvoicePaymentAddrRequiredOptionalGrace(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
allSubscriptions, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeNotifications(0, 0)
require.Nil(t, err)
defer allSubscriptions.Cancel()
// Subscribe to the not yet existing invoice.
subscription, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeSingleInvoice(
testInvoicePaymentHash,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
defer subscription.Cancel()
require.Equal(
t, subscription.invoiceRef.PayHash(), &testInvoicePaymentHash,
)
// Add the invoice, which requires the MPP payload to always be
// included due to its set of feature bits.
addIdx, err := ctx.registry.AddInvoice(
testPayAddrOptionalInvoice, testInvoicePaymentHash,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
require.Equal(t, int(addIdx), 1)
// We expect the open state to be sent to the single invoice
// subscriber.
select {
case update := <-subscription.Updates:
if update.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
update.State)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
// We expect a new invoice notification to be sent out.
select {
case newInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.NewInvoices:
if newInvoice.State != channeldb.ContractOpen {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
newInvoice.State)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
// We'll now attempt to settle the invoice as normal, this should work
// no problem as we should allow these existing invoices to be settled.
hodlChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
testInvoicePaymentHash, testInvoiceAmt,
testHtlcExpiry, testCurrentHeight,
getCircuitKey(10), hodlChan, testPayload,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
settleResolution, ok := resolution.(*HtlcSettleResolution)
if !ok {
t.Fatalf("expected settle resolution, got: %T",
resolution)
}
require.Equal(t, settleResolution.Outcome, ResultSettled)
// We expect the settled state to be sent to the single invoice
// subscriber.
select {
case update := <-subscription.Updates:
if update.State != channeldb.ContractSettled {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
update.State)
}
if update.AmtPaid != testInvoice.Terms.Value {
t.Fatal("invoice AmtPaid incorrect")
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
// We expect a settled notification to be sent out.
select {
case settledInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.SettledInvoices:
if settledInvoice.State != channeldb.ContractSettled {
t.Fatalf("expected state ContractOpen, but got %v",
settledInvoice.State)
}
case <-time.After(testTimeout):
t.Fatal("no update received")
}
}
2021-03-22 22:37:23 +03:00
// TestAMPWithoutMPPPayload asserts that we correctly reject an AMP HTLC that
// does not include an MPP record.
func TestAMPWithoutMPPPayload(t *testing.T) {
defer timeout()()
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
ctx.registry.cfg.AcceptAMP = true
2021-03-22 22:37:23 +03:00
const (
shardAmt = lnwire.MilliSatoshi(10)
expiry = uint32(testCurrentHeight + 20)
)
// Create payload with missing MPP field.
payload := &mockPayload{
amp: record.NewAMP([32]byte{}, [32]byte{}, 0),
}
hodlChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
lntypes.Hash{}, shardAmt, expiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(uint64(10)), hodlChan,
payload,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
// We should receive the ResultAmpError failure.
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
checkFailResolution(t, resolution, ResultAmpError)
}
// TestSpontaneousAmpPayment tests receiving a spontaneous AMP payment with both
// valid and invalid reconstructions.
func TestSpontaneousAmpPayment(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
ampEnabled bool
failReconstruction bool
numShards int
}{
{
name: "enabled valid one shard",
ampEnabled: true,
failReconstruction: false,
numShards: 1,
},
{
name: "enabled valid multiple shards",
ampEnabled: true,
failReconstruction: false,
numShards: 3,
},
{
name: "enabled invalid one shard",
ampEnabled: true,
failReconstruction: true,
numShards: 1,
},
{
name: "enabled invalid multiple shards",
ampEnabled: true,
failReconstruction: true,
numShards: 3,
},
{
name: "disabled valid multiple shards",
ampEnabled: false,
failReconstruction: false,
numShards: 3,
},
}
for _, test := range tests {
test := test
t.Run(test.name, func(t *testing.T) {
testSpontaneousAmpPayment(
t, test.ampEnabled, test.failReconstruction,
test.numShards,
)
})
}
}
// testSpontaneousAmpPayment runs a specific spontaneous AMP test case.
func testSpontaneousAmpPayment(
t *testing.T, ampEnabled, failReconstruction bool, numShards int) {
defer timeout()()
ctx := newTestContext(t)
defer ctx.cleanup()
ctx.registry.cfg.AcceptAMP = ampEnabled
allSubscriptions, err := ctx.registry.SubscribeNotifications(0, 0)
require.Nil(t, err)
defer allSubscriptions.Cancel()
const (
totalAmt = lnwire.MilliSatoshi(360)
expiry = uint32(testCurrentHeight + 20)
)
var (
shardAmt = totalAmt / lnwire.MilliSatoshi(numShards)
payAddr [32]byte
setID [32]byte
)
_, err = rand.Read(payAddr[:])
require.NoError(t, err)
_, err = rand.Read(setID[:])
require.NoError(t, err)
var sharer amp.Sharer
sharer, err = amp.NewSeedSharer()
require.NoError(t, err)
// Asserts that a new invoice is published on the NewInvoices channel.
checkOpenSubscription := func() {
t.Helper()
newInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.NewInvoices
require.Equal(t, newInvoice.State, channeldb.ContractOpen)
}
// Asserts that a settled invoice is published on the SettledInvoices
// channel.
checkSettleSubscription := func() {
t.Helper()
settledInvoice := <-allSubscriptions.SettledInvoices
require.Equal(t, settledInvoice.State, channeldb.ContractSettled)
}
// Asserts that no invoice is published on the SettledInvoices channel
// w/in two seconds.
checkNoSettleSubscription := func() {
t.Helper()
select {
case <-allSubscriptions.SettledInvoices:
t.Fatal("no settle ntfn expected")
case <-time.After(2 * time.Second):
}
}
// Record the hodl channels of all HTLCs but the last one, which
// received its resolution directly from NotifyExistHopHtlc.
hodlChans := make(map[lntypes.Preimage]chan interface{})
for i := 0; i < numShards; i++ {
isFinalShard := i == numShards-1
hodlChan := make(chan interface{}, 1)
var child *amp.Child
if !isFinalShard {
var left amp.Sharer
left, sharer, err = sharer.Split()
require.NoError(t, err)
child = left.Child(uint32(i))
// Only store the first numShards-1 hodlChans.
hodlChans[child.Preimage] = hodlChan
} else {
child = sharer.Child(uint32(i))
}
// Send a blank share when the set should fail reconstruction,
// otherwise send the derived share.
var share [32]byte
if !failReconstruction {
share = child.Share
}
payload := &mockPayload{
mpp: record.NewMPP(totalAmt, payAddr),
amp: record.NewAMP(share, setID, uint32(i)),
}
resolution, err := ctx.registry.NotifyExitHopHtlc(
child.Hash, shardAmt, expiry,
testCurrentHeight, getCircuitKey(uint64(i)), hodlChan,
payload,
)
require.NoError(t, err)
// When keysend is disabled all HTLC should fail with invoice
// not found, since one is not inserted before executing
// UpdateInvoice.
if !ampEnabled {
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
checkFailResolution(t, resolution, ResultInvoiceNotFound)
continue
}
// Check that resolutions are properly formed.
if !isFinalShard {
// Non-final shares should always return a nil
// resolution, theirs will be delivered via the
// hodlChan.
require.Nil(t, resolution)
} else {
// The final share should receive a non-nil resolution.
// Also assert that it is the proper type based on the
// test case.
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
if failReconstruction {
checkFailResolution(t, resolution, ResultAmpReconstruction)
} else {
checkSettleResolution(t, resolution, child.Preimage)
}
}
// Assert the behavior of the Open and Settle notifications.
// There should always be an open (keysend is enabled) followed
// by settle for valid AMP payments.
//
// NOTE: The cases are split in separate if conditions, rather
// than else-if, to properly handle the case when there is only
// one shard.
if i == 0 {
checkOpenSubscription()
}
if isFinalShard {
if failReconstruction {
checkNoSettleSubscription()
} else {
checkSettleSubscription()
}
}
}
// No need to check the hodl chans when keysend is not enabled.
if !ampEnabled {
return
}
// For the non-final hodl chans, assert that they receive the expected
// failure or preimage.
for preimage, hodlChan := range hodlChans {
resolution, ok := (<-hodlChan).(HtlcResolution)
require.True(t, ok)
require.NotNil(t, resolution)
if failReconstruction {
checkFailResolution(t, resolution, ResultAmpReconstruction)
} else {
checkSettleResolution(t, resolution, preimage)
}
}
}